Comparison of the cerebral activities exhibited by expert and novice visual communication designers during idea incubation

References

• Ahmed, S., Wallace, K. M., & Blessing, L. T. (2000). Identifying differences between novice and experienced designers (keynote address). In S. Sivaloganathan & P. T. J. Andrews (Eds.), Engineering design conference EDC2000 (pp. 97–106). London, UK: Professional Engineering Publishing Ltd, Brunel University.
   Google Scholar
• Akin, Ö., & Akin, C. (1996). Frames of reference in architectural design: Analyzing the hyper-acclamation (Aha!). Design Studies, 17(4), 341–361.
   Google Scholar
• Alexiou, K., Zamenopoulos, T., Johnson, J. H., & Gilbert, S. J. (2009). Exploring the neurological basis of design cognition using brain imaging: Some preliminary results. Design Studies, 30(6), 623–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz-Zadeh, L., Liew, S.-L., & Dandekar, F. (2013). Exploring the neural correlates of visual creativity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 475–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, L. J., & Ormerod, T. (1995). Structured and opportunistic processing in design: A critical discussion. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(1), 131–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, L. J., Ormerod, T. C., & Morley, N. J. (2004). Spontaneous analogising in engineering design: A comparative analysis of experts and novices. Design Studies, 25(5), 495–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, M., Capozzoli, M., McSweeney, L., & Sinha, D. (1999). Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27(1), 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskinger, M., & Nam, K.-C. (2006), February. Visual narratives: The essential role of imagination in the visualization process. Paper appeared at Asia Pacific Symposium on Information Visualization 2006 (APVIS 2006), Tokyo, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage, 88, 125–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonnardel, N., & Marmèche, E. (2004). Evocation processes by novice and expert designers: Towards stimulating analogical thinking. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(3), 176–186.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Brunet, N., Bosman, C. A., Roberts, M., Oostenveld, R., Womelsdorf, T., De Weerd, P., & Fries, P. (2015). Visual cortical gamma-band activity during free viewing of natural images. Cerebral Cortex, 25(4), 918–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, P., & Noone, L. (2006). Critical imagination: A pedagogy for engaging pre-service teachers in the university classroom. College Quarterly, 9(4). Retrieved February, 15, 2012, from http://www.senecac.on.ca/quarterly/2006-vol09-num04-fall/cartwright_noone.html. Accessed 15 December 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Casakin, H. P. (2005). Design aided by visual displays: A cognitive approach. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 22(3), 250–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casakin, H. P., & Goldschmidt, G. (1999). Expertise and the use of visual analogy: Implications for design education. Design Studies, 20(2), 153–175.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysikou, G. E., Hamilton, R. H., Coslett, H. B., Datta, A., Bikson, M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2013). Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use. Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(2), 81–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cila, N., Hekkert, P., & Visch, V. (2014). Source selection in product metaphor generation: The effects of salience and relatedness. International Journal of Design, 8(1), 15–28.\.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, H. W. (1985). EEG correlates of emotional tasks related to attentional demands. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 3(1), 33–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2001). Design cognition: Results from protocols and other empirical studies of design activity. In C. M. Eastman, W. M. McCraken, & W. C. Newstetter (Eds.), Design knowing and learning: Cognition in design education (Chapter 5, pp. 79–104). New York, NY: Elsevire.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan, M. (2013). Infant EEG and event-related potentials. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M. A. (2012). Faces of product pleasure: 25 positive emotions in human-product interactions. International Journal of Design, 6(2), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(6), 1011–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doll, A., Hölzel, B. K., Mulej Bratec, S., Boucard, C., Xie, X., Wohlschläger, A., & Sorg, C. (2016). Mindful attention to breath regulates emotions via increased amygdala-prefrontal cortex connectivity. NeuroImage, 134, 305–313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A. (2006). Protocol analysis and expert thought: Concurrent verbalizations of thinking during experts’ performance on representative tasks. In K. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 223–242). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2006). EEG alpha oscillations during the performance of verbal creativity tasks: Differential effects of sex and verbal intelligence. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62(1), 46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkmann, M. N. (2010, November 29–December 1). Enabling creativity. Imagination in design processes. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Design Creativity ICDC 2010. Japan: Kobe.
   Google Scholar
• Folkmann, M. N. (2013). The aesthetics of imagination in design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallup, G. G. J., & Platek, S. M. (2002). Cognitive empathy presupposes self-awareness: Evidence from phylogeny, ontogeny, neuropsychology and mental illness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 36–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaut, B. (2005). Creativity and imagination. In M. Beaney (Ed.), Imagination and creativity (pp. 268–293). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., Jiang, H., & Williams, C. (2013). Design cognition differences when using unstructured, partially structured and structured concept generation creativity techniques. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1(4), 196–214.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J., & Reiner, M. (2000). Thought experiments in science education: Potential and current realization. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 265–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., Georgiou, G. J., Sirota, M., & Paphiti-Galeano, A. (2015). Incubation and suppression processes in creative problem solving. Thinking and Reasoning, 21(1), 130–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel, V. (2014). Creative brains: Designing in the real world. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(1), article 241.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27(5), 549–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2011), August 15–18. Around you: How designers get inspired. International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED11, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, J., & Sadler-Smith, E. (2011). Unpacking intuition: A process and outcome framework. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 304–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabner, R. H., Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2007). Brain correlates of self-rated originality of ideas: Evidence from event-related power and phase-locking changes in the EEG. Behavioral Neuroscience, 121(1), 224–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., … Dehaene, S. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology, 2(4), 500–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavakli, M., & Gero, J. S. (2002). The structure of concurrent cognitive actions: A case study on novice and expert designers. Design Studies, 23(1), 25–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Ryu, H. (2014). A design thinking rationality framework: Framing and solving design problems in early concept generation. Human-Computer Interaction, 29(5/6), 516–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppel, R. H., & Storm, B. C. (2014). Escaping mental fixation: Incubation and inhibition in creative problem solving. Memory, 22(4), 340–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kragel, P. A., & LaBar, K. S. (2016). Decoding the nature of emotion in the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(6), 444–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, W.-J., Sjostrom, T., Chen, Y.-P., Wang, Y.-H., & Huang, C.-Y. (2009). Intuition and deliberation: Two systems for strategizing in the brain. Science, 324, 519–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, B., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, R., Braga, R., & Sharp, D. J. (2012). Echoes of the brain within the posterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 32(1), 215–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, C., & Chia, T.-L. (2014). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the imaginative capability scale. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 106–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, C., Lin, C.-T., Yao, S.-N., Chang, W.-S., Liu, Y.-C., & Chen, S.-A. (2017). Visual attention and association: An electroencephalography study in expert designers. Design Studies, 48, 76–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, C., & Lin, W.-S. (2015). The interplay of creativity, imagination, personality traits and academic performance. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 34(3), 270–290.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, C.-T., Chang, Y., & Liang, C. (2018). How can pictorial representations stimulate the imaginative capacity of experienced multimedia designers? International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 7(1–2). doi:10.1080/21650349.2018.1465477
   Google Scholar
• Lin, W.-S., Hsu, Y., & Liang, C. (2014). The mediator effects of conceiving imagination on academic performance of design students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 24(1), 73–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, E., & Noppe-Brandon, S. (2009). Imagination first: Unlocking the power of possibilities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, T. (Ed.). (2010). Design thinking: Integrating innovation, customer experience and brand value. New York, NY: Allworth Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, T., Ivtzan, I., & Fu, C. H. Y. (2015). A systematic review of the neurophysiology of mindfulness on EEG oscillations. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 57, 401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGregor, J. N., Ormerod, T. C., & Chronicle, E. P. (2001). Information-processing and insight: A process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27(1), 176–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaga, R. S. (2000). The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems. Design Support Systems, 29(2), 125–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannella, F., Mirolli, M., & Baldassarre, G. (2016). Goal-directed behavior and instrumental devaluation: A neural system-level computational model. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, Article 181, 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayseless, N., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2015). Enhancing verbal creativity: Modulating creativity by altering the balance between right and left inferior frontal gyrus with tDGS. Neuroscience, 291, 167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrea, S. M. (2010). Intuition, insight, and the right hemisphere: Emergence of higher sociocognitive functions. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 3, 1–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mega, L. F., Gigerenzer, G., & Volz, K. G. (2015). Do intuitive and deliberate judgments rely on two distinct neural systems? A case study in face processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 456, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer-Asscher, A., Mack, J. E., Barbieri, E., & Thompson, C. K. (2016). How the brain processes different dimensions of argument structure complexity: Evidence from fMRI. Brain and Language, 142, 65–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E. K., Freedman, D. J., & Wallis, J. D. (2002). The prefrontal cortex: Categories, concepts and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 357(1424), 1123–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagai, Y., Taura, T., & Mukai, F. (2009). Concept blending and dissimilarity: Factors for creative concept generation process. Design Studies, 30(6), 648–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, L. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(3), 510–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochsner, K. N., Silvers, J. A., & Buhle, J. T. (2012). Functional imaging studies of emotion regulation: A synthetic review and evolving model of the cognitive control of emotion. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1251(1), E1–E24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onton, J., & Makeig, S. (2006). Information-based modeling of event-related brain dynamics. Progress in Brain Research, 159, 99–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onton, J., Westerfield, M., Townsend, J., & Makeig, S. (2006). Imaging human EEG dynamics using independnt component analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 808–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palva, S., & Palva, J. M. (2007). New vistas for alpha-frequency band oscillations. Trends in Neurosciences, 30(4), 150–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroni, A., Cohen, S., Langer, N., Henin, S., Vanderwal, T., Milham, M. P., & Parra, L. C. (2016). Age and sex affect intersubject correlation of EEG throught development. BioRxiv. Retrieved from http://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/136020/1/089060.full.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Polich, J. (1997, May). EEG and ERP assessment of normal aging. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 104(3), 244–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Popovic, V. (2004). Expertise development in product design: Strategic and domain-specific knowledge connections. Design Studies, 25(5), 527–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptak, R. (2012). The Frontoparietal attention network of the human brain: Action, saliency, and a priority map of the environment. Neuroscientist, 18(5), 502–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raami, A., Mielonen, S., & Keinänen, M. (2010). Designer’s experiences of intuition: Coaching intuitive skills as part of creative design process. In E. Salmi (Ed.), Cumulus working papers G. Conference proceedings, Melbourne, Australia 1214 November 2009 (pp. 52–57). Helsinki: Cumulus Association, Aalto University.
   Google Scholar
• Rangi, M., & Tyagi, A. (2013). Distinguishing cognitive tasks using statistical analysis techniques. IOSR Journal of Computer Engineering, 11(5), 21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogenmoser, L., Zollinger, N., Elmer, S., & Jäncke, L. (2016). Independent component processes underlying emotions during natural music listening. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(9), 1428–1439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Kuhl, J., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: An organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behavior and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9(4), 701–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schore, A. N. (2001). Effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Mental Health Journal, 22(1–2), 7–66.
   Google Scholar
• Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2015). Incubation and cueing effects in problem-solving: Set aside the difficult problems but focus on the easy ones. Thinking and Reasoning, 21(1), 113–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwa, M., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2000). Unexpected discoveries and s-invention of design requirements: Important vehicles for a design process. Design Studies, 21(6), 539–567.
   Google Scholar
• Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18(4), 385–403.
   Google Scholar
• Taura, T., & Nagai, Y. (2013). Concept generation for design creativity: A systematized theory and methodology. London, UK: Springer-Verlag London Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Taura, T., & Nagai, Y. (2017). Creativity in innovation design: The roles of intuition, synthesis, and hypothesis. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 5(3–4), 131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., Bonakdarpour, B., Fix, S. C., Blumenfeld, H. K., Parrish, T. B., Gitelman, D. R., & Mesulam, -M.-M. (2007). Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(11), 1753–1767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson-Schill, S. L., Ramscar, M., & Chrysikou, G. E. (2009). Cognition without control: When a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 259–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Assche, K., Beunen, R., Duineveld, M., & de Jong, H. C. (2013). Co-evolutions of planning and design: Risks and benefits of design perspectives in planning systems. Planning Theory, 12(2), 177–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Den Bos, W., & Güroğlu, B. (2009). The role of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex in social decision making. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(24), 7631–7632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wai, J. (2014). Experts are born, then made: Combining prospective and retrospective longitudinal data shows that cognitive ability matters. Intelligence, 45, 74–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.-K., June, T.-P., & Lin, C.-T. (2015). EEG-based attention tracking during distracted driving. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 23(6), 1085–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, S.-N., Lin, C.-T., King, J.-T., Liu, Y.-C., & Liang, C. (2017). Learning in the visual association of novice and expert designers. Cognitive Systems Research, 43, 76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwissler, B., Sperber, C., Aigeldinger, S., Schindler, S., Kissler, J., & Plewnia, C. (2014). Shaping memory accuracy by left prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(11), 4022–4026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar