3,048
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Challenges of pathogen inactivation in animal manure through anaerobic digestion: a short review

, , , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1149-1161 | Received 25 Oct 2021, Accepted 08 Dec 2021, Published online: 04 Jan 2022

References

  • Thakur A, Mikkelsen H, Jungersen G. Intracellular pathogens: host immunity and microbial persistence strategies. J Immunol Res. 2019;2019:1356540.
  • Manyi-Loh CE, Mamphweli SN, Meyer EL, et al. An overview of the control of bacterial pathogens in cattle manure. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016;13(9):843.
  • WHO. WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group 2007-2015. World Health Org. 2015.
  • Marder EP, Griffin PM, Cieslak PR, et al. Preliminary incidence and trends of infections with pathogens transmitted commonly through food - foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 US sites, 2006-2017. Mmwr-Morbidity Mortality Weekly Rep. 2018;67(11):324–328.
  • Akor CI, Osman AI, Farrell C, et al. Thermokinetic study of residual solid digestate from anaerobic digestion. Chem Eng J. 2021;406:127039.
  • Yu X, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. Role of bioengineering and laborers in integration of farmland resources toward to improve dimension of sustainable agriculture in China. Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):559–571.
  • Scarlat N, Fahl F, Dallemand J-F, et al. A spatial analysis of biogas potential from manure in Europe. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2018;94:915–930.
  • USEPA. United States environmental protection agency.AgStar program biogas recovery in the agriculture sector. 2017.
  • Eurostat. European Statistics. 2017.
  • Lu J, Gao X. Biogas: potential, challenges, and perspectives in a changing China. Biomass Bioenergy. 2021;150:106127.
  • Zhao Q, Liu Y. Is anaerobic digestion a reliable barrier for deactivation of pathogens in biosludge? Sci Total Environ. 2019;668:893–902.
  • Manyi-Loh CE, Mamphweli SN, Meyer EL, et al. Inactivation of selected bacterial pathogens in dairy cattle manure by mesophilic anaerobic digestion (Balloon type digester). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(7):7184–7194.
  • Sahlström L. A review of survival of pathogenic bacteria in organic waste used in biogas plants. Bioresour Technol. 2003;87(2):161–166.
  • Alegbeleye OO, Sant’Ana AS. Manure-borne pathogens as an important source of water contamination: an update on the dynamics of pathogen survival/transport as well as practical risk mitigation strategies. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2020;227:113524.
  • Klein M, Brown L, Tucker RW, et al. Diversity and abundance of zoonotic pathogens and indicators in manures of feedlot cattle in Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76(20):6947–6950.
  • Thomas C, Idler C, Ammon C, et al. Inactivation of ESBL-/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli during mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of chicken manure. Waste Manag. 2019;84:74–82.
  • Massé D, Gilbert Y, Topp E. Pathogen removal in farm-scale psychrophilic anaerobic digesters processing swine manure. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(2):641–646.
  • Rousseau A, La Carbona S, Dumètre A, et al. Assessing viability and infectivity of foodborne and waterborne stages (cysts/oocysts) of Giardia duodenalis, Cryptosporidium spp., and Toxoplasma gondii: a review of methods. Parasite. 2018;25:14.
  • Pandey PK, Soupir ML. Escherichia coli inactivation kinetics in anaerobic digestion of dairy manure under moderate, mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. Amb Express. 2011;1(1):18.
  • Smith SR, Lang NL, Cheung KHM, et al. Factors controlling pathogen destruction during anaerobic digestion of biowastes. Waste Manag. 2005;25(4):417–425.
  • Popova TP, Zaharinov B, Kaleva MD, et al. Reduction of microorganisms in thermophilic process of anaerobic digestion of cattle manure. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci. 2013;2:653–660.
  • Varel VH, Wells JE, Shelver WL, et al. Effect of anaerobic digestion temperature on odour, coliforms and chlortetracycline in swine manure or monensin in cattle manure*. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;112(4):705–715.
  • Fongaro G, Kunz A, Magri ME, et al. Evaluation of the effective inactivation of enteric bacteria and viruses from swine effluent and sludge at tropical temperatures. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2018;229(7). DOI:10.1007/s11270-018-3878-y.
  • McCarthy G, Lawlor PG, Gutierrez M, et al. Assessing the biosafety risks of pig manure for use as a feedstock for composting. Sci Total Environ. 2013;463:712–719.
  • Jiang Y, Xie SH, Dennehy C, et al. Inactivation of pathogens in anaerobic digestion systems for converting biowastes to bioenergy: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2020;120:109654.
  • Basta M, Annamaraju P. Bacterial spores. StatPearls. 2021. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556071/.
  • Carlin F, Nguyen C. Pathogen update: bacillus species. In: Sofos J, editor. Part 4, Pathogen update: Bacillus species, advances in microbial food safety. England: Woodhead Publishing; 2013. p. 70–96.
  • Wang J, Yang C, Zhang C, et al. Complete genome sequence of the Clostridium difficile LCL126. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):745–754.
  • Plymforshell L. Survival of salmonellas and ascaris suum eggs in a thermophilic biogas plant. Acta Vet Scand. 1995;36(1):79–85.
  • Olsen JE, Larsen HE. Bacterial decimation times in anaerobic digestions of animal slurries. Biological Wastes. 1987;21(3):153–168.
  • Watcharasukarn M, Kaparaju P, Steyer JP, et al. Screening Escherichia coli, enterococcus faecalis, and Clostridium perfringens as indicator organisms in evaluating pathogen-reducing capacity in biogas plants. Microb Ecol. 2009;58(2):221–230.
  • Byrne B, Dunne G, Bolton DJ. Thermal inactivation of Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens vegetative cells and spores in pork luncheon roll. Food Microbiol. 2006;23(8):803–808.
  • Orzi V, Scaglia B, Lonati S, et al. The role of biological processes in reducing both odor impact and pathogen content during mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Sci Total Environ. 2015;526:116–126.
  • Costa A, Gusmara C, Gardoni D, et al. The effect of anaerobic digestion and storage on indicator microorganisms in swine and dairy manure. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;24(31):24135–24146.
  • Lloret E, Pastor L, Pradas P, et al. Semi full-scale thermophilic anaerobic digestion (TAnD) for advanced treatment of sewage sludge: stabilization process and pathogen reduction. Chem Eng J. 2013;232:42–50.
  • Salsali H, Parker WJ, Sattar SA. The effect of volatile fatty acids on the inactivation of Clostridium perfringens in anaerobic digestion. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24(5):659–665.
  • Xu HS, Roberts N, Singleton FL, et al. Survival and viability of nonculturable escherichia-coli and vibrio-cholerae in the estuarine and marine-environment. Microb Ecol. 1982;8(4):313–323.
  • Colwell RR, Grimes DJ. Nonculturable microorganisms in the environment. Part I, Semantics and strategies. 2000:1–6.
  • Pinto D, Santos MA, Chambel L. Thirty years of viable but nonculturable state research: unsolved molecular mechanisms. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2015;41(1):61–76.
  • Fu B, Jiang Q, Liu HB, et al. Occurrence and reactivation of viable but non-culturable E-coli in sewage sludge after mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Biotechnol Lett. 2014;36(2):273–279.
  • Higgins MJ, Chen YC, Murthy SN, et al. Reactivation and growth of non-culturable indicator bacteria in anaerobically digested biosolids after centrifuge dewatering. Water Res. 2007;41(3):665–673.
  • Yang Q, Gao Y, Ke J, et al. Antibiotics: an overview on the environmental occurrence, toxicity, degradation, and removal methods. Bioengineered. 2021;12(1):7376–7416.
  • Radzikowski JL, Vedelaar S, Siegel D, et al. Bacterial persistence is an active σS stress response to metabolic flux limitation. Mol Syst Biol. 2016;12(9):882.
  • Humphreys GJ, Mcbain AJ. An introduction to the biology of biofilm recalcitrance, Chapter 14. Biofilms in Infection Prevention Control. 2014: 245–256. ISBN: 9780123977519.
  • Monack DM, Mueller A, Falkow S. Persistent bacterial infections: the interface of the pathogen and the host immune system. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(9):747–765.
  • Helaine S, Kugelberg E. Bacterial persisters: formation, eradication, and experimental systems. Trends Microbiol. 2014;22(7):417–424.
  • Walsh JJ, Rousk J, Edwards-Jones G, et al. Fungal and bacterial growth following the application of slurry and anaerobic digestate of livestock manure to temperate pasture soils. Biol Fertil Soils. 2012;48(8):889–897.
  • Beneragama N, Iwasaki M, Lateef SA, et al. The survival of multidrug-resistant bacteria in thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure and waste milk. Anim Sci J. 2013;84(5):426–433.
  • Liu X, Lendormi T, Lanoisellé JL. Conventional and innovative hygienization of feedstock for biogas production: resistance of indicator bacteria to thermal pasteurization, pulsed electric field treatment, and anaerobic digestion. Energies. 2021;14(7):1938.
  • Salsali HR, Parker WJ, Sattar SA. Impact of concentration, temperature, and pH on inactivation of Salmonella spp. by volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion. Can J Microbiol. 2006;52(4):279–286.
  • Gavala HN, Yenal U, Skiadas IV, et al. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of primary and secondary sludge. Effect of pre-treatment at elevated temperature. Water Res. 2003;37(19):4561–4572.
  • Zhang S, Wang Y, Liu S. Process optimization for the anaerobic digestion of poplar (Populus L.) leaves. Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):439–448.
  • Marañón E, Castrillón L, Fernández JJ, et al. Anaerobic mesophilic treatment of cattle manure in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor with prior pasteurization. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2006;56(2):137–143.
  • Patinvoh RJ, Millati R, Sárvári-Horváth I, et al., Lukitawesa. Factors influencing volatile fatty acids production from food wastes via anaerobic digestion. Bioengineered. 2020;11(1):39–52.
  • Puchajda B, Oleszkiewicz J, Sparling R, et al. Low-temperature inactivation of fecal coliforms in sludge digestion. Water Environ Res. 2006;78(7):680–685.
  • Kunte DP, Yeole TY, Chiplonkar SA, et al. Inactivation of Salmonella typhi by high levels of volatile fatty acids during anaerobic digestion. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;84(1):138–142.
  • Wainaina S, Kumar Awasthi M, Taherzadeh MJ. Bioengineering of anaerobic digestion for volatile fatty acids, hydrogen or methane production: a critical review. Bioengineered. 2019;10(1):437–458.
  • Harroff LA, Liotta JL, Bowman DD, et al. Inactivation of Ascaris eggs in human fecal material through in situ production of carboxylic acids. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(17):9729–9738.
  • Jiang Y, Dennehy C, Lawlor PG, et al. Inactivation of Salmonella during dry co-digestion of food waste and pig for manure. Waste Manag. 2018;82:231–240.
  • Qi G, Pan Z, Yamamoto Y, et al. The survival of pathogenic bacteria and plant growth promoting bacteria during mesophilic anaerobic digestion in full-scale biogas plants. Anim Sci J. 2019;90(2):297–303.
  • Dennehy C, Lawlor PG, McCabe MS, et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure and food waste; effects on digestate biosafety, dewaterability, and microbial community dynamics. Waste Manag. 2018;71:532–541.
  • Huong LQ, Madsen H, Anh LX, et al. Hygienic aspects of livestock manure management and biogas systems operated by small-scale pig farmers in Vietnam. Sci Total Environ. 2014;470:53–57.
  • Ottoson JR, Schnurer A, Vinneras B. In situ ammonia production as a sanitation agent during anaerobic digestion at mesophilic temperature. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2008;46(3):325–330.
  • Scaglia B, D’Imporzano G, Garuti G, et al. Sanitation ability of anaerobic digestion performed at different temperature on sewage sludge. Sci Total Environ. 2014;466:888–897.
  • Park GW, Diez-Gonzalez F. Utilization of carbonate and ammonia-based treatments to eliminate Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Salmonella Typhimurium DT104 from cattle manure. J Appl Microbiol. 2003;94(4):675–685.
  • Bi S, Westerholm M, Qiao W, et al. Metabolic performance of anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under wet, high solid, and dry conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2020;296:122342.
  • Bi S, Westerholm M, Hu W, et al. The metabolic performance and microbial communities of anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under stressed ammonia condition: a case study of a 10-year successful biogas plant. Renewable Energy. 2021;167:644–651.
  • Chen Y, Cheng JJ, Creamer KS. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99(10):4044–4064.
  • Duan NN, Dong B, Wu B, et al. High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions: feasibility study. Bioresour Technol. 2012;104:150–156.
  • Sung S, Liu T. Ammonia inhibition on thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Chemosphere. 2003;53(1):43–52.
  • Mahdy A, Bi S, Song Y, et al. Overcome inhibition of anaerobic digestion of chicken manure under ammonia-stressed condition by lowering the organic loading rate. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2020;9:100359.