Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion/Recovery (OFER) scale among healthcare professionals

References

• Hockey GRJ. A motivational control theory of cognitive fatigue. Cognitive fatigue: multidisciplinary perspectives on current research and future applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2011; p. 167–187.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham TR, Guerin RJ, Ferguson J, et al. Work-related fatigue: a hazard for workers experiencing disproportionate occupational risks. Am J Ind Med. 2022;65:913–925. doi:10.1002/ajim.23325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Techera U, Hallowell M, Stambaugh N, et al. Causes and consequences of occupational fatigue: meta-analysis and systems model. J Occup Environ Med. 2016;58:961–973. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Stolk C, Staetsky L, Hassan E, et al. Management of psychosocial risks at work. Luxemburg: Eu-Osha; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sagherian K, Geiger-Brown J, Rogers VE, et al. Fatigue and risk of sickness absence in the working population: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019;45:333–345. doi:10.5271/sjweh.3819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Safety Council (NSC). Fatigue—you’re more than just tired; 2020. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nsc.org/work-safety/safety-topics/fatigue.
   Google Scholar
• Ricci JA, Chee E, Lorandeau AL, et al. Fatigue in the U.S. workforce: prevalence and implications for lost productive work time. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49:1–10. doi:10.1097/01.jom.0000249782.60321.2a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips RO. A review of definitions of fatigue – and a step towards a whole definition. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol Behav. 2015;29:48–56. doi:10.1016/j.trf.2015.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Work and fatigue [Internet]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/fatigue/default.html#:~:text=Fatigue%20has%20been%20described%20as,work%20and%20extended%20work%20hours.
   Google Scholar
• Yung M, Du B, Gruber J, et al. Fatigue measures and risk assessment tools for first responder fatigue risk management: a scoping review with considerations of the multidimensionality of fatigue. Saf Sci. 2022;154:105839. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong TJ, Buckle P, Fine LJ, et al. A conceptual model for work-related neck and upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993: 73–84. doi:10.5271/sjweh.1494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins S. Commentary occupational factors, fatigue, and cardiovascular disease. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2009: 28–31. doi:10.1097/01823246-200920020-00005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramey S, MacQuarrie A, Cochrane A, et al. Drowsy and dangerous? Fatigue in paramedics: an overview. Irish J Paramed. 2019;4(1). doi:10.32378/ijp.v4i1.175
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly EA, Bradford P, Davis M, et al. What influences safety in paramedicine? Understanding the impact of stress and fatigue on safety outcomes. J Am Coll Emerg Phys Open. 2020;1:460–473. doi:10.1002/emp2.12123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aaronson LS, Pallikkathayil L, Crighton F. A qualitative investigation of fatigue among healthy working adults. West J Nurs Res. 2003;25:419–433. doi:10.1177/0193945903025004007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen BS. Mood disorders and allostatic load. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54:200–207. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(03)00177-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwen B, Lasley EN. Allostatic load: when protection gives way to damage. Adv Mind Body Med. 2003;19:28–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McEwen BS, Stellar E. Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:2093–2101. doi:10.1001/archinte.1993.00410180039004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung M, Du B, Gruber J, et al. Developing a Canadian fatigue risk management standard for first responders: defining the scope. Saf Sci. 2021;134:105044. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawron VJ. Overview of self-reported measures of fatigue. Int J Aviat Psychol. 2016;26:120–131. doi:10.1080/10508414.2017.1329627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aghdam SR, Alizadeh SS, Rasoulzadeh Y, et al. Fatigue assessment scales: a comprehensive literature review. Arch Hyg Sci. 2019;8(3):145–153.
   Google Scholar
• Sagherian K, Geiger Brown J. In-depth review of five fatigue measures in shift workers. Fatigue: biomedicine. Health Behav. 2016;4:24–38.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson C. The chalder fatigue scale (CFQ 11). Occup Med (Lond). 2015;65:86. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqu168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Veldhoven M, Broersen S. Measurement quality and validity of the “need for recovery scale”. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:i3–i9. doi:10.1136/oem.60.suppl_1.i3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beurskens AJ, Bültmann U, Kant I, et al. Fatigue among working people: validity of a questionnaire measure. Occup Environ Med. 2000;57:353–357. doi:10.1136/oem.57.5.353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Hickie IB, Wilson AJ, et al. Screening for prolonged fatigue syndromes: validation of the SOFA scale. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2000;35:471–479. doi:10.1007/s001270050266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michielsen HJ, De Vries J, Van Heck GL, et al. Examination of the dimensionality of fatigue. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2004;20:39–48. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.20.1.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahsberg E. Dimensions of fatigue in different working populations. Scand J Psychol. 2000;41:231–241. doi:10.1111/1467-9450.00192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winwood PC, Lushington K, Winefield AH. Further development and validation of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery (OFER) scale. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:381–389. doi:10.1097/01.jom.0000194164.14081.06
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winwood PC, Winefield AH, Dawson D, et al. Development and validation of a scale to measure work-related fatigue and recovery: the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion/Recovery Scale (OFER). J Occup Environ Med. 2005;47:594–606. doi:10.1097/01.jom.0000161740.71049.c4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos J, Ramos C, Silva A, et al. Psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the occupational fatigue exhaustion/recovery (OFER) scale among industrial shift workers. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2022;77:554–560. doi:10.1080/19338244.2021.1967842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min A, Min H, Hong HC. Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery Scale in a nurse population. Res Nurs Health. 2019;42:358–368. doi:10.1002/nur.21980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J-B, Zhou C-F, Huang J, et al. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion/Recovery Scale: a test in a nursing population. J Nurs Res. 2018;26(3):191–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamaguchi S, Sato M, Sumi N, et al. Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Occupational Fatigue Exhaustion Recovery Scale among shift-work nurses. J Occup Health. 2022;64. doi:10.1002/1348-9585.12325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadpour F, Keshavarzi S, Choobineh A, et al. Validity and reliability of Occupational Fatigue/Exhaustion Recovery scale (OFER-15) among Iranian working population. Iran Occup Health. 2014;11:75–83.
   Google Scholar
• Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E-surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:e34. doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310:2191–2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klotz AC, Swider BW, Kwon SH. Back-translation practices in organizational research: avoiding loss in translation. J Appl Psychol. 2023;108:699–727. doi:10.1037/apl0001050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1:185–216. doi:10.1177/135910457000100301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michielsen HJ, De Vries J, Van Heck GL. Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure: the fatigue assessment scale. J Psychosom Res. 2003;54:345–352. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00392-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks C, Drent M, Elfferich M, et al. The fatigue assessment scale: quality and availability in sarcoidosis and other diseases. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2018;24. doi:10.1097/MCP.0000000000000496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Modeling. 2009;16:397–438. doi:10.1080/10705510903008204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén B, Muthén L. Mplus. In: Handbook of item response theory. Chapman and Hall; 2017. p. 507–518.
   Google Scholar
• Morin A, Asparouhov T. Estimation of a hierarchical exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) using ESEM-within-CFA. Montreal, QC: Substantive Methodological Synergy Research Laboratory; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Morin AJS, Parker PD, et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85–110. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald RP. The theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis,: canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1970;23:1–21. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1970.tb00432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Meredith W. Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika. 1993;58:525–543. doi:10.1007/BF02294825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Eq Model: Multidiscip J. 1999;6:1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C-Y. Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. Los Angeles: University of California; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Asparouhov T, Muthen B. Robust chi square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics. [Internet]; 2006. Available from: http:// www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/webnote10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chen FF. Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Struct Eq Model: Multidiscip J. 2007;14:464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Eq Model: Multidiscip J. 2002;9:233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Lüdtke O, Nagengast B, et al. Why item parcels are (almost) never appropriate: two wrongs do not make a right–camouflaging misspecification with item parcels in CFA models. Psychol Methods. 2013;18:257–284. doi:10.1037/a0032773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar