References

• Acikalin, S., Gul, E., & Develioglu, K. (2009). Conspicuous consumption patterns of Turkish youth: Case of cellular phones. Young Consumers, 10(3), 199–209.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, J. C., Durvasula, S., & Akhter, S. H. (1990). A framework for conceptualizing and measuring the involvement construct in advertising research. Journal of Advertising, 19(4), 27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, M., Luo, X., Fang, Z., & Aspara, J. (2014). Cause marketing effectiveness and the moderating role of price discounts. Journal of Marketing, 78(6), 120–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barone, M. J., Norman, A. T., & Miyazaki, A. D. (2007). Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better? Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 437–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basil, D. Z., & Weber, D. (2006). Values motivation and concern for appearances: The effect of personality traits on responses to corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 11(1), 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Batra, R., Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (2001). Values, susceptibility to normative influence, and attribute importance weights: A nomological analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(2), 115–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D., & Coke, J. S. (1981). Empathy: A source of altruistic motivation for helping. In J. P. Rushton & R. M. Sorren (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior: Social, personality, and developmental perspectives (pp. 169–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bearden, W. O., & Etzel, M. J. (1982). Reference group influence on product and brand pur chase decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), 183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 139–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, I. E., Cunningham, P. H., & Drumwright, M. E. (2006). Identity, identification, and relationship through social alliances. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science., 34(2), 128–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(4), 76–88.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A, & Sanford, C. (2006). Influence processes for information technology acceptance: an elaboration likelihood model. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 30(4), 805-825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigné-Alcañiz, E., Currás-Pérez, R., Ruiz-Mafé, C., & Sanz-Blas, S. (2010). Consumer behavioural intentions in cause-related marketing: The role of identification and social cause involvement. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 7(2), 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Boenigk, S., & Schuchardt, V. (2013). Cause-related marketing campaigns with luxury firms: An experimental study of campaign characteristics, attitudes, and donations. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18(2), 101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, J. L. (1998). The evolution of magnanimity. Human Nature, 9(1), 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, F. S. (1957). Group influence in marketing and public relations. In R. Likert & S. P. Hayes (Eds.), Some applications of behavioral research. Basil, Switzerland: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Brønn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: An overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207–222.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. The Journal of Marketing, 61, 68–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, J. J., & Wood, V. R. (1988). A proposed model of the donation decision process. Research in Consumer Behavior, 3, 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Business Korea. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: 44% of Korean enterprises increased spending on social contributions. Retrieved from http://www.businesskorea.co.kr/english/news/features/13462-corporate-social-responsibility-44-korean-enterprises-increased-spending-social
   Google Scholar
• CauseGood. (2017). The case for cause marketing – Statistics for businesses & nonprofits. Retrieved from https://causegood.com/blog/cause-marketing-statistics/
   Google Scholar
• Chaffey, D. (2017). Global social media research summary 2017. Retrieved from http://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. T. (2008). To donate or not to donate? Product characteristics and framing effects of cause‐related marketing on consumer purchase behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 25(12), 1089–1110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, Y., Yu, H., & Lu, H. (2015). Persuasive message, popularity cohesion, and message diffusion in social media marketing. Journal of Business Research, 68, 777–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H. O. (2000). The effect of CRM message on consumers’ purchase decisions. Kobacco, 49, 231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cone Communications. (2017). 2017 Cone communications CSR study. Retrieved from. http://www.conecomm.com/2017-cone-communications-csr-study-pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cornor. (2012). How strengthening people’s altruistic values can help change behavior. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/strengthening-altruistic-values-change-behaviour
   Google Scholar
• Cui, Y., Trent, E. S., Sullivan, P. M., & Matiru, G. N. (2003). Cause-related marketing: How generation Y responds. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31(6), 310–320.
   Google Scholar
• Dasilva, A. (2004). The 2004 cone corporate citizenship study. Boston: Cone Communications.
   Google Scholar
• DMR. (2017). 90 amazing Facebook page statistics (July 2017). Retrieved from https://expandedramblings.com/index.php/facebook-page-statistics/#.WeOWNHeGPBI
   Google Scholar
• Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D., & Nowak, M. A. (2008). Winners don’t punish. Nature, 452(7185), 348–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drumwright, M. E. (1996). Company advertising with a social dimension: The role of noneconomic criteria. Journal of Marketing, 60(4), 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubé, J. P., Luo, X., & Fang, Z. (2016). Self-signaling and prosocial behavior: A cause marketing experiment. Marketing Research, 36(2), 161–186.
   Google Scholar
• Engage For Good. (2017). Social impact statistics you should know. Retrieved from http://engageforgood.com/guides/statistics-every-cause-marketer-should-know/
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. P, & Armstrong, G. M. (1975). Identifying buyers of a major automotive innovation. Journal Of Marketing, 39(1), 47-53. doi:10.2307/1250802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (1980). Resource theory. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange (pp. 77–94). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes. (2018). Cause marketing: How to position your company as a value-based brand. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescommunicationscouncil/2018/01/04/cause-marketing-how-to-position-your-company-as-a-value-based-brand/#277411d8ab68
   Google Scholar
• Gierl, H., Plantsch, M., & Schweidler, J. (2008). Scarcity effects on sales volume in retail. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 18(1), 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J. (1993). Assessing self-concept discrepancy in consumer behavior: The joint effect of private self-consciousness and self-monitoring. Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), 419–424.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, S. J., & Barak, B. (1988). Public self-consciousness and consumption behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(3), 393–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grau, S. L., & Folse, J. A. G. (2007). Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer. Journal of Advertising, 36(4), 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Miller, G. F., & Kenrick, D. T. (2007). Blatant benevolence and conspicuous consumption: When romantic motives elicit strategic costly signals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 85–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., & Van den Bergh, B. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulf, G. (2014). What people share on social networks – Statistics and trends. Retrieved from https://www.go-gulf.ae/blog/what-people-share-on-social-networks/
   Google Scholar
• Hagtvedt, H., & Patrick, V. M. (2016). Gilt and guilt: Should luxury and charity partner at the point of sale. Journal of Retailing, 92(1), 56–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajjat, M. M. (2003). Effect of cause-related marketing on attitudes and purchase intentions: the moderating role of cause involvement and donation size. Journal Of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 11(1), 93-109. doi:10.1300/J054v11n01_07
   Google Scholar
• Ham, S. Y., & Cho, C. H. (2012). A study on advertising effectiveness of fair trade messages: Focusing on consumer ethics, self-monitoring, and social proof message. Journal of Korean Marketing, 25(1), 267–288.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1402–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, R. A. (1981). Infragravity energy in the surf zone. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 86(C7), 6442–6450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 259–266.
   Google Scholar
• Krishna, A. (2011). Can supporting a cause decrease donations and happiness? The cause marketing paradox. Journal of Consumer Psycology, 21(3), 338–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, B. A. (2007). The relevance of fit in a cause–Brand alliance when consumers evaluate corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 447–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landreth, S. (2002). For a good cause: The effects of cause importance, cause proximity, congruency and participation effort on consumers’ evaluations of cause related marketing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Louisiana State University, Louisiana.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Morton, C. (2017). The effect of media-bound factors on cause-related marketing (CRM) audience's attitudes and behavioral intention. In T. Reichert, Proceedings of the 2017 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 213-225), March 23-26, Boston. Lubbock: American Academy of Advertising.
   Google Scholar
• Lee-Won, R. J., Shim, M., Joo, Y. K., & Park, S. G. (2014). Who puts the best “face” forward on Facebook?: Positive self-presentation in online social networking and the role of self-consciousness, actual-to-total friends ratio, and culture. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 413–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, R., Sung, Y. S., & Lee, W. (2015, February). Building a socially responsible image: an analysis of the fortune global 500 companies through their websites. American Marketing Association 2015 Winter Marketing Educators’ Conference, San Antonio, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, H. F. (2007). Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, W., & Chan, A. (2014). Knowledge sharing and social media: Altruism, perceived online attachment motivation, and perceived online relationships commitment. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaquias, R. F., Malaquias, F., & Hwang, Y. (2016). Effects of information technology on corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from an emerging economy. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 195–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mano, R. S. (2014). Social media, social causes, giving behavior and money contributions. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 287–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcoux, J. S., Filiatrault, P., & Cheron, E. (1997). The attitudes underlying preferences of young, urban, educated polish consumers towards products made in western countries. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 9(4), 5–29.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. (2000). Sexual selection for indicators of intelligence. In Novartis foundation symposium (pp. 260–270). Chichester, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, G. (2014). Why people share: The psychology of social sharing. Retrieved from https://coschedule.com/blog/why-people-share/
   Google Scholar
• Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism‐collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(2), 127–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, I. P. (1997). Pillsbury proves charity, marketing begins at home. Marketing News, 31(4), 16.
   Google Scholar
• O’Cass, A. (2000). An assessment of consumers product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(5), 545–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Cass, A., & McEwen, H. (2004). Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(1), 25–39.
   Google Scholar
• Pater, J. D., Gadhavi, D. D., & Shukla, Y. S. (2017). Consumers’ responses to cause related marketing: Moderating influence of cause involvement and skepticism on attitude and purchase intention. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 14(1), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915–1926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M. J., & Wood, G. (2001). Can the overcommercialization of cause-related marketing harm society? Journal of Macromarketing, 21(1), 8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Pracejus, J. W., & Olsen, G. D. (2004). The role of brand/cause fit in the effectiveness of cause-related marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Research, 57, 635–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rifon, N., & Trimble, C. S. (2002). An update on consumer involvement with products and issues: Thirty years later. In K. R. Evans, & L. K. Scheer, 2002 American Marketing Association Winter Educators' Conference, 13 (pp. 271-278), Feb. 22-25, Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, J. K., Patterson, L. T., & Stutts, M. A. (1992). Consumer perceptions of organizations that use cause-related marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(1), 93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, G. (2013). Self-presentation and belonging on Facebook: How personality influences social media use and motivations. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(3), 402–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, E. A., & Bird, R. B. (2005). Costly signaling and cooperative behavior. In H. Gintis, S. Bowles, R. Boyd, & E. Fehr (Eds.), Moral sentiments and material interests: The foundations of cooperation in economic life (pp. 115–148). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., & Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahilevitz, M. A. (1999). The effects of product type and donation magnitude on willingness to pay more for a charity-linked brand. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(3), 215–241.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, L. A., & Harnish, R. J. (1990). Body image: Differences between high and low self- monitoring males and females. Journal of Research in Personality, 24(3), 291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. L., Mullen, L. G., & Fraedrich, J. (2011). Increased word-of-mouth via strategic cause-related marketing. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(1), 36–49.
   Google Scholar
• Varadarajan, R., & Menon, A. (1988). Cause-related marketing: A co-alignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 58–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. (2007). The theory of the leisure class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, D. J., & Mohr, L. A. (1998). A typology of consumer responses to cause-related marketing: From skeptics to socially concerned. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(2), 226–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, S. V. (2003). Cause-related marketing: Embracing a cause just makes good business sense. Retrieved from https://www.accountingweb.com/aa/standards/cause-related-marketing-embracing-a-cause-just-makes-good-business-sense
   Google Scholar
• Youn, S, & Kim, H. (2008). Antecedents of consumer attitudes toward cause-related marketing. Journal Of Advertising Research, 48(1), 123-137. doi:10.2501/S0021849908080136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, L., & Wong, A. (2008). Exploring the influence of product conspicuousness and social compliance on purchasing motives of young Chinese consumers for foreign brands. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7(6), 470–483.
   Google Scholar