Alkali activation of mechanically activated low-grade clay

References

• Robayo-Salazar R, Mejía-Arcila J, de Gutiérrez RM, et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) of an alkali-activated binary concrete based on natural volcanic pozzolan: a comparative analysis to OPC concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2018;176:103–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristály F, Szabó R, Mádai F, et al. Lightweight composite from fly ash geopolymer and glass foam. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2020;178:1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Uddin Ahmed Shaikh F, Haque S, Sanjayan J. Behavior of fly ash geopolymer as fire resistant coating for timber. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2019;8(5):259–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongsa A, Wongkvanklom A, Tanangteerapong D, et al. Comparative study of fire-resistant behaviors of high-calcium fly ash geopolymer mortar containing zeolite and mullite. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2020;9(5):307–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshaaer M. Synthesis and characterization of self-healing geopolymer composite. Constr Build Mater. 2020;245:118432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaya NA, Yun-Ming L, Cheng-Yong H, et al. Correlation between pore structure, compressive strength and thermal conductivity of porous metakaolin geopolymer. Constr Build Mater. 2020;247:118641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutník P, Soukup A, Bezucha P, et al. Low viscosity metakaolinite based geopolymer binders. Constr Build Mater. 2020;230:116978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolov A, Nugteren H, Rostovsky I. Optimization of geopolymers based on natural zeolite clinoptilolite by calcination and use of aluminate activators. Constr Build Mater. 2020;243:118257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramezanianpour AA. Metakaolin. In: Cement replacement materials. Springer; 2014. p. 225–255.
   Google Scholar
• Djobo JNY, Elimbi A, Tchakouté HK, et al. Mechanical activation of volcanic ash for geopolymer synthesis: effect on reaction kinetics, gel characteristics, physical and mechanical properties. RSC Adv. 2016;6(45):39106–39117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinkin A, Kumar S, Gurevich B, et al. Geopolymerization behavior of Cu–Ni slag mechanically activated in air and in CO2 atmosphere. Int J Miner Process. 2012;112–113:101–106. vol
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Kumar R. Mechanical activation of fly ash: effect on reaction, structure and properties of resulting geopolymer. Ceram Int. 2011;37(2):533–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Aswath M, Ranganath R. Effect of mechanical activation of red mud on the strength of geopolymer binder. Constr Build Mater. 2018;177:91–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei B, Zhang Y, Bao S. Preparation of geopolymers from vanadium tailings by mechanical activation. Constr Build Mater. 2017;145:236–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temuujin J, Williams R, Van Riessen A. Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. J Mater Process Technol. 2009;209(12–13):5276–5280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng J, Zhou M, Li Y, et al. Comparison of red mud and coal gangue blended geopolymers synthesized through thermal activation and mechanical grinding preactivation. Constr Build Mater. 2017;153:185–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan Q, Zhang Y, Zhang R. Using mechanical activation of quartz to enhance the compressive strength of metakaolin based geopolymers. Cem Concr Compos. 2020;111:103635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard A. C109/C109M Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (Using 2-in. or 50-mm cube specimens). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hounsi AD, Lecomte-Nana GL, Djétéli G, et al. Kaolin-based geopolymers: effect of mechanical activation and curing process. Constr Build Mater. 2013;42:105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiradate S, Wada S-I. Weathering process of volcanic glass to allophane determined by 27Al and 29Si solid-state NMR. Clays Clay Miner. 2005;53(4):401–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha J, Klinowski J. 29Si and 27Al magic-angle-spinning NMR studies of the thermal transformation of kaolinite. Phys Chem Miner. 1990;17(2):179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basile-Doelsch I, Amundson R, Stone W, et al. Mineral control of carbon pools in a volcanic soil horizon. Geoderma. 2007;137(3–4):477–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Guo J, Yang N, et al. Solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance and infrared spectroscopy of alkali feldspars. Sci. China Ser. D Earth Sci. 1997;40(2):159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Eisazadeh A, Kassim KA, Nur H. Solid-state NMR and FTIR studies of lime stabilized montmorillonitic and lateritic clays. Appl Clay Sci. 2012;67–68:5–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi S, Ueda T, Hayamizu K, et al. NMR study of kaolinite. 1. 29Si, 27Al, and 1 H spectra. J Phys Chem. 1992;96(26):10922–10928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherriff BL, Grundy HD. Calculations of 29Si MAS NMR chemical shift from silicate mineral structure. Nature. 1988;332(6167):819–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrero C, Sanz J, Serratosa J. Si, Al distribution in micas; analysis by high-resolution 29Si NMR spectroscopy. J Phys C: Solid State Phys. 1985;18(1):13–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmaa E, Maegi M, Samoson A, et al. Structural studies of silicates by solid-state high-resolution silicon-29 NMR. J Am Chem Soc. 1980;102(15):4889–4893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie K, Brown I, Cardile C, et al. The thermal reactions of muscovite studied by high-resolution solid-state 29-Si and 27-AI NMR. J Mater Sci. 1987;22(7):2645–2654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magi M, Lippmaa E, Samoson A, et al. Solid-state high-resolution silicon-29 chemical shifts in silicates. J Phys Chem. 1984;88(8):1518–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz J, Serratosa J. Silicon-29 and aluminum-27 high-resolution MAS-NMR spectra of phyllosilicates. J Am Chem Soc. 1984;106(17):4790–4793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins F, Sanjayan J. Microcracking and strength development of alkali activated slag concrete. Cem Concr Compos. 2001;23(4–5):345–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim M, Johari MAM, Maslehuddin M, et al. Influence of composition and concentration of alkaline activator on the properties of natural-pozzolan based green concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2019;201:186–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardhono A, Law DW, Strano A. The strength of alkali-activated slag/fly ash mortar blends at ambient temperature. Procedia Eng. 2015;125:650–656.
   Google Scholar
• Sukontasukkul P, Chindaprasirt P, Pongsopha P, et al. Effect of fly ash/silica fume ratio and curing condition on mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced geopolymer. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2020;9(4):218–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luukkonen T, Abdollahnejad Z, Ohenoja K, et al. Suitability of commercial superplasticizers for one-part alkali-activated blast-furnace slag mortar. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2019;8(4):244–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowles M, O'connor B. Chemical optimisation of the compressive strength of aluminosilicate geopolymers synthesised by sodium silicate activation of metakaolinite. J Mater Chem. 2003;13(5):1161–1165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald A, Hohmann M, Posern K, et al. The suitability of thermally activated illite/smectite clay as raw material for geopolymer binders. Appl Clay Sci. 2009;46(3):300–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjanović N, Komljenović M, Baščarević Z, et al. Improving reactivity of fly ash and properties of ensuing geopolymers through mechanical activation. Constr Build Mater. 2014;57:151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung-Il S, Yum WS, Sim S, et al. Effect of magnesium formate as compared with magnesium oxide on the strength enhancement and microstructures of CaO-activated Class F fly ash system. Constr Build Mater. 2020;253:119140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodr M, Law DW, Gunasekara C, et al. Compressive strength and microstructure evolution of low calcium brown coal fly ash-based geopolymer. J Sustain Cem Based Mater. 2020;9(1):17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddique S, Jang JG. Effect of CFBC ash as partial replacement of PCC ash in alkali-activated material. Constr Build Mater. 2020;244:118383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, et al. 29Si NMR study of structural ordering in aluminosilicate geopolymer gels. Langmuir. 2005;21(7):3028–3036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Q, Guo B, Sasaki K. Immobilization mechanism of Se oxyanions in geopolymer: effects of alkaline activators and calcined hydrotalcite additive. J Hazard Mater. 2020;387:121994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valcke SL, Pipilikaki P, Fischer HR, et al. FT-IR and 29Si-NMR for evaluating aluminium–silicate precursors for geopolymers. Mater Struct. 2015;48(3):557–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Jaarsveld J, Van Deventer J. Effect of the alkali metal activator on the properties of fly ash-based geopolymers. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1999;38(10):3932–3941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madejová J, Gates W, Petit S. IR spectra of clay minerals. In: Developments in clay science. Elsevier; 2017. p. 107–149. Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Lecomte I, Henrist C, Liégeois M, et al. Micro-structural comparison between geopolymers, alkali-activated slag cement and Portland cement. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2006;26(16):3789–3797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar