The effect of design education on creative design cognition of high school students

References

• Akin, Ö. (1986). Psychology of architectural design. London: Pion Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Aldous, C. (2005). Creativity in problem solving: Uncovering the origin of new ideas. International Education Journal, 5(ERC2004 Special Issue), 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. J. (2007). Engineering design processes: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besemer, S. P., & O’Quin, K. (1993). In S. G. Isaksen, M. C. Murdock, R. L. Firestien, & D. J. Treffinger Eds., Assessing creative products: Progress and potentials (pp. 331–349). Nurturing and developing creativity: The emergence of a discipline.Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). London; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. C. (2012). Creativity, surprise & design: an introduction and investigation. Paper presented at the The 2nd international conference on design creativity (ICDC2012), Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1957). What social scientists say about having an idea. Printers Ink Magazine, 260, 48–52.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1962). The conditions of creativity. In H. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Wertheimer (Eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Cognition (pp. 1–30). NY, USA: Atherton.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. S. (1979). On Knowing: Essays for the Left Hand. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, A. J. (1999). Definitions of creativity. Encyclopedia of Creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 511–524). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cropley, D., & Cropley, A. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains (pp. 169–185). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• D’Souza, N., & Dastmalchi, M. R. (2016). Creativity on the move: Exploring little-c (p) and big-C (p) creative events within a multidisciplinary design team process. Design Studies, 46, 6–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2010). Technological supports for acquiring 21st century skills. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (pp. 1–22). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Dewett, T. (2003). Understanding the relationship between information technology and creativity in organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 167–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437.
   Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. (2000). Computational models of innovative and creative design processes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 64(2–3), 183–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11(4), 26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. (1996). Creativity, emergence and evolution in design. Knowledge-Based Systems, 9(7), 435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., & Kan, J. (2016). Empirical results from measuring design creativity: Use of an augmented coding scheme in protocol analysis. Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Design Creativity, Atlanta, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004). The situated function-behaviour-structure framework. Design Studies, 25(4), 373–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., & McNeill, T. (1998). An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies, 19(1), 21–61.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., & Tang, -H.-H. (1999). Concurrent and retrospective protocols and computer-aided architectural design. Paper presented at the 4th Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA1999), Shanghai.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, K., & Maher, M. L. (2015). Specific curiosity as a cause and consequence of transformational creativity. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC 2015), Park City, Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Grace, K., Maher, M. L., Fisher, D., & Brady, K. (2015). Modeling expectation for evaluating surprise in design creativity. Paper presented at the Design Computing and Cognition ‘14, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Greenacre, M. (2007). Correspondence Analysis in Practice (2nd ed.). London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1975). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In A. Taylor & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 37–59). Chicago: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Hasirci, D., & Demirkan, H. (2007). Understanding the effects of cognition in creative decision-making: A creativity model for enhancing creativity in the design studio process. Creativity Research Journal, 19(2–3), 259–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R. (1978). Cognitive psychology: Thinking and creating. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagtap, S. (2018). Design creativity: Refined method for novelty assessment. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1–17. 10.1080/21650349.2018.1463176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordanous, A. (2011). Evaluating evaluation: assessing progress in computational creativity research. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Computational Creativity (ICCC-11), Mexico City, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Kan, J. W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2005). Can entropy indicate the richness of idea generation in team designing? Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2005), New Delhi, India.
   Google Scholar
• Kan, J. W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2008). Do computer mediated tools affect team design creativity? Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2008) Chiang Mai, Thailand.
   Google Scholar
• Kan, J. W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2009). Using the FBS ontology to capture semantic design information in design protocol studies. In J. McDonnell & P. Lloyd (Eds.), About: Designing. Analysing Design Meetings (pp. 213–229). New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Kan, J. W. T., & Gero, J. S. (2017). Quantitative methods for studying design protocols. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The international handbook of creativity. Cambridge; NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kristensen, T. (2004). The physical context of creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Lammi, M. (2011). Characterizing High School Students’ Systems Thinking in Engineering Design Through the Function-Behavior-Structure (FBS) Framework. ( PhD Thesis), Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think: The design process demystified. Completely rev. 3rd ed. Oxford; Boston: Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. (2005). Creativity–A framework for the design/problem solving discourse in technology education. Journal of Technology Education;, 17(1), 35–52.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M., Poon, J., & Boulanger, S. (1996a). Formalising Design Exploration as Co-Evolution. In J. Gero & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Advances in Formal Design Methods for CAD (pp. 3–30). New York, US: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M. L. (2010). Evaluating creativity in humans, computers, and collectively intelligent systems. Paper presented at the 1st DESIRE Network Conference on Creativity and Innovation in Design, Aarhus, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M. L., Fisher, D., & Brady, K. (2013). Computational models of surprise as a mechanism for evaluating creative design. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Computational Creativity, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M. L., & Fisher, D. H. (2012). Using AI to Evaluate Creative Designs. Paper presented at the Proceedings of International Conference on Design Creativity, Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M. L., & Poon, J. (1996). Modelling design exploration as co-evolution. Microcomputers in Civil Engineering, 11(3), 195–210.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M. L., Poon, J., & Boulanger, S. (1996b). Formalising design exploration as co-evolution: A combined gene approach. In J. Gero & F. Sudweeks (Eds.), Advances in formal design methods for CAD. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, L., & Shanks, G. (2009). A framework for understanding creativity in requirements engineering. Information and Software Technology, 51(3), 655–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oman, S., & Tumer, I. (2009). The potential of creativity metrics for mechanical engineering concept design. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’09), Palo Alto, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving. New York: Scribner.
   Google Scholar
• Parnes, S. J. (1981). The magic of your mind. New York: Bearly Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Purzer, S. Y., Baker, D., Roberts, C., & Krause, S. (2008). Development of a team interaction observation protocol and a self-efficacy survey using social cognitive theory as a framework. Paper presented at the 2008 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Rastogi, D., & Sharma, N. K. (2010). Creativity under concurrent and sequential task conditions. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 139–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, G. (2007). Some empirical criteria for attributing creativity to a computer program. Minds and Machines, 17(1), 67–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenman, M. A., & Gero, J. S. (1993). Creativity in design using a design prototype approach. In J. S. Gero & L. M. Maher (Eds.), Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design (pp. 111–138). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runco, M. A., & Pritzker, S. R. (1999). Encyclopedia of creativity. San Diego, Calif.: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Said-Metwaly, S., Noortgate, W. V. D., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Approaches to measuring creativity: a systematic literature review. Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications.4(2), 238.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2008). Studying engineering design creativity —-Developing a common definition and associated measures. Paper presented at the NSF International Workshop on Studying Design Creativity’08 - Design Science, Computer Science, Cognitive Science and Neuroscience Approaches: The State-of-the-Art, University of Provence Aix-Marseille I, Aix-en-Provence, France.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, P., & Chakrabarti, A. (2011). Assessing design creativity. Design Studies, 32(4), 348–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, T. (2014). Expert vs Novice: Problem Decomposition/Recomposition in Engineering Design. ( PhD Thesis), UtTah State University, Logan, UTah.
   Google Scholar
• Song, T., Becker, K., Gero, J., DeBerard, S., Lawanto, O., & Reeve, E. (2016). Problem decomposition and recomposition in engineering design: a comparison of design behavior between professional engineers, engineering seniors, and engineering freshmen. Journal of Technology Education, 27(2), 37–56.
   Google Scholar
• Suwa, M., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (1999). Unexpected Discoveries And S-Invention Of Design Requirements: A Key To Creative Designs In J. In S. Gero & L. M. Maher (Eds.), Computational Models of Creative Design IV (pp. 297–320). University of Sydney: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
   Google Scholar
• Toh, C. A., & Miller, S. R. (2015). How engineering teams select design concepts: A view through the lens of creativity. Design Studies, 38, 111–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. (Ed.). (1966). Torrance Test of creative thinking: Princeton, N.J. :  Princeton.
   Google Scholar
• Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Wallas, G. (1926). Art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the myth of genius. New York: W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, J., Lammi, M., Grubbs, M., Gero, J., Paretti, M., & Williams, C. (2016). Characterizing design cognition of high school students: Initial analyses comparing those with and without pre-engineering experiences. Journal of Technology Education (To Appear).
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G. A. (2006). A preliminary framework for description, analysis and comparison of creative systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 19(7), 449–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, C. B., Gero, J. S., Lee, Y., & Paretti, M. (2011). Exploring the effect of design education on the design cognition of mechanical engineering students. Paper presented at the ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE 2011), Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, R., Gu, N., Ostwald, M., & Gero, J. (2015). Empirical support for problem-solution co-evolution in a parametric design environment. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacturing (AIEDAM), 29(1), 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar