References
- Appelbaum, M., Cooper, H., Kline, R. B., Mayo-Wilson, E., Nezu, A. M., & Rao, S. M. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA publications and communications board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 3–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000191
- Association for Psychological Science. (2020). 2020 Submission Guidelines. https://www.psychologicalscience.org/publications/psychological_science/ps-submissions
- Burlig, F. (2018). Improving transparency in observational social science research: A pre-analysis plan approach. Economics Letters, 168, 56–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.03.036
- Carey, M. P., Coury-Doniger, P., Senn, T. E., Vanable, P. A., & Urban, M. A. (2008). Improving HIV rapid testing rates among STD clinic patients: A randomized controlled trial. Health Psychology, 27(6), 833.
- Center for Open Science. Open Science Badges. (2020). https://www.cos.io/our-services/badges
- Chambers, C. (2019). What’s next for registered reports? Nature, 573, 187–189.
- Donenberg, G., Emerson, E., & Kendall, A. D. (2018). HIV-risk reduction intervention for juvenile offenders on probation: The PHAT life group randomized controlled trial. Health Psychology, 37(4), 364.
- Freedland, K. E. (2019). The behavioral medicine research council: Its origins, mission, and methods. Health Psychology, 38(4), 277–289. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000731
- Hagger, M. S. (2019). Embracing Open Science and transparency in Health psychology. Health Psychology Review, 13(2), 131–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2019.1605614
- Jago, R., & van der Ploeg, H. (2018). Open science for nutrition and physical activity research: A new challenge and lots of opportunities for IJBNPA. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 15(1), 105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0739-4
- Kaplan, R. M., & Irvin, V. L. (2015). Likelihood of null effects of large NHLBI clinical trials has increased over time. PloS one, 10(8), e0132382.
- McVay, M. A., & Conroy, D. E. (2019). Transparency and openness in behavioral medicine research. Translational Behavioral Medicine. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz154
- Munafò, M. R. (2017). Improving the efficiency of grant and journal peer review: Registered reports funding. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 19(7), 773–773. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx081
- National Academies of Sciences, E. (2018). Open Science by Design: Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/25116
- Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., … Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
- Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114
- Nosek, B. A., & Lindsay, D. S. (2018). Preregistration becoming the norm in psychological science. APS Observer, 31(3).
- PLOS Medicine Editors. (2014). Observational studies: Getting clear about transparency. PLOS Medicine, 11(8), e1001711. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001711
- Riehm, K. E., Azar, M., & Thombs, B. D. (2015). Transparency of outcome reporting and trial registration of randomized controlled trials in top psychosomatic and behavioral health journals: A 5-year follow-up. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 79(1), 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.04.010
- Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group. (2010). CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ, 340(mar23 1), c332–c332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c332
- Sharapova, S. R., Singh, T., Agaku, I. T., Kennedy, S. M., & King, B. A. (2018). Patterns of e-cigarette use frequency—National adult Tobacco survey, 2012–2014. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 54(2), 284–288.
- Shrout, P. E., & Rodgers, J. L. (2018). Psychology, science, and knowledge construction: Broadening Perspectives from the replication crisis. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 487–510. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845
- Simonsohn, U., Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2015). Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on All reasonable Specifications. SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2694998
- Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016). Increasing transparency through a multiverse analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(5), 702–712. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616658637
- Szollosi, A., Kellen, D., Navarro, D. J., Shiffrin, R., van Rooij, I., Van Zandt, T., & Donkin, C. (2019). Is preregistration worthwhile? Trends in Cognitive Science, 24(2), 94–95.
- Tan, A. C., Jiang, I., Askie, L., Hunter, K., Simes, R. J., & Seidler, A. L. (2019). Prevalence of trial registration varies by study characteristics and risk of bias. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 113, 64–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.009
- von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2008). The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(4), 344–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008
- Wagenmakers, E.-J., Wetzels, R., Borsboom, D., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Kievit, R. (2012). An agenda for purely confirmatory research. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 632–638. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078
- Zhang, Y., Hedo, R., Rivera, A., Rull, R., Richardson, S., & Tu, X. M. (2019). Post hoc power analysis: Is it an informative and meaningful analysis? General Psychiatry, 32(4), doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2019-100069
- Zhao, G., Okoro, C. A., Li, J., & Town, M. (2018). Health insurance status and clinical cancer screenings among US adults. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 54(1), e11–e19.