Nanomechanical characterization of ambient-cured fly ash geopolymers containing nanosilica

References

• Lawrence CD. The production of low-energy cements. In: Heweit PC, editor. Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete. Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford; 1998. p. 421470.
   Google Scholar
• Hardjito D. Studies on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete [PhD thesis]. Australia: Curtin University of Technology; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez JA, Palomo A. Characterisation of fly ashes potential reactivity as alkaline cements. Fuel 2003;82(18):2259–2265.
   Google Scholar
• Phair JW, Deventer JSJ. Characterization of fly-ash-based geopolymeric binders activated with sodium aluminate. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41(17):4242–4251.
   Google Scholar
• Jaarsveld JGS, Deventer JSJ, Lukey GC. The effect of composition and temperature on the properties of fly ash and kaolinite based geopolymers. Chem Eng J. 2002;89(1-3):63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Chen-Tan NW, van Riessen A, Ly CV, et al. Determining the reactivity of a fly ash for production of geopolymer. J Am Ceram Soc. 2009;92(4):881–887.
   Google Scholar
• van Deventer JSJ, Provis JL, Duxson P, et al. Reaction mechanisms in the geopolymeric conversion of inorganic waste to useful products. J Hazard Mater. 2007;139(3):506–513.
   Google Scholar
• Palomo A, Krivenko P, Garcia LI, et al. Review on alkaline activation: new analytical perspectives. Mater De Constr. 2014;64(315):80–85.
   Google Scholar
• Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, et al. Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2005;269(1-3):47–58.
   Google Scholar
• Deb PS, Nath P, Sarker PK. The effects of ground granulated blast-furnace slag blending with fly ash and activator content on the workability and strength properties of geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Mater Des. 2014;62:32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Deb PS, Nath P, Sarker PK. Strength and permeation properties of slag blended fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Adv Mater Res. 2013;651:168–173.
   Google Scholar
• Nath P, Sarker PK. Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Constr Build Mater. 2014;66:163–171.
   Google Scholar
• Nath P, Sarker PK. Use of OPC to improve setting and early strength properties of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete cured at room temperature. Cem Concr Compos. 2015;55:205–214.
   Google Scholar
• Lee WKW, van Deventer JSJ. Structural reorganisation of class F fly ash in alkaline silicate solutions. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2002;211(1):49–66.
   Google Scholar
• Rees CA, Provis JL, Lukey GC, et al. In situ ATR-FTIR study of the early stages of fly ash geopolymer gel formation. Langmuir. 2007;23(17):9076–9082.
   Google Scholar
• Deb PS, Sarker PK, Barbhuiya S. Effects of nanosilica on the strength development of geopolymer cured at room temperature. Constr Build Mater. 2015;101(1):675–683.
   Google Scholar
• Konsta-Gdoutos MS. Nanomaterials in self-consolidating concrete: a state-of-the-art review. J Sust Cem Based Mat. 2014;3(3-4):167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Luo Z, Li W, Tam VWY, et al. Current progress on nanotechnology application in recycled aggregate concrete. J Sust Cem Based Mat. 2019;8(2):79–96.
   Google Scholar
• Shah SP, Hou P, Konsta-Gdoutos MS. Nano-modification of cementitious material: toward a stronger and durable concrete. J Sust Cem Based Mat. 2016;5(1-2):1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Du X, Zhao X, et al. The synergistic effect of nano-SiO2 with silica fume in cement-based material. J Sust Cem Based Mat. 2017;6(4):267–279.
   Google Scholar
• Kawashima S, Ted JW, Corr D, et al. Dispersion of CaCO3 nanoparticles by sonication and surfactant treatment for application in fly ash–cement systems. Mater Struc. 2014;47(6):1011–1023.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim M, Johari MAM, Hussaini SR, et al. Influence of pore structure on the properties of green concrete derived from natural pozzolan and nanosilica. J Sust Cem Based Mat. 2020;9(4):233–257.
   Google Scholar
• Diab AM, Elyamany HE, Elmoaty AEMA, et al. Effect of nanomaterials additives on performance of concrete resistance against magnesium sulfate and acids. Constr Build Mater. 2019;210:210–231.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Wang J, Cheng S. Study on the CPE/Nano SiO2 blends. J Funct Polym. 2002;15(3):271–275.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer BJ, Liu D-W, Jackson CL, et al. Epoxy/SiO2 interpenetrating polymer networks. Polym Adv Technol. 1996;7(4):333–339.
   Google Scholar
• Björnström J, Martinelli A, Johnson JRT, et al. Signatures of a drying SiO2 · (H2O)x gel from Raman spectroscopy and quantum chemistry. Chem Phys Lett. 2003;380(1-2):165–172.
   Google Scholar
• Mackay ME, Tuteja A, Duxbury PM, et al. General strategies for nanoparticle dispersion. Science. 2006;311(5768):1740–1743.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Xiao HG, Yuan J, et al. Microstructure of cement mortar with nano- particles. Compos Part B. 2004;35(2):185–189.
   Google Scholar
• Shih JY, Chang TP, Hsiao TC. Effect of nanosilica on characterization of Portland cement composite. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;424(1-2):266–274.
   Google Scholar
• Quercia G, Husken G, Brouwers HJH. Water demand of amorphous nano silica and its impact on the workability of cement paste. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42(2):344–357.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang MH, Islam J. Use of nanosilica to reduce setting time and increase early strength of concretes with high volumes of fly ash or slag. Constr Build Mater. 2012;29:573–580.
   Google Scholar
• Qing Y, Zenan Z, Deyu K, et al. Influence of nano-SiO2 addition on properties of hardened cement paste as compared with silica fume. Constr Build Mater. 2007;21(3):539–545.
   Google Scholar
• Deb PS, Sarker PK, Barbhuiya S. Sorptivity and acid resistance of ambient-cured geopolymer mortars containing nanosilica. Cem Concr Compos. 2016;72:235–245.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver WC, Pharr GMR. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res. 1992;7(6):1564–1583.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng K, Chiu CH. An analysis of load-penetration curves from instrumented indentation. Acta Mater. 2001;49(17):3539–3551.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng K, Shen L. A new analysis of nanoindentation load-displacement curves. Phil Mag A. 2002;82(10):2223–2229.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinides G, Chandran KSR, Ulm FJ, et al. Grid indentation analysis of composite microstructure and mechanics: principles and validation. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;430(1-2):189–202.
   Google Scholar
• Ulm FJ, Vandamme M, Bobko C, et al. Statistical indentation techniques for hydrated nanocomposites: concrete, bone, and shale. J Am Ceram Soc. 2007;90(9):2677–2692.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal P, Shah SP, Marks L. A reliable technique to determine the local mechanical properties at the nanoscale for cementitious materials. Cem Concr Res. 2007;37(10):1440–1444.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes JJ, Trtik P. Micro-mechanical properties of cement paste measured by depth- sensing nanoindentation: a preliminary correlation of physical properties with phase type. Mater Charac. 2004;53(2-4):223–231.
   Google Scholar
• S˘milauer V, Bittnar Z. Microstructure-based micromechanical prediction of elastic properties in hydrating cement paste. Cem Concr Res. 2006;36(9):1708–1718.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinides G, Ulm FJ. The effect of two types of C–S–H on the elasticity of cement-based materials: results from nanoindentation and micromechanical modelling. Cem Concr Res. 2004;34(1):67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Trtik P, Kaufmann J, Volz U. On the use of peak-force tapping atomic force microscopy for quantification of the local elastic modulus in hardened cement paste. Cem Concr Res. 2012;42(1):215–221.
   Google Scholar
• Oh JE, Monteiro PJM, Ssang SJ, et al. The evolution of strength and crystalline phases for alkali-activated ground blast furnace slag and fly ash-based geopolymers. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40(2):189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Sarker PK. Analysis of geopolymer concrete columns. Mater Struct. 2009;42(6):715–724.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez AMF, Palomo A, Hombrados CL. Engineering properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete. ACI Mater J. 2006;103(2):106–112.
   Google Scholar
• Sofi M, van Deventer JSJ, Mendis PA, et al. Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs). Cem Concr Res. 2007;37(2):251–257.,
   Google Scholar
• Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Sumajouw MJ. Developments in mechanics of structures and materials. Netherlands: A Balkema Publishers; 2005. p. 831–834.
   Google Scholar
• Wongpa J, Kiattikomol K, Jaturapitakkul C, et al. Compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and water permeability of inorganic polymer concrete. Mater Des. 2010;31(10):4748–4754.
   Google Scholar
• Nemecek J, Smilauer V, Kopecky L. Nanoindentation characteristics of alkali- activated aluminosilicate materials. Cem Concr Compos. 2011;33:163–170.
   Google Scholar
• AS 1012.1. Methods of testing concrete. Sampling of concrete. Australia: SAI Global; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cripps F, Anthony C. Nanoindentation. Berlin: Springer; 2002. p. 216.
   Google Scholar
• Lee H, Vimonsatit V, Chindaprasirt P. Mechanical and micromechanical properties of alkali activated fly-ash cement based on nanoindentation. Constr Build Mater. 2016;107:95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman RF, Beaudoin JJ. Microstructure and strength of hydrated cement. Cem Concr Res. 1976;6(3):389–400.
   Google Scholar
• Sorelli L, Constantinides G, Ulm FJ, et al. The nano-mechanical signature of ultra high performance concrete by statistical nanoindentation techniques. Cem Concr Res. 2008;38(12):1447–1456.
   Google Scholar
• Trtik P, Munch BB, Lura P. A critical examination of nanoindentation on model materials and hardened cement pastes based on virtual experiments. Cem Concr Compos. 2009;31(10):705–714.
   Google Scholar
• Lura P, Münch BB, Trtik P. Validity of recent approaches for statistical nanoindentation of cement pastes. Cem Concr Compos. 2011;33(4):457–465.
   Google Scholar
• Pelisser F, Gleize PJP, Michel MD. Nanomechanical properties of cement paste. Rev Ibracon Estrut Mater. 2011;4(4):561–574.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez JA, Palomo A. Composition and microstructure of alkali activated fly ash mortars. Effect of the activator. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35(10):1984–1992.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez JA, Palomo A, Sobrados I, et al. The role played by the reactive alumina content in the alkaline activation of fly ashes. Micro Meso Mater. 2006;91(1-3):111–119.
   Google Scholar
• Chicot D, Mendoza J, Zaoui A, et al. Mechanical properties of magnetite (Fe3O4), hematite (α-Fe2O3) and goethite (α-FeO·OH) by instrumented indentation and molecular dynamics analysis. Mater Chem Phy. 2011;129(3):862–870.
   Google Scholar
• Chicot D, Roudet F, Zaoui A, et al. Influence of visco-elasto-plastic properties of magnetite on the elastic modulus: Multicyclic indentation and theoretical studies. Mater Chem Phys. 2010;119(1-2):75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Nath S, Dey A, Mukhopadhyay AK, et al. Nanoindentation response of novel hydroxyapatite-mullite composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2009;513-514:197–201.
   Google Scholar