A nuclear North Korea and the limitations of US security perspectives

References

• Aradau, C., and R. Van Munster. 2007. “Governing Terrorism through Risk: Taking Precautions, (Un)Knowing the Future.” European Journal of International Relations 13 (1): 89–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader, J. A. 2012. Obama and China’s Rise an Insider’s Account of America’s Asia Strategy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. 2007. World at Risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, W. 2006. “The North Korean Nuclear Weapons Program: A Comparison of the Negotiating Strategies of the Clinton and Bush Administrations.” In Perspectives on U.S. Policy toward North Korea: Stalemate or Checkmate? edited by S. Richardson, 1–27. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiker, R. 2003. “A Rogue Is a Rogue Is a Rogue: US Foreign Policy and the Korean Nuclear Crisis.” International Affairs 79 (4): 719–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleiker, R. 2007. “Dealing With A Nuclear North Korea: Conventional And Alternative Security Scenarios.” In Critical Security In The Asia-pacific, edited by, 215–230. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. 1992. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cha, V. 2009. “Pyongbang! Washington’s Korea Conundrum.” Foreign Affairs Magazine, April 7.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J.-S. 2015. “Amb. Sung Kim: U.S. ‘Happy to Meet’ with N. Korean ‘Anytime, Anywhere’.” Yonhap, November10.
   Google Scholar
• Chinoy, M. 2008. Meltdown: The inside Story of the North Korean Nuclear Crisis. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clapton, W. 2011. “Risk in International Relations.” International Relations 25 (3): 280–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapton, W. 2014. Risk and Hierarchy in International Society: Liberal Interventionism in the post-Cold War Era. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Clapton, W., and S. Hameiri. 2012. “The Domestic Politics of International Hierarchy: Risk Management and the Reconstitution of International Society.” International Politics 49 (1): 59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, W. C. 2010. Getting to Yes in Korea. Boulder: Paradigm.
   Google Scholar
• De Goede, M. 2008. “Beyond Risk: Premediation and the Post-9/11 Security Imagination.” Security Dialogue 39 (2–3): 155–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delury, J. 2013. “The Disappointments of Disengagement: Assessing Obama’s North Korea Policy.” Asian Perspective 37: 149–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earnest, J. 2016a. “Press Briefing, February 8.” Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley: The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=111539.
   Google Scholar
• Earnest, J. 2016b. “Press Briefing, January 7.” Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley: The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=111384.
   Google Scholar
• Economist. 2012. “Leap of Faith.” The Economist Online. 1 March
   Google Scholar
• Edmunds, T. 2012. “British Civil–Military Relations and the Problem of Risk.” International Affairs 88 (2): 265–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, G., and S. Kwon. 2008. North Korea on the Brink: Struggle for Survival. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Homolar, A. 2011. “Rebels without a Conscience: The Evolution of the Rogue States Narrative in US Security Policy.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (4): 705–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Crisis Group. 2009. North Korea’s Missile Launch: The Risks of Overreaction. Seoul: ICG Asia Briefing No. 91.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, D. 2003. “Threatening, but Deterrence Works.” In Nuclear North Korea: A Debate on Engagement Strategies, edited by V. Cha and D. Kang. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, A. 2011. “Risk and the Fabrication of Apolitical, Unaccountable Military Markets: The Case of the CIA ‘Killing Program’.” Review of International Studies 37 (05): 2253–2268.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 1999. Risk. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Malici, A. 2009. “Rogue States: Enemies of Our Own Making?” Psicología Política 39: 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. 2012. “America’s Failed North Korea Nuclear Policy: A New Approach.” In Nuclear North Korea: Regional Dynamics, Failed Policies, and Ideas for Ending a Global Stalemate, edited by S. H. Lee, 115–136. Seoul: Kyungman University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mythen, G., and S. Walklate. 2008. “Terrorism, Risk and International Security: The Perils of Asking ‘What If?’.” Security Dialogue 39 (2–3): 221–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obama, B. 2008a. “Press Release - FACT SHEET: Obama’s New Plan to Confront 21st Century Threats.” July 16. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley: The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=93199.
   Google Scholar
• Obama, B. 2008b. “Statement of Senator Barack Obama on the North Korean Declaration, June 26.” Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley: The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=91073.
   Google Scholar
• Obama, B. 2009a. “Remarks in Prague, April 5.” Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley: The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=85963.
   Google Scholar
• Obama, B. 2009b. “Remarks on Accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo.” Online by Gerhard Peters & John T. Woolley: The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=86978.
   Google Scholar
• Obama, B. 2016. “Statement on North Korea’s Nuclear Test, September 9.” Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley: The American Presidency Project. www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=118931.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J. M. 1997. Liberal Peace, Liberal War: American Politics and International Security. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, C. 2007. Failed Diplomacy: The Tragic Story of How North Korea Got the Bomb. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, M. 2006. The Risk Society at War: Terror, Technology and Strategy in the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raum, T. 2007. “Obama Debate Comments Set of Firestorm.” The Washington Post, July 24.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, C. 2016. “President Barack Obama: Tuesday 04/26/2016.” https://charlierose.com/videos/27957.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Foreign Relations Committee. 2009a. “Opening Statement by Chairperson John F. Kerry.” Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Senate Foreign Relations Committee. 2009b. “A Strategy for Dealing with North Korea.” Senate Foreign Relations Committee. Leon V. Sigal, SSRC.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. 2000. “Bad, Mad, Sad or Rational Actor? Why the ‘Securitization’ Paradigm Makes for Poor Policy Analysis of North Korea.” International Affairs 76 (3): 593–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, S. 2009. “UN Security Council Response to North Korea’s Missile Test: Washington’s Policy Debate.” Global Security, April 13.
   Google Scholar
• The White House. 2015. “YouTube Interview with President Obama.” January 22. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbR6iQ62v9k.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of State. 2010. “United States Closing Statement at the 2010 NPT Review Conference.” https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/us/142370.htm.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of State. 2015. “Daily Press Briefing: January 12.” https://2009-2017.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2015/01/235866.htm.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of State. 2016. “North Korea’s Nuclear Test. Press Statement, September 9.” https://2009-2017.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2016/09/261710.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2): 391–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wit, J. S. 2009. U.S. Strategy Towards North Korea: Rebuilding Dialogue and Engagement. Washington, DC: U.S.-Korea Institute at SAIS and the Weatherhead East Asian Institute at Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Wit, J. S., D. B. Poneman, and R. S. Galluci. 2004. Going Critical: The First North Korean Nuclear Crisis. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar