How does the supervision stringency affect systemic risk based on the differential dynamic model?

References

• Alberto, B., Davide, L. T., Danilo, L., & Simone, M. (2019). Financial contagion and economic development: An epidemiological approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 162, 211–228. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2018.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, J. R., Caprio JrG., & Levine, R. (2004). Bank regulation and supervision: What works best? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13, 205–248. doi: 10.1016/j.jfi.2003.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouheni, F. B. (2014). Banking regulation and supervision: Can it enhance stability in Europe? Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 6(3), 244–269. doi: 10.1108/JFEP-11-2013-0059
   Google Scholar
• Buch, C. M., & DeLong, G. (2008). Do weak supervisory systems encourage bank risk-taking? Journal of Financial Stability, 4, 23–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jfs.2007.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, H. H., & Zhu, J. M. (2012). Research on banking crisis contagion dynamics based on the complex network of system engineering. Systems Engineering Procedia, 5, 156–161. doi: 10.1016/j.sepro.2012.04.025
   Google Scholar
• Demiris, N., Kypraios, T., & Smith, L. V. (2013). On the epidemic of financial crises. St. Louis: Centre for Financial Analysis and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Derbali, A., & Hallara, S. (2016). Measuring systemic risk of Greek banks: New approach by using the epidemic model “SEIR”. Cogent Business & Management, 3, 115–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamze, O. D., & Pelin, D. (2019). Bank risk-taking in developed countries: The influence of market power and bank regulations. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 59, 202–217. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2018.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garas, A., Argyrakis, P., Rozenblat, C., Tomassini, M., & Havlin, S. (2010). Worldwide spreading of economic crisis. New Journal of Physics, 12, 30–43. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/11/113043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hai, J., Jinyi, Z., & Chen, S. (2019). How does capital buffer affect bank risk-taking? New evidence from China using quantile regression. China Economic Review, 101300.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, F. (2019). Ownership, regulation and bank risk-taking: Evidence from the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), 23–43. doi: 10.1108/CG-07-2017-0135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, O., & Zingales, L. (2011). A new capital regulation for large financial institutions. American Law and Economics Review, 13, 453–490. doi: 10.1093/aler/ahr001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandrac, J., & Schlusche, B. (2017). The effect of bank supervision on risk taking: Evidence from a natural experiment. Washington: Social Science Electronic.
   Google Scholar
• Kashyap, A., Rajan, R., & Stein, J. (2008). Rethinking Capital regulation. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Symposium on Maintaining Stability in a Changing Financial System, 431–471.
   Google Scholar
• Kermack, W. O., & McKendrick, A. G. (1927). A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 115, 700–721. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1927.0118
   Google Scholar
• Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 259–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Y. Y., Zhuang, X. T., & Li, L. X. (2013). SIR model and simulation of crisis propagation in stock market. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 16, 81–93. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Mi, C. M., Liu, S. F., & Mi, C. J. (2007). Study on the diffusion of enterprise group internal distress based on SEIRS model. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 15, 725–728. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Morshedur, M., Ali, A., & Mouri, D. (2018). Relationship between risk-taking, capital regulation and bank performance: Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 11(22), 29–57. doi: 10.17015/ejbe.2018.022.02
   Google Scholar
• Ningyu, Q., Kezhong, Z., Changjun, Z., & Badar, A. (2019). How do regulatory ability and bank competition affect the adoption of explicit deposit insurance scheme and banks’ risk-taking behavior? International Review of Economics & Finance, 61, 69–90. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2019.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• People’s bank of China Nanning Branch Research Group. (2017). Research on risk cross-infection mechanism and prevention and control strategies in financial market based on SIRS infectious disease model. South China Finance, 2, 3–12. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Repullo, R. (2004). Capital requirements, market power, and risk-taking in banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13, 156–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jfi.2003.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toivanen, M. (2013). Contagion in the interbank network: An epidemiological approach. Helsinki: Bank of Finland Research.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Jiang, H. (2018). Capital regulatory pressure, charter value and bank risk-taking: Empirical evidence for China. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 26(1), 170–186. doi: 10.1108/JFRC-01-2017-0002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, A., & Liu, B. (2019). How Government regulation of interbank financing Impacts risk for Chinese commercial banks(In press). Journal of Asian Economics. doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2019.101148.
   Google Scholar