Prediction of permeability for fully weathered granite amended with fly ash by fractal dimensions

References

• Abdi MR, Wild S. Sulphate expansion of lime-stabilized kaolinite: I. Physical characteristics. Clay Miner. 1993;28(4):555–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmaruzzaman M. A review on the utilization of fly ash. Prog Energy Combust Sci. 2010;36(3):327–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assi LN, Deaver EE, Ziehl P. Effect of source and particle size distribution on the mechanical and microstructural properties of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2018;167:372–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykal G, Edinçliler A, Saygılı A. Highway embankment construction using fly ash in cold regions. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2004;42(3):209–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhagath Singh GVP, Subramaniam KVL. Effect of active components on strength development in alkali-activated low calcium fly ash cements. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater. 2019;8(1):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DJ, Fox WE, Aitken RL, et al. Physical characteristics of sands amended with fly ash. Soil Res. 1983; 21(2):147–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang AC, Lund LJ, Page AL, et al. Physical properties of fly ash-amended soils. J Environ Qual. 1977; 6(3):267–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consoli NC, Rosa AD, Saldanha RB. Variables governing strength of compacted soil-fly ash-lime mixtures. J Mater Civ Eng. 2011; 23(4):432–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai Q, Wang G, Zhao X, et al. Fractal model for permeability estimation in low-permeable porous media with variable pore sizes and unevenly adsorbed water lay. Mar Pet Geol. 2021; 130(10):105135.
   Google Scholar
• Duan P, Yan C, Zhou W. A novel water permeable geopolymer with high strength and high permeability coefficient derived from fly ash, slag and metakaolin. Adv Powder Technol. 2017; 28(5):1430–1434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Hassan H, Shehab E, Al-Sallamin A. Effect of curing regime on the performance and microstructure characteristics of alkali-activated slag-fly ash blended concrete. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater. 2021;10(5):289–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg A, Garg A, Lam JSL. Evolving functional expression of permeability of fly ash by a new evolutionary approach. Transp Porous Med. 2015; 107(2):555–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg N, Wang K. Comparing the performance of different commercial clays in fly ash-modified mortars. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater. 2012; 1(3):111–125.
   Google Scholar
• GB/T 50123-2019. Standard for geotechnical testing method [S]. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Islam MS, Elahi TE, Shahriar AR, et al. Effectiveness of fly ash and cement for compressed stabilized earth block construction. Constr Build Mater. 2020;255:119392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain A, Gupta R, Chaudhary S. Sustainable development of self-compacting concrete by using granite waste and fly ash. Constr Build Mater. 2020; 262:120516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JTG 3430–2020. Test methods of soils for highway engineering [S]. Beijing: China Communications Press; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• JTG E51–2009. Test methods of materials stabilized with inorganic binders for highway engineering[S]. Beijing: China Communications Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaivani M, Shyamala G, Ramesh S, et al. Performance evaluation of fly ash/slag based geopolymer concrete beams with addition of lime. Mater Today: Proc. 2020;27:652–656.
   Google Scholar
• Kaniraj SR, Gayathri V. Permeability and consolidation characteristics of compacted fly ash. J Energy Eng. 2004;130(1):18–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuri JC, Khan MNN, Sarker PK. Workability, strength and microstructural properties of ground ferronickel slag blended fly ash geopolymer mortar. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater. 2020; 9(2):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutchko B, Kim A. Fly ash characterization by SEM–EDS. Fuel. 2006;85(17-18):2537–2544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R, Jiang Y, Li B, et al. A fractal model for characterizing fluid flow in fractured rock masses based on randomly distributed rock fracture networks. Comput Geotech. 2015;65:45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R, Li B, Jiang Y. A fractal model based on a new governing equation of fluid flow in fractures for characterizing hydraulic properties of rock fracture networks. Comput Geotech. 2016; 75:57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao T, Yang S, Long Z, et al. Fractal analysis of permeability of dual-porosity media embedded with random fractures. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2015; 88:814–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murmu AL, Dhole N, Patel A. Stabilisation of black cotton soil for subgrade application using fly ash geopolymer. Road Mater Pavement Design. 2020; 21(3):867–885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitchumani R, Ramakrishnan B. A fractal geometry model for evaluating permeabilities of porous preforms used in liquid composite molding. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 1999; 42(12):2219–2232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prabakar J, Dendorkar N, Morchhale RK. Influence of fly ash on strength behavior of typical soils. Constr Build Mater. 2004; 18(4):263–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prashanth JP, Sivapullaiah PV, Sridharan A. Pozzolanic fly ash as a hydraulic barrier in land fills. Eng Geol. 2001; 60(1–4):245–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramadas TL, Kumar ND, Yesuratnam G. Geotechnical characteristics of three expansive soils treated with lime and flyash. Int J Earth Sci Eng. 2011; 4(6):46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan B, Pitchumani R. Fractal permeation characteristics of preforms used in liquid composite molding. Polym Compos. 2000; 21(2):281–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sezer A, İnan G, Yılmaz HR, et al. Utilization of a very high lime fly ash for improvement of izmir clay. Build Environ. 2006; 41(2):150–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma AK, Sivapullaiah PV. Ground granulated blast furnace slag amended fly ash as an expansive soil stabilizer. Soils Found. 2016; 56(2):205–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma NK, Swain SK, Sahoo UC. Stabilization of a clayey soil with fly ash and lime: a micro level investigation. Geotech Geol Eng. 2012; 30(5):1197–1205.
   Google Scholar
• Shen W, Zhou M, Zhao Q. Study on lime–fly ash–phosphogypsum binder. Constr Build Mater. 2007; 21(7):1480–1485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi C, Liu S, Cao Z, et al. Quantitative determination of fly ash in fresh cement mortars and concretes. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater. 2013; 2(1):58–66.
   Google Scholar
• Siddique R, Aggarwal P, Aggarwal Y. Mechanical and durability properties of self-compacting concrete containing fly ash and bottom ash. J Sustain Cement-Based Mater. 2012; 1(3):67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Sun W, Yan H, Zhan B. Analysis of mechanism on water-reducing effect of fine ground slag, high-calcium fly ash, and low-calcium fly ash. Cem Concr Res. 2003; 33(8):1119–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanepoel JC, Strydom CA. Utilisation of fly ash in a geopolymeric material. Appl Geochem. 2002;17(8):1143–1148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tastan EO, Edil TB, Benson CH, et al. Stabilization of organic soils with fly ash. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. 2011; 137(9):819–833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tho-In T, Sata V, Chindaprasirt P, et al. Pervious high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2012; 30:366–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umesha TS, Dinesh SV, Sivapullaiah PV. Control of dispersivity of soil using lime and cement. Int J Geol. 2009; 3(1):8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wang A, Zhang C, Sun W. Fly ash effects: I. The morphological effect of fly ash. Cem Concr Res. 2003; 33(12):2023–2029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang A, Zhang C, Sun W. Fly ash effects: II. The active effect of fly ash. Cem Concr Res. 2004; 34(11):2057–2060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu B, Cheng P. A fractal permeability model for bi-dispersed porous media. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2002; 45(14):2983–2993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Ma J, Ye G, et al. Effect of fly ash on the pore structure of cement paste under a curing period of 3 years. Constr Build Mater. 2017; 144:493–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Ni C, Tang M, et al. Relationship between water permeability and pore structure of Portland cement paste blended with fly ash. Constr Build Mater. 2018; 175:458–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabielska-Adamska K. Characteristics of compacted fly ash as a transitional soil. Materials. 2020; 13(6):1387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Q, Li K, Fen-Chong T, et al. Pore structure characterization of cement pastes blended with high-volume fly-ash. Cem Concr Res. 2012; 42(1):194–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar