700
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Drafting eligible biotech and immunotherapy claims

ORCID Icon
Pages 2706-2712 | Received 04 Mar 2019, Accepted 12 Apr 2019, Published online: 22 May 2019

References

  • Wang S-J. Designing around patents: a guideline. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(5):519–22. doi:10.1038/nbt0508-519.
  • Chang BC, Wang S-J. The impact of patent eligibility on biotech patents A flow chart for determining patent eligibility and an immune therapy case study. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(3):798–794. doi:10.1080/21645515.2015.1009344.
  • Bilski v. Kappos, (The US Supreme Court 2010).
  • Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., (The US Supreme Court 2012).
  • Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, (US Supreme Court 2013).
  • CLS Bank International v. Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd, (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2013).
  • Haanes E, Cànaves J. Stealing fire: a retrospective survey of biotech patent claims in the wake of Mayo v. Prometheus. Nat Biotech. 2012;30(8):758–60. doi:10.1038/nbt.2318.
  • Rantanen J Teva, Nautilus, and Change Without Change Stanford Technology Law Review. 2015.
  • Rai A, Js S. The changing life science patent landscape. Nat Biotech. 2016;34(3):292–94. doi:10.1038/nbt.3504.
  • Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc v. Sequenom, Inc., 14-1139 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2015).
  • In re Petrus A.C.M. Nuijten, 06-1371 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2007).
  • Mortgage Grader, Inc. v. First Choice Loan Services, 15-1415 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2016).
  • In Re Smith, 15-1664 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2016).
  • Allvoice Developments US, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 14-1258 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2015).
  • Internet Patents Corporation v. Active Network, Inc., 14-1048 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2015).
  • OIP Technologies, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 12-1696 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2015).
  • Versata Development Group v. Sap America, Inc., 14-1194 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2015).
  • Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial, 14-1506 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2015).
  • Vehicle Intelligence v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, 15-1411 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2015).
  • Buysafe, Inc. v. Google, Inc., 13-1575 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2014).
  • Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC 10-1544 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2014).
  • Planet Bingo, LLC v. VKGS LLC, 13-1663 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2014).
  • Digitech Image Technologies v. Electronics for Imaging, Inc., 13-1600 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2014).
  • Cyberfone Systems v. CNN Interactive Group, 12-1673 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2014).
  • Smartgene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Lab, 13-1186 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2014).
  • Content Extraction v. Wells Fargo Bank, 13-1588 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2014).
  • CLS Bank International v. Alice Corporation, 11-1301 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2013).
  • In Re Ferguson, 07-1232 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2009).
  • Bancorp Services, L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada (U.S.), 11-1467 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2012).
  • Bancorp Services, L.L.C. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada (U.S.), 07-1130 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2008).
  • DDR Holdings, LLC v. Hotels.Com, L.P., 13-1505 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2014).
  • Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation 15-1244 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2016).
  • In re Bentwich, 13-1460 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2014).
  • In re Roslin Institute(Edinburgh), 13-1407 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2014).
  • University of Utah Research v. Ambry Genetics Corporation 14-1361 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2014).
  • Perkinelmer, Inc. v. Intema LTD 11-1577 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2012).
  • The Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 10-1406 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2011).
  • The Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, 10-1406 (Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 2012).
  • Diamond v. Chakrabarty, (The US Supreme Court 1980).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.