Uncovering the specificities of CAD tools for industrial design with design theory – style models for generic singularity

References

• Arrighi, P.-A., & Kazakçi, A. O. (2013). Lack of integration between engineering industrial design processes. In 21st International Conference on Engineering Design, August 19, 22, 2013, Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Arrighi, P.-A., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2015). Addressing constraints creatively: How new design software helps solve the dilemma of originality and feasibility. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24, 247–260.10.1111/caim.2015.24.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, S.-H., Balakrishnan, R., & Singh, K. (2008) ILoveSketch: As-natural-as-possible sketching system for creating 3D curve models. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, October 19–22, 2008, Monterey, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Bettig, B., & Shah, J. (2001). Derivation of a standard set of geometric constraints for parametric modeling and data exchange. Computer-Aided Design, 33, 17–33.10.1016/S0010-4485(00)00058-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodein, Y., Rose, B., & Caillaud, E. (2012). Decisional model for KBE implementation in a commercial CAD software. Computer Aided Design Applications, 9, 121–131.10.3722/cadaps.2012.121-131
   Google Scholar
• Braha, D., & Reich, Y. (2003). Topological structures for modeling engineering design processes. Research in Engineering Design, 14, 185–199.10.1007/s00163-003-0035-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunetti, G., & Golob, B. (2000). A feature-based approach towards an integrated product model including conceptual design information. Computer-Aided Design, 32, 877–887.10.1016/S0010-4485(00)00076-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Gao, S., Yang, Y., & Zhang, S. (2012). Multi-level assembly model for top-down design of mechanical products. Computer-Aided Design, 44, 1033–1048.10.1016/j.cad.2010.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. H., & Cheung, H. H. (2005). A multi-material virtual prototyping system. Computer Aided Design, 37, 123–136.10.1016/j.cad.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deschênes, F., Ziou, D., & Fuchs, P. (2004). An unified approach for a simultaneous and cooperative estimation of defocus blur and spatial shifts. Image and Vision Computing, 22, 35–57.10.1016/j.imavis.2003.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorta, T., Pérez, E., & Lesage, A. (2008). The ideation gap: hybrid tools, design flow and practice. Design Studies, 29, 121–141.10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyn, N., Floater, M. S., & Hormann, K. (2009). Four-point curve subdivision based on iterated chordal and centripetal parameterizations. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 26, 279–286.10.1016/j.cagd.2008.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridenson, P. (2015). Inventeur salarié, automatisation et entreprise : expériences internationales, tensions et dynamiques. In A. Michel & S. Benoit (Eds.), Le monde du génie industriel au XXe siècle: autour de Pierre Bézier et des machines-outils (pp. 15–28). Belfort: Pôle éditorial de l'UTBM.
   Google Scholar
• Fuge, M., Yumer, M. E., Orbay, G., & Kara, L. B. (2012). Conceptual design and modification of freeform surfaces using dual shape representations in augmented reality environments. Computer-Aided Design, 44, 1020–1032.10.1016/j.cad.2011.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, A. K., Vattam, S., Wiltgen, B., & Helms, M. (2012). Cognitive, collaborative, conceptual and creative – Four characteristics of the next generation of knowledge-based CAD systems: A study in biologically inspired design. Computer-Aided Design, 44, 879–900.10.1016/j.cad.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, M. D, & Do, E. (1996). Ambiguous intentions: A paper-like interface for creative design. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Seattle, WA, pp. 183–192.
   Google Scholar
• Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., Reich, Y., & Weil, B. (2011). A systematic approach of design theories using generativeness and robustness. International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED'11 (p. 12). Copenhagen: Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Hatchuel, A., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2011). Teaching innovative design reasoning: How concept–knowledge theory can help overcome fixation effects. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 25, 77–92.10.1017/S089006041000048X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2009). C-K design theory: An advanced formulation. Research in Engineering Design, 19, 181–192.10.1007/s00163-008-0043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatchuel, A., Weil, B., & Le Masson, P. (2013). Towards an ontology of design: Lessons from C–K design theory and forcing. Research in Engineering Design, 24, 147–163.10.1007/s00163-012-0144-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igarashi, T., Matsuoka, S., & Tanaka, H. (2007). Teddy: A sketching interface for 3D freeform design. Paper presented at the ACM SIGGRAPH 2007, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Y., Kim, H., Suzuki, H., & Han, S. (2013). Feature-based 3D CAD modeling on smart device using multi-touch gesture. International Journal of CAD/CAM, 13, 49–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kazakçi, A. O. (2014). Conceptive artifical intelligence: Insights from design theory. Paper presented at the International Design Conference Design 2014, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, D., Feliz, D., Moscovich, T., Laidlaw, D., & LaViola, J. J. J. (2001). CavePainting: A fully immersive 3D artistic medium and interactive experience. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2001 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, ACM, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. C., Maheut, P., Papalambros, P. Y., & Petiot, J. F. (2011). Incorporating user shape preference in engineering design optimisation. Journal of Engineering Design, 22, 627–650.10.1080/09544821003662601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalski, M. A., Markosian, L., Northrup, J. D., Bourdev, L., Barzel, R., Holden, L. S., & Hughes, J. F. (1999). Art-based rendering of fur, grass, and trees. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kwok, T.-H., & Wang, C. C. L. (2014). Shape optimization for human-centric products with standardized components. Computer-Aided Design, 52, 40–50.10.1016/j.cad.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasram, A., Lefebvre, S., & Damez, C. (2012). Procedural texture preview. Computer Graphics Forum, 31, 413–420.10.1111/j.1467-8659.2012.03020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Masson, P., Dorst, K., & Subrahmanian, E. (2013). Design theory: History, state of the art and advancements. Research in Engineering Design, 24, 97–103.10.1007/s00163-013-0154-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Masson, P., Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2016). Design theory at Bauhaus: Teaching ‘splitting’ knowledge. Research in Engineering Design, 27, 91–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2013). Design theories as languages of the unknown: Insights from the German roots of systematic design (1840–1960). Research in Engineering Design, 24, 105–126.10.1007/s00163-012-0140-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Maekawa, T., Patrikalakis, N. M., Sachs, E. M., & Cho, W. (2004). Methods for feature-based design of heterogeneous solids. Computer-Aided Design, 36, 1141–1159.10.1016/j.cad.2003.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Dodds, G., McCartney, J., & Hinds, B. K. (2004). Virtual designworks – Designing 3D CAD models via haptic interaction. Computer-Aided Design, 36, 1129–1140.10.1016/j.cad.2003.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Ritchie, J. M., Lim, T., Kosmadoudi, Z., Sivanathan, A., & Sung, R. C. W. (2014). A fuzzy psycho-physiological approach to enable the understanding of an engineer’s affect status during CAD activities. Computer-Aided Design, 54, 19–38.10.1016/j.cad.2013.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loop, C., & Schaefer, S. (2008). Approximating Catmull-Clark subdivision surfaces with bicubic patches. ACM Transactions on Graphs, 27(1), 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loop, C., Schaefer, S., Ni, T., & Castano, I. (2009). Approximating subdivision surfaces with Gregory patches for hardware tessellation. ACM Transactions on Graphs, 28(5), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandil, G., Serré, P., Mireille, M., & Desrochers, A. (2011). Geometrical tools for the description and control of functional specifications at the conceptual design phase. IJODIR, 5, 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mishkinis, A., Gentil, C., Lanquetin, S., & Sokolov, D. (2012). Approximate convex hull of affine iterated function system attractors. Chaos Solitons Fractals, 45, 1444–1451.10.1016/j.chaos.2012.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nealen, A., Igarashi, T., Sorkine, O., & Alexa, M. (2007). FiberMesh: designing freeform surfaces with 3D curves. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 26(3), 41.10.1145/1276377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. A., & Zeng, Y. (2014). A physiological study of relationship between designer’s mental effort and mental stress during conceptual design. Computer-Aided Design, 54, 3–18.10.1016/j.cad.2013.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouertani, M. Z., Baïna, S., Gzara, L., & Morel, G. (2011). Traceability and management of dispersed product knowledge during design and manufacturing. Computer-Aided Design, 43, 546–562.10.1016/j.cad.2010.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen, D. (1993). Feature-based design: Four hypotheses for future CAD systems. Research in Engineering Design, 5, 125–139.10.1007/BF01608359
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, D., & Peters, T. (1993). Special issue: Advances in representation and reasoning for mechanical CAD. Research in Engineering Design, 5, 123–124.10.1007/BF01608358
   Google Scholar
• Salehi, V., & McMahon, C. (2011). Development and application of an integrated approach for parametric associative CAD design in an industrial context. Computer-Aided Design and Applications, 8, 225–236.10.3722/cadaps.2011.225-236
   Google Scholar
• Shah, J., & Rogers, M. (1993). Assembly modeling as an extension of feature-based design. Research in Engineering Design, 5, 218–237.10.1007/BF01608364
   Google Scholar
• Stergiopoulos, P., Fuchs, P., & Laurgeau, C. (2003). Design of a 2-finger hand exoskeleton for VR grasping simulation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of Eurohaptics. July 2003. Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N. P. (1990). Principles of design. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thurgood, P., & Clark, J. (2001). Use of 3D non-contact digitisation and 3D touch modelling systems within automotive seating design. Paper presented at the Proceedings of TCT Conference, Chester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Tovey, M. (1997). Styling and design: Intuition and analysis in industrial design. Design Studies, 18, 5–31.10.1016/S0142-694X(96)00006-3
   Google Scholar
• Tovey, M. (2002). Concept design CAD for the automotive industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 13, 5–18.10.1080/09544820110090287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whited, B., Daniels, E., Kaschalk, M., Osborne, P., & Odermatt, K. (2012). Computer-assisted animation of line and paint in Disney’s Paperman. Paper presented at the SIGGRAPH Talks, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, Z., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Jiang, S., & Sun, Y. (2013). Product modeling framework based on interaction feature pair. Computer-Aided Design, 45, 1591–1603.10.1016/j.cad.2013.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshikawa, H. (1981). General design theory and a CAD system. In T. Sata & E. Warman (Eds.), Man–machine communication in CAD/CAM, proceedings of the IFIP WG5.2–5.3 Working Conference 1980 (Tokyo) (pp. 35–57). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, Y., & Gu, P. (1999a). A science-based approach to product design theory Part I: Formulation and formalization of design process. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 15, 331–339.10.1016/S0736-5845(99)00028-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Y., & Gu, P. (1999b). A science-based approach to product design theory Part II: Formulation of design requirements and products. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 15, 341–352.10.1016/S0736-5845(99)00029-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Y., & Horváth, I. (2012). Fundamentals of next generation CAD/E systems. Computer-Aided Design, 44, 875–878.10.1016/j.cad.2012.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, D. H., Yan, F. X., Hou, Z. X., & Kang, W. K. (2009). Virtual clay modeling system with 6-DOF haptic feedback. Material Science Forum, 628, 155–160.
   Google Scholar