The regression trap: why regression analyses are not suitable for selecting determinants to target in behavior change interventions

References

• Armitage, C. J. (2005). Can the theory of planned behavior predict the maintenance of physical activity? Health Psychology, 24(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, C. J., Norman, P., & Conner, M. (2002). Can the theory of planned behaviour mediate the effects of age, gender and multidimensional health locus of control? British Journal of Health Psychology, 7(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910702760213698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8(2), 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartholomew Eldredge, L. K., Markham, C. M., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fernández, M. E., Kok, G., & Parcel, G. S. (2016). Planning health promotion programs: An intervention mapping approach (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Beaujean, D. J. M. A., Gassner, F., Wong, A., Van Steenbergen, J. E., Crutzen, R., & Ruwaard, D. (2013). Determinants and protective behaviours regarding tick bites among school children in The Netherlands: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1148. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, N. (2021). Graphical illustration of two-predictor suppression effects, v0.05. https://steamtraen.shinyapps.io/suppressiongraphics/
   Google Scholar
• Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: A new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Self-Determination Theory. (2021). Self-regulation questionnaires. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/self-regulation-questionnaires/
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, M. Z. I., & Turin, T. C. (2020). Variable selection strategies and its importance in clinical prediction modelling. Family Medicine and Community Health, 8(1), e000262. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2019-000262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutzen, R., Peters, G.-J. Y., & Noijen, J. (2017). Using confidence interval-based estimation of relevance to select social-cognitive determinants for behaviour change interventions. Frontiers in Public Health, 5, 165. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, R., Campbell, R., Hildon, Z., Hobbs, L., & Michie, S. (2015). Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: A scoping review. Health Psychology Review, 9(3), 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.941722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denis, D. J. (2020). Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistics using R: Quantitative tools for data analysis and data science. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1981). On construct validity: A critique of Miniard and Cohen’s paper. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17(3), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(81)90032-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hagger, M. S., Moyers, S., McAnally, K., & McKinley, L. E. (2020). Known knowns and known unknowns on behavior change interventions and mechanisms of action. Health Psychology Review, 14(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1719184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, J., Hastings, J., West, R., Lefevre, C. E., Direito, A., Bohlen, L. C., Godinho, C., Anderson, N., Zink, S., Groarke, H., & Michie, S. (2020). An ontology-based modelling system (OBMS) for representing behaviour change theories applied to 76 theories. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 177. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16121.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamilton, K., Van Dongen, A., & Hagger, M. S. (2020). An extended theory of planned behavior for parent-for-child health behaviors: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 39(10), 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino, M. T. J., Knittle, K., Noone, C., Hasselman, F., & Hankonen, N. (2021). Studying behaviour change mechanisms under complexity. Behavioral Sciences, 11(5), 77. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11050077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. W. (2000). A heuristic method for estimating the relative weight of predictor variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 35(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3501_1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, T. Z. (2019). Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McEachan, R., Taylor, N., Harrison, R., Lawton, R., Gardner, P., & Conner, M. (2016). Meta-analysis of the reasoned action approach (RAA) to understanding health behaviors. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 50(4), 592–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9798-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miniard, P. W., & Cohen, J. B. (1979). Isolating attitudinal and normative influences in behavioral intention models. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377901600115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbell, S., Blair, C., Sherlock, K., & Conner, M. (2001). The theory of planned behavior and ecstasy use: Roles for habit and perceived control over taking versus obtaining substances. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb02480.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orben, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Crud (re)defined. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters, G.-J. Y. (2021). Behaviorchange: Tools for behavior change researchers and professionals. https://r-packages.gitlab.io/behaviorchange/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G.-J. Y., & Crutzen, R. (2017). Pragmatic nihilism: How a theory of nothing can help health psychology progress. Health Psychology Review, 11(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1284015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G.-J. Y., & Crutzen, R. (2018). Establishing determinant importance using CIBER: An introduction and tutorial. The European Health Psychologist, 20(3), 485–495.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G.-J. Y., & Crutzen, R. (2021). Knowing how effective an intervention, treatment, or manipulation is and increasing replication rates: Accuracy in parameter estimation as a partial solution to the replication crisis. Psychology & Health, 36(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1757098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, J. M., Hünermund, P., Arslan, R. C., & Elson, M. (2022). That’s a lot to process! Pitfalls of popular path models. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 5(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221095827
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, J. A. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21(4), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v21n04_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiter, R. A. C., & Crutzen, R. (2020). Core processes: How to use evidence, theories and research in planning behavior change interventions. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skivington, K., Matthews, L., Simpson, S. A., Craig, P., Baird, J., Blazeby, J. M., Boyd, K. A., Craig, N., French, D. P., McIntosh, E., Petticrew, M., Rycroft-Malone, J., White, M., & Moore, L. (2021). A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of medical research council guidance. BMJ, 374, 2061. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, S. (1998). Predicting and explaining intentions and behavior: How well are we doing? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1317–1338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01679.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Hoor, G. A., Ruiter, R. A. C., Van Bergen, J. E. A. M., Hoebe, C. J. P. A., Houben, K., & Kok, G. (2013). Non-participation in chlamydia screening in The Netherlands: Determinants associated with young people’s intention to participate in chlamydia screening. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1091. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1091
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vrabel, J. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2020). Conscious versus unconscious determinants of behavior. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 855–858). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1124
   Google Scholar
• Westreich, D., & Greenland, S. (2013). The table 2 fallacy: Presenting and interpreting confounder and modifier coefficients. American Journal of Epidemiology, 177(4), 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. M., Rhodes, R. E., & Conner, M. T. (2019). Conceptualizing and intervening on affective determinants of health behaviour. Psychology & Health, 34(11), 1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1675659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar