Mathematical modeling based on ordinary differential equations: A promising approach to vaccinology

References

• US PITA. Committee, Computational Science: Ensuring America's Competitiveness, National Coordination Office for Information Technology Research & Development, URL https://books.google.com.br/books?id=YIhGAAAAYAAJ, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Schoeberl B, Eichler-Jonsson C, Gilles ED, Müller G. Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors. Nat Biotechnol 2002; 20(4):370-375; PMID:11923843; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0402-370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley HS, Shvartsman AY, Lauffenburger DA. Computational modeling of the EGF-receptor system: a paradigm for systems biology, TICB 2003; 13(1):43-50; PMID:12480339
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doddi SK, Bagchi P. Three-dimensional computational modeling of multiple deformable cells flowing in microvessels. Physical Review E 2009; 79(4):046318; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.046318
   Google Scholar
• Beard DA, Schlick T. Computational modeling predicts the structure and dynamics of chromatin fiber. Structure 2001; 9(2):105-114; PMID:11250195; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-2126(01)00572-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querec TD, Akondy RS, Lee EK, Cao W, Nakaya HI, Teuwen D, Pirani A, Gernert K, Deng J, Marzolf B, et al. Systems biology approach predicts immunogenicity of the yellow fever vaccine in humans. Nat Immunol 2009; 10 (1):116-125; PMID:19029902; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ni.1688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karr JR, Sanghvi JC, Macklin DN, Gutschow MV, Jacobs JM, Bolival B, Assad-Garcia N, Glass JI, Covert MW. A whole-cell computational model predicts phenotype from genotype. Cell 2012; 150(2):389-401; PMID:22817898; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke S, Vvedensky DD. Origin of reflection high-energy electrondiffraction intensity oscillations during molecular-beam epitaxy: A computational modeling approach. Phys Rev Lett 1987; 58(21):2235; PMID:10034688; http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.2235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakurai T. Computational modeling of magnetic fields in solar active regions. Space Sci Rev 1989; 51(1-2):11-48
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuitino AM, Ortiz M. Computational modelling of single crystals. Modelling Simulation Materials Sci Engineering 1993; 1(3):225; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/1/3/001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanez J, Kuznetsov M. An analysis of flame instabilities for hydrogen-air mixtures based on Sivashinsky equation. Phys Lett A 2016; 380(33):2549-2560; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2016.05.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldgus S, Landis CR. Large-scale computational modeling of Rh (DuPHOS)]+-catalyzed hydrogenation of prochiral enamides: reaction pathways and the origin of enantioselection. J Am Chem Soc 2000; 122(51):12714-12727; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja0019373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicerano J. Computational modeling of polymers. Plastics Engineering (Book 25). Taylor & Francis, 1992
   Google Scholar
• Rots JG. Computational modeling of concrete fracture. Ph.D. thesis. Technische Hogeschool Delft, 1988
   Google Scholar
• Schafer B, Peköz T. Computational modeling of cold-formed steel: characterizing geometric imperfections and residual stresses. J Constructional Steel Res 1998; 47(3):193-210; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0143-974X(98)00007-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel N, Geiker MR, Dufour F, Thrane LN, Szabo P. Computational modeling of concrete flow: general overview. Cement Concrete Res 2007; 37(9):1298-1307; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh P, Asaro R, Shih C. Computational modeling of metal matrix composite materials-I. Isothermal deformation patterns in ideal microstructures. Acta Metallurgica Et Materialia 1993; 41(5):1461-1476; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(93)90255-Q
   Google Scholar
• Porter B, Zauel R, Stockman H, Guldberg R, Fyhrie D. 3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. J Biomech 2005; 38(3):543-549; PMID:15652553; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl E, Maas R, Himpel G, Menzel A. Computational modeling of arterial wall growth. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2007; 6(5):321-331; PMID:17119902; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-006-0062-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall DA, Ringler TD, Heikes RP, Jones P, Baumgardner J. Climate modeling with spherical geodesic grids. Comput Sci Eng 2002; 4(5):32-41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCISE.2002.1032427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nefedova V, Jacob R, Foster I, Liu Z, Liu Y, Deelman E, Mehta G, Su MH, Vahi K. Automating climate science: Large ensemble simulations on the TeraGrid with the GriPhyN Virtual Data System. In: 2006 Second IEEE International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing (e-Science’06), IEEE, 32-32, 2006
   Google Scholar
• Bernholdt D, Bharathi S, Brown D, Chanchio K, Chen M, Chervenak A, Cinquini L, Drach B, Foster I, Fox P, et al. The Earth System Grid: Supporting the Next Generation of Climate Modeling Research. Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng 2005; 93(3):485-495; http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2004.842745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S, Aki K. Fault plane with barriers: a versatile earthquake model. J Geophys Res 1977; 82(36):5658-5670; http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JB082i036p05658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis HG. Tsunami prediction using the reciprocal property of Green's functions. Marine Geodesy 1979; 2(1):27-39; http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15210607909379333
   Google Scholar
• DeLisi C, Berzofsky JA. T-cell antigenic sites tend to be amphipathic structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1985; 82(20):7048-7052; PMID:2413457; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.20.7048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar N, Hendriks BS, Janes KA, Graaf D, Lauffenburger DA. Applying computational modeling to drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today 2006; 11(17–18):806-811; PMID:16935748; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2006.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot AS, Moise L, McMurry JA, Martin W. Epitope-Based Immunome-Derived Vaccines: A Strategy for Improved Design and Safety. In: Falus A, ed. Clinical Applications of Immunomics. New York: Springer, 2009:39-69
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira FM, Coelho IE, Lopes MD, Taranto AG, Junior MC, Santos LL, Villar JA, Fonseca CT, Lopes DD. The Use of Reverse Vaccinology and Molecular Modeling Associated with Cell Proliferation Stimulation Approach to Select Promiscuous Epitopes from Schistosoma mansoni. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2016; 179(6):1023-1040; PMID:26979443; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12010-016-2048-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappuoli R, Bottomley MJ, D'Oro U, Finco O, Gregorio E. Reverse vaccinology 2.0: Human immunology instructs vaccine antigen design. J Exp Med 2016; 213(4):469-481; PMID:27022144; http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.20151960
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalik M, Djahanshiri B, Leo JC, Linke D. Reverse Vaccinology: The Pathway from Genomes and Epitope Predictions to Tailored Recombinant Vaccines. Methods Mol Biol 2016; 1403:87-106; PMID:27076126; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3387-7_4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andreoni F, Amagliani G, Magnani M. Selection of Vaccine Candidates for Fish Pasteurellosis Using Reverse Vaccinology and an In Vitro Screening Approach. Methods Mol Biol 2016; 1404:181-192; PMID:27076298; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3389-1_12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang YT, Chow YH, Hsiao KN, Hu KC, Chiang JR, Wu SC, Chong P, Liu CC. Development of a full-length cDNA-derived enterovirus A71 vaccine candidate using reverse genetics technology. Antiviral Res 2016; 132:225-232; PMID:27387826; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2016.06.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meunier M, Guyard-Nicodème M, Hirchaud E, Parra A, Chemaly M, Dory D, Identification of Novel Vaccine Candidates against Campylobacter through Reverse Vaccinology. J Immunol Res 2016:5715790; PMID:27413761; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5715790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot AS, Bosma A, Chinai N, Frost J, Jesdale BM, Gonzalez MA, Martin W, Saint-Aubin C. From genome to vaccine: in silico predictions, ex vivo verification. Vaccine 2001; 19(31):4385-4395; PMID:11483263; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(01)00145-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappalardo F, Flower D, Russo G, Pennisi M, Motta S. Computational modelling approaches to vaccinology. Pharmacol Res 2015; 92:40-45; PMID:25224605; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2014.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafuente EM, Reche PA. Prediction of MHC-peptide binding: a systematic and comprehensive overview. Curr Pharm Des 2009: 15(28):3209-3220; PMID:19860671; http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138161209789105162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez-Bombarelli R, Aguilera-Iparraguirre J, Hirzel TD, Duvenaud D, Maclaurin D, Blood-Forsythe MA, Chae HS, Einzinger M, Ha DG, Wu T, et al. Design of efficient molecular organic light-emitting diodes by a highthroughput virtual screening and experimental approach. Nat Mater 2016; 15(10):1120-7; advance online publication; PMID:27500805; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat4717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geanes AR, Cho HP, Nance KD, McGowan KM, Conn PJ, Jones CK, Meiler J, Lindsley CW. Ligand-based virtual screen for the discovery of novel M5 inhibitor chemotypes. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2016; 26(18):4487-4491; PMID:27503678; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.07.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Yue L, Wang Y, Xing J, Chen Z, Shi Z, Liu R, Liu YC, Luo X, Jiang H, et al. Discovery of Novel Inhibitors Targeting Menin-Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL) Interface Using Pharmacophore- and Docking-Based Virtual Screening. J Chem Inf Model 2016; 56(9):1847-55; ; PMID:27513308; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalili S, Mohammadpour H, Shokrollahi Barough M, Kokhaei P. ILP-2 modeling and virtual screening of an FDA-approved library:a possible anticancer therapy. Turk J Med Sci 2016; 46(4):1135-1143; PMID:27513416; http://dx.doi.org/10.3906/sag-1503-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay A, Chen LH, Sisti M, Monath TP. Yellow fever vaccine seroconversion in travelers. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2011; 85(4):748-749; PMID:21976582; http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2011.11-0363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaborative group. Duration of post-vaccination immunity against yellow fever in adults. Vaccine 2014; 32(39):4977-4984; PMID:25090646; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monath TP, Gershman M, Staples EJ, Barrett ADT. Yellow fever vaccine. In: Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA, Offit PA, eds. Vaccines. 6th ed. Saunders Elsevier, 2012:870-896
   Google Scholar
• Knepell PL, Arangno DC. Simulation Validation: A Confidence Assessment Methodology. Wiley, 1993
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Vaccines and vaccination against yellow fever. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2013; 88(27):269-283; PMID:23909008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonin C, Santos RW, Fernandes GC, Lobosco M. Computational modeling of the immune response to yellow fever. J Comp Appl Math 2016; 295:127-138; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2015.01.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odeint, Odeint's Homepage, URL http://docs.scipy.org, 2014
   Google Scholar