Milestones in the analysis of alkali-activated binders

References

• Van Deventer JSJ, Provis JL, Duxson P. Technical and commercial progress in the adoption of geopolymer cement. Miner. Eng. 2012;29:89–104.10.1016/j.mineng.2011.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis JL. Geopolymers and other alkali activated materials: why, how, and what? Mater. Struct. 2014;47:11–25.10.1617/s11527-013-0211-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal SA, Provis JL. Durability of alkali-activated materials: progress and perspectives. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2014;97:997–1008.10.1111/jace.12831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis JL, Bernal SA. Geopolymers and related alkali-activated materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2014;44:299–327.10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ, editors. Alkali-activated materials: state-of-the-art report. RILEM TC 224-AAM. Dordrecht: Springer/RILEM; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kühl H. Slag cement and process of making the same. U.S. Patent 900,939. 1908.
   Google Scholar
• Purdon AO. The action of alkalis on blast-furnace slag, J. Soc. Chem. Ind. Trans. Commun. 1940;59:191–202.
   Google Scholar
• Buchwald A, Vanooteghem M, Gruyaert E, Hilbig H, Belie N. Purdocement: application of alkali-activated slag cement in Belgium in the 1950s. Mater. Struct. 2014 in press. DOI: 10.1617/s11527-013-0200-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glukhovsky VD. Gruntosilikaty (soil silicates). Kiev: Gosstroyizdat; 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Krivenko PV. Alkaline cements. In: Krivenko PV, editor. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes; Kiev, Ukraine: VIPOL Stock Company; 1994. p. 11–129.
   Google Scholar
• Shi C, Krivenko PV, Roy DM. Alkali-activated cements and concretes. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis; 2006.10.4324/9780203390672
   Google Scholar
• Xu H, Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ, Krivenko PV. Characterization of aged slag concretes. ACI Mater. J. 2008;105:131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovits J. Geopolymer chemistry and applications. Saint-Quentin: Institut Géopolymère; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wang S-D, Pu X-C, Scrivener KL, Pratt PL. Alkali-activated slag cement and concrete: a review of properties and problems. Adv. Cem. Res. 1995;7:93–102.10.1680/adcr.1995.7.27.93
   Google Scholar
• Gaboriaud F, Nonat A, Chaumont D, Craievich A. Structural model of gelation processes of a sodium silicate sol destabilized by calcium ions: combination of SAXS and rheological measurements. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2005;351:351–354.10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cwirzen A, Engblom R, Punkki J, Habermehl-Cwirzen K. Effects of curing: comparison of optimised alkali-activated PC-FA-BFS and PC concretes. Mag. Concr. Res. 2014;66:315–323.10.1680/macr.13.00231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalchuk G, Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A. Alkali-activated fly ash: effect of thermal curing conditions on mechanical and microstructural development – part II. Fuel 2007;86:315–322.10.1016/j.fuel.2006.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Małolepszy J, Deja J. The influence of curing conditions on the mechanical properties of alkali-activated slag binders. Silic. Indus. 1988;53:179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Hewlett PC. Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete. 4th ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wang SD, Scrivener KL, Pratt PL. Factors affecting the strength of alkali-activated slag. Cem. Concr. Res. 1994;24:1033–1043.10.1016/0008-8846(94)90026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talling B, Brandstetr J. Present state and future of alkali-activated slag concretes. In: Malhotra VM, editor. 3rd International Conference on Fly Ash, Silica Fume, Slag and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, ACI SP114. Trondheim, Norway: American Concrete Institute; 1989. p. 1519–1546.
   Google Scholar
• Buchwald A, Wierckx J. ASCEM cement technology – alkali-activated cement based on synthetic slag made from fly ash. In: Shi C, Shen X, editors. First International Conference on Advances in Chemically-Activated Materials. Jinan, China: RILEM; 2010. p. 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Benhaha M, Lothenbach B, Lesaout G, Winnefeld F. Influence of slag chemistry on the hydration of alkali-activated blast-furnace slag – part I: effect of MgO. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011;41:955–963.10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benhaha M, Lothenbach B, Lesaout G, Winnefeld F. Influence of slag chemistry on the hydration of alkali-activated blast-furnace slag – part II: effect of Al2O3. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012;42:74–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SA Bernal. R San Nicolas, RJ Myers, R Mejía de Gutiérrez, F Puertas, JSJ van Deventer, JL Provis. MgO content of slag controls phase evolution and structural changes induced by accelerated carbonation in alkali-activated binders. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014;57:33–43.10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izquierdo M, Querol X, Davidovits J, Antenucci D, Nugteren H, Fernández-Pereira C. Coal fly ash-slag-based geopolymers: microstructure and metal leaching. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009;166:561–566.10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis JL, Rose V, Bernal SA, van Deventer JSJ. High-resolution nanoprobe X-ray fluorescence characterization of heterogeneous calcium and heavy metal distributions in alkali-activated fly ash. Langmuir. 2009;25:11897–11904.10.1021/la901560h
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovits J. Geopolymers – inorganic polymeric new materials. J. Therm. Anal. 1991;37:1633–1656.10.1007/BF01912193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provis JL, Lukey GC, van Deventer JSJ. Do geopolymers actually contain nanocrystalline zeolites? A reexamination of existing results. Chem. Mater. 2005;17:3075–3085.10.1021/cm050230i
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell JL, Sarin P, Provis JL, Haggerty RP, Driemeyer PE, Chupas PJ, van Deventer JSJ, Kriven WM. Atomic structure of a cesium aluminosilicate geopolymer: a pair distribution function study. Chem. Mater. 2008;20:4768–4776.10.1021/cm703369s
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinrade SD, Swaddle TW. Direct detection of aluminosilicate species in aqueous solution by silicon-29 and aluminum-27 NMR spectroscopy. Inorg. Chem. 1989;28:1952–1954.10.1021/ic00309a036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaddle TW, Salerno J, Tregloan PA. Aqueous aluminates, silicates, and aluminosilicates. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1994;23:319–325.10.1039/cs9942300319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CE, Provis JL, Kearley GJ, Riley DP, van Deventer JSJ. Density functional modelling of silicate and aluminosilicate dimerisation solution chemistry. Dalton Trans. 2011;40:1348–1355.10.1039/c0dt01042a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, van Deventer JSJ. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J. Mater. Sci. 2007;42:2917–2933.10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal SA, Provis JL, Fernández-Jiménez A, Krivenko PV, Kavalerova E, Palacios M, Shi C. Binder chemistry – high-calcium alkali-activated materials. In: Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ, editors. Alkali-activated materials: state-of-the-art report. RILEM TC 224-AAM. Dordrecht: Springer/RILEM; 2014. p. 59–91.10.1007/978-94-007-7672-2
   Google Scholar
• Hajimohammadi A, Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ. The effect of alumina release rate on the mechanism of geopolymer gel formation. Chem. Mater. 2010;22:5199–5208.10.1021/cm101151n
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajimohammadi A, Provis JL, van Deventer JSJ. The effect of silica availability on the mechanism of geopolymerisation. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011;41:210–216.10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CE, Provis JL, Proffen T, van Deventer JSJ. Molecular mechanisms responsible for the structural changes occurring during geopolymerization: multiscale simulation. AIChE J. 2012;58:2241–2253.10.1002/aic.v58.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CE, Provis JL, Bloomer B, Henson NJ, Page K. In situ X-ray pair distribution function analysis of geopolymer gel nanostructure formation kinetics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013;15:8573–8582.10.1039/c3cp44342f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal SA, Provis JL, Walkley B, San Nicolas R, Gehman JD, Brice DG, Kilcullen A, Duxson P, van Deventer JSJ. Gel nanostructure in alkali-activated binders based on slag and fly ash, and effects of accelerated carbonation. Cem. Concr. Res. 2013;53:127–144.10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dombrowski K, Buchwald A, Weil M. The influence of calcium content on the structure and thermal performance of fly ash based geopolymers. J. Mater. Sci. 2007;42:3033–3043.10.1007/s10853-006-0532-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Santaquiteria C, Skibsted J, Fernández-Jiménez A, Palomo A. Alkaline solution/binder ratio as a determining factor in the alkaline activation of aluminosilicates. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012;42:1242–1251.10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egami T, Billinge SJL. Underneath the bragg peaks: structural analysis of complex materials. Oxford: Plenum; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Meral C, Benmore CJ, Monteiro PJM. The study of disorder and nanocrystallinity in C-S-H, supplementary cementitious materials and geopolymers using pair distribution function analysis. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011;41:696–710.10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CE. Pair distribution function analysis of amorphous geopolymer precursors and binders: the importance of complementary molecular simulation. Z. Kristallogr. 2012;227:304–312.10.1524/zkri.2012.1488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CE, Provis JL, Proffen T, Van Deventer JSJ. The effects of temperature on the local structure of metakaolin-based geopolymer binder: a neutron pair distribution function investigation. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010;93:3486–3492.10.1111/jace.2010.93.issue-10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White CE, Page K, Henson NJ, Provis JL. In situ synchrotron X-ray pair distribution function analysis of the early stages of gel formation in metakaolin-based geopolymers. Appl. Clay. Sci. 2013;73:17–25.10.1016/j.clay.2012.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost JR, Radlińska A, Ernst S, Salera M, Martignetti NJ. Structural behavior of alkali activated fly ash concrete. Part 2: structural testing and experimental findings. Mater. Struct. 2013;46:449–462.10.1617/s11527-012-9985-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Loya EI, Allouche EN, Vaidya S. Mechanical properties of fly-ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Mater. J. 2011;108:300–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badar MS, Kupwade-Patil K, Bernal SA, Provis JL, Allouche EN. Corrosion of steel bars induced by accelerated carbonation in low and high calcium fly ash geopolymer concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014;61:79–89.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagoe-Crentsil K, Brown T, Taylor A. Drying shrinkage and creep performance of geopolymer concrete. J. Sust. Cem. Based Mater. 2013;2:35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Wallah SE. Drying shrinkage of heat-cured fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Mod. Appl. Sci. 2009;3:14–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wallah SE. Creep behaviour of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Civil Eng. Dimension. 2010;12:73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Provis JL, Myers RJ, White CE, Rose V, van Deventer JSJ. X-ray microtomography shows pore structure and tortuosity in alkali-activated binders. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012;42:855–864.10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail I, Bernal SA, Provis JL, San Nicolas R, Brice DG, Kilcullen AR, Hamdan S, van Deventer JSJ. Influence of fly ash on the water and chloride permeability of alkali-activated slag mortars and concretes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013;48:1187–120110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar