Understanding the industrial designer’s self-perception of ideation

References

• Bacciotti, D., Borgianni, Y., & Rotini, F. (2016). An original design approach for stimulating the ideation of new product features. Computers in Industry, 75, 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.004
   Google Scholar
• BERA (2018) 'Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research', British Educational Research Association. Available at https://www.bera.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/BERA-Ethi-cal-Guidelines-for-Educational-Research_4thEdn_2018.pdf?noredirect=1. Retrieved in June, 2019
   Google Scholar
• Biskjaer, M. M., Christensen, B. T., Friis-Olivarius, M., Abildgaard, S. J. J., Lundqvist, C., & Halskov, K. (2019). How task constraints affect inspiration search strategies. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30, 101-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09496-7.
   Google Scholar
• Blaxter, L., Hughes, C. and Tight, M. (2001) How to research. Buckingham: Open University Press
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. HarperCollins Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brun, J., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2016). Designing with sketches: The generative effects of knowledge preordering. Design Science, 2. DOI:10.1017/dsj.2016.13.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, A. (2017). Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in research practice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, H., Do, E. Y. L., & Zimring, C. M. (2010). Extended linkography and distance graph in design evaluation: An empirical study of the dual effects of inspiritation sources in creative design. Design Studies, 31(2), 146–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.12.003
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasekera, T., Vo, N., & D’Souza, N. (2013). The effect of subliminal suggestions on Sudden Moments of Inspiration (SMI) in the design process. Design Studies, 34(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2012.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Chansri, N., & Koomsap, P. (2014, November). Sketch-based modeling from a paper-based overtraced freehand sketch. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 75(5), 705–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6161-4
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00475.x
   Google Scholar
• De Vaus, D. A. (2001). Research design in social research. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Diggins, T., & Tolmie, P. (2003). The ‘adequate’ design of ethnographic outputs for practice: Some explorations of the characteristics of design resources. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7(3–4), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-003-0226-y
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, C., & Stacey, M. (2000). Sources of inspiration: A language of design. Design Studies, 21(5), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(00)00022-3
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, E. (1991). Engineering and the mind’s eye. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frascara, J. (1995). Graphic design: Fine art or social science? In V. Margolin & R. Buchanan (Eds.), The idea of design (pp. pp 44–56). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, E., & Carroll, M. (2012, January). The psychological experience of prototyping. Design Studies, 33(1), 64–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.06.005
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. The Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss., A. (1965). Awareness of dying. Aldine Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss., A. (1968). Time for dying. Aldine Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. (1991). The dialectics of sketching. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. (2003). The backtalk of self-generated sketches. Design Issues, 19(1), 72–88. DOI:10.2307/1512057.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., & Sever, A. L. (2010). Inspiring design ideas with text. Design Studies, 32(2), 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.09.006
   Google Scholar
• Gonḉalves, M., Badke-Schaub, P., & Cardoso, C., (2011) Searching for inspiration during idea generation. IASDR 2011, the 4th World Conference on Design Research, 31 October-4 November, Delft, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Gonḉalves, M., Cardoso, C., & Badke-Schaub, P. (2014). What inspires designers? Preferences on inspirational approaches during idea generation. Design Studies, 35(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Hallgrimsson, B. (2012) Prototyping and model making for product design. In Isa, S.S., Liem, A., Classifying physical modelas and prototypes in the design process: A study on the economical and usability impact of adopting models and prototypes in the design process. Proceeding of the Design 2014, 13th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik, Croatia. pp 2071–2082.
   Google Scholar
• Halskov, K. (2010). Kinds of inspiration in interaction design. Digital Creativity, 21(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2010.502236
   Google Scholar
• Halskov, K., & Dalsgaard, P. (2007). The emergence of ideas: The interplay between sources of inspiration and emerging design concepts. CoDesign, 3(4), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701607404.
   Google Scholar
• Han, J., Shi, F., & Childs, P. R. N. (2016). The combinator: A computer-based tool for idea generation. In DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016, 14th International Design Conference. Dubrovnik, Croatia. 639-648.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. R., Chang, -C.-C., Krantzler, J., & Bailey, B. P. (2009)Getting Inspired! Understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice. CHI 2009 - Design Methods. pp 87–96.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, A., & Tracy, M. W. (2015). Design ideas, reflection, and professional identity how graduate students explore the idea generation process. Instructional Science, 43(5), 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9354-9
   Google Scholar
• Inie, N., & Dalsgaard, P. (2017). How interaction designers use tools to capture, manage, and collaborate on ideas. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI’17), (pp. 2668–2675). New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Ireland, C. (2003). The changing role of research. In L. Brenda (Ed.), Design research: Methods and perspectives (pp. pp 22–29). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, J. H. & Robert, G. M. (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Keller, I., Pasman, G. J., & Stappers, P. J. (2006). Collections designers keep: Collecting visual material for inspiration and reference. CoDesign, 2(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880600571123
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, & Fourie. (2015). Contrasting classic, straussian, and constructivist grounded theory: Methodological and philosophical conflicts. The Qualitative Report, 20(8), 1270–1289. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/iss8/9
   Google Scholar
• Koch, J., László, M., Lucero, A., & Oulasvirta, A. (2018). Surfing for inspiration: Digital inspirational material in design practice. In Proceedings of the Design Research Society Conference 2018 (DRS’18), Limerick, Ireland. Volume 3, pp 1247–1260.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, T. (2013). Creativity in online communication. Empirical considerations from a connectivist background; In: A. M. J. Skulimovski. (ed.): Looking into the Future of Creativity and Decision Support Systems. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems; Kraków, Progress & Business Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, T., & Skulimowski, A. M. J. (2019). Triggering research creativity and increasing efficiency through open innovation platforms; IIAI AAI 2019, 10th International Conference on E-Service and Knowledge Management; Toyama, 07.-12.07.2019
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V. (2013). 101 design methods: Structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Laamanen, T. K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2014). Interview study of professional designers’ ideation approaches. The Design Journal, 17(2), 194–217. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630614X13915240575988
   Google Scholar
• Malaga, R. A. (2000). The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity supports systems. Decision Support System, 29(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(00)00067-1
   Google Scholar
• Martin, B., & Hanington, B. (2012). Universal methods of design. Rockport Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Mcginley, C., & Dong, H. (2011). Designing with information and empathy: Delivering human information to designers. The Design Journal, 14(2), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630611X12984592780005
   Google Scholar
• Mckay, D., Cunningham, S. J., & Thomson, K. (2006) Exploring the user experience through collage. Proceeding of the 7th ACM SIGCHI New Zealand chapter’s international conference on Computer-human interaction: design centered HCI, Hamilton, NZ. pp. 109–115.https://doi.org/10.1145/1152760.1152774.
   Google Scholar
• Mirtalaie, M. A., Hussain, O. K., Chang, E., & Hussain, F. K. (2017). A decision support framework for identifying novel ideas in new product development from cross-domain analysis. Information Systems, 69, 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2017.04.003
   Google Scholar
• Mose, J. M. (2007) ‘Sampling in Grounded Theory’ in Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (2007) The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: SAGE Publication, pp.229–243
   Google Scholar
• Mougenot, C., Bouchard, C., Aoussat, A., & Westerman, S. (2008). Inspiration, images and design: An investigation of designers‘ information gathering strategies. Journal Of Design Research, 7(4), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2008.026987
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User-centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novoseltseva, E. (2017). User-centered design: An introduction. https://usabilitygeek.com/user-centered-design-introduction/.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, R., Kuo, S. P., & Strobel, J. (2013, August). Interplay of computer and paper-based sketching in graphic design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 785–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9216-6
   Google Scholar
• Perttula, M., & Sipila, P. (2007). The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820600679679
   Google Scholar
• Petre, M. (2004). How expert engineering teams use disciplines of innovation. Design Studies, 25(5), 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.003
   Google Scholar
• Pniewska, J., Adrian, W. T., & Czerwoniec, A. (2013). Prototyping: Is it a more creative way for shaping ideas. MIDI ’13: Proceedings of the International Conference on Multimedia, Interaction, Design and Innovation. Warsaw, Poland. 24-25th, June, 2013. Article No.: 18, pp. 1-8.DOI:10.1145/2500342.2500361.
   Google Scholar
• Power, T. (2012). Guidelines for a literature survey and an annotated bibliography. Retrieved October 15, 2018, from http://www.trinity.utoronto.ca/library_archives/theological_resources/Theological_guides/literature_survey_bibliography.html
   Google Scholar
• Pramod, K., & Uday, A. (2010). Grounded theory: An effective method for user experience design research. Design Thoughts, 11–22. August 2010. Industrial Design Center, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay. http://www.idc.iitb.ac.in/resources/dt-aug-2010/total.pdf#page=17.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, D., & Reed, V. (1998). The A-Z of social research jargon. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Sas, C., Whittaker, S., Dow, S., Forlizzi, J., & Zimmerman, J. (2014) Generating implications for design through design research. CHI 2014, April 26-May 01, 2014
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, S. G. (2009). Scenario planning: A collage construction approach. Foresight, 11(2), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680910950129.
   Google Scholar
• Shedroff, N. Research methods for designing effective experience. In Laurel, B. (2003) Design research: methods and perspectives. 155–163. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J. C. (2003). Research and design for kids. In B. Laurel (Ed.), Design research: Methods and perspectives (pp. 301–308). The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. M., Linsey, J. S., & Kerne, A. (2010). Using evolved analogies to overcome creative design fixation. In: Taura T., Nagai Y. (eds) Design Creativity 2010,  35–39.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-224-7_6.
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. N. (1980) Grounded theory methodology: its uses and applications. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 12 (1), 2–24
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. pp. 273–285). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (1st ed.). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Taura, T., & Nagai, Y. (2017). Creativity in innovation design: The roles of intuition, synthesis, and hypothesis. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 5(3–4), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2017.1313132
   Google Scholar
• Tovey, M., Porter, S., & Newman, R. (2003). Sketching, concept development and automotive design. Design Studies, 24(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00035-2
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Suwa, M. (2009). Thinking with sketches. In Markman, A.B., & Wood, K.L (Eds.), Tools for innovation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Lugt, R. (2005). How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings. Design Studies, 26(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Lugt, R. (2002). Brainsketching and how it differs from brainstorming. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), pp.43–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00235
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, L. A., & Crilly, N. (2016). Inspiration and fixation: Questions, methods, findings, and challenges. Design Studies, 42, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Vijaykumar, G., Vasantha, A., Chakrabarti, A., Rout, B. K., & Corney, J. (2014). Influences of design tools on the original and redesign processes. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 2 (1), 20-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.839076.
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, V., & Linsey, J. (2013). Examining design fixation in engineering idea generation: The role of example modality. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.774689
   Google Scholar
• Watschke, H., Bavendiek, A. K., Giannakos, A., & Vietor, T. (2017) A methodical approach to support ideation for additive manufacturing in design education. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 17) Vol 5: Design for X, Design to X, Vancouver, Canada, 21–25. 08.2017
   Google Scholar
• Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), p.490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, S., Daly, S. R., Seifert, C. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2016). Evidence-based design heuristics for idea generation. Design Studies, 46, 95–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, M. Y. (2013) Seek it or let it come: How designers achieve inspirations. Conference: CHI ‘13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Paris 27th April-2nd May.
   Google Scholar
• Zina, O. L. (2010). The essential guide to doing your research project. SAGE Publications Inc.
   Google Scholar