Bioprocessing of wheat bran for the production of lignocellulolytic enzyme cocktail by Cotylidia pannosa under submerged conditions

References

• Sukumaran RK, Surender VJ, Sindhu R, Binod P, Janu KU, Sajna KV, Rajasree KP, Pandey A. Lignocellulosic ethanol in India: Prospects, challenges and feedstock availability. Bioresour Technol 2010; 101:4826-33; PMID:20018505; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khare SK, Pandey A, Larroche C. Current perspectives in enzymatic saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass. Biochem Eng J 2015; 102:38-44; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2015.02.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swana J, Yang Y, Behnam M, Thompson R. An analysis of net energy production and feedstock availability for biobutanol and bioethanol. Bioresour Technol 2011; 102:2112-17; PMID:20843683; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansfield SD, Mooney C, Saddler JN. Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Prog 1999; 15:804-16; PMID:10514250; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bp9900864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson T, Borjesson J, Tjerneld F. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb Technol 2002; 31:353-64; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00134-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moilanen U, Kellock M, Galkin S, Viikari L. The laccase-catalyzed modification of lignin for enzymatic hydrolysis. Enzyme Microb Technol 2011; 49:492-98; PMID:22142723; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmqvist H, Hahn-Hagerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol 2000; 74:25-33; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00161-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmel ME, Ding SY, Johnson DK, Adney WS, Nimlos MR, Brady JW, Foust TD. Biomass recalcitrance: Engineering plants and enzymes for biofuels production Science 2007; 315:804-7; PMID:17289988; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1137016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heap L, Green A, Brown D, van Dongen B, Turner N. Role of laccase as an enzymatic pretreatment method to improve lignocellulosic saccharification. Catal Sci Technol 2014; 4:2251-59; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4cy00046c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulla Moilanen U, Kellock M, Várnai A, Andberg M, Viikari L. Mechanisms of laccase-mediator treatments improving the enzymatic hydrolysis of pre-treated spruce. Biotechnol Biofuels 2014; 7:177; PMID:25648942; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13068-014-0177-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manavalan T, Manavalan A, Heese K. Characterization of lignocellulolytic enzymes from white-rot fungi. Curr Microbiol 2015; 70:485-98; PMID:25487116; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00284-014-0743-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandel AK, Caroline BMG, Strap JL, Silva SS. Biodelignification of lignocellulosic substrates: an intrinsic and sustainable pretreatment strategy for clean energy production. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2015; 35:281-93; PMID:24156399; http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2013.841638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi V, Verma P. An overview of key pretreatment processes employed for bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass into biofuels and value added products. Three Biotech. 2013; 3:415-31
   Google Scholar
• Sun FF, Hong J, Hu J, Saddler JN, Fang X, Zhang Z, Shen S. Accessory enzymes influence cellulase hydrolysis of the model substrate and the realistic lignocellulosic biomass. Enzyme Microb Technol 2015; 79-80:42-8; PMID:26320713; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2015.06.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosales-Calderon O, Trajano HL, Duff SJB. Stability of commercial glucanase and β-glucosidase preparations under hydrolysis conditions. Palomo J, ed. Peer J 2014; 2:e402; PMID:24949230; http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.402
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response Surface Methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2009
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan M, Garlapati VK. Modeling embedded optimization strategy for formulation of bacterial lipase based bio-detergent. Indus Eng Chem Res 2014; 53:514-20; http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie401357h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahapatra P, Kumari A, Garlapati VK, Banerjee R, Nag A. Enzymatic synthesis of fruit flavor esters by immobilized lipase from Rhizopus oligosporus optimized with response surface methodology. J Mol Catal B: Enzym 2009; 60:57-63; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma D, Goel G, Sud A, Chauhan RS. A novel laccase from newly isolated Cotylidia pannosa and its application in decolorization of synthetic dyes. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 2015b; 4:661-66
   Google Scholar
• Sharma D, Goel G, Bansal S, Mahajan R, Sharma BM, Chauhan RS. Characterization of cellulolytic activities of newly isolated Thelephora sowerbyi from North-Western Himalayas on different lignocellulosic substrates. J Basic Microbiol 2015a; DOI: 10.1002/jobm.201500107.
   Google Scholar
• Khurana S, Kapoor M, Gupta S, Kuhad RC. Statistical optimization of alkaline xylanase production from Streptomyces violaceoruber under submerged fermentation using response surface methodology. Ind J Microbiol 2007; 47:144-52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12088-007-0028-4
   Google Scholar
• Thygesen A, Thomsen AB, Schmidt AS, Jørgensen H, Ahring BK, Olsson L. Production of cellulose and hemicellulose-degrading enzymes by filamentous fungi cultivated on wet-oxidised wheat straw. Enzyme Microb Tech 2003; 32:606-15; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(03)00018-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishore D, Kayastha AM. Optimisation of immobilisation conditions for chick pea β-galactosidase (CpGAL) to alkylamine glass using response surface methodology and its applications in lactose hydrolysis. Food Chem 2012; 134:1650-7; PMID:25005995; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.03.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh MV, Lonsane BK. Regulation of α-amylase production in Bacillus licheniformis M 27 by enzyme end-products in submerged fermentation and its overcoming in solid state fermentation system. Biotechnol Lett 1991; 13:355-60; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01027682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon SH, Parulekar SJ. A parametric study of protease production in batch and fed-batch cultures of Bacillus firmus. Biotechnol Bioeng 1991; 37:467-83; PMID:18597393; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bit.260370509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isil S, Nilufer A. Investigation of factors affecting xylanase activity from Trichoderma harzianum1073 D3. Brazilian Arch Biol Technol 2005; 48:187-93; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132005000200004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrasan CRF, Temer B, Durate MCT, Carmona EC. Production of xylanolytic enzymes by Penicillium janczewskii. Bioresour Technol 2010; 101:4139-43; PMID:20122825; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal M, Kalra KL, Sareen VK, Soni G. Xylanase production with xylan rich lignocellulosic wastes by a local soil isolate of Trichoderma viride. Braz J Microbiol 2008; 39:535-41; PMID:24031262; http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822008000300025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knob A, Beitel SM, Fortkamp D, Terrasan CR, de Almeida AF. Production, purification, and characterization of a major Penicillium glabrum xylanase using brewer's spent grain as substrate. BioMed Res Intern 2013; 2013:728-35; http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/728735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinigaglia M, Corbo MR, Ciccarone C. Influence of temperature, pH and water activity on “in vitro” inhibition of Penicillium glabrum (Wehmer) westling by yeasts. Microbiol Res 1998; 153:137-43; PMID:9760746; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0944-5013(98)80031-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevarez L, Vasseur V, Le Madec A, Le Bras MA, Coroller L, Leguérinel I, Barbier G. Physiological traits of Penicillium glabrum strain LCP 08.5568, a filamentous fungus isolated from bottled aromatised mineral water. Int J Food Microbiol 2009; 130:166-71; PMID:19233496; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli U, Nigam P, Singh D, Chaudhary K. Thermostable, alkalophilic and cellulase free xylanase production by Thermonoactinomyces thalophilus subgroup C. Enzym Microb Technol 2001; 28:606-10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(01)00320-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen LT, Neo KRS, Yang KL. Continuous hydrolysis of carboxymethyl cellulose with cellulase aggregates trapped inside membranes. Enzyme Microb Technol 2015; 78:34-39; PMID:26215342; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2015.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendis M, Simsek S. Production of structurally diverse wheat arabinoxylan hydrolyzates using combinations of xylanase and arabinofuranosidase. Carbohyd Polym 2015; 132:452-59; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.05.083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya SS, Garlapati VK, Banerjee R. Optimization of laccase production using response surface methodology coupled with differential evolution. New Biotechnol 2011; 28:31-39; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2010.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basş D, Boyacá IH. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. J Food Eng 2007; 78:836-45; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar