Securitisation and the function of functional actors

References

• Adger, W. N., J. M. Pulhin, J. Barnett, G. D. Dabelko, G. K. Hovelsrud, M. Levy, Ú. Oswald Spring, and C. H. Vogel. 2014. “Human Security.” In Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, M. Chatterjee, et al., 755–791. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. 2018. “From Securitization Theory to Critical Approaches to (In) Security.” European Journal of International Security 3 (3): 300–305. doi:10.1017/eis.2018.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakardjieva, M. 2015. “Do Clouds Have Politics? Collective Actors in Social Media Land.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (8): 983–990. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1043320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. 2005. “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.” European Journal of International Relations 11 (2): 171–201. doi:10.1177/1354066105052960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T. 2015. “Legitimacy and the “Logic” of Security.” In Contesting Security, edited by T. Balzacq, 1–10. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T., S. Léonard, and J. Ruzicka. 2016. “‘Securitization’revisited: Theory and Cases.” International Relations 30 (4): 494–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, J. 2001. The Meaning of Environmental Security: Ecological Politics and Policy in the New Security Era. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Behnke, A. 2006. “No Way Out: Desecuritization, Emancipation and the Eternal Return of the Political — A Reply to Aradau.” JIRD 9: 62–69.
   Google Scholar
• Bourbeau, P., and J. A. Vuori. 2015. “Security, Resilience and Desecuritization: Multidirectional Moves and Dynamics.” Critical Studies on Security 3 (3): 253–268. doi:10.1080/21624887.2015.1111095.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1991 [1982]. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. 2004. From International to World Society? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. 2014. An Introduction to the English School of International Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., O. Wæver, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Côté, A. 2016. “Agents without Agency: Assessing the Role of the Audience in Securitization Theory.” Security Dialogue 47 (6): 541–558. doi:10.1177/0967010616672150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Londras, F. 2011. Detention in the ‘War on Terror’: Can Human Rights Fight Back? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelista, M. 2008. Law, Ethics and the War on Terror. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. 2016. “‘Extraordinary or Ordinary Emergency Measures: What, and Who, Defines the ‘Success’ of Securitisation?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 29 (2): 677–694. doi:10.1080/09557571.2015.1077651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. 2018. “Parallels with the Hate Speech Debate: The Pros and Cons of Criminalising Harmful Securitising Requests.” Review of International Studies 44 (1): 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. 2019a. The Morality of Security Policy: A Theory of Just Securitization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, R. 2019b. “Collective Securitisation in the EU: Normative Dimensions.” West European Politics 42 (2): 391–412. doi:10.1080/01402382.2018.1510200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. 2018. “Against Identity Politics: The New Tribalism and the Crisis of Democracy.” Foreign Affair 97: 90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gearon, L. F., and P. Parsons. 2018. “Research Ethics in the Securitised University.” Journal of Academic Ethics 17: 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleditsch, N. P. and R. Nordås. 2014. “Conflicting Messages? The IPCC on Conflict and Human Security.” Political Geography 43: 82–90. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grygiel, J. 2019. “Facebook Algorithm Changes Suppressed Journalism and Meddled with Democracy.” The Conversation, July 24.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. 2017. “Wriston Lecture: The Age of Outrage: What It’s Doing to Our Universities, and Our Country.” https://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/2017-wriston-lecture-age-outrage-10779.html
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. 2012. “Reconstructing Desecuritisation: The Normative-political in the Copenhagen School and Directions for How to Apply It.” Review of International Studies 7 (4): 525–546. doi:10.1017/S0260210511000581.
   Google Scholar
• Hynek, N., and D. Chandler. 2013. “No Emancipatory Alternative, No Critical Security Studies.” Critical Studies on Security 1 (1): 46–63.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2015. “The Politicisation and Securitisation of Religious Education? A Rejoinder.” British Journal of Educational Studies 63 (3): 345–366. doi:10.1080/00071005.2015.1069257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, L., and T. Legrand. 2016. “”I Am Somewhat Puzzled” Questions, Audiences and Securitization in the Proscription of Terrorist Organisations.” Security Dialogue 48 (2): 149–167. doi:10.1177/0967010616686020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C., and S. Léonard. 2010. “Reconceptualizing the Audience in Securitization Theory.” In Securitization Theory, edited by T. Balzacq, 71–90. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koene, A. 2016. “Facebook’s Algorithms Give It More Editorial Responsibility – Not Less.” The Conversation, September 14.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, L. 2015. “Ebola Diaries: From Denial and Fear to Action.” Accessed 11 February 2019. https://www.who.int/features/2015/ebola-diaries-linn/en/
   Google Scholar
• Lomborg, B. 2013. “The Poor Need Cheap Fossil Fuels.” New York Times, December 3. Accessed 1 March 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/04/opinion/the-poor-need-cheapfossil-fuels.html?_r=2&
   Google Scholar
• Mealer, B. 2018. “This Is What Trump’s Caravan ‘Invasion’ Really Looks Like.” The Guardian, November 26. Accessed 13 December 2018. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/26/migrant-caravan-disabled-children
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S. 2015. “When Algorithms Shape Collective Action: Social Media and the Dynamics of Cloud Protesting.” Social Media + Society, July-December 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Mutimer, D. 2019. “Critical Security Studies: A Schismatic History.” In Contemporary Security Studies, edited by A. Collins, 91–110. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, A. 2013. “Legislative Practices.” In Research Methods in Critical Security Studies, edited by M. B. Salter and C. E. Mutlu, 125–128. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olesker, R. 2018. “The Securitisation Dilemma: Legitimacy in Securitisation Studies.” Critical Studies on Security 6 (3): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Oren, I., and T. Solomon. 2015. “WMD, WMD, WMD: Securitisation through Ritualised Incantation of Ambiguous Phrases.” Review of International Studies 41: 313–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, B. 2016. “German Minister’s Advice to Donald Trump: ‘Building Walls Is a Bad Idea’ Politico.” January 3. Accessed 19 June 2020. https://www.politico.eu/article/german-ministers-donald-trump-building-walls-bad-idea-berlin-wall-campaign-elections/
   Google Scholar
• Parry, J. 2017. “Defensive Harm, Consent, and Intervention.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 45 (4): 356–396. doi:10.1111/papa.12099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattison, J. 2010. Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peter, F. 2017. “Political Legitimacy.” In The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy, edited by E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/legitimacy/
   Google Scholar
• Porter, G., & Brown, J. W. 1991. Global Environmental Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, P. 2008. “Actor, Audience (S) and Emergency Measures: Securitization and the UK’s Decision to Invade Iraq.” Security Dialogue 39 (6): 615–635. doi:10.1177/0967010608098212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, P. 2012. “Is Securitization a ‘Negative’ Concept? Revisiting the Normative Debate over Normal versus Extraordinary Politics.” Security Dialogue 43 (3): 249–266. doi:10.1177/0967010612443723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolandi, A. 2017. “Spanish Government under Fire for Referendum Violence.” Catalan News, October 1. Accessed 1 March 2019. http://www.catalannews.com/politics/item/spanish government-under-fire-for-referendum-violence
   Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B. 2011. “When Securitization Fails: The Hard Case of Counter-terrorism Programs.” In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, edited by T. Balzacq, 116–132. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schweller, R. 2018. “Three Cheers for Trump’s Foreign Policy.” Foreign Affairs 133–143, September/October.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöstedt, R. 2011. “Health Issues and Securitization: The Construction of HIV/AIDS as a US National Security Threat.” In Securitization Theory, edited by T. Balzacq, 164–183. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soanes, C. 2000. The Compact English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. 2018. “A Tariffically Bad Idea: The Looming Global Trade War.” March 8. Accessed 1 March 2019. https://www.economist.com/briefing/2018/03/08/the-looming-global-trade war
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. 2018. “The Guardian View on Trump’s Tariffs: More Smoke than Fire Editorial.” March 8. Accessed 1 March 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/08/guardian-view-trump steel-tarifffs-more-smoke-than-fire-editorial
   Google Scholar
• Villumsen Berling, T. 2011. “Science and Securitization: Objectivation, the Authority of the Speaker, and Mobilization of Scientific Facts.” Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 385–389. doi:10.1177/0967010611418714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vultee, F. 2011. “Securitization as a Media Frame: What Happens When the Media ‘Speak Security.” In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, edited by T. Balzacq, 77–94. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vuori, J. 2008. “Illocutionary Logic and Strands of Securitization: Applying the Theory of Securitization to the Study of Non-Democratic Political Orders.” European Journal of International Relations 14: 65–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuori, J. 2011a. “Religion Bites: Falungong, Securitization/desecuritization in the People’s Republic of China.” In Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, edited by T. Balzacq, 186–211. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vuori, J. 2011b. “How to Do Security with Words: A Grammar of Securitization in the People’s Republic of China.” unpublished manuscript, University of Turku, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, O. 1989. “Security, the Speech Act: Analysing the Politics of a Word.” unpublished paper, presented at the Research Training Seminar, Sostrup Manor, 1989, Jerusalem/Tel Aviv, 25–26 June 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, O. 2003. “Securitisation: Taking stock of a Research Programme in Security Studies.” unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. C. 2003. “Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 47 (4): 511–531. doi:10.1046/j.0020-8833.2003.00277.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winfield, N., and M. G. Murru. 2018. “Italy’s Vaccine Debate Shows Anti-establishment Sway.” Medical Press, February 26. Accessed 25 February 2019. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2018-02-italy vaccine-debate-anti-establishment-sway.htm
   Google Scholar