Genetic modification for enhancing bacterial cellulose production and its applications

References

• Patel AK, Pandey A, Singhania RR. Production of celluloytic enzymes for lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis. 2nd. Pandey A, Larroche C, Gnansounou E, et al, editors. ISBN 9780128168561. Biofuels: alternative feedstocks and conversion processes for the production of liquid and gaseous biofuels, Cambridge, MA, USA: Academic Press. 2019. pp. 401–426.
   Google Scholar
• Patel AK, Singhania RR, Sim SJ, et al. Thermostable cellulases: current status and perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2019;279:385–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Jasso RMR, Gonzalez-Gloria KD, et al. The enzyme biorefinery platform for advanced biofuels production. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2019;7:100257.
   Google Scholar
• Singhania RR, Dixit P, Patel AK, et al. Role and significance of lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) in lignocellulose deconstruction. Bioresour Technol. 2021;335:125261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Rodríguez Jasso RM, Saxena R, et al. Subcritical water pretreatment for agave bagasse fractionation from tequila production and enzymatic susceptibility. Bioresour Technol. 2021. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal R, Verma A, Singhania RR, et al. Current understanding of the inhibition factors and their mechanism of action for the lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis. Bioresour Technol. 2021;332:125024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao W, Li H, Xia W, et al. Co-expression of cellulase and xylanase genes in Sacchromyces cerevisiae toward enhanced bioethanol production from corn stover. Bioengineered. 2019;10(1):513–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore SP, Henske JK, O’malley A. Driving biomass breakdown through engineered cellulosomes. Bioengineered. 2015;6(4):204–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R. A paradigm shift in biomass technology from complete to partial cellulose hydrolysis: lessons learned from nature. Bioengineered. 2014;6(2):69–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh A, Patel AK, Adsul M, et al. Genetic modification: a tool for enhancing cellulase secretion. Biofuel Res J. 2017;4(2):600–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jozala AF, Lencastre-Novaes LC, Lopes AM, et al. Bacterial nanocellulose production and application: a 10-year overview. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100(5):2063–2072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi M, Jacek P, Farhangfar A, et al. The role of genetic manipulation and in situ modifications on production of bacterial nanocellulose: a review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;183:635–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Wu G, Chen L, et al. Performance of nanocellulose-producing bacterial strains in static and agitated cultures with different starting pH. Carbohydr Polym. 2019;215:280–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiniati I, Hrymak AN, Margaritis A. Recent developments in the production and applications of bacterial cellulose fibers and nanocrystals. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2017;37(4):510–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J, Zheng S, Zhang Z, et al. Bacterial cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum ATCC 23767 using tobacco waste extract as culture medium. Bioresour Technol. 2019;274:518–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahan F, Kumar V, Saxena RK. Distillery effluent as a potential medium for bacterial cellulose production: a biopolymer of great commercial importance. Bioresour Technol. 2018;250:922–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Sharma DK, Bansal V, et al. Efficient and economic process for the production of bacterial cellulose from isolated strain of Acetobacter pasteurianus of RSV-4 bacterium. Bioresour Technol. 2019;275:430e433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Yang R, Liu X, et al. Green synthesis of bacterial cellulose via acetic acid pre-hydrolysis liquor of agricultural corn stalk used as carbon source. Bioresour Technol. 2017;234:8–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Hong F, Yang XX, et al. Biotransformation of wheat straw to bacterial cellulose and its mechanism. Bioresour Technol. 2013;135:464e468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin D, Lopez-Sanchez P, Li R, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii CGMCC 3917 using only waste beer yeast as nutrient source. Bioresour Technol. 2014;151:113–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross P, Mayer R, Benziman M. Cellulose biosynthesis and function in bacteria. Microbiol Rev. 1991;55(1):35–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tanaka M, Murakami S, Shinke R, et al. Genetic characteristics of cellulose-forming acetic acid bacteria identified phenotypically as Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000;64(4):757–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moniri M, Boroumand Moghaddam A, Azizi S, et al. Production and status of bacterial cellulose in biomedical engineering. Nanomaterials. 2017;7(9):257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jedrzejczak-Krzepkowska M, Kubiak K, Ludwicka K. Bacterial nanocellulose synthesis, recent findings. 1st. Nanocellulose B, Gama M, Dourado F, et al, editors. e-book, ISBN: 9780444634665. From biotechnology to bio-economy, Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2016. pp. 19–46.
   Google Scholar
• Gullo M, China SL, Petroni G, et al. Exploring K2G30 genome: a high bacterial cellulose producing strain in glucose and mannitol-based media. Front Microbiol. 2019;10: 58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoso SP, Chou CC, Lin SP, et al. Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by Komactobacter intermedius using statistical modeling. Cellulose. 2020;27(5):2497–2509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong F, Guo X, Zhang S, et al. Bacterial cellulose production from cotton-based waste textiles: enzymatic saccharification enhanced by ionic liquid pretreatment. Bioresour Technol. 2012;104:503–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsouko E, Maina S, Ladakis D, et al. Integrated biorefinery development for the extraction of value-added components and bacterial cellulose production from orange peel waste streams. Ren. Energ. 2020;160:944–954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderón-Toledo S, Horue M, Alvarez VA, et al. Isolation and partial characterization of Komagataeibacter sp. SU12 and optimization of bacterial cellulose production using Mangifera indica extracts. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2021. DOI:10.1007/s10570-019-02961-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revin V, Liyaskina E, Nazarkina M, et al. Cost-effective production of bacterial cellulose using acidic food industry by-products. Braz J Microbiol. 2018;49:151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Catchmark JM. Bacterial cellulose/hyaluronic acid nanocomposites production through co-culturing Gluconacetobacter hansenii and Lactococcus lactis in a two-vessel circulating system. Bioresour Technol. 2019;290:121715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena IM, Kudlicka K, Okuda K, et al. Characterization of genes in the cellulose-synthesizing operon (acs operon) of Acetobacter xylinum: implications for cellulose crystallization. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(18):5735–5752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florea M, Hagemann H, Santosa G, et al. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. Engineering control of bacterial cellulose production using a genetic toolkit and a new cellulose-producing strain. 2016;113(24):E3431–E3440.
   Google Scholar
• Kubiak K, Kurzawa M, Jędrzejczak‐Krzepkowska M, et al. Complete genome sequence of Gluconacetobacter xylinus E25 strain—Valuable and effective producer of bacterial nanocellulose. J Biotechnol. 2014;176:18–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang WD, Kim TY, Kim HU, et al. Genomic and metabolic analysis of Komagataeibacter xylinus DSM 2325 producing bacterial cellulose nanofiber. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116(12):3372–3381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielecki S, Krystynowicz A, Turkiewicz M, et al. Bacterial cellulose. In: Biopolymer Online. Weinheim, Germany:Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2005; pp. 40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Ross P, Aloni Y, Weinhouse C, et al. An unusual guanyl oligonucleotide regulates cellulose synthesis in Acetobacter xylinum. FEBS Lett. 1985;186(2):191–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujiwara T, Komoda K, Sakurai N, et al. The c-di-GMP recognition mechanism of the PilZ domain of bacterial cellulose synthase subunit A. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;431(4):802–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Römling U, Galperin MY, Gomelsky M. Cyclic di-GMP: the first 25 years of a universal bacterial second messenger. Microbiol Mol. Biol. Rev. 2013;77:1–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal R, Wong HC, Calhoon R, et al. Three cdg operons control cellular turnover of cyclic Di-GMP in Acetobacter xylinum: genetic organization and occurrence of conserved domains in Isoenzymes. J Bacteriol. 1998;180(17):4416–4425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Römling U. Cyclic di-GMP, an established secondary messenger still speeding up. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14(8):1817–1829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umeda Y, Hirano A, Ishibashi M, et al. Cloning of cellulose synthase genes from Acetobacter xylinum JCM 7664: implication of a novel set of cellulose synthase genes. DNA Res. 1999;6(2):109–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Römling U, Galperin MY. Bacterial cellulose biosynthesis: diversity of operons, subunits, products, and functions. Trends Microbiol. 2015;23(9):545–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara JT, Morgan JLW, Zimmer J. A molecular description of cellulose biosynthesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84(1):895–921. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem060614–033930
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Augimeri RV, Varley AJ, Strap JL. Establish ing a role for bacterial cellulose in environmental interactions: lessons learned from diverse biofilm-produ cing Proteobacteria. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1282. eCollection 2015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Arriaga AM, Cerro CD, Urbina L, et al. Genome sequence and characterization of the BCS clusters for the production of nanocellulose from the low pH resistant strain Komagataeibacter medellinensis ID13488. Microb Biotechnol. 2019;12(4):620–632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryngajłło M, Jędrzejczak-Krzepkowska M, Kubiak K, et al. Towards control of cellulose biosynthesis by Komagataeibacter using systems-level and strain engineering strategies: current progress and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104(15):6565–6585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi MS, Shin JE. The nanofication and functionalization of bacterial cellulose and its applications. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(3):406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skočaj M. Bacterial nanocellulose in papermaking. Cellulose. 2019;26(11):6477–6488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benziman M, Mazover A. Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide- and Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate-specific Glucose 6-Phosphate Dehydrogenases of Acetobacter xylinum and their role in the regulation of the pentose cycle. J Biol Chem. 1973;248(5):1603–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swissa M, Benziman M. Factors affecting the activity of citrate synthase of Acetobacter xylinum and its possible regulatory role. Biochem J. 1976;153(2):173–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromet Z, Schramm M, Hestrin S. Synthesis of cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum. 4. Enzyme systems present in a crude extract of glucose-grown cells. Biochem J. 1957;67(4):679–689.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao H, Sun Q, Han Z, et al. Comparison of bacterial nanocellulose produced by different strains under static and agitated culture conditions. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;227:115323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanskul S, Amornthatree K, Jaturonlak N. A new cellulose-producing bacterium, Rhodococcus sp. MI 2: screening and optimization of culture conditions. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;92(1):421–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Wang X, Qi X, et al. Isolation and identification of a bacterial cellulose synthesizing strain from kombucha in different conditions: gluconacetobacter xylinus ZHCJ618. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2018;27(3):705–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsutani M, Ito K, Azuma Y, et al. Adaptive mutation related to cellulose producibility in Komagataeibacter medellinensis (Gluconacetobacter xylinus) NBRC 3288. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(17):7229–7240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur DH, Rhee HS, Lee JH, et al. Enhanced production of cellulose in Komagataeibacter xylinus by preventing insertion of IS element into cellulose synthesis gene. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2020;156:107527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Li S, Xie Y, et al. Enhanced bacterial cellulose pro duction by Gluconacetobacter xylinus via expression of Vitreoscilla haemoglobin and oxygen tension regulation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(3):1155–1165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae SO, Sugano Y, Ohi K, et al. Features of bacterial cellulose synthesis in a mutant generated by disruption of the diguanylate cyclase 1 gene of Acetobacter xylinum BPR 2001. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;65(3):315–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacek P, Ryngajłło M, Bielecki S. Structural changes of bacterial nanocellulose pellicles induced by genetic modification of Komagataeibacter hansenii ATCC 23769, Appl. Microb. Cell Physiol. 2019;103:5339–5353.
   Google Scholar
• Kawano S, Tajima K, Uemori Y, et al. Cloning of cellulose synthesis related genes from Acetobacter xylinum ATCC23769 and ATCC53582: comparison of cellulose synthetic ability between strains. DNA Res. 2002;9(5):149–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhania RR, Patel AK, Pandey A, et al. Genetic modification: a tool for enhancing beta-glucosidase production for biofuel application. Bioresour Technol. 2017;245:1352–1361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wu Y, Zhou Y. Current understanding of the inhibition factors and their mechanism of action for the lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis. Bioengineered. 2016;8(92):129–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singhania RR, Patel AK, Sukumaran RK, et al. Role and significance of beta-glucosidases in the hydrolysis of cellulose for bioethanol production. Bioresour Technol. 2013;127:500–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhania RR, Sukumaran RK, Rajasree KP, et al. Properties of a major β-glucosidase-BGL1 from Aspergillus niger NII-08121 expressed differentially in response to carbon sources. Process Biochem. 2011;46(7):1521–1524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas R, Farah LF. Production and application of microbial cellulose. Polym Degrad Stab. 1998;59(1–3):101–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trovatti E, Serafim LS, Freire CSR, et al. Gluconacetobacter sacchari: an efficient bacterial cellulose cell-factory. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;86(3):1417–1420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigematsu T, Takamine K, Kitazato M, et al. Cellulose production from glucose using a glucose dehydrogenase gene (gdh)-deficient mutant of Gluconacetobacter xylinus and its use for bioconversion of sweet potato pulp. J Biosci Bioeng. 2005;99(4):415–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo CH, Teng HY, Lee CK. Knockout of glucose dehydrogenase gene in Gluconacetobacter xylinus for bacterial cellulose production enhancement, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2015;20(1):18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo CH, Teng HY, Lee CK. Knockout of glucose dehydrogenase gene in Gluconacetobacter xylinus for bacterial cellulose production enhancement. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2015;20(1):18–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Tian C, Tian H, et al. Improvement of bacterial cellulose production by manipulating the metabolic pathways in which ethanol and sodium citrate involved. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;96(6):1479–1487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Chu J, Zhuang Y, et al. Enhancement of inosine production by Bacillus subtilis through suppression of carbon overflow by sodium citrate. Biotechnol Lett. 2005;27(10):689–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuren PG, Cardona TD, Nout MJR, et al. Location and limitation of cellulose production by Acetobacter xylinum established from oxygen profiles. J Biosci Bioeng. 2000;89(5):414–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wulf P, Joris K, Vandamme EJ. Improved cellulose formation by anAcetobacter xylinum mutant limited in (Keto)gluconate synthesis. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1996;67(4):376–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valla S, Kjosbakken J. Cellulose-negative mutants of Acetobacter xylinum. Microbiology. 1982;128(7):1401–1408.
   Google Scholar
• Schellenberger J, Palsson BØ. Use of randomized sampling for analysis of metabolic networks. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(9):5457–5461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogino PC, Oliva MM, Sorroche FG, et al. The role of bacterial biofilms and surface components in plant-bacterial associations. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(8):15838–15859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawano S, Tajima K, Kono H, et al. Effects of endogenous endo-β-1,4-glucanase on cellulose biosynthesis in Acetobacter xylinum ATCC23769, J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2002;94(3):275–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacek P, Dourado F, Gama M, et al. Molecular aspects of bacterial nanocellulose biosynthesis. Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;12(4):633–649.
   Google Scholar
• Jacek P, Szustak M, Kubiak K, et al. Scaffolds for chondrogenic cells cultivation prepared from bacterial cellulose with relaxed fibers structure Induced Genetically. Nanomaterials. 2018;8(12):1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacek P, Kubiak K, Ryngajłło M, et al. Modification of bacterial nanocellulose properties through mutation of motility related genes in Komagataeibacter hansenii ATCC 53582. New Biotechnol. 2019;52:60–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J, Kawano S, Tajima K, et al. In Vivo curdlan/cellulose bionanocomposite synthesis by genetically modified gluconacetobacter xylinus. Biomacromolecules. 2015;16(10):3154–3160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav V, Paniliatis BJ, Shi H, et al. Novel In Vivo-degradable cellulose-chitin copolymer from metabolically engineered Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(18):6257–6265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshk SMAS, Cellulose B. Bacterial cellulose production and its industrial applications. J Bioprocess Biotech. 2014;4(2):150.
   Google Scholar
• Cacicedo ML, Castro MC, Servetas I, et al. Progress in bacterial cellulose matrices for biotechnological applications. Bioresour Technol. 2016;213:172–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Zhang Y, Phillips GO, et al. Utilization of bacterial cellulose in food. Food Hydrocoll. 2014;35:539–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillat A, Martı´nez J, Valls C, et al. Bacterial cellulose for increasing barrier properties of paper products. Cellulose. 2018;25(10):6093–6105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Quintana E, et al. Characterization of purified bacterial cellulose focused on its use on paper restoration. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;116:173–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Go´mez N, et al. Use of bacterial cellulose in degraded paper restoration. Part I: application on model papers. J Mater Sci. 2016;51(3):1541–1552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos SM, Carbajo JM, Go´mez N, et al. Paper reinforcing by in situ growth of bacterial cellulose. J Mater Sci. 2017;52(10):5882–5893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu L, Zhang J, Yang G. Present status and applications of bacterial cellulose-based materials for skin tissue repair. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;92(2):1432–1442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla PR, Bajaj IB, Survase SA, et al. Microbial Cellulose: fermentative Production and Applications. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2009;47:107–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah N, Ul-Islam M, Khattak WA, et al. Overview of bacterial cellulose composites: a multipurpose advanced material. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;98(2):1585–1598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Numata Y, Sakata T, Furukawa H, et al. Bacterial cellulose gels with high mechanical strength. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;47:57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller A, Ni Z, Hessler N, et al. The biopolymer bacterial nanocellulose as drug delivery system: investigation of drug loading and release using the model protein albumin. J Pharm Sci. 2013;102(2):579–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu W, Chen S, Yang J, et al. Functionalized bacterial cellulose derivatives and nanocomposites. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2014;101:1043–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaveemas P, Chuenchom L, Kaowphong S, et al. Magnetic carbon nanofiber composite adsorbent through green in-situ conversion of bacterial cellulose for highly efficient removal of bisphenol A. Bioresour Technol. 2021;333:125184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Ma H, Liu T, et al. An excellent alternative composite modifier for cathode catalysts prepared from bacterial cellulose doped with Cu and P and its utilization in microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol. 2019;289:121661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar