Economic production quantity models for imperfect items with pollution costs

References

• Benjaafar, S., Li, Y., & Daskin, M. (2013). Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains: Insights from simple models. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 10(1), 99–116. doi: 10.1109/TASE.2012.2203304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonney, M., & Jaber, M. Y. (2011). Environmentally responsible inventory models: Non-classical models for a non-classical era. International Journal of Production Economics, 133, 43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Benjaafar, S., & Elomri, A. (2013). The carbon-constrained EOQ. Operations Research Letters, 41, 172–179. doi: 10.1016/j.orl.2012.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, H., Harten, T., Springer, J., Randall, P., Curran, M. A., & Stone, K. (1992). Industrial pollution prevention – A critical review. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 42(5), 618–656. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1992.10467016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, S. K., & Cardenas-Barron, L. E. (2002). Note on: Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality – A practical approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 77, 85–87. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(01)00203-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, S. K., Huang, C.-K., & Chen, K.-C. (2003). A simple integrated production policy of an imperfect item for vendor and buyer. Production Planning & Control: The Management of Operations, 14(7), 596–602. doi: 10.1080/09537280310001626188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2006). IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Retrieved April 16, 2013 from http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl
   Google Scholar
• Katz, R. S. (2012). Environmental pollution: Corporate crime and cancer mortality. Contemporary Justice Review: Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice, 15(1), 97–125. doi: 10.1080/10282580.2011.653523
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M., Jaber, M. Y., Guiffrida, A. L., & Zolfaghari, S. (2011). A review of the extensions of a modified EOQ model for imperfect quality items. International Journal of Production Economics, 132, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Letmathe, P., & Balakrishnan, N. (2005). Environmental considerations on the optimal product mix. European Journal of Operational Research, 167, 398–412. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddaha, B., & Jaber, M. Y. (2008). Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: Revisited. International Journal of Production Economics, 112, 808–815. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molina, M. J., & Molina, L. T. (2004). Megacities and atmospheric pollution. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 54(6), 644–680. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2004.10470936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, A., & Goswami, A. (2014). Economic production quantity (EPQ) model for three type imperfect items with rework and learning in setup. International Journal of Optimization & Control: Theories & Applications. doi: 10.11121/ijocta.01.2014.00170
   Google Scholar
• Papachristos, S., & Konstantaras, I. (2006). Economic ordering quantity models for items with imperfect quality. International Journal of Production Economics, 100, 148–154. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porteus, E. L. (1986). Optimal lot sizing, process quality improvement and setup cost reduction. Operations Research, 34, 137–144. doi: 10.1287/opre.34.1.137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, M. J., & Lee, H. L. (1986). Economic production cycles with imperfect production processes. IIE Transactions, 18, 48–55. doi: 10.1080/07408178608975329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salameh, M. K., & Jaber, M. Y. (2000). Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality. International Journal of Production Economics, 64, 59–64. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00044-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sana, S. S. (2012). Preventive maintenance and optimal buffer inventory for products sold with warranty in an imperfect production system. International Journal of Production Research, 50(23), 6763–6774. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.623838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsakovski, S. L., Simeonova, P. A., & Simeonov, V. D. (2012) Statistical modeling of air pollution. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A: Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering, 47(1), 6763–6774. doi: 10.1080/10934529.2012.629576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsou, J. C., Hejazi, S. R., & Barzoki, M. R. (2012). Economic production quantity model for items with continuous quality characteristic, rework and reject. International Journal of Systems Science, 43(12), 2261–2267. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2011.569769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Veen, J. A., & Venugopal, V. (2014). Economic and environmental performance of the firm: Synergy or trade-off? Insights from the EOQ model. In T.- M. Choi (Ed.), Handbook of EOQ inventory problems (pp. 121–137). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H. F., & Gupta, M. S. (2011) Green Supply Chain Management: Product Life Cycle Approach. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P.-C., Lin, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-C., & Chen, J.-M. (2009). An optimal production lot-sizing problem for an imperfect process with imperfect maintenance and inspection time length. International Journal of Systems Science, 40(10), 1051–1061. doi: 10.1080/00207720902974645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wee, H. M., Yu, J., & Chen, M. C. (2007). Optimal inventory model for items with imperfect quality and shortage backordering. Omega, 35, 7–11. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., & Gerchak, Y. (1990). Joint lot sizing and inspection policy in an EOQ model with random yield. IIE Transactions, 22(1), 41–47. doi: 10.1080/07408179008964156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar