A systematic scoping review of how people with ME/CFS use the internet

References

• Action for ME. 2022. What is M.E.? See https://www.actionforme.org.uk/get-information/what-is-me/what-does-me-feel-like/.
   Google Scholar
• Grue J. A garden of forking paths: a discourse perspective on ‘Myalgic Encephalomyelitis’ and ‘Chronic Fatigue Syndrome’. Crit Discourse Stud. 2014;11:35–48. doi:10.1080/17405904.2013.829114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jason LA K, Sunnquist B, et al M. Chronic fatigue syndrome and myalgic encephalomyelitis: towards an empirical case definition. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2015;3(1):82–93. doi:10.1080/21642850.2015.1014489
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kingod C, Bowman E, Curran H, et al. Functional status and well-being in people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome compared with people with multiple sclerosis and healthy controls. PharmacoEconomics - Open. 2018;2:381–392. doi:10.1007/s41669-018-0071-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hvidberg F, Brinth M, Schouborg L, et al. The health-related quality of life for patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendergrast T, Brown A, Sunnquist M, et al. Housebound versus nonhousebound patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome. Chronic Illn. 2016;12(4):292–307. doi:10.1177/1742395316644770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke J, James S. The radicalized self: the impact on the self of the contested nature of the diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:1387–1395. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00515-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManimen S, McClellan D, Stoothoff J, et al. Effects of unsupportive social interactions, stigma, and symptoms on patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis and chronic fatigue syndrome. J Community Psychol. 2018;46(8):959–971. doi:10.1002/jcop.21984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris K, Band R, Cooper H, et al. Distress in significant others of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Br J Health Psychol. 2016;21:881–893. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling A. Measuring health: a review of quality of life measurement scales. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Action for ME.: Five year Big Survey. 2019. Available from: http://actionforme.org.uk/research-and-campaign/five-year-big-survey/ [Accessed 9th August 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Edwards CR, Thompson AR, Blair A. An ‘overwhelming illness: women’s experiences of learning to live with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis’. J Health Psychol. 2007;12(2):203–214. doi:10.1177/1359105307071747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ytre-Arne B. The social media experiences of long-term patients: illness, identity, and participation. Nordicom Review. 2016;37(1):57–70. doi:10.1515/nor-2016-0002
   Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk M, Faber M, Aarts J, et al. Using online health communities to deliver patient-centered care to people with chronic conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(6):e115. doi:10.2196/jmir.2476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian O, Nettleton S. United we stand: framing myalgic encephalomyelitis in a virtual symbolic community. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(10):1383–1394. doi:10.1177/1049732314562893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasker JN, Sogolow ED, Sharim RR. The role of an online community for people with a rare disease: content analysis of messages posted on a primary biliary cirrhosis mailing list. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e10. doi:10.2196/jmir.7.1.e10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eichhorn K. Soliciting and providing social support over the internet: an investigation of online eating disorder support groups. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2008;14(1):67–78. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01431.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loane S, D’Alessandro S. Empowered and knowledgeable health consumers: the impact of online support groups on the doctor-patient relationship. Australas Mark J. 2014;22:238–245. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2014.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Perkins V, Coulson NS, Davies EB. Using online support communities for tourette syndrome and TIC disorders: online survey of user’s experiences. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(11):e18099. doi:10.2196/18099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drentea P, Moren-Cross J. Social capital and social support on the web: the case of an internet mother site. Sociol Health Illn. 2005;27:920–943. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00464.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad P, Stults C, et al. The internet and the experience of illness. In: Bird CE, Conrad P, Fremont AM, editors. Handbook of medical sociology. 6th ed. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press; 2010. p. 179.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad P, Bandini J, Vasquez A. Illness and the internet: from private to public experience. Health. 2016;20(1):22–32. doi:10.1177/1363459315611941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin TC, Hsu JSC, Cheng HL, et al. Exploring the relationship between receiving and offering online social support: a dual social support model. Inf Manag. 2015;52(3):371–383. doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier C, Laumer S, Eckhardt A, et al. Giving too much social support: social overload on social networking sites. Eur J Inf Syst. 2015;24(5):447–464. doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck LS, Gurion B, Sheva B. Internet ethnography: online and offline. Int J Qual Methods. 2004;3(2):45–51. doi:10.1177/160940690400300204
   Google Scholar
• Kingod N, Cleal B, Wahlberg A, et al. Online peer-to-peer communities in the daily lives of people with chronic illness: a qualitative systematic review. Qual Health Res. 2017;27(1):89–99. doi:10.1177/1049732316680203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen C, Vassilev I, Kennedy A, et al. The work and relatedness of ties mediated online in supporting long-term condition self-management. Sociol Health Illn. 2020;42(3):579–595. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung J. Social interaction in online support groups: preference for online social interaction over offline social interaction. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29:1408–1414. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings J, Sproul L, Kiesler S. Beyond hearing: where the real-world and online support meet. Group Dyn. 2002;6(1):78–88. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.6.1.78
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorhea S, Hazlett D, Harrison L, et al. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85. doi:10.2196/jmir.1933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huan K, Chengalur-Smith I, Ran W. Not just for support: companionship activities in healthcare virtual support communities. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2014;34(1):561–594.
   Google Scholar
• Kummervold P, Gammon D, Bergvik S, et al. Social support in a wired world: use of online mental health forums in Norway. Nord J Psychiatry. 2002;56(1):59–65. doi:10.1080/08039480252803945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liemeister J, Schwiezer K, Leimester S, et al. Do virtual communities matter for the social support of patients? Antecedents and effects of virtual relationships in online communities. Inf Technol People. 2008;21(4):350–374. doi:10.1108/09593840810919671
   Google Scholar
• Caplan SE. Preference for online social interaction: a theory of problematic internet use and psychological well-being. Communic Res. 2003;30(6):625–648. doi:10.1177/0093650203257842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters MDJ, Godfrey C, McInerney P, et al. Scoping reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. 2020. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global.
   Google Scholar
• Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18:143. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical Appraisal Tools. Available from: https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools. [Accessed 20th June 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Collins. 2022. Internet. Available from: www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/internet.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz. 2010;53:59–68. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin E, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi:10.7326/M18-0850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, et al. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Syst Rev. 2007;6(245).
   Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Shortt S, Godwin M, et al. Models for integrating rehabilitation and primary care: a scoping study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(9):1523–1531. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.03.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brien SE, Lorenzetti DL, Lewis S, et al. Overview of a formal scoping review on health system report cards. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):2. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant M, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf Libr J. 2009;26(920):91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daudt HML, van Mossel C, Scott SJ. Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:48. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP Qualitative Checklist. 2018. Available from: https://casp-uk.b-cdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf. [Accessed 9th August 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. MMAT Mixed Methods Checklist. 2018. Available from: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/page/24607821/FrontPage. [Accessed 20th June 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Bates C. Performing the self in illness narratives. The role of evidentiality. In: Bates, Nebot, editors. Perspectives on evidentiality in Spanish: exploration across genres. John Benjamins; 2018. p. 73–106.
   Google Scholar
• Davison K, Pennebaker J, Dickerson S. Who talks? The ocial psychology of illness support groups. Am Psychol. 2000;55(2):205–217. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.2.205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian O, Grue J. Generating a social movement online community through an online discourse: the case of myalgic encephalomyelitis. J Med Humanit. 2017;38:173–189. doi:10.1007/s10912-016-9390-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray R, Turner L. Living with chronic fatigue syndrome during lockdown and a global pandemic. Fatigue: Biomed Health Behav. 2021;8(3):144–155.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez M. Sick and tired: narratives of contested illness in chronic fatigue syndrome blogs. In: Green S, Loseke D, editors. New narratives of disability: constructions, clashes, and controversies. Bingley: Emerald; 2019. p. 245–260.
   Google Scholar
• Best K, Butler S. The necessity of control for computer and internet users with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Inf Commun Soc. 2013;16(7):1042–1060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady B. 2015. Trust, empowerment, and identity online: a qualitative exploration of the use of Internet forums by individuals with long term conditions. The University of Manchester (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Brady E, Segar J, Sanders C. “I always vet things”: navigating privacy and the presentation of self on health discussion boards among individuals with long-term conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2016a;18(10):e274. doi:10.2196/jmir.6019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady E, Segar J, Sanders C. “You get to know the people and whether they’re talking sense or not”: negotiating trust on health-related forums. Soc Sci Med. 2016b;162:151–157. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy A. 2014. Exploring the online social identities of people with chronic fatigue syndrome/myaligc encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): a discourse analysis approach. University of Exeter (UK).
   Google Scholar
• Knudsen AK, Lervik LV, Harvey SB, et al. Comparison of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis with other disorders: an observational study. J R Soc Med Short Rep. 2012;3:32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tian H, Brimmer D, Lin JM, et al. Web usage data as a means of evaluating public health messaging and outreach. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4):e52. doi:10.2196/jmir.1278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray R, Day K, Tobbell J. Duvet woman versus action man: the gendered aetiology of chronic fatigue syndrome according to English newspapers. Fem Media Stud. 2019;19(2):890–905. doi:10.1080/14680777.2019.1595694
   Google Scholar
• Morehouse S, Schaible K, Williams O, et al. Impacts of online support groups on quality of life, and perceived anxiety and depression in those with ME/CFS: a survey. Fatigue: Biomed Health Behav. 2021;9(2):113–122.
   Google Scholar
• Murray R, Turner L. Using communities of practice theory to understand the crisis of identity in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME). Chronic Illn. 2021;19(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromby J. The public meanings of CFS/ME: making up people. In: Ward C, editor. Meanings of ME: interpersonal and social dimensions of chronic fatigue. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. 129-151.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd J. Internet plugged in. Accent on Living. 2000;44(4):28–28.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer G, Stratton K. Living with chronic fatigue syndrome during lockdown and a global pandemic. Fatigue: Biomed Health Behav. 2020;8(3):144–155.
   Google Scholar
• International Alliance for ME. Recognition, research and respect: an agenda for change in ME. 2018. Available from: https://www.actionforme.org.uk/uploads/images/2019/01/IAFME-recognition-research-respect-041218.pdf [Accessed 29th August 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Capelli E, Lorusso L, Ghitti, M., Venturini, L , Cusa, C, Ricevuti, G. Chronic fatigue syndrome: features of a population of patients from Northern Italy. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2015;28(1):53–59. doi:10.1177/0394632015572074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faro M, Saez-Franca N, Castro-Marrero J, et al. Gender differences in chronic fatigue syndrome. Reumatología Clínica. 2016;12(2):72–77. doi:10.1016/j.reuma.2015.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. Fourth Edition Berkshire: Open University Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bamdad S, Finaughty D, Johns S. ‘Grey areas’: ethical challenges posed by social media-enabled recruitment and online data collection in cross-border, social science research. Res Ethics. 2022;18(1):24–38. doi:10.1177/17470161211045557
   Google Scholar
• Arigo D, Pagoto S, Carter-Harris L, et al. Using social media for health research: methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery. Digital Health. 2018;4:205520761877175–15. doi:10.1177/2055207618771757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinton S, Reynolds N. The changing roles of researchers and participants in digital social media research: ethics challenges and forward directions. In: Woodfield K, editor. The ethics of online research. Leeds: Emerald; 2017. p. 53–78.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Chen C. Determining factors of participants’ attitudes toward the ethics of social media data research. Online Inf Rev. 2022;46(1):164–181. doi:10.1108/OIR-11-2020-0514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodfield K, Iphofen R. Introduction to volume 2: the ethics of online research. In: Woodfield K, editor. The ethics of online research. Leeds: Emerald; 2017. p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Colbert J, Yuan N, Agarwal P, et al. The promise of social media for health: a nationwide survey of primary care patients on usage patterns and attitudes. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:279–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison K, Pennebaker J. Virtual narratives: illness representations in online support groups. In: Petrie K, Weinman J, editors. Perceptions of health & illness. London: Harwood Academic Publishers; 1997. p. 463–486.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson V, Jason L, Hlavaty L, et al. A review and meta-anaylsis of qualitative studies on myalgic encephalomylelitis/chronic fatigue. Patient Educ Couns; 2012;86:147–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baken D, Harvey S, Bimler D, et al. Stigma in myalgic encephalomyelitis and its association with functioning. Fatigue: Biomed Health Behav. 2018;6(1):30–40. doi:10.1080/21641846.2018.1419553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg F, Leung D, Quick J. Do support groups help people with chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia? A comparison of active and inactive members. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang K, Ottenbacker A, Lucke J, et al. Measuring social support for weight loss in an internet weight loss community. J Health Commun. 2011;16(2):198–211. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.535106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree J, Haslam S, Postmes T, et al. Mental health support groups, stigma, and self-esteem: positive and negative implications of group identification. J Soc Sci. 2010;66(3):553–569.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves D, Blickem C, Vassilev I, et al. The contribution of social networks to the health and self-management of patients with long-term conditions: a longitudinal study. PLoS One. 2014;9(6). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreas A, Dhand A, Vassilev I, et al. Understanding online and offline social networks in illness management of older patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: mixed methods study using quantitative social network assessment and qualitative analysis. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(5):1.
   Google Scholar
• Barg J, McKenna K, Fitzsimons G. Can You See the Real Me? Activation and Expression of the ‘True Self’ on the internet. J Soc Issues. 2002;58(1):33–48. doi:10.1111/1540-4560.00247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban R, Barrowclough C, Emsle R, et al. Significant other behavioural responses and patient chronic fatigue symptom fluctuations in the context of daily life: an experience sampling study. Br J Health Psychol. 2015;21:499–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks B, Kanuika A, Kelliher Rabon J, et al. Social support and subjective health in fibromyalgia: self-compassion as a mediator. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2022;29:375–383. doi:10.1007/s10880-021-09832-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versaandonk J, Cenders M, Bleijenberg G, et al. The role of the partner and relationship satisfaction on treatment outcome in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychol Med. 2015;45:2345–2352. doi:10.1017/S0033291715000288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks J, Daglish J, Wearden A. Attributions, distress and behavioural responses in the significant others of people with chronic fatigue syndrome. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(10):1288–1295. doi:10.1177/1359105312464670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump L, LaChapelle D. “My Fibro Family!” A qualitative analysis of Facebook Fibromyalgia support groups’ discussion content’. Canad J Pain. 2022;6(1):95–111. doi:10.1080/24740527.2022.2078183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingod N. The tinkering m-patient: co-constructing knowledge on how to live with type 1 diabetes through Facebook searching and sharing and offline tinkering with self-care. Health. 2020;24(2):152–168. doi:10.1177/1363459318800140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian O, Robson C. “It’s incredible how much I’ve had to fight”: negotiating medical uncertainty in clinical encounters. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-Being. 2017;12(1):1392219. doi:10.1080/17482631.2017.1392219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jason L. Small wins matter in advocacy movements: giving voice to patients. Leonard Am J Community Psychol. 2011;49(3):307–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad B, Barker K. The social construction of illness: key insights and policy implications. J Health Soc Behav. 2010;51(1):S67–S79. doi:10.1177/0022146510383495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bury M. The sociology of chronic illness: a review of research and prospects. Sociol Health Illn. 1991;13(4):451–468. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.1991.tb00522.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilberg C. A troubling truth: chronic illness, participation and learning for change. The Centre for Welfare Reform. 2016. Available from: http://www.cenrteforwelfarereform.org/uplaods/attachment/509/a-troubling-truth.pdf [Accessed 19/9/23].
   Google Scholar
• Frank A. The wounded storyteller: body, illness and ethics. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead L. Toward a trajectory of identity reconstruction in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: a longitudinal qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006;43:1023–1031. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groevelt I. “It’s not all nice and fun”: narrating contested illness on YouTube and Instagram. Health. 2022;26(5):589–604. doi:10.1177/13634593211017187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein J. From activist to ‘passivist’: where is the mass movement? In: Munson P, editor. Stricken voices from the hidden epidemic. Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2000. p. 163–172.
   Google Scholar
• Khalafbeigi M, Yazdani F, Genis F, et al. Invisibility and diagnosis stigma: disabling factors for female adults with mylagic encephalomyelitis (ME/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) in a small-scale qualitative study in England. Ir J Occup Ther. 2023;51(2):52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Vya J, Muirhead N, Sing R, et al. Impacts of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) on the quality of life of people with ME/CFS and their partners and family members: an online cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open. 2022;12:e058128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brittain E, Muirhead N, Finlay A, et al. Myalgic encephaloymyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS): major impact on lives of both patients and family members. 2021;57:43.
   Google Scholar
• Yao T, Zheng Q, Fan X. The impact of online social support on patients’ quality of life and the moderating role of social exclusion. J Serv Res. 2015;18(3):369–383. doi:10.1177/1094670515583271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks J, King N, Wearden A. Couple’s experiences of interacting with outside others in chronic fatigue syndrome: a qualitative study. Chronic Illn. 2014;10(1):5–17. doi:10.1177/1742395312474478
   PubMedGoogle Scholar