REFERENCES
- Camacho A, Van Deynze A, Chi-Ham C and Bennett AB. Genetically engineered crops that fly under the US regulatory radar. Nature Biotechnology 2014; 32(11):1087–1091.
- Health Canada. Arctic Apple Events GD743 and GS784. Online at: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/gmf-agm/appro/arcapp-arcpom-eng.php. [Accessed 4 August 2016]
- Jaffe G. Implementing the Biosafety Protocol through national biosafety regulatory systems: An analysis of key unresolved issues. Journal of Public Affairs 2005; 5(3–4):299–311.
- Ledford H. CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature 2015; 522: 20–24.
- Little J. Presentation to the 7th European Innovation Summit. Brussels, 7–10 December, 2015.
- Lusser M, Parisi C, Plan D and Rodrigues-Cerezo E. New Plant Breeding Techniques: State-of-the-art and Prospects for Commercial Development. Report for the Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2011.
- Macdonald P. Genetically modified organisms regulatory challenges and science: A Canadian perspective. Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 2014; 9(S1):S59–S64.
- Panella F, et al. Open letter to the Commission on new genetic engineering methods. Online at: http://www.genewatch.org/uploads/f03c6d66a9b354535738483c1c3d49e4/New_Breeding_Techniques___Open_Letter_27_Jan_2015.pdf. [Accessed 28 July 2016]
- Phillips McDougall. The cost and time involved in the discovery, development and authorization of a new plant biotechnology derived trait. A consultancy study for CropLife International. 2011. Online at: http://croplife.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf_files/Getting-a-Biotech-Crop-to-Market-Phillips-McDougall-Study.pdf. [Accessed 4 August 2016]
- Ryan CD and McHughen A. Tomatoes, potatoes and flax: exploring the cost of lost innovations. Chapter 51 in SJ Smyth, PWB Phillips and D Castle (eds.) Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development, 841-852. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
- Simplot. The Innate® Generation 1 potato benefits consumers, the environment and potato industry economics. Online at: http://www.innatepotatoes.com/. [Accessed 4 August 2016]
- Smart R, Blum M and Wesseler J. EU Member States' voting for authorizing genetically engineered crops: A regulatory gridlock. German Journal of Agricultural Economics 2015; 64(4):244–262.
- Smart R, Blum M and Wesseler J. Trends in approval times for genetically engineered crops in the United States and the European Union. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2016; DOI: 10.1111/1477–9552.12171.
- Smyth SJ, Falck-Zepeda J and Ludlow K. The Costs of Regulatory Delays on Genetically Modified Crops. The Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy. Forthcoming.
- Visser B, Eaton D, Louwaars N and van der Meer I. Potential impacts of genetic use restriction technologies (GURTs) on agrobiodiversity and agriculture production systems. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization. Online at: ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/meeting/015/aj627e.pdf. [Accessed 29 July 2016]
- Waltz E. Tiptoeing around transgenics. Nature Biotechnology 2012; 30(3):215–217.
- Waltz E. Gene-editing CRISPR mushroom escapes US regulation. Nature 2016; 532: 293.
- Wang S, Yi F, and Qu J. Eliminate mitochondrial diseases by gene editing in germ-line cells and embryos. Protein and Cell 2015; 6(7):472–475.
- Whelan AI and Lema MA. Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques (NBTs) in Argentina. GM Crops & Food 2015; 6(4):253–265.