Embodied design: Design inspiration and mood improvement depend on perceived stimulus sources and predict satisfaction with an immersion experience

References

• Abrahamson, D., & Lindgren, R. (2014). Embodiment and embodied design. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd edition) (pp. 358–376). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahamson, D. (2009). Embodied design: Constructing means for constructing meaning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(1), 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Amidi, A., & Lasseter, J. (2009). The art of pixar short films. San Francisco: Chronicle Books LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. L. (2003). Embodied Cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence, 149(1), 91–130.
   Google Scholar
• Ayob, A., Majid, R. A., Hussain, A., & Mustaffa, M. M. (2012). Creativity enhancement through experiential learning. Advances in Natural and Applied Sciences, 6(2), 94–99.
   Google Scholar
• Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779.
   Google Scholar
• Beckem, J. M., II. (2012). Bringing life to learning: immersive experiential learning simulations for online and blended courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(5), 61–71.
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, A. M., & Pecher, D. (2011). Introduction to the special topic embodied and grounded cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(AUG), 2010–2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bretz, F., Hothorn, T., & Westfall, P. (2011). Multiple comparisons using R (Vol. 6) Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bürgi, P., & Roos, J. (2003). Images of strategy. European Management Journal, 21(1), 69–78.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, M., Goldman, S., Britos, L., Koh, J., Royalty, A., & Hornstein, M. (2010). Destination, imagination and the fires within: Design thinking in a middle school classroom. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 29(1), 37–53.
   Google Scholar
• Cassim, F. (2013). Hands on, hearts on, minds on: Design thinking within an education context. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 32, 190–202.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 25–38.
   Google Scholar
• De Freitas, S., Rebolledo-Mendez, G., Liarokapis, F., Magoulas, G., & Poulovassilis, A. (2010). Learning as immersive experiences: Using the four-dimensional framework for designing and evaluating immersive learning experiences in a virtual world. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 69–85.
   Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69.
   Google Scholar
• Dimeo, F., Bauer, M., Varahram, I., Proest, G., & Halter, U. (2001). Benefits from aerobic exercise in patients with major depression: A pilot study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 35, 114–117.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, C., & Stacey, M. (2000). Sources of inspiration: A language of design. Design Studies, 21(5), 523–538.
   Google Scholar
• Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design Issues, 17(1), 5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., & Sever, A. L. (2011). Inspiring design ideas with texts. Design Studies, 32(2), 139–155.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., & Smolkov, M. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27(5), 549–569.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2014). What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Design Studies, 35(1), 29–53.
   Google Scholar
• Groth, C. (2016). Design and craft thinking analysed as embodied cognition. FormAkademisk-Forskningstidsskrift For Design Og Designdidaktikk, 9(1), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gundry, L. K., & Kickul, J. R. (1996). Flights of imagination: Fostering creativity through experiential learning. Simulation & Gaming, 27(3), 334–349.
   Google Scholar
• Hamer, L. O. (2000). The additive effects of semistructured classroom activities on student learning: An application of classroom-based experiential learning techniques. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(1), 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Haner, U.-E. (2005). Spaces for creativity and innovation in two established organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(3), 288–298.
   Google Scholar
• Inks, S. A., & Avila, R. A. (2008). Preparing the next generation of sales professionals through social, experiential, and immersive learning experiences. Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education, 13(4), 47–55.
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., Nowicki, G. P., & Gary. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131.
   Google Scholar
• James, K. H., Humphrey, G. K., Vilis, T., Corrie, B., Baddour, B., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). “Active” and “passive” learning of three-dimensional object structure within an immersive virtual reality environment. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34(3), 383–390.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur Majithia, R. (2017). What’s next in design education? Transforming role of a designer and its implications in preparing youth for an ambiguous and volatile future. The Design Journal, 20(sup1), S1521–S1529.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsh, D. (2013). Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 20(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Klemmer, S. R., Hartmann, B., & Takayama, L. (2006). How bodies matter: Five themes for interaction design. In Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems (pp. 140–149). University Park, PA: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Klemmer, S. R., Verplank, B., & Ju, W. (2005). Teaching embodied interaction design practice. In Designing for user experience (Vol. 135, pp. 2–7). AIGA: American Institute of Graphic Arts.
   Google Scholar
• Knasko, S. C. (1992). Ambient odor’s effect on creativity, mood, and perceived health. Chemical Senses, 17(1), 27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kohonen, V., J., Jaatinen, R., Kaikkonen, P., & Lehtovaara, J. (2014). Experiential learning in foreign language education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Management Learning, 4(2), 193–212.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). The learning way: Meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simulation and Gaming, 40(3), 297–327.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). The Process of Experiential Learning. In Experiential Learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and Development, 20–38. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kosel, M., Sturm, V., Frick, C., Lenartz, D., Zeidler, G., Brodesser, D., & Schlaepfer, T. E. (2007). Mood improvement after deep brain stimulation of the internal globus pallidus for tardive dyskinesia in a patient suffering from major depression. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 41(9), 801–803.
   Google Scholar
• Kouprie, M., & Visser, F. S. (2009). A framework for empathy in design: Stepping into and out of the user’s life. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(5), 437–448.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, C. H., Yang, J. C., Chen, F. C., Ho, C. W., & Chan, T. W. (2007). Affordances of mobile technologies for experiential learning: The interplay of technology and pedagogical practices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(4), 326–337.
   Google Scholar
• Last, J. M. (2001). A dictionary of epidemiology (4th ed. ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis-Beck, M., Bryman, A., & Futing Liao, T. (2004). The sage encyclopedia of social science research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mainemelis, C., Boyatzis, R. E., & Kolb, D. A. (2002). Learning styles and adaptive flexibility: Testing experiential learning theory. Management Learning, 33(1), 5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, T., Wong, W., & Carriazo, E. (2005). User experiences and lessons learned from developing and implementing an immersive game for the science classroom. In Proceedings of HCI International 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M. (2016). Experiential learning theory: From theory to practice. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 14(3), 91.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Moultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., Haner, U. E., Janssen, S., & Van der Lugt, R. (2007). Innovation spaces: Towards a framework for understanding the role of the physical environment in innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(1), 53–65.
   Google Scholar
• Nae, H.-J. (2017). An interdisciplinary design education framework. Design Journal, 20(December), S835–S847.
   Google Scholar
• Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Simulating entrepreneurial learning: Integrating experiential and collaborative approaches to learning. Management Learning, 38(2), 211–233.
   Google Scholar
• Reichheld, F. F. (2003). The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review, 81, 46–54.
   Google Scholar
• Seton, M. (2008). Pixar phenomenology: The embodiment of animation. Metro Magazine: Media & Education Magazine, (157), 94.
   Google Scholar
• Smithwick, D., & Sass, L. (2014). Embodied design cognition: Action-based formalizations in architectural design. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 12(4), 399–418.
   Google Scholar
• So, C. (2016). Embodied design: “Creative idea generation” class. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AM6Gjcfs5vc
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Lugt, R. (2002). Brainsketching and how it differs from brainstorming. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eck, M., Berkhof, H., Nicolson, N., & Sulon, J. (1996). The effects of perceived stress, traits, mood states, and stressful daily events on salivary cortisol. Psychosomatic Medicine, 58, 447–458.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rompay, T. J. L., & Hekkert, P. (1987). Embodied design: On the role of bodily experiences in product design. Cognitive Science, (July 2016). doi:10.1007/s10649-008-9137-1
   Google Scholar
• Van Rompay, T. J. L., & Ludden, G. D. S. (2015). Types of embodiment in design: The embodied foundations of meaning and affect in product design. International Journal of Design, 9(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, S., & Seifert, C. M. (2011). Creativity through design heuristics: A case study of expert product design. Design Studies, 32(4), 384–415.
   Google Scholar