How do young women approaching screening age interpret the NHS cervical screening leaflet? A mixed methods study of identifying interpretation difficulties, barriers, facilitators, and leaflet interpretation, engagement and future screening behaviour

References

• 2011 Census Programme. (2009a). Final recommended questions for the 2011 census in England and Wales: Ethnic group. https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011census/howourcensusworks/howweplannedthe2011census/questionnairedevelopment/finalisingthe2011questionnaire
   Google Scholar
• 2011 Census Programme. (2009b). Final recommended questions for the 2011 Census in England and Wales: religion. https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/2011census/howourcensusworks/howweplannedthe2011census/questionnairedevelopment/finalisingthe2011questionnaire
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. (2006). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=0574b20bd58130dd5a961f1a2db10fd1fcbae95d
   Google Scholar
• Audina, W., Elfarianti, B., Daniati, L., Marpaung, M. R., Yulanda, E. S., Siahaan, E. Y., … Fasrini, U. U.. (2019). Health promotion intervention for increasing cervical cancer awareness screening: A systematic review. Health Education, 6(12), 294–299.
   Google Scholar
• Bol, N., Smit, E. S., & Lustria, M. L. (2020, September). Tailored health communication: Opportunities and challenges in the digital era. Digital health, 6, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620958913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006, January 1). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brust-Renck, P. G., Reyna, V. F., Wilhelms, E. A., Wolfe, C. R., Widmer, C. L., Cedillos-Whynott, E. M., & Morant, A. K. (2017, August). Active engagement in a web-based tutorial to prevent obesity grounded in Fuzzy-Trace Theory predicts higher knowledge and gist comprehension. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1386–1398. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0794-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1984, January). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in consumer research, 11(1), 673–675.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. E., Gray, A. M., Watson, J., Jackson, C., Moseley, C., Cruickshank, M. E., Kitchener, H. C., & Rivero-Arias, O. (2020, February). Preferences for interventions designed to increase cervical screening uptake in non-attending young women: How findings from a discrete choice experiment compare with observed behaviours in a trial. Health Expectations, 23(1), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancer Research UK. (2020). Cervical cancer progress falters as screening uptake hits record lows. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-us/cancer-news/press-release/2020-01-22-cervical-cancer-progress-falters-as-screening-uptake-hits-record-lows
   Google Scholar
• Cane, J., O’Connor, D., & Michie, S. (2012, December). Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Science, 7(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorley, A. J., Hirst, Y., Vrinten, C., von Wagner, C., Wardle, J., & Waller, J. (2018, June). Public understanding of the purpose of cancer screening: A population-based survey. Journal of Medical Screening, 25(2), 64–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141317699440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chorley, A. J., Marlow, L. A., Forster, A. S., Haddrell, J. B., & Waller, J. (2017, February). Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. Psycho-oncology, 26(2), 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couch, B. A., Hubbard, J. K., & Brassil, C. E. (2018, June 1). Multiple–true–false questions reveal the limits of the multiple–choice format for detecting students with incomplete understandings. BioScience, 68(6), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain-Thoreson, C., Lippman, M. Z., & McClendon-Magnuson, D. (1997, December). Windows on comprehension: Reading comprehension processes as revealed by two think-aloud procedures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 579. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bruin, W. B., Downs, J. S., Fischhoff, B., & Palmgren, C. (2007, July 20). Development and evaluation of an HIV/AIDS knowledge measure for adolescents focusing on misconceptions. Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention in Children & Youth, 8(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1300/J499v08n01_03
   Google Scholar
• de Bruin, W. B., & Fischhoff, B. (2000, June 1). The effect of question format on measured HIV/AIDS knowledge: Detention center teens, high school students, and adults. AIDS Education and Prevention, 12(3), 187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos, A., Sarstedt, M., Fuchs, C., Wilczynski, P., & Kaiser, S. (2012, May). Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: A predictive validity perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 434–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0300-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, E., Waller, J., Duffy, S. W., & Wardle, J. (2016, June). Socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical screening coverage in England: Are we closing the gap? Journal of Medical Screening, 23(2), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141315600192
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egawa-Takata, T., Ueda, Y., Morimoto, A., Tanaka, Y., Yagi, A., Terai, Y., Ohmichi, M., Ichimura, T., Sumi, T., Murata, H., & Okada, H. (2018, March 5). Motivating mothers to recommend their 20-year-old daughters receive cervical cancer screening: A randomized study. Journal of Epidemiology, 28(3), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20160155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egawa-Takata, T., Ueda, Y., Tanaka, Y., Morimoto, A., Kubota, S., Yagi, A., Terai, Y., Ohmichi, M., Ichimura, T., Sumi, T., & Murata, H. (2016, October). Mothers’ attitudes in Japan regarding cervical cancer screening correlates with intention to recommend cervical cancer screening for daughters. International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21(5), 962–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-0970-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A.. (1984). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: Bradford books/MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falcaro, M., Castañon, A., Ndlela, B., Checchi, M., Soldan, K., Lopez-Bernal, J., Elliss-Brookes, L., & Sasieni, P. (2021, December 4). The effects of the national HPV vaccination programme in England, UK, on cervical cancer and grade 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia incidence: A register-based observational study. The Lancet, 398(10316), 2084–2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02178-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J. J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwistle, V., Eccles, M. P., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2010, December 1). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and health, 25(10), 1229–1245.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2017, June). Designing visual aids that promote risk literacy: A systematic review of health research and evidence-based design heuristics. Human Factors, 59(4), 582–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817690634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, B., de Bruijn, G. J., & Lally, P. (2012, September). Habit, identity, and repetitive action: A prospective study of binge-drinking in UK students. British Journal of Health Psychology, 17(3), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02056.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanouni, A., Renzi, C., & Waller, J. (2017, December). A cross-sectional survey assessing factors associated with Reading cancer screening information: Previous screening behaviour, demographics and decision-making style. BMC Public Health, 17(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4224-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Edwards, A. (2003, September 25). Simple tools for understanding risks: From innumeracy to insight. BMJ, 327 (7417):741–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurmankin, A. D., Baron, J., & Armstrong, K. (2004, June). The effect of numerical statements of risk on trust and comfort with hypothetical physician risk communication. Medical Decision Making, 24(3), 265–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X04265482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, L., Clements, A., Damery, S., Wilkinson, C., Austoker, J., & Group, S. W. (2011, March). A false sense of security’? Understanding the role of the HPV vaccine on future cervical screening behaviour: A qualitative study of UK parents and girls of vaccination age. Journal of Medical Screening, 18(1), 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1258/jms.2011.010148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huf, S. (2018). The use of behavioural sciences in targeted health messages to improve the participation in cervical and breast screening programmes. Diss. Imperial College London.
   Google Scholar
• Huf, S., Kerrison, R. S., King, D., Chadborn, T., Richmond, A., Cunningham, D., Friedman, E., Shukla, H., Tseng, F. M., Judah, G., & Darzi, A. (2020, October 1). Behavioral economics informed message content in text message reminders to improve cervical screening participation: Two pragmatic randomized controlled trials. Preventive Medicine, 139, 106170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, S. C., Harris, A. J., & Lark, R. M. (2019, May 4). When unlikely outcomes occur: The role of communication format in maintaining communicator credibility. Journal of Risk Research, 22(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1440415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, C. J., Bottsford-Miller, N. A., & Thompson, S. J. (2006, August). Using the think aloud method (cognitive labs) to evaluate test design for students with disabilities and English language learners. Technical Report 44. National Center on Educational Outcomes, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust. (2017). Embarrassment preventing young women from attending a test that could save their life. https://www.jostrust.org.uk/node/573478
   Google Scholar
• Jo’s Cervical Cancer Trust. (2018). Body shame responsible for young women not attending smear tests. https://www.jostrust.org.uk/node/1073042
   Google Scholar
• Jo's Cervical Cancer Trust. (2019). Smear test fears causing hidden health crisis for Millennials. https://www.jostrust.org.uk/node/1076499
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, S., Martin, S., Kuhn, I., Cowan, A., Brayne, C., & Lafortune, L. (2016, January 27). Barriers and facilitators to the uptake and maintenance of healthy behaviours by people at mid-life: A rapid systematic review. PLoS One, 11(1), e0145074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchener, H., Gittins, M., Cruickshank, M., Moseley, C., Fletcher, S., Albrow, R., Gray, A., Brabin, L., Torgerson, D., Crosbie, E. J., & Sargent, A. (2018, June). A cluster randomized trial of strategies to increase uptake amongst young women invited for their first cervical screen: The STRATEGIC trial. Journal of Medical Screening, 25(2), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141317696518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchener, H. C., Gittins, M., Rivero-Arias, O., Tsiachristas, A., Cruickshank, M., Gray, A., … Roberts, C. (2016, September 30). A cluster randomised trial of strategies to increase cervical screening uptake at first invitation (STRATEGIC). Health Technology Assessment, 20(68), 1–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, L. C., Wardle, J., & von Wagner, C. (2014, April 1). Limited health literacy is a barrier to colorectal cancer screening in England: Evidence from the English longitudinal study of ageing. Preventive Medicine, 61, 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, M. W., Strecher, V. J., & Glassman, B. (1999, December). One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21(4), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02895958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, R., Pesola, F., Castañón, A., & Sasieni, P. (2016, October). Impact of cervical screening on cervical cancer mortality: Estimation using stage-specific results from a nested case–control study. British Journal of Cancer, 115(9), 1140–1146. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy, R., Sasieni, P. D., Mathews, C., Wiggins, C. L., Robertson, M., McDonald, Y. J., Goldberg, D. W., Scarinci, I. C., Cuzick, J., & Wheeler, C. M. (2020, August 1). New Mexico HPV Pap Registry Steering Committee. Impact of screening on cervical cancer incidence: A population-based case–control study in the United States. International Journal of Cancer, 147(3), 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucero, K. S., & Chen, P. (2020, January 1). What do reinforcement and confidence have to do with it? A systematic pathway analysis of knowledge, competence, confidence, and intention to change. Journal of European CME, 9(1), 1834759.
   Google Scholar
• Marlow, L., Forster, A. S., McBride, E., Rockliffe, L., Kitchener, H., & Waller, J. (2020, December 1). Information needs among women taking part in primary HPV screening in England: A content analysis. BMJ Open, 10(12), e044630. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow, L. A., Waller, J., & Wardle, J. (2015, October 1). Barriers to cervical cancer screening among ethnic minority women: A qualitative study. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 41(4), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2014-101082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesher, D., Cuschieri, K., Hibbitts, S., Jamison, J., Sargent, A., Pollock, K. G., Powell, N., Wilson, R., McCall, F., Fiander, A., & Soldan, K. (2015, February 1). Type-specific HPV prevalence in invasive cervical cancer in the UK prior to national HPV immunisation programme: Baseline for monitoring the effects of immunisation. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 68(2), 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, S., Richardson, M., Johnston, M., Abraham, C., Francis, J., Hardeman, W., Eccles, M. P., Cane, J., & Wood, C. E. (2013, August 1). The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Readership Survey. (2021). Social grade. http://www.nrs.co.uk/nrs-print/lifestyle-and-classification-data/social-grade/
   Google Scholar
• NHS. (2019). Cervical Screening Programme, England - 2018-19. https://files.digital.nhs.uk/56/6FF6AB/nhs-cerv-scre-prog-eng-2018-19-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NHS. (2021). Cervical screening. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cervical-screening/
   Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133(4), 673. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for Health Improvement and Disparities. (2023). Public health profiles. https://fingertips.phe.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Okan, Y., Petrova, D., Smith, S. G., Lesic, V., & de Bruin W, B. (2019, October). How do women interpret the NHS information leaflet about cervical cancer screening? Medical Decision Making, 39(7), 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X19873647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldach, B. R., & Katz, M. L. (2014, February 1). Health literacy and cancer screening: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling, 94(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, H. (2014, August 1). Measuring overconfidence: Methodological problems and statistical artifacts. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1766–1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, H., Moss, E. L., & Sherman, S. M. (2018, June). HPV primary cervical screening in England: Women's awareness and attitudes. Psycho-Oncology, 27(6), 1559–1564. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.4694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrova, D., Kostopoulou, O., Delaney, B. C., Cokely, E. T., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2018, April). Strengths and gaps in physicians’ risk communication: A scenario study of the influence of numeracy on cancer screening communication. Medical Decision Making, 38(3), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X17729359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourebrahim-Alamdari, P., Mehrabi, E., Nikkhesal, N., Nourizadeh, R., Esmaeilpour, K., & Mousavi, S. (2021). Effectiveness of motivationally tailored interventions on cervical cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Womens Health Reprod Sci, 9(2), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.15296/ijwhr.2021.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presseau, J., Francis, J. J., Campbell, N. C., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2011, December). Goal conflict, goal facilitation, and health professionals’ provision of physical activity advice in primary care: An exploratory prospective study. Implementation Science, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-73
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ravindran, R., Cotton, S., & Cruickshank, M. (2020, January). Women's preferences for communication with the cervical screening programme: A qualitative study. Cytopathology, 31(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.12783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. F. (2008, November). A theory of medical decision making and health: Fuzzy trace theory. Medical Decision Making, 28(6), 850–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08327066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, K., Dockray, S., & Linehan, C. (2019, February). A systematic review of tailored eHealth interventions for weight loss. Digital Health, 5, 1–23https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619826685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., Marlow, L., Forster, A., Ruwende, J., & Waller, J. (2020, June). Offering an app to book cervical screening appointments: A service evaluation. Journal of Medical Screening, 27(2), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969141319871312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M., Waller, J., & Marlow, L. A. (2019, July 1). Could changing invitation and booking processes help women translate their cervical screening intentions into action? A population-based survey of women’s preferences in Great Britain. BMJ Open, 9(7), e028134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, L., Albrow, R., Shelton, R., Kitchener, H., & Brabin, L. (2013). Development of a pre-notification leaflet to encourage uptake of cervical screening at first invitation: A qualitative study. Health Education Research, 28(5), 793–802. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cys103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, J. (2014). Behind the screen: Revealing the true cost of cervical cancer. Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Schiffman, M., Kinney, W. K., Cheung, L. C., Gage, J. C., Fetterman, B., Poitras, N. E., Lorey, T. S., Wentzensen, N., Befano, B., Schussler, J., & Katki, H. A. (2018, May 1). Relative performance of HPV and cytology components of cotesting in cervical screening. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 110(5), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx225
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz, L. M., Woloshin, S., Black, W. C., & Welch, H. G. (1997, December 1). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(11), 966–972. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. G., Kobayashi, L. C., Wolf, M. S., Raine, R., Wardle, J., & Von Wagner, C. (2016, August). The associations between objective numeracy and colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes and defensive processing in a deprived community sample. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(8), 1665–1675. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314560919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. G., Raine, R., Obichere, A., Wolf, M. S., Wardle, J., & von Wagner, C. (2015, April). The effect of a supplementary (‘gist-based’) information leaflet on colorectal cancer knowledge and screening intention: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9596-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S. G., Vart, G., Wolf, M. S., Obichere, A., Baker, H. J., Raine, R., Wardle, J., & von Wagner, C. (2015, October). How do people interpret information about colorectal cancer screening: Observations from a think-aloud study. Health Expectations, 18(5), 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. G., Niederdeppe, J., Cappella, J. N., Gaysynsky, A., Kelley, D. E., Oh, A., Peterson, E. B., & Chou, W. Y. (2019, August 1). Misinformation as a misunderstood challenge to public health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(2), 282–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, M., Dow, L., & Baxter, G. (2011, December 1). Promoting public awareness of the links between lifestyle and cancer: A controlled study of the usability of health information leaflets. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 80(12), e214–e229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulfa, M., Tahir, A. M., & Ulfa, M. (2019). The effects of audio visual information and leaflets towards increasing knowledge, mother’s demeanour on cervical cancer and visual inspection With acetic acid (via) in Sudiang Health Center, Makassar. East African Scholars Journal of Medical Sciences, 4421(6), 319–325.
   Google Scholar
• van der Meij, A. E., Damman, O. C., Uiters, E., & Timmermans, D. R. (2019, July 1). What benefits and harms are important for a decision about cervical screening? A study of the perspective of different subgroups of women. Patient Preference and Adherence, 13, 1005–1017. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S193522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van ‘t Riet, J., & Ruiter, R. A. (2013, May 1). Defensive reactions to health-promoting information: An overview and implications for future research. Health Psychology Review, 7(sup1), S104–S136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2011.606782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdoodt, F., Jentschke, M., Hillemanns, P., Racey, C. S., Snijders, P. J., & Arbyn, M. (2015, November 1). Reaching women who do not participate in the regular cervical cancer screening programme by offering self-sampling kits: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. European Journal of Cancer, 51(16), 2375–2385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers, V. H., Meertens, R. M., Passchier, W. W., & De Vries, N. N. (2009, February). Probability information in risk communication: A review of the research literature. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 29(2), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01137.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Wagner, C., Semmler, C., Power, E., & Good, A. (2010, March). What matters when deciding whether to participate in colorectal cancer screening? The moderating role of time perspective. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research, 15(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9861.2010.00050.x
   Google Scholar
• Vorsters, A., Arbyn, M., Baay, M., Bosch, X., de Sanjosé, S., Hanley, S., Karafillakis, E., Lopalco, P. L., Pollock, K. G., Yarwood, J., & Van Damme, P. (2017, December 1). Overcoming barriers in HPV vaccination and screening programs. Papillomavirus Research, 4, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pvr.2017.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittink, H., & Oosterhaven, J. (2018, December 1). Patient education and health literacy. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, 38, 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2018.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar