Virtual Reality design-build-test games with physics simulation: opportunities for researching design cognition

References

• Alsawaier, R. S. (2018). The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 56–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-02-2017-0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alstott, J., Triulzi, G., Yan, B., & Luo, J. (2017). Inventors’ explorations across technology domains. Design Science, 3(e20). https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology ofcreativity. Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Amabile, T. M. (2018). Cognition and the Labor of Love. In R. J. Sternberg & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The nature of human creativity (pp. 1–15). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., Lundblad, N., & Jin, M. (2008). The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: Digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(1), 102–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701793141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balk, S. A., Bertola, M. A., & Inman, V. W. (2013). Simulator sickness questionnaire: Twenty years later. Proceedings of the Seventh International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 257–263), USA.
   Google Scholar
• Bateman, I. J., Day, B. H., Jones, A. P., & Jude, S. (2009). Reducing gain–loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baytar, F. (2018). Apparel CAD patternmaking with 3D simulations: Impact of recurrent use of virtual prototypes on students’ skill development. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2017.1378731
   Google Scholar
• Beepa (2013). Fraps. Beepa Pty Ltd. Accessed date 21 April 2016. http://www.fraps.com/
   Google Scholar
• Bewick, N., & Riedel, O. (1994). Enhancing architectural details by using abstract possibilities of virtual environments. In Proceedings – Virtual Environments in Architecture and Design Conference, University of Leeds, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bickler, D. (1998). Roving over mars. Mechanical Engineering Magazine, 120(4), 74–77. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1998-APR-6
   Google Scholar
• Bideau, B., Kulpa, R., Ménardais, S., Fradet, L., Multon, F., Delamarche, P., & Arnaldi, B. (2003). Real handball goalkeeper vs. virtual handball thrower. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 12(4), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603322391631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blech, C., Gaschler, R., & Bilalić, M. (2019). Why do people fail to see simple solutions? Using think-aloud protocols to uncover the mechanism behind the Einstellung (mental set) effect. Thinking & Reasoning, 26(4), 552–580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2019.1685001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blessing, L. T. M., & Chakrabarti, A. (2009). DRM, a Design Research Methodology. Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bohil, C. J., Alicea, B., & Biocca, F. A. (2011). Virtual reality in neuroscience research and therapy. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(12), 752–762. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordegoni, M., Cugini, U., & Covarrubias Rodriguez, M. (2008). Design of a visualization system integrated with haptic interfaces. In I. Horvàth & Z. Rusàk (Eds.), 8th International Symposium on Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering (TMCE 2008), (pp. 21–25). Izmir, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Bordegoni, M., Ferrise, F., Ambrogio, M., Caruso, F., & Bruno, F. (2010). Data exchange and multi-layered architecture for a collaborative design process in virtual environments. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (Ijidem), 4(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-010-0092-6
   Google Scholar
• Boujut, J. F., & Blanco, E. (2003). Intermediary objects as a means to foster co-operation in engineering design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 12(2), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023980212097
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, D. A., & McMahan, R. P. (2007). Virtual reality: How much immersion is enough? Computer, 40(7), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2007.257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucciarelli, L. L. (1994). Designing engineers. MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Burleson, W. (2005). Developing creativity, motivation, and self-actualization with learning systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4), 436–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby, J. A., & Lloyd, P. A. (1999). Influences on solution search processes in design organisations. Research in Engineering Design, 11(3), 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001630050012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buur, J., & Andreasen, M. M. (1989). Design models in mechatronic product development. Design Studies, 10(3), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(89)90033-1
   Google Scholar
• Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (1996). Creative design of the Lotus bicycle: Implications for knowledge support systems research. Design Studies, 17(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(95)00026-N
   Google Scholar
• Carulli, M., Bordegoni, M., & Cugini, U. (2013). An approach for capturing the voice of the customer based on virtual prototyping. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(5), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0662-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascini, G., Nagai, Y., Georgiev, G. V., & Zelaya, J. (2020). What can we learn from COVID-19 pandemic for design cognition research? International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 8(3), 141–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1771867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, P., Stanković, T., & Štorga, M. (2016). An introduction to experimental design research. In Experimental Design Research (pp. 3–12). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, C. S. (1997). Virtual reality in architectural design. In Computer Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 97) Workshops, HsinChu, Taiwan (Vol. 97, pp. 1–10).
   Google Scholar
• Chandrasekera, T. (2015). The effect of augmented reality and virtual reality interfaces on epistemic actions and the creative process. [Doctoral dissertation], University of Missouri:.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, I., & Shu, L. H. (2010). Potential limitations of verbal protocols in design experiments. In ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 287–296). American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S. H., & Chan, A. M. M. (2004). A virtual prototyping system for rapid product development. Computer-Aided Design, 36(5), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(03)00110-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, C. H., & Kao, E. T. (2020). A comparative study of design evaluation with virtual prototypes versus a physical product. Applied Sciences, 10(14), 4723. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144723
   Google Scholar
• Collins, B. J. (2010). Invited reaction: Investigating the influences of core self-evaluations, job autonomy, and intrinsic motivation on in-role job performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 21(4), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colln, M. C., Kusch, K., Helmert, J. R., Kohler, P., Velichkovsky, B. M., & Pannasch, S. (2012). Comparing two types of engineering visualizations: Task-related manipulations matter. Applied Ergonomics, 43(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N. (2015). Fixation and creativity in concept development: The attitudes and practices of expert designers. Design Studies, 38, 54–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N. (2019a). Creativity and fixation in the real world: A literature review of case study research. Design Studies, 64, 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N. (2019b). Methodological diversity and theoretical integration: Research in design fixation as an example of fixation in research design? Design Studies, 65, 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., & Cardoso, C. (2017). Where next for research on fixation, inspiration and creativity in design? Design Studies, 50, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crilly, N., & Moroşanu Firth, R. (2019). Creativity and fixation in the real world: Three case studies of invention, design and innovation. Design Studies, 64, 169–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2001). Design Cognition: Results from Protocol and other Empirical Studies of Design Activity. In EastmanC. M., McCrackenW. M., & NewstetterW. C. (Eds.), Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education (pp. 79–103). Elsevier Science.5–X. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008043868-9/5000
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. (2004). Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 25(5), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, N., & Clayburn Cross, A. (1996). Winning by design: The methods of Gordon Murray, racing car designer. Design Studies, 17(1), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(95)00027-O
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• De França, A. C. P., Soares, M. M., & De Lemos Meira, L. R. (2013). Is reality real? Thoughts and conjectures about culture, self, intersubjectivity and parallel worlds in digital technologies. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability (pp. 68–73). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38(2), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dede, C. (2009). Immersive Interfaces for Engagement and Learning. Science, 323(5910), 66–69. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande, A. A., & Huang, S. H. (2011). Simulation games in engineering education: A state-of-the-art review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 19(3), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. (1998). Exploring conceptual design using CAD visualisation and virtual reality modelling. In Computerised Craftsmanship-16th Conference on Education in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe (eCAADe) (pp. 68–71), Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6
   Google Scholar
• Dorta, T., Kinayoglu, G., & Hoffmann, M. (2016). Hyve-3D and the 3D Cursor: Architectural co-design with freedom in virtual reality. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 14(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077116638921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J., Shi, Y., Zou, Z., & Zhao, D. (2017). CoVR: Cloud-based multiuser virtual reality headset system for project communication of remote users. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(2), 04017109. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T. (2007). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, C. M. (1969). Cognitive processes and ill-defined problems: A case study from design. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence: IJCAI, 69, (pp. 669–690). Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Editorial board of IJDCI. (2013). Perspectives on design Creativity and innovation research. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.754657
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, A., Peiris, B., & Parnin, C. (2015). Virtual reality in software engineering: Affordances, applications, and challenges. In 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (Vol. 2, pp. 547–550). Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Faas, D., Bao, Q., Frey, D. D., & Yang, M. C. (2014). The influence of immersion and presence in early stage engineering designing and building. AI EDAM, 28(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060414000055
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G., & Nakakoji, K. (1991). Making design objects relevant to the task at hand. AAAI-91 Proceedings, (pp. 67–73). Anaheim, California.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, G., & Nakakoji, K. (1992). Beyond the macho approach of artificial intelligence: Empower human designers — Do not replace them. Knowledge-Based Systems, 5(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-7051(92)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, D. J., Stone, B., Nysetvold, T. T., Hepworth, A., & Red, W. E. (2014). Collaborative design principles from minecraft with applications to multi-user CAD, Volume 1B: 34th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Buffalo, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S. (2020). Nascent directions for design Creativity research. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 8(3), 144–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1767885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., & McNeill, T. (1998). An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies, 19(1), 21–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00015-X
   Google Scholar
• Gero, J. S., & Milovanovic, J. (2020). A framework for studying design thinking through measuring designers’ minds, bodies and brains. Design Science, 6 (e19). https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S. B. (2016). Perceived Realism of Virtual Environments Depends on Authenticity. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 25(4), 322–324. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, C., Sanders, E., & Shim, S. (2011). Prototypes as inquiry, visualization and communication. In DS 69: Proceedings of E&PDE 2011, the 13th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G. (2019). Design creativity research: Recent developments and future challenges. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 7(4), 194–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2019.1646387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, G., & Tatsa, D. (2005). How good are good ideas? Correlates of design creativity. Design Studies, 26(6), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Z., & Georgiev, G. V. (2020) Literature review: Existing methods using VR to enhance creativity, in J.-F. Boujut, G. Cascini, S. Ahmed-Kristensen, G. V. Georgiev, & N. Iivari (eds.) The Sixth International Conference on Design Creativity (26–28 August 2020). University of Oulu, Finland (online). pp. 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/ICDC.2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gowda, S., Jayaram, S., & Jayaram, U. (1999). Architectures for internet-based collaborative virtual prototyping. In Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Technical Conference and Computers in Engineering Conference (pp. 11–15). Las Vegas, Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, S. (2016). The effects of 3D printing in design thinking and design education. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 14(4), 752–769. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-02-2014-0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggman, A., Tsai, G., Elsen, C., Honda, T., & Yang, M. C. (2015). Connections between the design tool, design attributes, and user preferences in early stage design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(7), 071408. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4030181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havig, P., McIntire, J., & Geiselman, E. (2011). Virtual reality in a cave: Limitations and the need for HMDs? In Peter L. Marasco & Paul R. Havig. (Ed.), Head-and helmet-mounted displays XVI: Design and applications (Vol. 8041, p. 804107). International Society for Optics and Photonics.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, L., Cash, P., & McKilligan, S. (2020). The future of design Creativity analysis. Design Science, 6 (e20). https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.20
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, L., Duffy, A. H., Gilbert, S. J., Lyall, L., Campbell, G., Coyle, D., & Grealy, M. A. (2019). The neural correlates of ideation in product design engineering practitioners. Design Science, 5(e29). https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, L., Duffy, A. H. B., Grealy, M., Tahsiri, M., McTeague, C., & Vuletic, T. (2020). A novel systematic approach for analysing exploratory design ideation. Journal of Engineering Design, 31(3), 127–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2019.1662381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Y., & Luo, J. (2017). The novelty ‘sweet spot’ of invention. Design Science, 3(e21). https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helweg-Larsen, M. (1999). (The lack of) optimistic biases in response to the 1994 Northridge earthquake: The role of personal experience. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(2), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BA210204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. R., Chang, C. C., Krantzler, J., & Bailey, B. P. (2009). Getting inspired!: Understanding how and why examples are used in creative design practice. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 87–96). Boston, MA, United States: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, T., & Summers, J. D. (2013). Case study: Evidence of prototyping roles in conceptual design. In DS 75–1: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED13), Design for Harmonies, Vol. 1: Design Processes. Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• HTC (2018). Accessed date 7 Jan 2018. www.vive.com
   Google Scholar
• Huang, T., Kong, C. W., Guo, H., Baldwin, A., & Li, H. (2007). A virtual prototyping system for simulating construction processes. Automation in Construction, 16(5), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2006.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W., Roscoe, R. D., Johnson‐Glenberg, M. C., & Craig, S. D. (2020). Motivation, engagement, and performance across multiple virtual reality sessions and levels of immersion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(3), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12520
   Google Scholar
• Iorio, J., Peschiera, G., Taylor, J. E., & Korpela, L. (2011). Factors impacting usage patterns of collaborative tools designed to support global virtual design project networks. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (Itcon), 16(14), 209–230. http://www.itcon.org/paper/2011/14
   Google Scholar
• Islamoglu, O. S., & Deger, K. O. (2015). The location of computer aided drawing and hand drawing on design and presentation in the interior design education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 182, 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.792
   Google Scholar
• Israel, J. H., Wiese, E., Mateescu, M., Zöllner, C., & Stark, R. (2009). Investigating three-dimensional sketching for early conceptual design—Results from expert discussions and user studies. Computers & Graphics, 33(4), 462–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2009.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram, S., Connacher, H. I., & Lyons, K. W. (1997). Virtual assembly using virtual reality techniques. Computer-Aided Design, 29(8), 575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(96)00094-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johanson, B., Fox, A., & Winograd, T. (2002). The interactive workspaces project: Experiences with ubiquitous computing rooms. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 1(2), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPRV.2002.1012339
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, K., Dickerson, R., Raij, A., Lok, B., Jackson, J., Shin, M., Hernandez, J., Stevens, A., & Lind, D. S. (2005). Experiences in using immersive virtual characters to educate medical communication skills. In Virtual Reality, 2005. Proceedings. VR 2005. IEEE (pp. 179–186). Bonn, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Jonson, B. (2005). Design ideation: The conceptual sketch in the digital age. Design Studies, 26(6), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassinove, J. I., & Schare, M. L. (2001). Effects of the” near miss” and the” big win” on persistence at slot machine gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.15.2.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawaguchi, K., Endo, Y., & Kanai, S. (2009, July). Database-driven grasp synthesis and ergonomic assessment for handheld product design. In International Conference on Digital Human Modeling (pp. 642–652). Springer, Berlin: Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3
   Google Scholar
• Kent, L., Snider, C., & Hicks, B. (2019). Engaging citizens with urban planning using city blocks, a mixed reality design and visualisation platform. In L. T. De Paolis & P. Bourdot (Eds.), Augmented reality, virtual reality, and computer graphics (pp. 51–62). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kershaw, T., Holtta-Otto, K., & Lee, Y. S. (2011). The effect of prototyping and critical feedback on fixation in engineering design. In L. Carlson, C. Hoelscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds.) (pp. 807e812). Boston, MA: Proceedings of 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci’11). Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Kilteni, K., Groten, R., & Slater, M. (2012). The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 21(4), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosmadoudi, Z., Lim, T., Ritchie, J., Louchart, S., Liu, Y., & Sung, R. (2013). Engineering design using game-enhanced CAD: The potential to augment the user experience with game elements. Computer-Aided Design, 45(3), 777–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2012.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlov, M. D., & Johansen, M. K. (2010). Real behavior in virtual environments: Psychology experiments in a simple virtual-reality paradigm using video games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(6), 711–714. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankoski, P., & Björk, S. (2015). Game research methods: An overview. ETC Press, Carnegie Mellon University.
   Google Scholar
• LaViola Jr, J. J. (2000). A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 32(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1145/333329.333344
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, G. N., & Rosie, J. A. (2012). Virtual reality games for movement rehabilitation in neurological conditions: How do we meet the needs and expectations of the users? Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(22), 1880–1886. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.670036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010). Universal principles of design, revised and updated: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Rockport Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, Y. K., Stolterman, E., & Tenenberg, J. (2008). The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 15(2), 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/1375761.1375762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, P., Lawson, B., & Scott, P. (1996). Can concurrent verbalization reveal design cognition? Design Studies, 16(2), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)00011-2
   Google Scholar
• Lomas, D., Patel, K., Forlizzi, J. L., & Koedinger, K. R. (2013). Optimizing challenge in an educational game using large-scale design experiments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 89–98). Paris, France: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Luque, F. C., & O’Hora, D. (2002). Addressind the limitations of protocol analysis in the study of complex human behavior. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 2(2), 115–130. https://www.ijpsy.com/volumen2/num2/41.html
   Google Scholar
• Maaravi, Y., Heller, B., Shoham, Y., Mohar, S., & Deutsch, B. (2020). Ideation in the digital age: Literature review and integrative model for electronic brainstorming. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00400-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdjoub, M., Monticolo, D., Gomes, S., & Sagot, J. C. (2010). A collaborative design for usability approach supported by virtual reality and a multi-agent system embedded in a PLM environment. Computer-Aided Design, 42(5), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cad.2009.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, M. L. (1994). Creative design using a genetic algorithm. In K. Khozeimeh (Ed.), Proceedings of the First Annual Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering (Vol. 2, pp. 2014–2021). Washington, D.C.: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE).
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M. L., & Poon, J. (1996). Modeling design exploration as co‐evolution. Computer‐Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(3), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.1996.tb00323.x
   Google Scholar
• Maher, M. L., & Tang, -H.-H. (2003). Co-evolution as a computational and cognitive model of design. Research in Engineering Design, 14(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-002-0016-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masclet, C., Boujut, J. F., Poulin, M., & Baldaccino, L. (2021). A socio-cognitive analysis of evaluation and idea generation activities during co-creative design sessions supported by spatial augmented reality. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 9(1), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1854122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahan, R. P., Bowman, D. A., Zielinski, D. J., & Brady, R. B. (2012). Evaluating display fidelity and interaction fidelity in a virtual reality game. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(4), 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahan, R. P., Ragan, E. D., Leal, A., Beaton, R. J., & Bowman, D. A. (2011). Considerations for the use of commercial video games in controlled experiments. Entertainment Computing, 2(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2011.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Menold, J., Jablokow, K., & Simpson, T. (2017). Prototype for X (PFX): A holistic framework for structuring prototyping methods to support engineering design. Design Studies, 50, 70–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mingers, J. (1997). Multi-paradigm Multimethodology. In J. Mingers & A. Gill (Eds.), Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining management science methodologies (pp. 1–20), Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Moraes, R. M., & Machado, L. S. (2007, November). Multiple assessment for multiple users in virtual reality training environments. In Luis Rueda, Domingo Mery & Josef Kittler (eds.), Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition (pp. 950–956). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, D. P., Hernández, A. A., Yang, M. C., Otto, K. N., Hölttä-Otto, K., Linsey, J. S., Wood, K. L., & Linden, A. (2014). Fundamental studies in design-by-analogy: A focus on domain-knowledge experts and applications to transactional design problems. Design Studies, 35(3), 232–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moroşanu Firth, R., & Crilly, N. (2018). “A way to understand things better through doing”: Creative action and intrinsic meaning in engineering design. Presented at the The Fifth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC2018), Bath, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Morosi, F., Carli, I., Caruso, G., Cascini, G., Dhokia, V., & Ben Guefrache, F. (2018). Analysis of co-design scenarios and activities for the development of a spatial-augmented reality design platform. In DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference (pp. 381–392), Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Muhanna, M. A. (2015). Virtual reality and the CAVE: Taxonomy, interaction challenges and research directions. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 27(3), 344–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2014.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller, N., Panzoli, D., Galaup, M., Lagarrigue, P., & Jessel, J. P. (2017). Learning mechanical engineering in a virtual workshop: A preliminary study on utilisability, utility and acceptability. In 2017 9th International Conference on Virtual Worlds and Games for Serious Applications (VS-Games) (pp. 55–62). Athens, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Nee, A. Y., Ong, S. K., Chryssolouris, G., & Mourtzis, D. (2012). Augmented reality applications in design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 61(2), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negendahl, K. (2015). Building performance simulation in the early design stage: An introduction to integrated dynamic models. Automation in Construction, 54, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neroni, M. A., & Crilly, N. (2019). Whose ideas are most fixating, your own or other people’s? The effect of idea agency on subsequent design behaviour. Design Studies, 60, 180–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neroni, M. A., & Crilly, N. (2020). How to Guard Against Fixation? Demonstrating Individual Vulnerability is More Effective Than Warning of General Risk.The Journal of Creative Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.465
   Google Scholar
• Neroni, M. A., Vasconcelos, L. A., & Crilly, N. (2017). Computer-based “Mental Set” tasks: An alternative approach to studying design fixation. Journal of Mechanical Design, 139(7), 071102. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4036562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving (Vol. 104, No. 9). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Norgaard, R. B. (1989). The case for methodological pluralism. Ecological Economics, 1(1), 37–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(89)90023-2
   Google Scholar
• Norris, F. H., Smith, T., & Kaniasty, K. (1999). Revisiting the experience–behavior hypothesis: The effects of Hurricane Hugo on hazard preparedness and other self-protective acts. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2101_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northway Games (n.d.). Accessed date: 07 Jan 2018. Fantastic Contraption. www.fantasticcontraption.com
   Google Scholar
• O’Hare, J., Dekoninck, E., Mombeshora, M., Martens, P., Becattini, N., & Boujut, J. F. (2020). Defining requirements for an augmented reality system to overcome the challenges of creating and using design representations in co-design sessions. CoDesign, 16(2), 111–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1546319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obeid, S., & Demirkan, H. (2020). The influence of virtual reality on design process creativity in basic design studios. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1858116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oti, A., & Crilly, N. (2021). Immersive 3D sketching tools: Implications for visual thinking and communication. Computers & Graphics, 94, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2020.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özhan, Ş. Ç., & Kocadere, S. A. (2020). The effects of flow, emotional engagement, and motivation on success in a gamified online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(8), 2006–2031. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633118823159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1996). Engineering design: A systematic approach. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pallavicini, F., & Pepe, A. (2019). Comparing player experience in video games played in virtual reality or on desktop displays: Immersion, flow, and positive emotions. Extended Abstracts of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play Companion Extended Abstracts, (pp. 195–210). Barcelona, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Panchal, J. H., & Szajnfarber, Z. (2017). Experiments in systems engineering and design research. Systems Engineering, 20(6), 529–541. https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H., Son, J. S., & Lee, K. H. (2008). Design evaluation of digital consumer products using virtual reality-based functional behaviour simulation. Journal of Engineering Design, 19(4), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820701474129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekkanen, J., & Lappi, O. (2017). A new and general approach to signal denoising and eye movement classification based on segmented linear regression. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 17726. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17983-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perttula, M., & Sipilä, P. (2007). The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation. Journal of Engineering Design, 18(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544820600679679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhu, R., Bracken, J., Armstrong, C. B., Jablokow, K., Simpson, T. W., & Meisel, N. A. (2020). Additive creativity: Investigating the use of design for additive manufacturing to encourage creativity in the engineering design industry. International Journal of Design Creativity  and Innovation, 8(4), 198–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2020.1813633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabhu, R., Miller, S. R., Simpson, T. W., & Meisel, N. A. (2018). Teaching design freedom: Exploring the effects of design for additive manufacturing education on the cognitive components of students’creativity. In ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Quebec City, Canada: American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection.
   Google Scholar
• Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202286008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psotka, J. (1995). Immersive training systems: Virtual reality and education and training. Instructional Science, 23(5–6), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00896880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, M., & Clark, K. R. (2016). Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behaviour, 63, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeb, S. B., & Leclercq, P. (2013). Using spatial augmented reality in synchronous collaborative design. In International Conference on Cooperative Design, Visualization and Engineering (pp. 1–10). Mallorca, Spain: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Rias, A. L., Bouchard, C., Segonds, F., & Abed, S. (2016).Design for additive manufacturing: A creative approach. In DS 84: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2016 14th International Design Conference (pp. 411–420). Dubrovnik, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, B. F., Walther, J., & Radcliffe, D. F. (2007). Creativity and the use of CAD tools: Lessons for engineering design education from industry. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(7), 753–760. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2722329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, C. (2002). Real world research: A resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Blackwell, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, R. S., Baughman, S. L., Bailenson, J. N., & Szolnoki, A. (2013). Virtual superheroes: Using superpowers in virtual reality to encourage prosocial behavior. PloS One, 8(1), e55003. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, R. (1993). Case studies of creativity in innovative product development. Design Studies, 14(4), 423–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(93)80016-6
   Google Scholar
• Sagarin, B. J., Cialdini, R. B., Rice, W. E., & Serna, S. B. (2002). Dispelling the illusion of invulnerability: The motivations and mechanisms of resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(3), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.3.526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schon, D. A., & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 13(2), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(92)90268-F
   Google Scholar
• Shah, J. J., Kulkarni, S. V., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2000). Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1315592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharples, S., Cobb, S., Moody, A., & Wilson, J. R. (2008). Virtual reality induced symptoms and effects (VRISE): Comparison of head mounted display (HMD), desktop and projection display systems. Displays, 29(2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck, D. W. (2018). Multiuser virtual reality environment for visualising neuroimaging data. Healthcare Technology Letters, 5(5), 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1049/htl.2018.5077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, T. B. (2000). Interaction, imagination and immersion some research needs. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on virtual reality software and technology (pp. 1–7). ACM. Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Shiratuddin, M. F., Thabet, W., & Bowman, D. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of virtual environment displays for displaying 3D models and tasks in construction. In Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality (CONVR 2004), 13-15 September, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Shroyer, K., Lovins, T., Turns, J., Cardella, M. E., & Atman, C. J. (2018). Timescales and idea-space: An examination of idea generation in design practice. Design Studies, 57, 9–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, I. M., & Moioli, R. C. (2017). A method for creating interactive, user-resembling avatars. PeerJ Computer Science, 3, e128. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.128
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. (1999). Measuring presence: A response to the witmer and singer presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 8(5), 560–565. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474699566477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. P., & Eppinger, S. D. (1997). Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration. Management Science, 43(3), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.3.276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonalkar, N., Mabogunje, A., & Leifer, L. (2013). Developing a visual representation to characterize moment-to-moment concept generation in design teams. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 1(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2013.773117 
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, R. (2019). Accretion theory of ideation: Evaluation regimes for ideation stages. Design Science, 5(e23). https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.22
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straker, L. M., Campbell, A. C., Jensen, L. M., Metcalf, D. R., Smith, A. J., Abbott, R. A., Pollok, C. M., & Piek, J. P. (2011). Rationale, design and methods for a randomised and controlled trial of the impact of virtual reality games on motor competence, physical activity, and mental health in children with developmental coordination disorder. BMC Public Health, 11(1), 654. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18(4), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00008-2
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, N., & Takagi, H. (2004). Virtual reality environment design of managing both presence and virtual reality sickness. Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science, 23(6), 313–317. https://doi.org/10.2114/jpa.23.313
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang, Y., Shetty, S., Jahan, K., Henry, J., & Hargrove, S. K. (2012). SustainCity—An interactive virtual reality game system. Journal or Computational Science Education,3(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDEC.2012.6186915
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Y. M., Au, K. M., Lau, H. C., Ho, G. T., & Wu, C. H. (2020). Evaluating the effectiveness of learning design with mixed reality (MR) in higher education. Virtual Reality, 24(4), 797–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00427-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennent, P., Marshall, J., Walker, B., Brundell, P., & Benford, S. (2017). The challenges of visual-kinaesthetic experience. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 1265–1276). ACM. Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Thomke, S. H. (1998). Managing experimentation in the design of new products. Management Science, 44(6), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.6.743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toh, C. A., & Miller, S. R. (2016). Creativity in design teams: The influence of personality traits and risk attitudes on creative concept selection. Research in Engineering Design, 27(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-015-0207-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., & Chou, J. Y. (2011). Creativity: Depth and breadth. In design creativity 2010 (pp. 209–214). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, K. T. (2004). Product design and development. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Lugt, R. (2005). How sketching can affect the idea generation process in design group meetings. Design Studies, 26(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2004.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velde, F. W. van der., Hooykaas, C., & Van Der Joop, P. (1992). Risk perception and behavior: Pessimism, realism, and optimism about AIDS-related health behavior. Psychology and Health, 6(1–2), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449208402018
   Google Scholar
• van Peer, W., Hakemulder, F., & Zyngier, S. (2012). Scientific methods for the humanities (Vol. 13). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, L. A., Neroni, M. A., Cardoso, C., & Crilly, N. (2018). Idea representation and elaboration in design inspiration and fixation experiments. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 6(1–2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/21650349.2017.1362360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verner, I. M., & Ahlgren, D. J. (2004). Robot contest as a laboratory for experiential engineering education. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), 4(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.1145/1071620.1071622
   Google Scholar
• Vinodh, S., Sundararaj, G., Devadasan, S. R., Kuttalingam, D., & Rajanayagam, D. (2009). Agility through rapid prototyping technology in a manufacturing environment using a 3D printer. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(7), 1023–1041. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380910984267
   Google Scholar
• Virvou, M., & Katsionis, G. (2008). On the usability and likeability of virtual reality games for education: The case of VR-ENGAGE. Computers & Education, 50(1), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, V. K., & Linsey, J. (2011). Design fixation in physical modeling: An investigation on the role of sunk cost. In ASME 2011 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 119–130). Washington D.C.: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, V. K., & Linsey, J. S. (2010). Physical models in idea generation: Hindrance or help? In ASME 2010 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference (pp. 329–339). New York, N.Y.: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R., Passerino, L. M., Piovesan, S. D., & De Lima, J. V. (2013). Using 3D virtual learning environments in new perspective of education. In Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), 2013 International Conference (pp. 1–6). Antalya, Turkey: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, D. B., & Gruber, H. E. (1989). Creative people at work: Twelve cognitive case studies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, G. G. (2002). Definition and Review of Virtual Prototyping. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2(3), 232–236.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Shen, C., & Ritterfeld, U. (2009). Enjoyment of digital games. In U. Ritterfeld, M. Cody, & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Serious games: Mechanisms and effects(pp. 25–47). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, A., Liker, J. K., Cristiano, J. J., & Sobek, D. K. (1995). The second Toyota paradox: How delaying decisions can make better cars faster. Sloan Management Review, 36, 43. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-second-toyota-paradox-how-delaying-decisions-can-make-better-cars-faster/
   Google Scholar
• Weber, B. G., John, M., Mateas, M., & Jhala, A. (2011). Modeling player retention in Madden NFL 11. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference (IAAI). San Francisco: AAAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 806. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science, 246(4935), 1232–1234. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2686031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, M., Barlex, D., & Lim, H. S. (2000). Sketching: Friend or foe to the novice designer? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(2), 125–148. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008991319644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R. F., Meserve, R. J., & Stanovich, K. E. (2012). Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, K. B. (1992). Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiltschnig, S., Christensen, B. T., & Ball, L. J. (2013). Collaborative problem–solution co-evolution in creative design. Design Studies, 34(5), 515–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfartsberger, J. (2019). Analyzing the potential of virtual reality for engineering design review. Automation in Construction, 104, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, S., & Seifert, C. M. (2011). Creativity through design heuristics: A case study of expert product design. Design Studies, 32(4), 384–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youmans, R. J. (2011). Design fixation in the wild: Design environments and their influence on fixation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(2), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01089.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. Z., Xie, C., & Nourian, S. (2017). Are their designs iterative or fixated? Investigating design patterns from student digital footprints in computer-aided design software. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-017-9408-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorriassatine, F., Wykes, C., Parkin, R., & Gindy, N. (2003). A survey of virtual prototyping techniques for mechanical product development. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 217(4), 513–530. https://doi.org/10.1243/095440503321628189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zyda, M. (2005). From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer, 38(9), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2005.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar