Modernity, mobility, and acceleration: cycling as the blind spot in Swedish transport innovation

References

• Adey, P., Cresswell, T., Yeonjae Lee, J., Nikolaeva, A., Nóvoa, A., & Temenos, C. (2021). Moving towards transition: Commoning mobility for a low-carbon future. Bloomsbury. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350237520
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Kritisk Samhällsvetenskaplig Metod. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur, W. B. 2013. Complexity economics: A different framework for economic thought. Santa Fe Institute. Working Papers (13-04-012).
   Google Scholar
• Brömmelstroet, T., Marco, A. N., Glaser, M., Skou Nicolaisen, M., & Chan, C. (2017). Travelling together alone and alone together: Mobility and potential exposure to diversity. Applied Mobilities, 2(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2017.1283122
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, T., Stilgoe, J., Stares, S., Akyelken, N., Cavoli, C., Day, J., Dickinson, J., Fors, V., Hopkins, D., Lyons, G., Marres, N., Newman, J., Reardon, L., Sipe, N., Tennant, C., Wadud, Z., & Wigley, E. (2020). A constructive role for social science in the development of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 6, 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100133
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, T. (2011). Mobilities II: Still. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511423349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elg, L. (2014, April). Innovations and new technology - what is the role of Research? Implications for public policy. VINNOVA - Swedish Governmental Agency for innovation systems/Verket för innovationssystem. VINNOVA - Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems/Verket för Innovationssystem).
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. In S. B. Ortner, N. B. Dirks, & G. Eley (Eds.), Princeton studies in culture/power/history. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. (2017). A critical theory of technology. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 635–664). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Hartmann-Petersen, K., Friis, F., Rudolf Lindberg, M., & Grindsted, T. S. (2020). Sustainable mobility in the Mobile risk society—designing innovative mobility solutions in Copenhagen. Sustainability, 12, 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudendal-Pedersen, M., Kesselring, S., & Servou, E. (2019). What is smart for the future City? Mobilities and automation. Sustainability, 11(1), 221. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin, B. (2017). Why is imitation not innovation? In B. Godin & D. Vinck (Eds.), Critical studies of innovation (pp. 1–32). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B., & Dominique, V. (2017). Introduction: Innovation–from the forbidden to a cliché. In B. Godin & D. Vinck (Eds.), Critical studies of innovation (pp. 1–14). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B., Vinck, D., Godin, B., & Vinck, D. (2017). Critical studies of innovation: Alternative approaches to the pro-innovation bias (pp. 97–114). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785367229
   Google Scholar
• Goulet, F., & Vinck, D. (2017). Moving towards innovation through withdrawal: The neglect of destruction. In Critical studies of innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. ([1969] 1987). Technology and Science as ideology. In Toward a rational society: Student protest, science and politics (pp. 81–122). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hasu, M., Karl-Heinz, L., Nikodemus, S., & Urmas, V. (2012). Accelerating the innovation race: Do we need reflexive brakes? In K. Sveiby, P. Gripenberg, & B. Segercrantz (Eds.), Challenging the innovation paradigm (pp. 87–112). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksson, M., Wallsten, A., & Ihlström, J. (2022). Can bike-sharing contribute to transport justice? Exploring a municipal bike-sharing system. Transportation Research, Part D: Transport & Environment, 103, 103185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickel, J. (2021). What does degrowth mean? A few points of clarification. Globalizations, 18(7), 1105–1111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, D., (2022, March). Designing missions: Mission-oriented innovation in Sweden - a practice Guide by Vinnova. Vinnova.
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., & Glasare, L. (2020). Shopping centres, cycling accessibility and planning—the case of Nova Lund in Sweden. Urban Science, 4(4), 70. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci4040070
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., & Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2021). Contested values in bike-sharing mobilities – a case study from Sweden. Journal of Transport Geography, 92, 103026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A. … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R., & Samuel Presner, T. (2002). The practice of conceptual history: Timing history, spacing concepts. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503619104
   Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A., & Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2020). Experimental governance of smart mobility: Some normative implications. In A. Paulsson, & C. H. Sørensen (Eds.), Shaping smart mobility futures: Governance and policy instruments in times of sustainability transitions (pp. 119–135). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Lasch, C. (1989). The idea of progress in our time. In S. Goldman (Ed.), Science, technology, and social progress (pp. 229–239). Lehigh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leitner, K.-H. (2017). ‘No’and ‘slow’ innovation strategies as a response to increased innovation speed. In B. Godin & D. Vinck (Eds.), Critical studies of innovation (pp. 201–218). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., & Elander, I. (2012). Ecological modernization in practice? The case of sustainable development in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 14(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.737234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg, R., Malene, N. G. K., Freudendal-Pedersen, M., & Hartmann-Petersen, K. (2023). Uneven mobilities and epistemic injustice: Towards reflexive mobilities research. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2023.2244682
   Google Scholar
• Lindelöw, D., Koglin, T., & Svensson, Å. (2016). Pedestrian planning and the challenges of instrumental rationality in transport planning: Emerging strategies in three Swedish municipalities. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(3), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1199813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malinowski, B. (1927). The life of culture. In G. E. Smith, B. Malinowski, H. J. Spinden, & A. Goldenweiser (Eds.), The diffusion controversy (pp. 26–46). Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Männistö-Funk, T. (2012). The prime, decline, and recalling of rural cycling: Bicycle practices in 1920s’ and 1930s’ Finland remembered in 1971-1972. Transfers, 2(2), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.3167/trans.2012.020205
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. ([1964] 1991). One-dimensional man. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. 2018. Mission-oriented Research & innovation in the European union. European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5b2811d1-16be-11e8-9253-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J. S. (2001). Institutions and progress. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), 561–586. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/10.3.561
   Google Scholar
• Meulen, J. V. D., & Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2021). Deconstructing accessibility – discursive barriers for increased cycling in Sweden. Mobilities, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1902240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladenović, M. N., Dominic, S., Dimitris, M., Kate, P., & Moshe, G. (2020). Governance cultures and sociotechnical imaginaries of self-driving vehicle technology: Comparative analysis of Finland, UK and Germany. In D. Milakis, N. Thomopoulos, & B. van Wee (Eds.), Advances in transport policy and planning (pp. 235–262). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Modig, S., Palmberg, C., & Schofield, M. (2018). Första Utvärderingen av MedTech4Health, InfraSweden2030 , Drive Sweden, RE:Source och Smart Built Environment. Vinnova, Energimyndigheten, Formas (Stockholm: Forskningsrådet Formas).
   Google Scholar
• Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2012). Planering för Framsteg och Gemenskap: om den Kommunala Utvecklingsplaneringens Idémässiga Förutsättningar. (Vol. 167). Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhtar-Landgren, D., & Paulsson, A. (2021). Governing smart mobility: Policy instrumentation, technological utopianism, and the administrative quest for knowledge. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 43(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1782111
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1990). Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy, 19(3), 193–214. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0048733390900366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, A., Adey, P., Cresswell, T., Yeonjae Lee, J., Nóvoa, A., & Temenos, C. (2019). Commoning mobility: Towards a new politics of mobility transitions. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 44(2), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaeva, A., Te Brömmelstroet, M., Raven, R., & Ranson, J. (2019). Smart cycling futures: Charting a new terrain and moving towards a research agenda. Journal of Transport Geography, 79, 102486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nykvist, B., & Whitmarsh, L. (2008). A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 75(9), 1373–1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldbury, K. 2021. Public transport meets smart mobility: Roles and relationships shaping driverless shuttles and maaS [ Dissertation]. KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Palmberg, C., Shofield, M., & Jansson, T. (2020). Viable cities: Utvärdering av ett Strategiskt Innovationsprogram. Statens Energimyndighet. Statens Energimyndighet.
   Google Scholar
• Pangbourne, K., Mladenović, M. N., Stead, D., & Milakis, D. (2020). Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, M. (2007). Automobile politics: Ecology and cultural political economy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pel, B. (2022). A transitions theory perspective on transport innovation. In B. Van Wee, J. A. Annema, & J. Köhler (Eds.), Innovations in transport (pp. 14–34). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S. M., & Juhl, J. (2017). Innovation and the political state: Beyond the myth of technologies and markets. In B. Godin & D. Vinck (Eds.), Critical studies of innovation (pp. 68–96). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Popan, C. (2019). Bicycle utopias: Imagining fast and slow cycling futures. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Psarikidou, K. (2015). Rethinking innovation through a moral economy lens: The case of alternative agro-food and mobility practices. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 15(1), 67–93. https://ephemerajournal.org/contribution/rethinking-innovation-through-moral-economy-lens-case-alternative-agro-food-and
   Google Scholar
• Psarikidou, K. (2020). Em-‘powering’ niche innovations: Learning from cycling inequalities. Applied Mobilities, 5(3), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2020.1723386
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2010). Alienation and acceleration. Towards a critical theory of late-modern temporality. NSU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosa, H. (2019). Resonance: A sociology of our relationship to the world. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryghaug, M., Subotički, I., Smeds, E., von Wirth, T., Scherrer, A., Foulds, C., Robison, R., Bertolini, L., Beyazit İ̇nce, E., Brand, R., Cohen-Blankshtain, G., Dijk, M., Freudendal Pedersen, M., Gössling, S., Guzik, R., Kivimaa, P., Klöckner, C., Lazarova Nikolova, H. … Wentland, A. (2023). A social sciences and humanities research agenda for transport and mobility in Europe: Key themes and 100 research questions. Transport Reviews, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2023.2167887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., & Edward Steinmueller, W. (2018). Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2012). The emergence of new cultures of mobility: Stability, openings and prospects. In F. W. Geels, R. Kemp, G. Dudley, & G. Lyons (Eds.), Automobility in transition? A socio-technical analysis of sustainable transport (pp. 180–202). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M. (2018). Mobility justice: The politics of movement in an age of extremes. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2000). The City and the car. International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 24(4), 737–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment & Planning A: Economy & Space, 38(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1068/a37268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2012). The shadowy side of innovation: Unmaking and sustainability. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 24(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2012.663961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinney, J., & Lin, W. I. (2018). Are you being shared? Mobility, data and social relations in Shanghai’s public bike sharing 2.0 sector. Applied Mobilities, 3(1), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2018.1437656
   Google Scholar
• Stanujkic, D., Popovic, G., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., Karabasevic, D., & Binkyte-Veliene, A. (2020). Assessment of progress towards achieving sustainable development goals of the “agenda 2030” by using the CoCoSo and the Shannon entropy methods: The case of the EU countries. Sustainability, 12(14), 5717. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145717
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sveiby, K.-E., Pernilla, G., & Beata, S. (2012). Challenging the innovation paradigm: Conclusions, practical implications, and future Research. In K. Sveiby, P. Gripenberg, & B. Segercrantz (Eds.), Challenging the innovation paradigm (pp. 261–268). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (1993). The sociology of social change. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. J. (2017). Introduction: What is critical theory? In M. J. Thompson (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of critical theory (pp. 1–14). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2000). Sociology beyond societies: Mobilities for the twenty-first century. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2016). What is the future?. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaaben, N. (2013). Innovations-, Samarbejds-og Styringsfantasmer i det Offentlige. Roskilde Universitet. https://rucforsk.ruc.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/45463585/phd_Nana.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Wee, B., Annema, J., & Köhler, J. (2022). Innovations in transport: Success, failure and societal impacts. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnova. (2019). Förutsättningar för systeminnovation för en hållbar framtid Analysbilaga till Systeminnovation för en hållbar framtid. In VR (p. 08). Publisher:Vinnova.
   Google Scholar
• Westman, L., & Castan Broto, V. (2022). Urban Transformations to Keep All the Same: The power of ivy discourses. Antipode, 54(4), 1320–1343. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-J., Isaksson, K., & Antonson, H. (2017). The struggle to achieve holistic landscape planning: Lessons from planning the E6 road route through tanum world heritage Site, Sweden. Land Use Policy, 67, 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.05.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. (2022). What is shared in shared bicycles? Mobility, space, and capital. Mobilities, 17(5), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2022.2099755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar