Bioengineered bioreactors: a review on enhancing biomethane and biohydrogen production by CFD modeling

References

• Achkari-Begdouri A, Goodrich PR. Rheological properties of Moroccan dairy cattle manure. Bioresour Technol. 1992;40(2):149–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal RK. A textbook of fluid mechanics: (in S.I. units). New Delhi, India: Laxmi Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Batchelor GK. An introduction to fluid dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Baudez J, Markis F, Eshtiaghi N, et al. The rheological behaviour of anaerobic digested sludge. Water Res. 2011;45(17):5675–5680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan AA, Naser J. CFD modelling of co-firing of biomass with coal under oxy-fuel combustion in a large scale power plant. Fuel. 2015;159:150–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridgeman J. Computational fluid dynamics modelling of sewage sludge mixing in an anaerobic digester. Adv Eng Software. 2012;44(1):54–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P. The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(22):5478–5484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim K, Hoffmann R, Klasson KT, et al. Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: effect of mode of mixing. Water Res. 2005;39(15):3597–3606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalid A, Arshad M, Anjum M, et al. The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste. Waste Manage. 2011;31(8):1737–1744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon KD, Stroot PG, Mackie RI, et al. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions—II: microbial population dynamics. Water Res. 2001;35(7):1817–1827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroot PG, McMahon KD, Mackie RI, et al. Anaerobic codigestion of municipal solid waste and biosolids under various mixing conditions—I. Digester performance. Water Res. 2001;35:1804–1816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak CM, Wang X, Ai ZT. Prediction of flow noise from in-duct spoilers using computational fluid dynamics. Appl Acoust. 2014;76:386–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai M, Liu J, Wei Y. Enhanced biohydrogen production from sewage sludge with alkaline Pretreatment. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38(11):3195–3202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalina T, Virgone J, Kuznik F. Evaluation of thermal comfort using combined CFD and experimentation study in a test room equipped with a cooling ceiling. Build Environ. 2009;44(8):1740–1750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim T, Kato S, Murakami S. Indoor cooling/heating load analysis based on coupled simulation of convection, radiation and HVAC control. Build Environ. 2001;36(7):901–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Su H, Chu J. A CFD-based test method for control of indoor environment in air-conditioned rooms. In Control Conference (CCC), 2012 31st Chinese 2012 Jul 25 (pp. 6933–6937). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Shao L, Riffat S. Accuracy of CFD for predicting pressure losses in HVAC duct fittings. Appl Energy. 1995;51(3):233–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebremedhin KG, Wu B, Gooch C, et al. Heat transfer model for plug-flow anaerobic digesters. Trans ASABE. 2005;48(2):777–785.
   Google Scholar
• Sun Z, Wang S. A CFD-based test method for control of indoor environment and space ventilation. Build Environ. 2010;45(6):1441–1447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai Z. Application of computational fluid dynamics in building design: aspects and trends. Indoor and built environment. 2006;15(4):305–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig K, Nieuwoudt M, Niemand L. CFD simulation of anaerobic digester with variable sewage sludge rheology. Water Res. 2013;47(13):4485–4497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferng Y. Predicting local distributions of erosion–corrosion wear sites for the piping in the nuclear power plant using CFD models. Ann Nucl Energy. 2008;35(2):304–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding J, Wang X, Zhou X-F, et al. CFD optimization of continuous stirred-tank (CSTR) reactor for biohydrogen production. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(18):7005–7013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Agyemang SA, Amini H, et al. Mathematical modeling of production and biorefinery of energy crops. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2015;43:530–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ri P-C, Ren N-Q, Ding J, et al. CFD optimization of horizontal continuous stirred-tank (HCSTR) reactor for bio-hydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42(15):9630–9640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogel A, The AJ. The 2D eulerian approach of entrained flow and temperature in a biomass stratified downdraft gasifier. Am J Appl Sci. 2006;3(10):2068–2075.
   Google Scholar
• Shah SH, Raja IA, Rizwan M, et al. Potential of microalgal biodiesel production and its sustainability perspectives in Pakistan. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2018;81:76–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen F, Tian L, Yuan H, et al. Improving the mixing performances of rice straw anaerobic digestion for higher biogas production by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;171(3):626–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B, Bibeau EL. Development of 3-D anaerobic digester heat transfer model for cold weather applications. Trans ASABE. 2006;49(3):749–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B. CFD simulation of gas and non-Newtonian fluid two-phase flow in anaerobic digesters. Water Res. 2010a;44(13):3861–3874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B, Bibeau EL, Gebremedhin KG. Three-dimensional numerical simulation model of biogas production for anaerobic digesters. Canadian Biosystems Engineering. 2009;51:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang CX. Numerical predictions of turbulent recirculating flows with a κ-ϵ model. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics. 1994;51(2):177–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Launder BE, Spalding DB. Lectures in mathematical models of turbulence. London: Academic Press; 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Wu B. CFD investigation of turbulence models for mechanical agitation of non-Newtonian fluids in anaerobic digesters. Water Res. 2011;45(5):2082–2094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yu G, Yu L, et al. Computational fluid dynamics study on mixing mode and power consumption in anaerobic mono- and co-digestion. Bioresour Technol. 2016;203:166–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry H, Lagua C, Roberge M. Physical and rheological properties of manure products. Applied Engineering in Agriculture. 2004;20(3):277–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B. Advances in the use of CFD to characterize, design and optimize bioenergy systems. Comp Electron Agric. 2013;93:195–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastella G, Testa C, Cornacchia G, et al. Anaerobic digestion of semi-solid organic waste: biogas production and its purification. Energy Convers Manag. 2002;43(1):63–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B, Chen S. CFD simulation of non-Newtonian fluid flow in anaerobic digesters. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;99(3):700–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy BN, Ghadge RS, Joshi JB. CFD simulations of gas–liquid–solid stirred reactor: prediction of critical impeller speed for solid suspension. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62(24):7184–7195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesvikar MS, Al‐Dahhan M. Flow pattern visualization in a mimic anaerobic digester using CFD. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2005;89(6):719–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B. CFD simulation of mixing in egg-shaped anaerobic digesters. Water Res. 2010b;44(5):1507–1519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindmark J, Thorin E, Fdhila RB, et al. Effects of mixing on the result of anaerobic digestion: review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;40:1030–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie S, Hai FI, Zhan X, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion: a critical review of mathematical modelling for performance optimization. Bioresour Technol. 2016;222:498–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellinger A, Murphy J, Baxter DJ. The biogas handbook science, production and applications. Oxford (G.B): Woodhead Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ward AJ, Hobbs PJ, Holliman PJ, et al. Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(17):7928–7940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamarád L, Pohn S, Bochmann G, et al. Determination of mixing quality in biogas plant digesters using tracer tests and computational fluid dynamics. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 2013;61(5):1269–1278.
   Google Scholar
• González L, Whitney E, Srinivas K, et al. Multi-objective wing design in CFD using evolutionary techniques. In: Computational fluid dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2004. p. 681–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31801-1_99
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann RA, Garcia ML, Veskivar M, et al. Effect of shear on performance and microbial ecology of continuously stirred anaerobic digesters treating animal manure. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008;100(1):38–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister M, Rezavand M, Ebner C, et al. Mixing non-Newtonian flows in anaerobic digesters by impellers and pumped recirculation. Adv Eng Software. 2018;115:194–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Ma J, Chen S. Numerical simulation of mechanical mixing in high solid anaerobic digester. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(2):1012–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulle SWV, Vesvikar M, Poutiainen H, et al. Importance of scale and hydrodynamics for modeling anaerobic digester performance. Chem Eng J. 2014;255:71–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taghavi M, Zadghaffari R, Moghaddas J, et al. Experimental and CFD investigation of power consumption in a dual Rushton turbine stirred tank. Chem Eng Res Des. 2011;89(3):280–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadnerkar D, Utikar RP, Tade MO, et al. CFD simulation of solid–liquid stirred tanks. Adv Powder Technol. 2012;23(4):445–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu B, Chen Z. An integrated physical and biological model for anaerobic lagoons. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(8):5032–5038.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meroney RN, Colorado PE. CFD simulation of mechanical draft tube mixing in anaerobic digester tanks. Water Res. 2009;43(4):1040–1050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lübken M, Koch K, Klauke L, et al. CFD investigation of the flow characteristics of a plug flow anaerobic digester for lignocellulosic biomass methanisation. In13th World Congress on Anaerobic Digestion: Recovering (bio) Resources for the World 2013; (Vol. 25, p. 28).
   Google Scholar
• Gebraad PMO, Teeuwisse FW, Wingerden JWV, et al. Wind plant power optimization through yaw control using a parametric model for wake effects-a CFD simulation study. Wind Energy. 2014;19(1):95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(10):4044–4064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Zhao Q, Ma J, et al. Experimental and modeling study of a two-stage pilot scale high solid anaerobic digester system. Bioresour Technol. 2012;124:8–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton CH, Turner C. Manure management treatment strategies for sustainable agriculture. Silsoe: Silsoe Research Institute; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Jiang D, Zhang H, et al. Enhancement of the biohydrogen production performance from mixed substrate by photo-fermentation: effects of initial pH and inoculation volume ratio. Biores Technol. 2021;319:124153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yue T, Jiang D, Zhang Z, et al. Recycling of shrub landscaping waste: exploration of Bio-hydrogen production potential and optimization of photo-fermentation bio-hydrogen production process. Biores Technol. 2021;331:125048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ding J, Ren N-Q, et al. CFD simulation of an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor for biohydrogen production. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2009;34(24):9686–9695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Difuntorum JK, Danao LAM. Parametric study of vertical axis wind turbine rotor configurations using CFD. ASME 2017 11th International Conference on Energy Sustainability 2017. Charlotte, North Carolina, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ding J, Guo W-Q, et al. Scale-up and optimization of biohydrogen production reactor from laboratory-scale to industrial-scale on the basis of computational fluid dynamics simulation. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2010;35(20):10960–10966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan H, Hu YF, Pu WH, et al. CFD optimization of the baffle angle of an expanded granular sludge bed reactor. J Environ Chem Eng. 2017;5(5):4531–4538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren TT, Mu Y, Ni BJ, et al. Hydrodynamics of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. AIChE J. 2009;55(2):516–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patra TK, Sheth PN. Biomass gasification models for downdraft gasifier: a state-of-the-art review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2015;50:583–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terashima M, Goel R, Komatsu K, et al. CFD simulation of mixing in anaerobic digesters. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(7):2228–2233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukitawesa PRJ, Millati R, Sárvári-Horváth I, et al. Factors influencing volatile fatty acids production from food wastes via anaerobic digestion. Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):39–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, He C, Li G, et al. Biological pretreatment of corn straw for enhancing degradation efficiency and biogas production. Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):251–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar