The influence of consumers’ knowledge on their responses to genetically modified foods

References

• Chow S, Norris JF, Bilder BG. Insight into the genetically modified foods: from the concerns of safety to food development (Part I). Sci Insights. 2016:2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.15354/si.16.vi010.
   Google Scholar
• Costa-Font M, Gil JM, Traill WB. Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: review and implications for food policy. Food Policy. 2008;33(2):99–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung RMW, Morris J. Food safety risk: consumer perception and purchase behavior. Br Food J. 2001;103(3):170–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700110386728.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal Z, Iqbal MS, Ahmad A, Memon AG, Ansari MI. New prospects on the horizon: genome editing to engineer plants for desirable traits. Curr Plant Biol. 2020. in Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2020.100171.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro TG, Barone B, Behrens JH. Genetically modified foods and their social representation. Food Res Int. 2016;84:120–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bánáti D. Consumer response to food scandals and scares. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2011;22(2–3):56–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis KR, McCluskey JJ, Wahl TI. Consumer acceptance of genetically modified food products in the developing world. J Agrobiotechnol Manage Econ. 2004;7:70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts RJ. The Nobel Laureates’ campaign supporting GMOs. J Innovation Knowl. 2018;3:61–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2017.12.006.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Liu G. The effects of consumer’s subjective and objective knowledge on perceptions and attitude towards genetically modified foods: objective knowledge as a determinant. Intl J Food Sci Technol. 2015;50(5):1198–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs/12753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbeck A, Binimelis R, Defarge N, Steinbrecher R, Székács A, Wickson F, Antomiou M, Bereano PL, Clark E, Hansen M, et al. No scientific consensus on GMO safety. Environ Sci Eur. 2015;27(4):1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-014-0034-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hogarth RM, Michaud C, Mery J-L. Decision behavior in urban development: a methodological approach and substantive considerations. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1980;45:95–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawa AS, Anilakumar KR. Genetically modified foods: safety, risk, and public concerns-a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2013;50(6):1035–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0899-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui P, Shoemaker SP. Public perception of genetically-modified (GM) food: a nationawide Chinese consumer study. Npj Sci Food. 2018;2(10). doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41538-018-0018-4.
   Google Scholar
• Elder L, Greene S, Lizotte MK. The gender gap on public opinion towards genetically modified foods. Soc Sci J. 2018;55(4):500–09. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/soscil.2018.02.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solvic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk‐assessment battlefield. Risk Anal. 1999;19(4):689–701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00439.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaptan G, Fischer ARH, Frewer LJ. Extrapolating understanding of food risk perceptions to emerging food safety cases. J Risk Res. 2017;21(8):996–1018. (in press). doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1281330.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton JR, Van Kleef E, Rowe G, Frewer LJ. Consumer perceptions of the effectiveness of food risk management practices: A cross-cultural study. Health Risk Soc. 2006;8:165–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleenhoff S, Osseweijer P. Consumer choice: linking consumer intentions to actual purchase of GM labeled food products. GM Ccrops & Food. 2013;4:166–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa-Font M, Gil JM. Structural equation modelling of consumer acceptance of genetically modified (GM) food in the Mediterranean Europe: a cross country study. Food Qual Prefer. 2009;20(6):399–409. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coupe RH, Capel PD. Trends in pesticide use on soybean, corn and cotton since the introduction of major genetically modified crops in the United States. Pest Manag Sci. 2015;72(5). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4082.
   Google Scholar
• Moseley BE. The safety and social acceptance of novel foods. Int J Food Microbiol. 1999;50(1–2):25–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(99)00074-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodman RE. Biosafety: evaluation and regulation of genetically modified (GM) crops in the United States. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 2014a;33:85–114.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman RE. GMOs: are they a regulatory or food safety issue? Cereal Foods World. 2014b;59:164–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Font J, Mossialos E. Are perceptions of ‘risks’ and ‘benefits’ of genetically modified food (in) dependent? Food Qual Prefer. 2007;18:173–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain F, Onyango B. Product attributes and consumer acceptance of nutritionally enhanced genetically modified foods. Int J Consum Stud. 2004;28(3):255–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2004.00352.x.
   Google Scholar
• Kim YG, Suh BW, Lee AJ. Consumer attitude considering perceived benefits and perceived risks of food products involving genetic modification. J Foodservice Manage Soc Korea. 2008;11:123–43.
   Google Scholar
• Rzymski P, Królczyk A. Attitudes toward genetically modified organisms in Poland: to GMO or not to GMO? Food Secur. 2016;8:689–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0572-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredahl L. Consumers’ perception on genetically modified food: results of qualitative study in four countries. Appetite. 1999;33(3):343–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredahl L. Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified foods-results of a cross-national survey. J Consum Policy. 2001;24(1):23–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010950406128.
   Google Scholar
• Jin J, Wailes EJ, Dixon BL, Nayga RM, Zheng Z (2014). Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for genetically modified rice in China, In 2014 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, July, Minneapolis, Minnesota, pp. 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Verdurme A, Viaene J. Exploring and modelling consumer attitudes towards genetically modified food. Qual Market Res Int J. 2003a;6(2):95–110. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750310470109.
   Google Scholar
• Verdurme A, Viaene J. Consumer beliefs and attitude towards genetically modified food: basis for segmentation and implications for communication. Agribusiness. 2003b;19(1):91–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.10045.
   Google Scholar
• Boccaletti S, Moro D. Consumer willingness-to-pay for GM food products in Italy. J Agrobiotechnol Manage Econ. 2000;3:259–67.
   Google Scholar
• Boccia F, Sarnacchiaro P. Genetically modified foods and consumer perspective. Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric. 2015;7(1):28–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.2174/2212798407666150401105044.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu L, Rahman I, Chi CGQ. Can knowledge and product identity shift sensory perceptions and patronage intentions? The case of genetically modified wines. Int J Hospitality Manage. 2016;53:152–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2015.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon W, Balasubramanian SK. Public attitudes toward agrobiotechnology: the mediating role of risk perceptions on the impact of trust, awareness, and outrage. Rev Agric Econ. 2004;26(2):186–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2004.00170.x.
   Google Scholar
• Engel JF, Blackwell RD, Kollat D. Consumer behavior. 8th ed. Chicago (IL): The Dryden Press, Harcourt Brace College Publisher; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Liang YP. The relationship between consumer product involvement, product knowledge and impulsive buying behavior. Procedia-Social Behav Sci. 2012;57:325–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1193.
   Google Scholar
• MacInnis DJ, Mooreman C, Jaworski BJ. Enhancing and measuring consumers’ motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. J Mark. 1991;55:32–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1251955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CW, Moon BJ. The relationship between product involvement and product knowledge: moderating roles of product type and product knowledge type. Psychol Marketing. 2003;20:977–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SY, You SY. A study of the effect of health motivation and environmental concern on choosing organic food. J Korean Consumption Culture Assoc. 2007;10:107–26.
   Google Scholar
• Park CW, Parker LC. Familiarity and its impact on consumer decision biases and heuristics. J Consum Res. 1981;8:223–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brucks M. The effect of product class knowledge on information search behavior. J Consum Res. 1985;12:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alba JW, Hutchinson JW. Knowledge calibration: what consumers know and what they think they know. J Consum Res. 2000;27:123–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MG, Hong ST. Understanding of consumer behavior. Seoul (Korea): Bubmoonsa; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Radecki CM, Jaccard J. Perceptions of knowledge, actual knowledge, and information search behavior. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1995;31(2):107–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1995.1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999;77(6):1121–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han JH. Consumers’ willingness to pay for price increases by the expansion of GMO labelling. Korean J Food Nutr. 2009;22:338–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HC, Kim MR. An analysis on the factors to distinguish consumers’ willingness to purchase genetically modified organism. Family Environ Res. 2002;40:83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KH. Study on the empirical analysis and the implications for the effective food risk communication. J Consum Policy Stud. 2008;34:104–33.
   Google Scholar
• House L, Lusk J, Jaeger S, Traill WB, Moore M, Valli C, Yee WMS. Objective and subjective knowledge: impacts on consumer demand for genetically modified foods in the United States and the European Union. J Agrobiotechnol Manage Econ. 2004;7:113–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett MS. Tests of significance in factor analysis. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1950;3:77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bawa AS, Anilakumar KR. Genetically modified foods: safety, risks and public concerns-a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2013;50(6):1035–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0899-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39:31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. 1993;78(1):98–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Font J, Mossialos E. Is dread of genetically modified food associated with the consumers’ demand for information? Appl Econ Lett. 2005;12(14):859–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500365830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field A. Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London (UK): Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Schilling BJ, Hallman WK, Adelaja AO, Marxen LJ. Consumer knowledge of food biotechnology: a descriptive study of US residents. New Brunswick (NJ): Food Policy Institute, Rutgers University; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Vilella-Vila M, Costa-Font J, Mossialos E. Consumer involvement and acceptance of biotechnology in the European Union: a specific focus on Spain and the UK. Int J Consum Stud. 2005;29(2):108–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2004.00425.x.
   Google Scholar
• Greenleaf EA, Lehmann DR. Reasons for substantial delay in consumer decision making. J Consum Res. 1995;22:186–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson JC, Wachenheim CJ, Lesch WC. Perceptions of genetically modified and organic foods and processes. J Agrobiotechnol Manage Econ. 2006;9:180–94.
   Google Scholar
• Sörqvist P, Marsh JE, Holmgren M, Hulme R, Haga A, Seager PB. Effects of labeling a product eco-friendly and genetically modified: a cross-cultural comparison for estimates of taste, willingness to pay and health consequences. Food Qual Prefer. 2016;50:65–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.01.007.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker M, Whaley SR, Sharp JS. Consumer perceptions of food‐related risks. Int J Food Sci Technol. 2006;41(2):135–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.01010.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto-Hursti UK, Magnusson MK. Consumer perceptions of genetically modified and organic foods: what kind of knowledge matters? Appetite. 2003;41(4):207–09. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00056-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim JM, Jeong SC. GMO: analysis of the role of the government and its effects in public communication. Korean Public Manage Rev. 2017;31:117–44.
   Google Scholar
• Kim YY. Risk communication. Seoul (Korea): CommunicationBooks; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist M. The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Anal. 2000;20(2):1925–204. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020.
   Google Scholar
• Komoto K, Okamoto S, Hamada M, Obana N, Smori M, Imamura T. Japanese consumer perceptions of genetically modified food: findings from an international comparative study. Interact J Med Res. 2016;5:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Government at a Glance 2015. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Government at a Glance 2017. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Government at a Glance 2019. 2019.
   Google Scholar