References
- Aalberts, T., X. Kurowska, A. Leander, M. Mälksoo, C. Heath-Kelly, L. Lobato, and T. Svensson. 2020. “Rituals of World Politics: On (Visual) Practices Disordering Things.” Critical Studies on Security 8 (3): 240–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2020.1792734.
- Adamsky, D. 2018. “From Moscow with Coercion: Russian Deterrence Theory and Strategic Culture.” Journal of Strategic Studies 41 (1–2): 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2017.1347872.
- Albon, C. 2023. Pentagon Tests Joint Warfighting Technology During TREX Exercise. C4ISRNet. May 17. https://www.c4isrnet.com/battlefield-tech/2023/05/17/pentagon-tests-joint-warfighting-technology-during-trex-exercise/.
- Allik, S., S. Fahey, T. Jermalavičius, R. McDermott, and K. Muzyka. 2021. The Rise of Russia’s Military Robots: Theory, Practice and Implications. Tallinn: International Centre for Defence and Security.
- Andersen, R. S., J. A. Vuori, and C. E. Mutlu. 2013. “Visuality.” In Critical Security Methods: New Frameworks for Analysis, edited by C. Aradau, J. Huysmans, A. Neal, and N. Voelkner, 85–117. London: Routledge.
- Atherton, K. D. 2021. “Russia’s New Tank Will Be Able to Pick Its Own Targets.” Popular Science. April 30. https://www.popsci.com/story/technology/russia-armata-tank-pick-its-own-targets/.
- Austin, J. L., and A. Leander. 2022. “Visibility: Practices of Seeing and Overlooking.” In Conceptualizing International Practices: Directions for the Practice Turn in International Relations, edited by A. Drieschova, C. Bueger, and T. Hopf, 213–233. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Basham, V. M. 2015. “Waiting for War: Soldiering, Temporality and the Gendered Politics of Boredom and Joy in Military Spaces.” In Emotions, Politics and War, 128–140. London: Routledge.
- Bendett, S. 2021. Defense One Radio, Ep. 88: How Air Warfare Is Changing, Defense One. September 17. https://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2021/09/defense-one-radio-ep-88-how-air-warfare-changing/185391/.
- Bendett, S. 2023. “The State of Autonomy, AI & Robotics for Russia’s Ground Vehicles.” European Security and Defence. June 26. https://euro-sd.com/2023/06/articles/31798/the-state-of-autonomy-ai-robotics-for-russias-ground-vehicles/.
- Bernhardt, J., and L. Sukin. 2021. “Joint Military Exercises and Crisis Dynamics on the Korean Peninsula.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 65 (5): 855–888. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002720972180.
- Blackwill, R. D., and J. W. Legro. 1989. “Constraining Ground Force Exercises of NATO and the Warsaw Pact.” International Security 14 (3): 68–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/2538932.
- Bleiker, R. 2018a. “Mapping Visual Global Politics.” In Visual Global Politics, edited by R. Bleiker, 1–29. London: Routledge.
- Bleiker, R., Ed. 2018b. Visual Global Politics. London: Routledge.
- Boulègue, M. ( Director). 2021. Deciphering Russia’s Zapad-21 Strategic Military Exercise, Chatham House. September 9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLefopMaxyQ.
- Brodie, B. 1953. “Military Demonstration and Disclosure of New Weapons.” World Politics 5 (3): 281–301. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009134.
- Bueger, C., and F. Gadinger. 2018. International Practice Theory. 2nd ed. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Callahan, W. A. 2020. Sensible politics: Visualizing international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Campbell, D. 2004. “Horrific Blindness: Images of Death in Contemporary Media.” Journal for Cultural Research 8 (1): 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/1479758042000196971.
- Campbell, D. 2007. “Geopolitics and Visuality: Sighting the Darfur Conflict.” Political Geography 26 (4): 357–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.11.005.
- Campbell, D., and M. Power. 2010. “The Scopic Regime of ‘Africa.” In Observant States: Geopolitics and Visual Culture, edited by F. MacDonald, R. Hughes, and K. Dodds, 167–195. London: Tauris.
- Carson, A., and K. Yarhi-Milo. 2017. “Covert Communication: The Intelligibility and Credibility of Signaling in Secret.” Security Studies 26 (1): 124–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2017.1243921.
- Cho, E. J. R. 2017. “Nation Branding for Survival in North Korea: The Arirang Festival and Nuclear Weapons Tests.” Geopolitics 22 (3): 594–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1269753.
- Clark, M., and G. Barros. 2021. Russia’s Zapad-2021 Exercise, Institute for the Study of War. September 17. https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russia%E2%80%99s-zapad-2021-exercise.
- Clem, R. 2018. “Military Exercises As Geopolitical Messaging in the NATO-Russia Dynamic: Reassurance, Deterrence, and (In)stability.” Texas National Security Review 2 (1): 130–143.
- Crilley, R. 2016. “Like and Share Forces Making Sense of Military Social Media Sites.” In Understanding Popular Culture and World Politics in the Digital Age, edited by C. Hamilton and L. J. Shepherd, 51–67. London: Routledge.
- Crilley, R., and P. N. Chatterje-Doody. 2020. “Emotions and War on YouTube: Affective Investments in RT’s Visual Narratives of the Conflict in Syria.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 33 (5): 713–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2020.1719038.
- Danil, L. R. 2018a. “Introduction: Visual Representations of War and Violence: Considering Embodiment.” Critical Studies on Security 6 (3): 344–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2018.1432533.
- Danil, L. R. 2018b. “Weapons, Desire and the Making of War: A Lacanian Response.” Critical Studies on Security 6 (3): 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2018.1473670.
- De Mesquita, B. B., J. D. Morrow, and E. R. Zorick. 1997. “Capabilities, Perception, and Escalation.” The American Political Science Review 91 (1): 15–27. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952256.
- Dixon, R., and R. Thebault. 2021. “Russia Begins Major Military Drills with Belarus After Moves Toward Closer Integration.” Washington Post. September 10. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/russia-belarus-zapad-military-drill/2021/09/10/14f3231a-1012-11ec-baca-86b144fc8a2d_story.html.
- Dong, Z. 2019 DF-17 Ballistic Missile Makes Debut at National Day Parade. China Military. http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/view/2019-10/01/content_9642091.htm.
- Doty, R. L. 1997. “A Critical Exploration of the Agent-Structure Problematique in International Relations Theory.” European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 365–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003003004.
- Edmonds, J., and S. Bendett. 2019. “Russian Battlefield Awareness and Information Dominance: Improved Capabilities and Future Challenges.” The Strategy Bridge. February 26. https://thestrategybridge.org/the-bridge/2019/2/26/russian-battlefield-awareness-and-information-dominance-improved-capabilities-and-future-challenges.
- Edwards, A. 2021. “A Vulnerable Russia: Militarisation Through Anxiety in 1990s Russian Historical Textbooks.” Political Crossroads 25 (1): 5–24. https://doi.org/10.7459/pc/25.1.02.
- Edwards, A. 2022. “Dear Young Warriors”: Memories of Sacrifice, Debt and Youth Militarisation in Yeltsin’s Russia.” In Youth and Memory in Europe, edited by F. Krawatzek and N. Friess, 99–112. Berlin: De Gruyter.
- Fearon, J. 1997. “Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (1): 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002797041001004.
- Foxall, A. 2013. “Photographing Vladimir Putin: Masculinity, Nationalism and Visuality in Russian Political Culture.” Geopolitics 18 (1): 132–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2012.713245.
- Frosh, P. 2003. The Image Factory: Consumer Culture, Photography and the Visual Content Industry. London: Berg Publishers.
- Fuhrmann, M., and T. Sechser. 2014. “Signalling Alliance Commitments: Hand-Tying and Sunk Costs in Extended Nuclear Deterrence.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 919–935. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12082.
- Giles, K. 2018. Russia Hit Multiple Targets with Zapad-2017. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/Giles_Zapad_web.pdf.
- Gilliver, K. 2007. “Display in Roman Warfare: The Appearance of Armies and Individuals on the Battlefield.” War in History 14 (1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968344507071038.
- Gosselin-Malo, E. 2024. Ukrainian Officials See Ground Robots as ‘Game changer’ in War, Defense News. March 14. https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2024/03/14/ukrainian-officials-see-ground-robots-as-game-changer-in-war/.
- Grayson, K., and J. Mawdsley. 2019. “Scopic Regimes and the Visual Turn in International Relations: Seeing World Politics Through the Drone.” European Journal of International Relations 25 (2): 431–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066118781955.
- Green, B. R., and A. Long. 2019. “Signaling with Secrets: Evidence on Soviet Perceptions and Counterforce Developments in the Late Cold War.” In Cross-Domain Deterrence: Strategy in an Era of Complexity, edited by E. Gartzke and J. Lindsay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gusterson, H. 1998. Nuclear Rites: A Weapons Laboratory at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Hansen, L. 2011. “Theorizing the Image for Security Studies: Visual Securitization and the Muhammad Cartoon Crisis.” European Journal of International Relations 17 (1): 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110388593.
- Hansen, L. 2015. “How Images Make World Politics: International Icons and the Case of Abu Ghraib.” Review of International Studies 41 (2): 263–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210514000199.
- Haynes, K. 2017. Signaling Resolve or Capability? The Difference Matters on the Korean Peninsula, War on the Rocks. May 10. https://warontherocks.com/2017/05/signaling-resolve-or-capability-the-difference-matters-on-the-korean-peninsula/.
- Hedlund, E., M. Börjesson, and J. Österberg. 2015. “Team Learning in a Multinational Military Staff Exercise.” Small Group Research 46 (2): 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414568462.
- Heuser, B., T. Heier, and G. Lasconjarias, Eds. 2018. Military Exercises: Political Messaging and Strategic Impact. Rome: NATO Defense College.
- Hochberg, G. Z. 2015. Visual Occupations: Violence and Visibility in a Conflict Zone. Durham: Duke University Press.
- Hoijtink, M. 2022. “‘Prototype warfare’: Innovation, Optimisation, and the Experimental Way of Warfare.” European Journal of International Security 7 (3): 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2022.12.
- Hutchison, E. 2016. Affective Communities in World Politics: Collective Emotions After Trauma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Jackman, A. 2021. “Visualizations of the Small Military Drone: Normalization Through ‘Naturalization’.” Critical Military Studies 8 (4): 339–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2020.1846955.
- Jackson, S. T. 2016. “Marketing Militarism in the Digital Age Arms Production, YouTube and Selling ‘National Security” In Understanding Popular Culture and World Politics in the Digital Age, edted by L. J. Shepherd and C. Hamilton, 68–82. London: Routledge.
- Ji, S., and V. Cha. 2022. “Making Sense of North Korea’s Recent ICBM and (Possible) Nuclear Tests.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. May 27. https://thebulletin.org/2022/05/making-sense-of-north-koreas-recent-icbm-and-possible-nuclear-tests/.
- Jude, S. 2022. “Geopolitical Imaginations of War Preparations: Visual Representations of the Romanian Armed forces’ Military Exercises.” Critical Military Studies 9 (3): 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2022.2106101.
- Keck, Z. 2015 Why America Should Fear China’s Hypersonic Nuclear Missile. The National Interest. June 15. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/why-america-should-fear-chinas-hypersonic-nuclear-missile-13115.
- Kofman, M. 2021. Zapad 2021: What We Learned from Russia’s Massive Military Drills, The Moscow Times. September 23. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/09/23/zapad-2021-what-we-learned-from-russias-massive-military-drills-a75127.
- Kofman, M., R. Connolly, J. Edmonds, A. Kendall-Taylor, and S. Bendett. 2022. Assessing Russian State Capacity to Develop and Deploy Advanced Military Technology. Washington, D.C.: Center for a New American Security.
- Konaev, M., and S. Bendett. 2019. “Russian AI-Enabled Combat: Coming to a City Near You?” War on the Rocks. July 31. https://warontherocks.com/2019/07/russian-ai-enabled-combat-coming-to-a-city-near-you/.
- Kozyulin, V. 2019. “.” [Militarization of AI]. Moscow: Russian Center for Policy Research https://stanleycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/MilitarizationofAI-Russia.pdf.
- Kunkle, F., and Korolchuk. 2023. “Enemies Duel with Drones As Ukraine Faces Dug-In Russian Forces.” Washington Post. July 12. https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2023/07/12/ukraine-zaporizhzhia-counteroffensive-russia/.
- Lee, R. 2021. “Longer Video of the Nerekhta and Uran-9 UGVs Used During Zapad 2021 at the Mulino Training Area. Platforma-M UGVs Were Also Used by Baltic Fleet Troops in Kaliningrad.” [@RAlee85]. Twitter. September 20. https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1440770815000133640.
- MacKenzie, M. 2020. “Why Do Soldiers Swap Illicit Pictures? How a Visual Discourse Analysis Illuminates Military Band of Brother Culture.” Security Dialogue 51 (4): 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010619898468.
- Mälksoo, M. 2021. “A Ritual Approach to Deterrence: I Am, Therefore I Deter.” European Journal of International Relations 27 (1): 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066120966039.
- Masco, J. 2002. “Lie Detectors: On Secrets and Hypersecurity in Los Alamos.” Public Culture 14 (3): 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-14-3-441.
- Mathers, J. G. 2020. “Ginger Cats and Cute Puppies: Animals, Affect and Militarisation in the Crisis in Ukraine.” In Making War on Bodies, edited by C. Baker, 148–169. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Meiches, B. 2017. “Weapons, Desire, and the Making of War.” Critical Studies on Security 5 (1): 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2017.1312149.
- Ministry of Defence Russia. 2021a. Crews of the UAV of the Ulyanovsk Airborne Unit Have Worked Out the Search and Detection of Objects of a Mock Enemy on the JSE Zapad-2021: Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. https://eng.mil.ru/en/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12383374@egNews.
- Ministry of Defence Russia. 2021b. During the JSE Zapad-2021, for the First Time, the Uran-9 and Nerekhta Reconnaissance and Fire Support Robots Were Used in Combat Formations: Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. September 13. https://eng.mil.ru/en/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12383861@egNews.
- Ministry of Defence Russia. 2021c. The Main Stage of the Joint Strategic Exercise Zapad-2021 Is Being Held at the Mulino Training Ground in the Nizhny Novgorod Region: Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. September 13. https://eng.mil.ru/en/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12383849@egNews.
- Ministry of Defence Russia. 2021d. Military Observers from China, Vietnam and Myanmar Will Be Present at the Joint Strategic Exercises Zapad-2021: Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. https://eng.mil.ru/en/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12383015@egNews.
- Ministry of Defence Russia. 2021e. The UAV Complexes and Combat Robots Are Actively Involved in In the Episodes of the Exercise with the Troops (Forces) of the Baltic Fleet: Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. https://eng.mil.ru/en/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12383432@egNews.
- Ministry of Defence Russia. 2021f. Uran-9 Robotic Complexes Provided a Change of Positions of Motorized Rifle Units at the Mulino Training Ground, Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. https://eng.mil.ru/en/news_page/country/more.htm?id=12383855@egNews.
- Ministry of Defence Russia. 2021g. ССУ «Запад-2021», Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation. https://eng.mil.ru/en/news_page/country.htm?f=1&fid=0&blk=10340619&id=11090@egClassification&ra=egNews&objInBlock=25.
- Montgomery, E. B. 2020. “Signals of Strength: Capability Demonstrations and Perceptions of Military Power.” Journal of Strategic Studies 43 (2): 309–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2019.1626724.
- Muzyka, K. 2021. Russia Goes to War: Exercises, Signaling, War Scares, and Military Confrontations. Washington, D.C.: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
- Nadibaidze, A. 2022. Russian Perceptions of Military AI, Automation, and Autonomy. Philadelphia: Foreign Policy Research Institute.
- Nadibaidze, A. 2023. “Russia’s ‘Low-Tech’ War on Ukraine Discredited Its Military Modernization Narrative.” Network for Strategic Analysis (NSA). March 3. https://ras-nsa.ca/russias-low-tech-war-on-ukraine/.
- Nadibaidze, A. 2024. “Technology in the Quest for Status: The Russian leadership’s Artificial Intelligence Narrative.” Journal of International Relations and Development. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-023-00322-1.
- Noys, B. 2015. ”Drone Metaphysics.” In Drone Cultures, edited by R. Coley and D. Lockwood, 1–22. Online: Culture Machine.
- Orwell, G. 2011. “England Your England.” In The Lion and the Unicorn: Socialism and the English Genius, Orwell Foundation. https://www.orwellfoundation.com/the-orwell-foundation/orwell/essays-and-other-works/the-lion-and-the-unicorn-socialism-and-the-english-genius/.
- Palmer, D. A. R. 2015. Back to the Future? Russia’s Hybrid Warfare, Revolutions in Military Affairs, and Cold War Comparisons. Rome: NATO Defense College.
- Partis-Jennings, H., and H. Redwood. 2021. “War Art and the Formation of Community.” Critical Studies on Security . https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2021.1875711.
- Pili, G., and F. Minniti. 2022. “.” Understanding Russia’s Great Games: From Zapad 2013 to Zapad 2021 (London: RUSI). https://rusi.org/explore-our-research/publications/commentary/understanding-russias-great-games-zapad-2013-zapad-2021.
- Pomarède, J. 2018. “Normalizing Violence Through Front-Line Stories: The Case of American Sniper.” Critical Military Studies 4 (1): 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2016.1246995.
- Post, A. 2019. “Flying to Fail: Costly Signals and Air Power in Crisis Bargaining.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 63 (4): 869–895. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002718777043.
- Ramsay, G., and S. Robertshaw. 2018. Weaponising News: RT, Sputnik and Targeted Disinformation. London: King’s College Centre for the Study of Media, Communication and Power.
- Rappaport, R. A. 1974. “Obvious Aspects of Ritual.” The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 2 (1): 3–69.
- Rech, M., D. Bos, K. N. Jenkings, A. Williams, and R. Woodward. 2015. “Geography, Military Geography, and Critical Military Studies.” Critical Military Studies 1 (1): 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2014.963416.
- Roderick, I. 2009. “Bare Life of the Virtuous Shadow Warrior: The Use of Silhouette in Military Training Advertisements.” Continuum 23 (1): 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310802596325.
- Roderick, I. 2016. “Studying Military Image Banks: A Social Semiotic Approach.” In The Routledge Companion to Military Research Methods, edited by A. J. Williams, K. N. Jenkings, M. F. Rech, and R. Woodward, 317–331. London: Routledge.
- Rose, G. 2016. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials. 4th ed. London: SAGE.
- Schatzki, T. 2001. “Introduction: Practice Theory.” In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, edited by T. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, and E. Von Savigny, 10–23. London: Routledge.
- Schlag, G. 2015. “Imaging Security: A Visual Methodology for Security Studies.” In Transformations of Security Studies, edited by G. Schlag, J. Junk, and C. Daase, 251–273. London: Routledge.
- Serafinelli, E., and L. A. O’Hagan. 2022. “Drone Views: A Multimodal Ethnographic Perspective.” Visual Communication 23 (2): 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/14703572211065093.
- Shapiro, M. J., G. M. Bonham, and D. Heradstveit. 1988. “A Discursive Practices Approach to Collective Decision-Making.” International Studies Quarterly 32 (4): 397–419. https://doi.org/10.2307/2600590.
- Shim, D. 2013. Visual Politics and North Korea. London: Routledge.
- Sinkkonen, E. 2015. Parading for Peace? China’s Military Parade Targets Both Domestic and Foreign Audiences. Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs. https://www.fiia.fi/en/publication/parading-for-peace.
- Solomon, T. 2014. “The Affective Underpinnings of Soft Power.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (3): 720–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113503479.
- Stahl, R. 2010. Militainment, Inc: War, Media, and Popular Culture. London: Routledge.
- Stahl, R. 2018. Through the Crosshairs: War, Visual Culture & the Weaponized Gaze. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
- Sturken, M., and L. Cartwright. 2017. Practices of Looking. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- TASS. 2018. Russia Tests Robotic Strike Vehicle in Conditions Close to Real Combat, TASS. January 19. https://tass.com/defense/985821.
- TASS. 2019. First Batch of Next-Generation Armata Tanks to Arrive for Russian Troops in Late 2019, TASS. November 19. https://tass.com/defense/1090343.
- TASS. 2021a. Main Phase of Zapad-2021 Exercise Begins in Nizhny Novgorod Region. TASS. https://tass.com/defense/1337247.
- TASS. 2021b. Russia’s Top Brass Says Zapad-2021 Drills Show Cohesion, Compatibility with Belarus. TASS. https://tass.com/defense/1339159.
- TASS. 2021c. Troops Use Uran-9 Combat Robots for First Time in Volga Area Drills, TASS. August 27. https://tass.com/defense/1331147.
- TASS. 2022. Russia Unveils Export Version of Breakthrough Armata Main Battle Tank at Army Forum, TASS. August 18. https://tass.com/defense/1495461.
- Taylor, T. B. 1990. “Nuclear Tests and Nuclear Weapons.” The Journal of Strategic Studies 13 (3): 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402399008437424.
- Tharoor, I. 2009. “A Brief History of Military Parades.” Time. January 10. http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1927129,00.html.
- Town, J. 2020. “After the Parade, North Korea’s Steady Progress Matters More Than Its Big New Missile.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. October 16. https://thebulletin.org/2020/10/after-the-parade-north-koreas-steady-progress-matters-more-than-its-big-new-missile/.
- Tucker, P. 2019. New Drones, Weapons Get Spotlight in China’s Military Parade, Defense One. October 1. https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2019/10/new-drones-weapons-get-spotlight-chinas-military-parade/160291/.
- Tucker, P., and L. C. Williams. 2022. The Army’s Big Convention Was Full of Armed Robots, Defense One. https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2022/10/armys-big-convention-was-full-armed-robots/378435/.
- Tyner, J., and G. A. Cromley. 2019. “Geography, Genocide, and Global Militarism: An Agenda for the Twentyfirst Century.” In A Research Agenda for Military Geography, edited by R. Woodward, 26–39. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Van der Maarel, S., D. Verweij, E.-H. Kramer, and T. Molendijk. 2023. ““This Is Not What I Signed Up for”: Sociotechnical Imaginaries, Expectations, and Disillusionment in a Dutch Military Innovation Hub.” Science, Technology, & Human Values.
- Ventsel, A., S. Hansson, M.-L. Madisson, and V. Sazonov. 2019. “Discourse of Fear in Strategic Narratives: The Case of Russia’s Zapad War Games.” Media, War & Conflict 14 (1): 21–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635219856552.
- Virilio, P. (P. Camiller, Translated by. 1989. War and Cinema: The Logistics of Perception. London: Verso.
- Von Foerster, H. 2003. “On Constructing a Reality.” In Understanding: Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition, edited by H. Von Foerster, 211–227. New York: Springer.
- Vuori, J. A. 2010. “A Timely Prophet? The Doomsday Clock as a Visualization of Securitization Moves with a Global Referent Object.” Security Dialogue 41 (3): 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010610370225.
- Walker, J. R. 2010. British Nuclear Weapons and the Test Ban 1954–1973: Britain, the United States, Weapons Policies and Nuclear Testing: Tensions and Contradictions. London: Routledge.
- Wegner, N. 2020. “Militarization in Canada: Myth-Breaking and Image-Making Through Recruitment Campaigns.” Critical Military Studies 6 (1): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/23337486.2018.1444727.
- Wendt, A. 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics.” International Organization 46 (2): 391–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764.
- Williams, M. C. 2018. “International Relations in the Age of the Image.” International Studies Quarterly 62 (4): 880–891. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqy030.
- Woodward, R. 2005. “From Military Geography to militarism’s Geographies: Disciplinary Engagements with the Geographies of Militarism and Military Activities.” Progress in Human Geography 29 (6): 718–740. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph579oa.
- Woodward, R., T. Winter, and K. N. Jenkings. 2009. “Heroic Anxieties: The Figure of the British Soldier in Contemporary Print Media.” Journal of War & Culture Studies 2 (2): 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcs.2.2.211_1.
- Yang, C. 2021. “Visuality and Violence: Touring the Occupied West Bank.” Geopolitics 26 (4): 1175–1195. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2019.1656609.
- Yeo, M. 2022. North Korea Says it Has Tested Hypersonic Missile, Launched from Russian-Made Vehicle, Defense News. January 6. https://www.defensenews.com/flashpoints/2022/01/05/north-korea-says-hypersonic-missile-tested-to-modernize-weaponry/.