Application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process to develop walkability index: a case study of Dwarka sub city, New Delhi, India

References

• Allan, A. (2001). Walking as a local transport model choice in Adelaide. World Transport Policy & Practice, 7(2), 44–18 .
   Google Scholar
• Blečić, I., Cecchini, A., Congiu, T., & Fancello, G. (2014). Walkability explorer: An evaluation and design support tool for walkability. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 511–521). University of Minho, Guimaraes, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, C. (1993). Creating and use of ratiing for neighbourhood walk abilities towards an agenda. 14th International Pedestrain Conferance.
   Google Scholar
• Brownson, R. C., Fielding, J. E., & Maylahn, C. M. (2009). Evidence-based public Health: A fundamental concept for public health practice. Annual Review of Public Health, 30(1), 175–201. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burden, D. (2001). Building communities with Transportation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1773(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.3141/1773-02
   Google Scholar
• Chang, D. (1996). Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy ahp. European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3), 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Portland. (1998). Portland pedestrian master plan. City of Portland Office of Transportation.
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, C., Louderback, E., & Sen Roy, S. (2019). The role of land use and walkability in predicting crime patterns: A spatiotemporal analysis of Miami-Dade County neighborhoods, 2007–2015. Security Journal, 32(3), 264–286. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-018-00161-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannenberg, A. (2004). Assessing the walkability of the workplace: A new audit. In Presented at the 4th National Congress of Pedestrian Advocates. America Walks.
   Google Scholar
• Devarajan, R., Prabhakaran, D., & Goenka, S. (2019). Built environment for physical activity—an urban barometer, surveillance, and monitoring. Public Health.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., Yuan, Z., & Li, Y. (2008). Performance evaluation model for transportation corridor based on fuzzy-ahp approach. Fifth International Conference on in Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Dis-Covery, 3, 608–612. https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2008.225
   Google Scholar
• EPA. (2021). National walkability index methodology and user guide. United States Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L., Appleyard, B., Ulmer, J., Chapman, J., & Fox, E. (2021). Comparing walkability methods: Creation of street smart walk score and efficacy of a code-based 3D walkability index. Journal of Transport & Health, 21, 101005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.101005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayani, R., Amarawickrama, S., Rathnayake, R., Randeniya, T., & Rathnasiri, S. (2015). A model for assessing the level of walkability in urban neighborhoods in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 2. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v2.n4.97
   Google Scholar
• Gori, S., Nigro, M., & Petrelli, M. (2014). Walkability indicators for pedestrian-friendly design. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2464(-1), 38-45.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M., Grivna, M., Nauman, J., Soteriades, E., Cevik, A. A., Hashim, M. J., Govender, R., & Al Azeezi, S. R. (2020). Global incidence and mortality patterns of pedestrian Road traffic injuries by sociodemographic index, with forecasting: Findings from the global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors 2017 study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 2135. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-K., Ulfarsson, G., Shankar, V., & Kim, S. (2008). Age and pedestrian injury severity in motor-vehicle crashes: A heteroskedastic logit analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(5), 1695–1702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krambeck, H. (1999). The Global walkability index. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Krambeck, H. V. (2006). The global walkability index.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Hyung, J., Dowdy, M., Deanna, D., & Marcia, G. O. (2013). TCOPPE school environmental audit tool: Assessing safety and walkability of school environments. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 10(7), 949–960. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.10.7.949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, Z. 2016. Evaluating transit operator efficiency:an enhanced DEA model with constrained fuzzy-AHPcones. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. (EnglishEdition)3,215–225.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, T. A. (2003). Economic value of walkability. Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, H. (2002). Pedestrian environments and sense of community. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0202100307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayou, R., & Bryant, B. (2003). Consequences of road traffic accidents for different types of road user. Journal of the Care of the Injured, 34(3), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00285-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MoUD. (2008). Study on traffic and Transportation Policies and strategies in urban areas in India. Ministry of Urban Development.
   Google Scholar
• Moudon, A. V. (2002). WBC Project: Environnemental Audit Instrument Review. University of Washington Urban Form Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Moura, F., Cambra, P., & Gonçalves, A. B. (2017). Measuring walkability for Distinct Pedestrian Groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon. Landscape Urban Plann, 157, 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, M., & Bracke, K. 2002. Pedestrian level of service.Transportation Department. City of Fort Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Padillo, A., Minella Pasqual, F., Margarita Larranaga Uriarte, A., & Beatriz Bettella Cybis, H. (2018). Application of multi-criteria decision analysis methods for assessing walkability: A case study in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Transportation Research, Part D: Transport & Environment, 63, 855–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. (1977). Scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical and Psychology, 15(3), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: Planning, priority setting, resource allocation (decision making series). Mcgraw-Hill College.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. (1983). Axiomatic foundations of the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science, 32(7), 841–855. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.841
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. (1990). An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process”. Management Science, 36(3), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.3.259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. (1994). Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the AHP. RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sayyadi, G., & Awasthi, A. (2013). AHP-Based approach for location Planning of pedestrian zones: Application in Montréal, Canada. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 139(2), 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000493
   Google Scholar
• Triantaphyllou, E., & Mann, S. H. (1995). Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: Some challenges. Inter’l Journal of Industrial Engineering: Applications and Practice, 2, 35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Tribby, C., Miller, H., Smith, K., Werner, C. M., & Smith, K. R. (2016). Analyzing walking route choice through built environments using random forests and discrete choice techniques. Environment and Planning, 44(6), 1145–1167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516659286
   Google Scholar
• Vargo, B. S., Glanz, K., & Glanz, K. (2011). Google walkability: A New tool for local Planning and public Health Research? Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 9(5), 689–697. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.9.5.689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walkingscore.com. (2010). Walkingscore.com.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., Jiang, Y., Jia Li, Z., & Liu, G. (2012). The walkability assessment of Lishan Road: A case study in Jinan, China. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 164, 178–181. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.164.178
   Google Scholar
• Wann-Ming, W., & Chiu, Y.-H. (2012). Assessing the walkability of pedestrian environment under the transit-oriented development. Habitat International, 38 106–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., & Chen, C. 2016. Does the built environment affect non-motorized travel behaviors differently for lower-and higher-income people ? In: Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Washington,10–14
   Google Scholar