The impact of planning policies on bicycle-transit integration in Calgary

References

• Abraham, J. E., McMillan, S., Brownlee, A. T., & Hunt, J. D. (2002). Investigation of cycling sensitivities. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
   Google Scholar
• Alta Planning + Design. (2005). Caltrans pedestrian and bicycle facilities technical reference guide: A technical reference and technology transfer synthesis for caltrans planners and engineers. Los Angeles, CA: California Department of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Aultman-Hall, L. (1997). Using GIS for evaluation of neighborhood pedestrian accessibility. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 123, 10–17.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1997)123:1(10)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J. (2005). Report to council – City of Vancouver cycling program (2006–2008) capital plan, cycling portion ( RTS 4777). Retrieved April 3, 2011, from http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/cclerk/20050118/tt3BAC.htm
   Google Scholar
• Brons, M., Givoni, M., & Rietveld, P. (2009). Access to train stations and its potential for increasing rail use. Transportation Research Part A, 43, 136–149.
   Google Scholar
• Berke, P., & Conroy, M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? Journal of the American Planning Association, 66, 21–33.10.1080/01944360008976081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Calgary. (1996). Calgary cycle plan. Calgary, City of Calgary: Transportation Department.
   Google Scholar
• City of Calgary. (2008). Bicycle policy and needs report. Calgary, City of Calgary: Transportation Department.
   Google Scholar
• City of Calgary. (2009). Calgary transportation plan (plan-it Calgary). Calgary, City of Calgary: Transportation Department.
   Google Scholar
• Dill, J., & Carr, T. (2003). Bicycle commuting and facilities in major US cities: If you build them, commuters will use them. Transportation Research Record, 1828, 116–123.10.3141/1828-14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2001). Travel and the built environment: A synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780, 87–114.10.3141/1780-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Transit Administration (FTA). (1999). Bicycles & transit; A partnership that works. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Handy, S., & Xing, Y. (2011). Factors correlated with bicycle commuting: A study in six small US cities. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5, 91–110. doi:10.1080/1556831090351478910.1080/15568310903514789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25, 73–76.10.1080/01944365908978307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegger, R. (2007). Public transport and cycling: Living apart or together? Public Transport International, 2, 38–41.
   Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews, 30, 59–96. doi:10.1080/0144164090318700110.1080/01441640903187001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillman, M. (1997). The potential of non-motorised transport for promoting health. In R. Tolley (Ed.), The greening of urban transport (2nd ed., pp. 21–27). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. D., & Abraham, J. E. (2007). Influences on bicycle use. Transportation, 34, 453–470.10.1007/s11116-006-9109-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inouye, D., & Berry, K. (2008). Assessing bikeways networks around public schools: A tool for transportation planning in Washoe County, Nevada. Planning, Practice & Research, 23, 229–247.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, N. (2010, February 16). Alternative transportation planner. Personal Interview. City of Calgary.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T., Blair, R., Demopoulus, B., Eddy, N., Fritzel, A., Laidlaw, D., & Maddox, H. (2002). Bicycle planning – A guide to best practices. Victoria Policy and Transport Institute. Retrieved June 6, 2009, from www.vpti.org/nmtguide.doc
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T. (2007). Land use impacts on transport: How land use factors affect travel behavior. Victoria: Victoria Transport Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Martens, K. (2007). Promoting bicycle-and-ride: The Dutch experience. Transportation Research, 41, 326–338.
   Google Scholar
• Mahalek, D. (2011). Bycicle transit integration in Calgary. Calgary: Faculty of Environmental Design, University of Calgary.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A., & Allen, D. (1997). If you build them, commuters will use them: Association between bicycle facilities and bicycle commuting. Transportation Research Record, 1578, 79–83.10.3141/1578-10
   Google Scholar
• Parker, K. (2010, February 19). Leader, parks planning. Personal Interview. City of Calgary.
   Google Scholar
• Parkin, J., Wardman, M., & Page, M. (2008). Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data. Transportation, 35, 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2006). Sustainable transport in Canadian cities: Cycling trends and policies. Berkeley Planning Journal, 19, 97–123.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2008). Making cycling irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28, 495–528.10.1080/01441640701806612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2012a). City cycling. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2012b). Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: New evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes. Transportation, 39, 409–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., Buehler, R., & Seinen, M. (2011). Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-assessment of cycling trends and policies.” Transportation Research A, 45, 451–475.
   Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., Dill, J., & Handy, S. (2009). Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: An international review. Preventative Medicine, 50, 106–125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucher, J., Komanoff, C., & Schimek, P. (1999). Bicycling renaissance in North America? Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling. Transportation Research A, 33, 625–654.
   Google Scholar
• Replogle, M. (1992). Bicycle access to public transportation: Learning from abroad. Institute for Transportation Engineers Journal, 7, 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ryley, T. (2001). Translating cycling policy into cycling practice. World Transport Policy and Practice, 7, 38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Schimek, P. (1996). The dilemmas of bicycle planning. Presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning (ACSP) and Association of European Schools of Planning (AESOP) Joint International Congress, July 27, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. (2005). Integration of bicycles and transit: A synthesis of transit practice. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TRCP) Synthesis 62, Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board. Retrieved September 5, 2009, from http://gulliver.trb.org/publications/tcrp/trcp_syn_62.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. (2013). Censuses of population 1996 to 2011, Tables 11a, 11b, 11c. Retrieved January 12, 2014, from http://www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2013/as-sa/97-561/tables-tableaux-notes-eng.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Talen, E. (1996). Do plans get implemented? A review of evaluation in planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 10, 248–259.10.1177/088541229601000302
   Google Scholar
• Transport Canada. (2008). Urban bicycle planning. Urban Transportation Showcase Program, Issue Paper 77. Ottawa: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tolley, R. (1997). Obstacles to walking and cycling. In R. Tolley (Ed.), The greening of urban transport (2nd ed., pp. 3–21). Chichester: Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tsenkova, S., & Damiani, R. (2009). Urban sustainability: Learning from evaluation of community plans in Calgary. Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 18, 82–106.
   Google Scholar
• Velo Quebec. (1992). Technical handbook of bikeways design: Planning, design, implementation. Quebec: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Victoria Transport and Policy Institute (VTPI). (2009). Accessibility: Evaluating people’s to reach desired goods, services and activities. TDM Encyclopedia. Retrieved March 28, 2009, from http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm84.htm
   Google Scholar
• USDOT. (2009). Lesson 18: Bicycle and pedestrian connections to transit. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved October 7, 2009, from http://www.tfhrc.gov/safety/pubs/05085/chapt18.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wardman, M., Tight, M., & Page, M. (2007). Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work. Transportation Research Part A, 41, 339–350.
   Google Scholar
• Welleman, T. (1997). The Dutch bicycle master plan. In R. Tolley (Ed.), The greening of urban transport (2nd ed., pp. 177–190). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar