The adoption of self-driving vehicles in Africa: insight from Ghana

References

• Abraham, H., Lee, C., Brady, S., Fitzgerald, C., Mehler, B., Reimer, B., & Coughlin, J. F. (2016). Autonomous vehicles, trust, and driving alternatives: a survey of consumer preferences (Vol. 1, 16). Massachusetts Inst.Technol, AgeLab.
   Google Scholar
• Acheampong, R. A. (2017). Towards sustainable Urban transportation in Ghana:Exploring adults’ intention to adopt cycling to work using theory of planned behaviour and structural equation modelling. Transportation in Developing Economies, 3(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-017-0047-8
   Google Scholar
• Acheampong, R. A., & Cugurullo, F. (2019). Capturing the behavioural determinants behind the adoption of autonomous vehicles: Conceptual frameworks and measurement models to predict public transport, sharing and ownership trends of self-driving cars. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav, 62, 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajibade, P. (2018). Technology acceptance model limitations and criticisms: exploring the practical applications and use in technology-related studies, mixed-method, and qualitative researches. Library Philosophy and Practice, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/t15668-000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Automobile Association (2019). Fact sheet automated vehicle survey-phase IV. https://newsroom.aaa.com/2019/03/americans-fear-self-driving-cars-survey/
   Google Scholar
• Asadi, S., Madjid, B., Asadi, M., & Oliver, T. (2016). Autonomous vehicles :Challenges, opportunities, and future implications for transportation policies. Journal of Modern Transportation, 24(4), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-016-0117-3
   Google Scholar
• Bajpai, J. N. (2016). Emerging vehicle technologies and the search for urban mobility solutions. Urban, Planning and Transport Research, 4(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650020.2016.1185964
   Google Scholar
• Banks, V. A., Plant, K. L., & Stanton, N. A. (2018). Driver error or designer error: Using the perceptual cycle model to explore the circumstances surrounding the fatal tesla crash on 7th May 2016. Safety Science, 108, 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal, P., Kockelman, K. M., & Singh, A. (2016). Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: An Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boateng, F. G. (2021). Why Africa cannot prosecute (or even educate) its way out of road accidents: Insights from Ghana. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00695-5
   Google Scholar
• Bronfman, N. C., & Vazquez, E. L. (2011). A cross-cultural study of perceived benefit versus risk as mediators in the trust- acceptance relationship. Risk Analysis, 31(12), 1919–1934. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01637.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, B., Drew, M., Erenguc, C., Hasegawa, M., Hill, R., Schmith, S., & Ganula, B. (2014). Global automotive consumer study: the changing nature of mobility—exploring consumer preferences in key markets around the world (Vol. 2014). Deloitte University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, L., & Bélanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government ser- vices: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.2005.15.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. K., & Ji, Y. G. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. Int. J. Hum.-Comp. Interact, 31(10), 692–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DfT (2015a). The pathway to driverless cars: Summary report and action plan. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/401562/pathway-driverless-cars-summary.pdf [Accessed 20th June 2020]
   Google Scholar
• Dotse, J., Nicolson, R., & Rowe, R. (2019). Behavioral influences on driver crash risks in Ghana: A qualitative study of commercial passenger drivers. Traffic Inj Prev, 20(2), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2018.1556792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudovskiy, J. (2016). The ultimate guide to writing a dissertation in business studies: a step-by-step assistance. Pittsburgh, USA, 51.
   Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction toTheory and research. Addison-Wesley. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 10(2).
   Google Scholar
• Gallo, A. (2015). “A refresher on regression analysis”. Harvard Business Review, November 4, 2015, https://hbr.org/2015/11/a-refresher-on-regression-analysis
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27, 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghana Statistical Service. (2013). 2010 population & housing census report: children, adolescents & young people in Ghana
   Google Scholar
• Ghazizadeh, M., Lee, J. D., & Boyle, L. N. (2012). Extending the technology acceptance model to assess automation. Cogn. Technol. Work, 14(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0194-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global status report on road safety. (2018). World Health Organization; 2018 Licence: CC BYNC-SA 3.0IGO
   Google Scholar
• Golbabaei, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Paz, A., & Bunker, J. (2020). Individual predictors of autonomous vehicle public acceptance and intention to use: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6040106 2199-8531, MDPI, Basel
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Celsi, M., Money, A., Samouel, P., & Page, M. (2015). The essentials of business research methods (Third ed.). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315716862
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. (2012). PROCESS: a versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling 1.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling.
   Google Scholar
• Herrenkind, B., Brendel, A. B., Nastjuk, I., Greve, M., & Kolbe, L. M. (2019). Investigating end-user acceptance of autonomous electric buses to accelerate diffusion. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ, 74, 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrenkind, B., Nastjuk, I., Brendel, A. B., Trang, S., & Kolbe, L. M. (2019). Young people’s travel behavior–Using the life-oriented approach to understand the acceptance of autonomous driving. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ, 74, 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. C., & Lu, L. C. (2016). Examining the roles of collectivism, attitude toward business, and religious beliefs on consumer ethics in China. J. Bus. Ethics, 146, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulse, L., Xie, H., & Galea, E. R. (2018). Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Saf. Sci, 102, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulse, L. M., Xie, H., & Galea, E. R. (2018). Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Safety Science, 102, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igliński, H., & Babiak, M. (2017). Analysis of the potential of autonomous vehicles in reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases in road transport. Procedia Engineering, 192, 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.061
   Google Scholar
• Jing, P., Huang, H., Ran, B., Zhan, F., & Shi, Y. (2019). Exploring the factors affecting mode choice Intention of autonomous vehicle based on an extended theory of planned behavior—A case study in China. Sustainability, 11(4), 1155. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn Ribeiro, S., Kobayashi, S., Beuthe, M., Gasca, J., Greene, D., Lee, D. S., Muromachi, Y., Newton, P. J., Plotkin, S., Sperling, D., Wit, R., & Zhou, P. J. (2007). Transport and its infrastructure. in climate change 2007: Mitigation.contribution of working group iii to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [B]. O. R. D. Metz, P. R. Bosch, R. Dave, & L. A. Meyer (eds.], Cambridge University PressPress;Cambridge United Kingdom and New York NY USA
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S. (1991). Beyond rationality: clarity-based decision making. In T. Gärling, & G. W. Evans (Eds.), Environment, cognition, and action: an integrated approach (pp. 171–190). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurniabudi, K., & Assegaff, S. (2014). A literature review: acceptance models for e-learning implementation in higher institution. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4259.8720
   Google Scholar
• Kyriakidis, M., Happee, R., & de Winter, J. C. (2015). Public opinion on automated driving: Results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 32, 127–140.
   Google Scholar
• Kyu Choi, J., & Gu Ji, Y. (2015). Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10), 692–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Moray, N. (1992). Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human–machine systems. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1243–1270. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139208967392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & Moray, N. (1994). Trust, self-confidence, and operators’ adapta- tion to automation. International Journal ofHuman–Computer Studies, 40(1), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004). Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors, 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrisa, P., Inghamb, J., & Pierre, C. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40(3), 191–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., Zhang, Y., & He, Z. (2019). The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf, 185, 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2019.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, N., Nikitas, A., & Parkinson, S. (2020). Exploring expert perceptions about the cyber security and privacy of connected and autonomous vehicles: A thematic analysis approach. Transportation Research. Part F, Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 75, 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madigan, R., Louw, T., Wilbrink, M., Schieben, A., & Merat, N. (2017). What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav, 50, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marriott, H. R., & Williams, M. D. (2018). Exploring consumers perceived risk and trust for mobile shopping: A theoretical framework and empirical study. J. Retail. Consum. Serv, 42, 133–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. (1995). Model of Trust, 20(3), 709–734.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, N., Pinjari, A. R., Zhang, Y., & Zou, L. (2016). Consumer perception and intended adoption of autonomous–vehicle technology: Findings from a university population survey (No. 16-5998). Paper presented at the meeting of the transportation research board.
   Google Scholar
• Midden, C. J. H., & Huijts, N. M. A. (2009). The role of trust in the affective evaluation of novel risks: The case of CO2 storage. Risk Analysis, 29(5), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01201.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard-Ball, A. (2018). Pedestrians, autonomous vehicles, and cities. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 38(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16675674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, V. W. (1999). Consumer perceived risk: Conceptualisations and models. Eur. J. Mark, 33(1/2), 163–195. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569910249229
   Google Scholar
• Moody, J., Bailey, N., & Zhao, J. (2020). Public perceptions of autonomous vehicle safety: An international comparison. Safety Science, 121, 634–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.07.022
   Google Scholar
• Musah, B. I., Peng, L., & Xu, Y. (2020). Urban congestion and pollution: a quest for cogent solutions for Accra city. In IOP conference series: earth and environmental science (Vol. 435, No. 1, p. 012026). IOP Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Nees, M. A. (2016). Acceptance of self-driving cars: An examination of idealized versus realistic portrayals with a self-driving car acceptance scale. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. (Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 1449–1453). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116, 1849–1864. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-07-2015-0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P. E., & Thorbjørnsen, H. (2005). Explaining intention to use mobile chat services: Moderating effects of gender. Journal of consumer Marketing, 22, 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760510611671
   Google Scholar
• Olushola, T., & Abiola, J. O. (2017). The efficacy of technology acceptance model:A review of applicable theoretical models in information technology researches.
   Google Scholar
• Osei, K. K., Adams, C. A., Ackaah, W., & Oliver-Commey, Y. (2021). Signalization options to improve capacity and delay at roundabouts through microsimulation approach: A case study on arterial roadways in Ghana. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 8(1), 70–82.
   Google Scholar
• Osswald, S., Wurhofer, D., Trösterer, S., Beck, E., & Tscheligi, M. (2012). Predicting information technology usage in the car: Towards a car technology acceptance model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 51–58).
   Google Scholar
• Pan, J. Y., & Truong, D. (2018). Passengers’ intentions to use low-cost carriers: An extended theory of planned behavior model. J. Air Transp. Manag, 69, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagiotopoulos, I., & Dimitrakopoulos, G. (2018). An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol, 95, 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2008). Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making, 2(2), 140–160. https://doi.org/10.1518/155534308X284417
   Google Scholar
• Park, C. W., Mothersbaugh, D. L., & Feick, L. (1994). Consumer Knowledge Assessment. J. Consum. Res, 21(1), 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payre, W., Cestac, J., & Delhomme, P. (2014). Intention to use a fully automated car: Attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transp. Res. Part F Psychol. Behav, 27, 252–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, S., Worrall, C., Talati, Z., Fritschi, L., & Norman, R. (2019). Dimensions of attitudes to autonomous vehicles, Urban. Planning and Transport Research, 7(1), 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Qian, L., & Yin, J. (2017). Linking Chinese cultural values and the adoption of electric vehicles: The mediating role of ethical evaluation. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ, 56, 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, R., Meister, S. R., VanLaar, W., & Hing, M. M. (2017). Automated vehicles and behavioural adaptation in Canada. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 104, 50–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014a). A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/108384/103024.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Schoettle, B., & Sivak, M. (2014b). A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. (2000). The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Analysis, 20(2), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.202020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simsekoglu, Ö., & Nayum, A. (2019). Predictors of intention to buy a battery electric vehicle among conventional car drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMP2.0 final report – integrated sustainable mobility in cities, a practical guide (2016). WBCSD Mobility.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn& Bacon/Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Taeihagh, A., & Lim, H. (2019). Governing autonomous vehicles: Emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1494640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme. (2019). Emissions Gap Report 2019. UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Jin, F., Zhao, D., Shu, Y., & Fu, Y. (2016). Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: Using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation, 43(1), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9567-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., & Yang, S. (2016). Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: Using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model [WWW Document]. ResearchGate. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9567-9
   Google Scholar
• Ward, C., Raue, M., Lee, C., Ambrosio, L. D., & Coughlin, J. F. (2017). Acceptance of automated driving across generations: The role of risk and benefit perception, knowledge, and trust. In 19th international conference on human-computer interaction, (pp. 254–266). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Weedmark, D. March 13, 2018. The advantages & disadvantages of a multiple regression model. Sciencing, https://sciencing.com/advantages-disadvantages-multiple-regression-model-12070171.html
   Google Scholar
• Wei-Yun, Y. E., Feng, Z. G., & Wei-Bin, W. U. (2010). Investigation on consumer’s knowledge and practice about nutrition labeling of food in Guangzhou. Mod. Prev. Med, 37(10), 1850–1852.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., Zhang, K., Min, H., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., & Liu, P. (2018). What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 95, 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo, K., & Lee, K. H. (2019). Core self-evaluation and work engagement: Moderated mediation model of career adaptability and job insecurity. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G. (2007). Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the TAM: Part 2. J. Model. Manage, 2(3), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465660710834462
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Lin, R., & Zhang, W. (2019). The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 98, 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X., Zeng, J., Zhu, H., & Zhu, H. (2020). Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 112, 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, A. (2012). Individual characteristics and stated preferences for alternative energy sources and propulsion technologies in vehicles: A discrete choice analysis for Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(8), 1372–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar