840
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Optimizing quality of digital mammographic imaging using Taguchi analysis with an ACR accreditation phantom

, , , &
Pages 226-234 | Received 15 Mar 2016, Accepted 22 Jun 2016, Published online: 09 Jun 2016

References

  • DOH. The establishment of data bank for domestic medicine and its application. Technical Report DoH 82-HP-114-4M16. Department of Health, Taiwan, 1993
  • Simonetti D. What's new in mammography. Eur J Radiol 1998; 27s:234-41; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(98)00069-2
  • DOH. Statistic data for public hygiene in Taiwan. Technical Report DoH 02-PH-2-tab-21. Department of Health, Taiwan, 2002.
  • Morimoto T. Effectiveness of mammographic screening for breast cancer in women aged over 50 years in Japan. Japan J Cancer Res 1997; 88:778-884; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1997.tb00450.x
  • Qi J, Moses WW. Instrumentation optimization for positron emission mammography. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 2004; 527:76-82; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2004.03.066
  • Chen CY, Liu KC, Chen HH, Pan LK. Optimizing the TLD-100 readout system for various radiotherapy beam doses using the Taguchi methodology. Appl Radi and Isot 2010; 68(3):481-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.12.001
  • Cheng TC, Chang CY, Yao KS, Hsieh YH, Hsieh LL, Wang PS. Optimization of preparation of the TiO2 Photocatalytic reactor using the Taguchi method. Adv Mat Res 2008; 47–50:351-4; http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.47-50.351
  • Pan LF, Chang MH, Pan LK. Optimization of coronary angiography for spider view via Taguchi methodology. Chin J Radiologic Tech 2012; 34(4):270-7
  • Pan LK, Chou DS, Chang BD. Optimization for solidification of low-level-radioactive resin using Taguchi analysis. Waste Management 2001; 21:767-72; PMID:11699633; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(01)00012-5
  • Pan LK, Wang CC, Shih YC, Sher HF. Optimizing multiple qualities of Nd:YAG laser welding onto magnesium alloy via Grey relational analysis. Sci Technol Welding Joining 2005; 10(4):503-10; http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/174329305X46727
  • Pan LK, Wang CC, Wei SL, Sher HF. Optimizing multiple quality characteristics via Taguchi method-based Grey analysis. J Materials Processing Technol 2007; 182:107-16; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.07.015
  • Aggarwal A, Singh H, Kumar P. Optimizing power consumption for CNC turned parts using response surface methodology and Taguchi's technique-A comparative analysis. J Materials Processing Technol 2008; 200(1–3):373-84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.041
  • Yang W, Tarng Y. Optimization of the weld bead geometry in gas tungsten arc welding by the Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1998; 14:549-54; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01301698
  • Taguchi G. Introduction to quality engineering. Asian productivity organization, Tokyo, 1990
  • Phadke MS. Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1989
  • Microsoft Excel. http://www.microsoft.com/taiwan/office2010/excel/default.aspx, 2010.
  • Fisher RA. Design and analysis of experiments. Olive and Boyd, London, 1925.
  • Lomax RG. Statistical Concepts: A Second Course p. 10, ISBN 0-8058-5850-4, 2007
  • Vedantham S, Suryanarayanan S, Karellas A. Physical characteristic of a full-field digital mammography system. Nucl Inst and Meth in Phy Res A 2004; 533:560-70; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2004.05.128
  • Jouan B. Digital mammography performed with computed radiography technology. Eur J Radiol 1999; 31:18-24; PMID:10477094; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(99)00065-0
  • Dougherty G. Computerized evaluation of mammographic image quality using phantom images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1998; 22:365-373; PMID:9890181; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-6111(98)00043-3
  • Gilbert FJ, Undrill PE, O'kane AD. A comparison of digital and screen-film mammography using quality control phantoms. Clin Radiol 2000; 55:782-90; PMID:11052880; http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/crad.2000.0521
  • Hillman BJ, Alpert HR. Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology. J Am College Radiol 2004; 1:127-32; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2003.11.001
  • Moeckli R. Assessment of the image contrast improvement and dose reduction in mammography with synchrotron radiation compared to standard units. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 2001; 467:1349-52; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00662-3
  • Geeraert N, Klausz R, Muller S, Bloch I, Bosmans H. Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2015; 165(1–4):342-5 1-4
  • Huda W, Sajewicz AM, Ogden KM, Scalzetti EM, Dance DR. How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography. Acad Radiol 2002; 9(7):764-72; PMID:12139090; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80345-8

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.