981
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Evaluation of decision support system for disaster management using multi-criteria decision techniques: a case study of Alappuzha, Kerala

, ORCID Icon &
Article: 2262546 | Received 16 Aug 2023, Accepted 20 Sep 2023, Published online: 02 Oct 2023

References

  • Aguila Lasserre, A. A., Stainer, R., & Montoya-Torres, J. R. (2009). A decision support system for the optimal planning and control of semiconductor manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 47(22), 6321–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802262135
  • Allaoui, H., Guo, Y., & Sarkis, J. (2019). Decision support for collaboration planning in sustainable supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production 229, 761–774. ISSN 0959-6526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.367
  • Altay, N., & Green, W. G. (2006). OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 475–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.016
  • Amorim, M., Antunes, F., Ferreira, S., & Couto, A. (2019). An integrated approach for strategic and tactical decisions for the emergency medical service: Exploring optimization and metamodel-based simulation for vehicle location. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106057
  • Bigi, V., Comino, E., Fontana, M., Pezzoli, A., & Rosso, M. (2021). Flood vulnerability analysis in an urban context: A socioeconomic sub-indicators overview. Climate, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9010012
  • Buckley, J. J. (1985). Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
  • Bui, D. T. (2016). Flood susceptibility mapping using fuzzy analytical Hierarchy Process for Cedar Rapids, Iowa. Natural Hazards, 82(2), 1377–1396.
  • Celik, E., Gumus, A. T., & Celik, N. (2009). Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8), 11302–11312.
  • Chang, D. Y. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(95), 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
  • Ekmekçioğlu, Ö., Koc, K., & Özger, M. (2021). District-based flood risk assessment in Istanbul using fuzzy analytical hierarchy process. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 35(3), 617–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01924-8
  • Flood report 2018 of Alappuzha. https://reliefweb.int/report/india/study-report-kerala-floods-august-2018
  • Gao, M., Wang, Z., & Yang, H. (2022). Review of urban flood resilience: Insights from Scientometric and systematic analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(16), 8837. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148837
  • Hassan Ahmadi, C., Jahangoshai Rezaee, M., Ghasemi, P., & Saberi, M. (2021). Efficient crisis management by selection and analysis of relief centers in disaster integrating GIS and multicriteria decision methods: A case study of Tehran. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2021, 1–22. Article ID 5944828. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5944828
  • Kundzewicz, Z. W., Kanae, S., Seneviratne, S. I., Handmer, J., Nicholls, N., Peduzzi, P., Mechler, R., Bouwer, L. M., Arnell, N., Mach, K., Muir-Wood, R., Brakenridge, G. R., Kron, W., Benito, G., Honda, Y., Takahashi, K., & Sherstyukov, B. (2014). Flood risk and climate change: Global and regional perspectives. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2013.857411
  • Lawrence, V. S. (2006). Facility location under uncertainty: A review. IIE Transactions, 38(7), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170500216480
  • Liu, S. T., & Chen, C. W. (2006). A GIS-based decision support system for urban emergency logistics planning. Computers & Operations Research, 33(8), 2294–2313.
  • Manopiniwes, W. (2018). A multi-objective Model for relief operations in flood-affected areas: A case study of Thai floods. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 9(2), 141–158.
  • Mikhailov, L. (2003). Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A general view. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 134(3), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00383-4
  • Mottahedi, A., Sereshki, F., Ataei, M., Nouri Qarahasanlou, A., & Barabadi, A. (2021). The resilience of critical infrastructure Systems: A systematic literature review. Energies, 14(6), 1571. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14061571
  • NDMA. (2008). Annual Report 2008 (english) (pp. 1–126). https://www.jru.orthop.gu.se/archive/AnnualReport-2008-eng.pdf%5Cnpapers2://publication/uuid/023A3055-01BC-49D3-A2A5-AD650F0176E8
  • Noor, A. Z. M. (2018). Sustainable supply chain Model for material flow cost accounting: A case study in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3322–3338.
  • Pagell, M., & Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. The Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12037
  • Prathipati, V. K., CV, N., & Konatham, P. (2019). Inconsistency in the frequency of rainfall events in the Indian summer monsoon season. International Journal of Climatology, 39(13), 4907–4923. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6113
  • Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-Worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57 Zhu, K J, Jing, Y, and Chang, D Y (1999), “A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 116, pp. 450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00331-2
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.
  • SeyedAmir, H., Ahmadi Choukolaei, H., Ghasemi, P., Dardaei-Beiragh, H., Sherafatianfini, S., & Pourghader Chobar, A. (2022). Evaluating the performance of emergency centers during coronavirus epidemic using multi-criteria decision-making methods (case study: Sari city). Discrete Dynamics in Nature & Society, 2022, 13. Article ID 6074579. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6074579
  • Shin, H., Lee, K., & Park, Y. (2007). An integrated approach for the selection of a reverse logistics provider. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 12(5), 397–405.
  • Tabari, M., Haghani, A., & Danesh, A. (2008). Application of fuzzy AHP to select the best pavement maintenance technique. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(1), 518–527.
  • Tang, L., Zhou, X., & Zhang, Q. (2017). Optimization of emergency logistics distribution for a sudden disaster: A case study in China. Transportation Research Part E Logistics & Transportation Review, 101, 15–31.
  • Tesfamariam, S., & Sadiq, R. (2006). Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP). Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 21(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0042-9
  • Tzeng, G. H., Huang, J. J., & Ong, C. S. (2007). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. CRC Press.
  • Van Laarhoven, P. J. M., & Pedrycz, W. (1983). A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 11(1–3), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
  • Vayvay, Ö. (2016). AHP-Based decision support system for disaster centre location selection: A case study for Istanbul. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 16(2), 419–431.
  • Vazhuthi, H. I., & Kumar, A. (2020). Causes and impacts of urban floods in Indian cities: A review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies, 11, 140–147.
  • Wang, Y. M., & Elhag, T. M. S. (2006). Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 31(2), 309–319.
  • Zhang, H., & Chen, S. (2011). Location selection for regional distribution centers: A fuzzy-AHP approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(3), 1378–1388.