Vaccine hesitancy and religiosity in a sample of university students in Venezuela

References

• Grillet ME, Hernández-Villena JV, Llewellyn MS, Paniz-Mondolfi AE, Tami A, Vincenti-Gonzalez MF, Alarcón-de Noya B, Mogollon-Mendoza AC, Hernandez-Pereira CE, Plaza-Morr JD. Venezuela’s humanitarian crisis, resurgence of vector-borne diseases, and implications for spillover in the region. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(5):e149–e161. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30757-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burki T. COVID-19 in Latin America. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):547–48. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30303-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loyo ESL, González MJ, Esparza J. Venezuela is collapsing without COVID-19 vaccines. Lancet (London, England). 2021;397(10287):1806–1806. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00924-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallam M. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy worldwide: a concise systematic review of vaccine acceptance rates. Vaccines. 2021;9(2):160. doi:10.3390/vaccines9020160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade G. Conspiracy mongering in Venezuela: the Chavismo period (1998–2018). Bull Lat Am Res. 2020;39(4):500–12. doi:10.1111/blar.13019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah I, Khan KS, Tahir MJ, Ahmed A, Harapan H. Myths and conspiracy theories on vaccines and COVID-19: potential effect on global vaccine refusals. Vacunas. 2021;22(2):93–97. doi:10.1016/j.vacun.2021.01.001.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinclair JH. Research on Protestantism in Latin America: a bibliographic essay. Int Bull Missionary Res. 2002;26(3):110–17. doi:10.1177/239693930202600303.
   Google Scholar
• Froehle BT. Religious competition, community building, and democracy in Latin America: grassroots religious organizations in Venezuela. Sociol Relig. 1994;55(2):145–62. doi:10.2307/3711854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley D, Douglas KM. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PloS One. 2014;9(2):e89177. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg RV, McKean J, Craig AT. Introduction to mathematical statistics. New York: Pearson Education; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro GK, Holding A, Perez S, Amsel R, Rosberger Z. Validation of the vaccine conspiracy beliefs scale. Papillomavirus Res. 2016;2:167–72. doi:10.1016/j.pvr.2016.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutledge ML, Sadler KC. University students’ acceptance of biological theories–is evolution really different? J Coll Sci Teach. 2011;41:2.
   Google Scholar
• Rutledge ML, Warden MA. The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. Sch Sci Math. 1999;99(1):13–18. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17441.x.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig HG, Futterman A. 1995. Religion and health outcomes: a review and synthesis of the literature (March 16_17). Conference on methodological approaches to the study of religion, aging, and health; Bethesda (MD), National Institute on Aging and the Fetzer Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Koenig HG, Büssing A. The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): a five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Religions. 2010;1(1):78–85. doi:10.3390/rel1010078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafizi S, Memari AH, Pakrah M, Mohebi F, Saghazadeh A, Koenig HG. The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): validation and reliability of the Farsi version. Psychol Rep. 2013;112(1):151–59. doi:10.2466/08.07.17.PR0.112.1.151-159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taunay TCDE, Gondim FDAA, Macêdo DS, Moreira-Almeida A, Gurgel LDA, Andrade LMS, Carvalho AF. Validity of the Brazilian version of the Duke Religious Index (DUREL). Arch Clin Psychiatry (São Paulo). 2012;39(4):130–35. doi:10.1590/S0101-60832012000400003.
   Google Scholar
• Doerflinger RM. The ethics of funding embryonic stem cell research: a Catholic viewpoint. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999;9(2):137–50. doi:10.1353/ken.1999.0011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelčić G, Karačić S, Mikirtichan GL, Kubar OI, Leavitt FJ, Tai MCT, Tomašević L, Vuletić S, Tomašević L. Religious exception for vaccination or religious excuses for avoiding vaccination. Croat Med J. 2016;57(5):516. doi:10.3325/cmj.2016.57.516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman RK. Helping patients with ethical concerns about COVID-19 vaccines in light of fetal cell lines used in some COVID-19 vaccines. Vaccine. 2021;13:3.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer O. 2021. Covid-19: US Catholics split after bishops’ conference recommends against Johnson and Johnson vaccine. BMJ. 2021;372:n666.
   Google Scholar
• Siemaszko C. Christians and the vaccine’ project: combating ethical qualms of evangelical communities. NBC. 2021 Apr 23. [accessed 2021 June 25]. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/divine-intervention-pastors-tapped-help-get-skeptical-churchgoers-vaccinated-n1264646
   Google Scholar
• Freston P. Evangelicals and politics in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsey MJ, Finlayson M, Chatwood G, Begeny CT. Donald Trump and vaccination: the effect of political identity, conspiracist ideation and presidential tweets on vaccine hesitancy. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2020;88:103947. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallam M, Dababseh D, Eid H, Hasan H, Taim D, Al-Mahzoum K, Mahafzah A, Yaseen A, Ababneh NA, Assaf A. Low covid-19 vaccine acceptance is correlated with conspiracy beliefs among university students in Jordan. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2407. doi:10.3390/ijerph18052407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogart LM, Ojikutu BO, Tyagi K, Klein DJ, Mutchler MG, Dong L, Kellman S, Thomas DR, Kellman S. COVID-19 related medical mistrust, health impacts, and potential vaccine hesitancy among Black Americans living with HIV. J Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndr (1999). 2021;86(2):200. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000002570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings W, Stoker G, Bunting H, Valgarðsson VO, Gaskell J, Devine D, Mills MC, Mills MC. Lack of trust, conspiracy beliefs, and social media use predict COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines. 2021;9(6):593. doi:10.3390/vaccines9060593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks B, Bangerter A, Bauer M. Conspiracy theories as quasi-religious mentality: an integrated account from cognitive science, social representations theory, and frame theory. Front Psychol. 2013;4:424. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade G. Medical conspiracy theories: cognitive science and implications for ethics. Med Health Care Philos. 2020;23:1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzarevic F, Saroglou V, Clobert M. Are atheists undogmatic? Pers Individ Dif. 2017;116:164–70. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. Views about human evolution among atheists; 2021. [accessed 2021 June 25]. https://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/religious-family/atheist/views-about-human-evolution/
   Google Scholar
• Emurayeveya F. Science and religion in Catholic high schools. In: Soli S, editors. Center for applied research in the apostolate. New York: CARA at Georgetown University; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Funk C, Smith G, Masci D. How many creationists are there in America? Scientific American; 2019. [accessed 2021 June 12]. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/how-many-creationists-are-there-in-america/
   Google Scholar
• McGrath AE. The ideological uses of evolutionary biology in recent atheist apologetics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2010. p. 329–52.
   Google Scholar
• Artigas M, Martnez RA, Glick TF, Martínez RA. Negotiating Darwin: the Vatican confronts evolution, 1877–1902. Baltimare: JHU Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Paul J. The magisterium and the question of evolution. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2003;3(3):565–68. doi:10.5840/ncbq20033334.
   Google Scholar
• Collins J, Burke G. Vatican thinking evolves. Time. 1996;148:85–85.
   Google Scholar
• Watts E, Hossfeld U, Tolstikova I, Levit GS. Beyond borders: on the influence of the creationist movement on the educational landscape in the USA and Russia. Theory Biosci. 2017;136(1):31–48. doi:10.1007/s12064-016-0238-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huskinson BL. American creationism, creation science, and intelligent design in the evangelical market. New York (USA): Springer Nature; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy RE. What is Catholic about Catholic biblical scholarship?—revisited. Biblic Theol Bull. 1998;28(3):112–19. doi:10.1177/014610799802800304.
   Google Scholar
• Jelen TG. Biblical literalism and inerrancy: does the difference make a difference? Socioll Anal. 1989;49(4):421–29. doi:10.2307/3711227.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau J. Science denial: a guide for scientists. Trends Microbiol. 2012;20(12):567–69. doi:10.1016/j.tim.2012.10.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant J. Denying science: conspiracy theories, media distortions, and the war against reality. New York (USA): Prometheus Books; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke M. Science denialism: creationism. Aus Human. 2015;6(116):6.
   Google Scholar