Recommendations from the workshop on Comparative Approaches to Safety Assessment of GM Plant Materials: A road toward harmonized criteria?

REFERENCES

• AMIS. Market Monitor. Agricultural market information system. N 19, June 2014. Available at: www.amis-outlook.org
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomaeus A, Parrott W, Bondy G. The use of whole food animal studies in the safety assessment of genetically modified crops: limitations and recommendations. Crit Rev Toxicol 2013; 43 S2:1-24; PMID:24164514; http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2013.842955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brune PD, Culler AH, Ridley WP, Walker K. Safety of GM crops: compositional analysis. J Agric Food Chem 2013; 61:8243-7; PMID:24266762; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf401097q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burachik M. The trade dispute about genetically engineered products: argentina against the european communities. AgBioForum 2013; 16, 170-6
   Google Scholar
• Bushey DF. Bannon GA, Delaney BF, Graser G, Hefford M, Jiang X, Lee TC, Madduri KM, Pariza M, Privalle LS. et al. Characteristics and safety assessment of intractable proteins in genetically modified crops. Reg Toxicol Pharmacol 2014; 69:154-70; PMID:24662477; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Codex Alimentarius. Guideline for the conduct of food safety assessment of foods derived from recombinant-DNA plants (CAC/GL 45-2003). Codex Alimentarius Commission. Rome, Italy: Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme; 2003a
   Google Scholar
• Codex Alimentarius. Principles for the risk analysis of foods derived from modern biotechnology. CAC/GL 44-20032003. Codex Alimentarius Commission. Rome, Italy: Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme; 2003b
   Google Scholar
• Delaney B. Astwood JD, Cunny H, Conn RE, Herouet-Guicheney C, Macintosh S, Meyer LS, Privalle L, Gao Y, Mattsson J., et al. Evaluation of protein safety in the context of agricultural biotechnology. Food Chem Toxicol 2008; 46 2:S71-97; PMID:18348900; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.01.045
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 2006; 127:1309-21; PMID:17190597; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2006.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EFSA., Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: The role of animal feeding trials. Report of the EFSA GMO panel working group on animal feeding trials. Food Chem Toxicol 2008; 46, S2-S70; PMID:18328408
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EFSA. Scientific opinion on guidance for risk assessment of food and feed from genetically modified plants. EFSA J 2011; 9:2150
   Google Scholar
• FAO. Technical Consultation on Low Levels of Genetically Modified (GM) Crops in International Food and Feed Trade. Rome, Italy, 2014, Narrative Report. 20-1. 2014. Available from: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/agns/topics/LLP/AGD803_6_Report_En.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Flint-Garcia SA. Genetics and consequences of crop domestication. J Agric Food Chem 2013; 61:8267−76; PMID:23718780; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf305511d
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrigan GG. Lundry D, Drury S, Berman K, Riordan SG, Nemeth MA, Ridley WP, Glenn KC. Natural variation in crop composition and the impact of transgenesis. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28:402-4; PMID:20458297; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nbt0510-402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman RA., Chassy BM, Parrott W. Compositional assessment of transgenic crops: an idea whose time has passed. Trend Biotechnol 2009; 27:555-7; PMID:19699543; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman RA, Price WD. Unintended compositional changes in genetically modified (GM) crops 20 years of reasearch. J Agric Food Chem 2013; 61:11695-701; PMID:23414177; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf400135r
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekenga OA, Srinivasan J, Barry G, Bartholomaeus A. Compositional analysis of genetically modified (GM) crops: key issues and future needs. J Agric Food Chem 61, 8248−53; PMID:23746303; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf401141r
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James C. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013. ISAAA Brief No. 46. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY; 2013
   Google Scholar
• Kuiper HA, Kleter GA, Noteborn PJM, Kok EJ. Assessment of the food safety issues related to genetically modified foods. Plant J 2001; 27, 503-28; PMID:11576435; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-313X.2001.01119.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladics GS. Cressman RF, Herouet-Guicheney C, Herman RA, Privalle L, Song P, Ward JM, McClain S. Bioinformatics and the allergy assessment of agricultural biotechnology products: industry practices and recommendations. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2011; 60:46-53; PMID:21320564; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2011.02.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenser T, Theissen G. Molecular mechanisms involved in convergent crop domestication. Trend Plant Sci 2013; 18, 704-14; PMID:24035234; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2013.08.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Privalle LS, Gillikin N, Wandelt C, Bringing a transgenic crop to market: where compositional analysis fits. J Agric Food Chem 2013; 61:8260−6; PMID:23534903; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf400185q
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricroch AE. Assessment of GE food safety using ‘-omics’ techniques and long-term animal feeding studies. New Biotechnol 2013; 30, 349-54; PMID:23253614; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2012.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang T Genes and mutations underlying domestication transitions in grasses. Plant Physiol 2009; 149, 63-70; PMID:19126696; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.128827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell C. Bernheim A, Bergé JB, Kuntz M, Pascal G, Paris A, Ricroch AE. Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: a literature review. Food Chem Toxicol 2012; 50:1134-48; PMID:22155268; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.11.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner HY. Halpin C, Jez JM, Kough J, Parrott W, Underhill L, Weber N, Hannah LC. Evaluating the potential for adverse interactions within genetically engineered breeding stacks. Plant Physiol 2013; 161 1587-94; PMID:23460691; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.209817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanksley SD, The genetic developmental and molecular bases of fruit size and shape variation in tomato. Plant Cell 2004; 16 2004:S181-S189; PMID:15131251; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.018119
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• USDA. World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates. Agricultural marketing service. economic research service. foreign agricultural service. WASDE 530. June 11, 2014. Available at: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/
   Google Scholar
• Weber N, Halpin C, Hannah LC, Jez JM, Kough J, Parrott W. Editor's choice: Crop genome plasticity and its relevance to food and feed safety of genetically engineered breeding stacks. Plant Physiol 2012; 160:1842-1853; PMID:23060369; ; 10.1104/pp.112.204271
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolt JD. Keese P, Raybould A, Fitzpatrick JW, Burachik M, Gray A, Olin SS, Schiemann J, Sears M, Wu F. Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgen Res 2010; 19, 425-36; PMID:19757133; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11248-009-9321-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang XS, Staub JM, Pandravada A, Riordan SG, Yan Y, Bannon GA, Martino-Catt SJ. Omics technologies reveal abundant natural variation in metabolites and transcripts among conventional maize hybrids. Food Nutr Sci 2013; 4:335-41; http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/fns.2013.43044
   Google Scholar
• Zhou J. Harrigan GG, Berman KH, Webb EG, Klusmeyer TH, Nemeth MA. Stability in the composition equivalence for grain from insect protected maize and seed from glyphosate-tolerant soybean to conventional counterparts over multiple season, locations, and breeding germplasms. J Agric Food Chem 2011; 59:8822-8; PMID:21797257; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf2019038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar