Design creativity: refined method for novelty assessment

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-1-4612-5533-8
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview press.
   Google Scholar
• Borgianni, Y., Cascini, G., & Rotini, F. (2012). A proposal of metrics to assess the creativity of designed services. Paper presented at the DS 73-1 Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Design Creativity Volume 1.
   Google Scholar
• Casakin, H. P. (2007). Factors of metaphors in design problem-solving: Implications for design creativity. International Journal of Design, 1(2), 21–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, A., & Bligh, T. P. (1994). Functional synthesis of solution-concepts in mechanical conceptual design. Part I: Knowledge Representation. Research in Engineering Design, 6(3), 127–141.10.1007/BF01607275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, A., Sarkar, P., Leelavathamma, B., & Nataraju, B. (2005). A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. AIE EDAM, 19(02), 113–132.
   Google Scholar
• Childs, P.R.N., & Fountain, R. (2011). “Commercivity”, DS 69: Proceedings of E and PDE 2011, the 13th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education (pp. 3–8).
   Google Scholar
• Chulvi, V., Mulet, E., Chakrabarti, A., López-Mesa, B., & González-Cruz, C. (2012). Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 241–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corr. (2010). Critical values of the correlation coefficient. Retrieved from http://www.microbiologybytes.com/maths/rtable.html
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G. (2005). Cox review of creativity in business: Building on the UK’s strengths. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hmtreasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/cox_review/coxreview_index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains (pp. 169–185). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. New York, NY: Berg Publishers.10.5040/9781474293884
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A. (1992). Creativity is forever. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Dubey, U., Kothari, D. P., & Awari, G. K. (2016). Quantitative techniques in business, management and finance: A case-study approach. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisentraut, R., & Badke-Schaub, P. (1995). Creativity: A personality trait or an Illusion. Paper presented at the International workshop: Engineering design and creativity, State Scientific Library, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Elizondo, L. A., Kisselburgh, L. G., Hirleman, E. D., Cipra, R. J., Ramani, K., Yang, M., … Carleton, T. (2010). Understanding innovation in student design projects. In ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 805–810). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• FCAI. (2015). Can my vehicle operate on Ethanol blend petrol? Retrieved April30, 2015, from http://www.fcai.com.au/environment/can-my-vehicle-operate-on-ethanol-blend-petrol
   Google Scholar
• Fuge, M., Stroud, J., & Agogino, A. (2013). Automatically inferring metrics for design creativity. Paper presented at the ASME 2013 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, E. M., & Martin, C. K. (2012). Supporting creativity within web-based self-services. International Journal of Design, 6(1), 85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagtap, S. (2016). Assessing design creativity: Refinements to the novelty assessment method. In DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Jagtap, S., Warell, A., Hiort, V., Motte, D., & Larsson, A. (2014). Design methods and factors influencing their uptake in product development companies: A review. In 13th International Design Conference, Cavtat – Dubrovnik, Croatia (pp. 231–240).
   Google Scholar
• Jagtap, S., Larsson, A., Hiort, V., Olander, E., & Warell, A. (2015). Interdependency between average novelty, individual average novelty, and variety. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 3(1), 43–60.10.1080/21650349.2014.887987
   Google Scholar
• Linsey, J. S. (2007). Design-by-analogy and representation in innovative engineering concept generation (PhD thesis). Austin: The University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Linsey, J., Wood, K. L., & Markman, A. (2008). Increasing innovation: Presentation and evaluation of the wordtree design-by-analogy method. In ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 21–32). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. C., Chakrabarti, A., & Bligh, T. P. (2000). Further developments of FuncSION. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Artificial intelligence in design’00 (pp. 499e519). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Mesa, B., & Vidal, R. (2006). Novelty metrics in engineering design experiments. Paper presented at the DS 36: Proceedings DESIGN 2006, the 9th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, B. A., Wilson, J. O., Rosen, D., & Yen, J. (2009). Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 30(6), 737–743.10.1016/j.destud.2009.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oman, S. K., Tumer, I. Y., Wood, K., & Seepersad, C. (2013). A comparison of creativity and innovation metrics and sample validation through in-class design projects. Research in Engineering Design, 24(1), 65–92.10.1007/s00163-012-0138-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K.-H. (2007). Engineering design: A systematic approach (Vol. 157). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2
   Google Scholar
• Redelinghuys, C. (2000). Proposed criteria for the detection of invention in engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design, 11(3), 265–282.10.1080/095448200750021021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumsey, D. J. (2007). Intermediate statistics for dummies. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, J., Shluzas, L., & Blikstein, P. (2016). Building blocks in creative computing: Modularity increases the probability of prototyping novel ideas. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2008). Studying engineering design creativity-developing a common definition and associated measures.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2011). Assessing design creativity. Design studies, 32(4), 348–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, R. (2002). Curious design agents and artificial creativity a synthetic approach to the study of creative behavior (PhD thesis). Department of Architectural and Design Science, Faculty of Architecture, University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111–134.10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00034-0
   Google Scholar
• Snider, C. M., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. A. (2013). Analysing creative behaviour in the later stage design process. Design Studies, 34(5), 543–574.10.1016/j.destud.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. Handbook of creativity, 1, 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.uwsp.edu/education/lwilson/creativ/define.htm
   Google Scholar
• Verhaegen, P. A., Vandevenne, D., Peeters, J., & Duflou, J. R. (2013). Refinements to the variety metric for idea evaluation. Design Studies, 34(2), 243–263.10.1016/j.destud.2012.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. (1993). From creativity e beyond the myth of genius. W H Freeman and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Worinkeng, E., Joshi, S., & Summers, J. D. (2015). An experimental study: Analyzing requirement type influence on novelty and variety of generated solutions. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 3(2), 61–77.10.1080/21650349.2014.909294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunus, A. C. (2003). Heat transfer: A practical approach. New York: MacGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar