Bacterial Cellulose Production from agricultural Residues by two Komagataeibacter sp. Strains

References

• McNamara JT, Morgan JL, Zimmer J. A molecular description of cellulose biosynthesis. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84(1):895–921.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moniri M, Moghaddam AB, Azizi S, et al. Production and status of bacterial cellulose in biomedical engineering. Nanomaterials. 2017;7(257):1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bayon B, Berti IR, Gagneten AM, et al. 2018. Waste to wealth. Singhania RK, Rani R, Kumar RP, et al ed. January
   Google Scholar
• Brown RM. Cellulose structure and biosynthesis: what is in store for the 21st century? J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2004;42(3):487–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deinema MH, Zevenhuizen LP. Formation of cellulose fibrils by gram-negative bacteria and their role in bacterial flocculation. Arch Microbiol. 1971;78(1):42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan JLW, Strumillo J, Zimmer J. Crystallographic snapshot of cellulose synthesis and membrane translocation. Nature. 2013;493(7431):181–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang WH, Jia SR, Jia YY, et al. The influence of fermentation conditions and post-treatment methods on porosity of bacterial cellulose membrane. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;26(1):125–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadkazemi F, Azin M, Ashori A. Production of bacterial cellulose using different carbon sources and culture media. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;117:518–523.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanskul S, Amornthatree K, Jaturonlak N. A new cellulose-producing bacterium, rhodococcus sp. MI 2: screening and optimization of culture conditions. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;92(1):421–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abol-Fotouh D, Hassan MA, Shokry H, et al. Bacterial nanocellulose from agro-industrial wastes: low-cost and enhanced production by komagataeibacter saccharivorans MD1. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebayo-Tayo BC, Akintunde MO, Alao SO. Comparative effect of agrowastes on bacterial cellulose production by acinetobater sp BAN1 and Acetobacter pasteurianus PW1. Turkish J Agric Nat Sci. 2017;4(2):145–154.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes FP, Silva NHCS, Trovatti E, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose by gluconacetobacter sacchari using dry olive mill residue. Biomass Bioenergy. 2013;55:205–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurosumi A, Sasaki C, Yamashita Y, et al. Utilization of various fruit juices as carbon source for production of bacterial cellulose by acetobacter xylinum NBRC 13693. Carbohydr Polym. 2009;76(2):333–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sar T, Akbas MY. Potential use of olive oil mill wastewater for bacterial cellulose production. Bioengineered. 2022;13(3):7659–7669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reshmy R, Eapen P, Deepa T, et al. Bacterial nanocellulose: engineering, production, and applications. Bioengineered. 2021;12(2):11463–11483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millati R, Cahyono RB, Ariyanto T, et al. Chapter 1 – agricultural. In: Taherzadeh MJ, Bolton K, Wong J, et al, editors. Industrial, municipal, and forest wastes: an overview. Elsevier; 2019. p. 1–22. Sustainable Resource Recovery and Zero Waste Approaches.
   Google Scholar
• FAO, 2017. GIEWS - Global Information and Early Warning System: country briefs, Nigeria. http://www.fao.org/giews/countrybrief/country.jsp?code=NGA
   Google Scholar
• Boluwade E. Sugar annual report (NI2021-0003). approved by Gerald Smith. In: Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Foreign agricultural services. Lagos Nigeria; 2021. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Ogwo JN, Dike OC, Matthew SC, et al. Overview of biomass energy production in Nigeria: implication and challenges. Asian J Nat Appl Sci. 2012;1(4):48–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mohlala LM, Bodunrin MO, Awosusi AA, et al. Beneficiation of corncob and sugarcane bagasse for energy generation and materials development in Nigeria and South Africa : a short overview. Alexandria Eng J. 2016;55(3):3025–3036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Zhang YX, Hou T, et al. Mechanical deconstruction of corn stover as an entry process to facilitate the microwave-assisted production of ethyl levulinate. Fuel Process Technol. 2018;174:53–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucharska K, Rybarczyk P, Hołowacz I, et al. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials as substrates for fermentation processes. Molecules. 2018;23(11):1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Abdallah W, Dahman Y. Production of green biocellulose nanofibers by Gluconacetobacter xylinus through utilising the renewable resources of agriculture residues. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2013;36(11):1735–1743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Yang XY, Xiong L, et al. Utilization of corncob acid hydrolysate for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015;175(3):1678–1688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Z, Yang R, Liu X. Production of bacterial cellulose by acetobacter xylinum through utilizing acetic acid hydrolysate of bagasse as low-cost carbon source. BioResources. 2017;12(1):1190–1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Y, Zhang C, Lin Q, et al. Microwave-Assisted oxalic acid pretreatment for the enhancing of enzyme hydrolysis in the production of xylose and arabinose from bagasse. Molecules. 2018;23(4):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imman S, Laosiripojana N, Champreda V. Effect of liquid hot water pretreatment on enzymatic hydrolysis and physicochemical changes of corncobs. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2018;184(2):432–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair RB, Lundin M, Brandberg TL, et al. Dilute phosphoric acid pretreatment of wheat bran for enzymatic hydrolysis and subsequent ethanol production by edible fungi Neurospora intermedia. Ind Crops Prod. 2015;69:314–323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diba F, Alam F, Talukder AA. Screening of acetic acid producing microorganisms from decomposed fruits for vinegar production. Adv Microbiol. 2015;5(5):291–297.
   Google Scholar
• Dubey S, Singh J, Singh RP. Biotransformation of sweet lime pulp waste into high-quality nanocellulose with an excellent productivity using komagataeibacter europaeus SGP37 under static intermittent fed-batch cultivation. Bioresour Technol. 2018;247:73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hestrin S, Schramm M. Synthesis of cellulose by acetobacter xylinum. 2. Preparation of freeze-dried cells capable of polymerizing glucose to cellulose. Biochem J. 1954;58(2):345–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada Y, Yukphan P, LanVu HT, et al. Description of Komagataeibacter gen. nov., with proposals of new combinations (Acetobacteraceae). J Gen Appl Microbiol. 2012;58(5):397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, et al. 2012. NREL laboratory analytical procedure for determination of structural carbohydrates and Lignin in biomass. Technical Report; NREL/TP-510-42618.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, et al. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009;48(8):3713–3729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae SO, Shoda M. Production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter xylinum BPR2001 using molasses medium in a jar fermentor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;67(1):45–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro C, Zuluaga R, Alvarez C, et al. Bacterial cellulose produced by a new acid-resistant strain of Gluconacetobacter genus. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;89(4):1033–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohite BV, Salunke BK, Patil SV. Enhanced production of bacterial cellulose by using Gluconacetobacter hansenii NCIM 2529 strain under shaking conditions. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;169(5):1497–1511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi GX, Luo MT, Huang C, et al. Comparison of bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus on bagasse acid and enzymatic hydrolysates. J Appl Polym Sci. 2017;134(28):45066–45072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Yang XX, Guo L, et al. Using wastewater after lipid fermentation as substrate for bacterial cellulose production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;136:198–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çakar F, Özer I, Aytekin AO, et al. Improvement production of bacterial cellulose by semi-continuous process in molasses medium. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;106:7–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco G, Nogueira CR, Meneguin AB, et al. Development and characterisation of bacterial cellulose produced by cashew tree residues as alternative carbon source. Ind Crops Prod. 2017;107:13–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Li J, Zhu K. Bacterial cellulose production from wastes products and fermentation conditions optimisation. Mat Sci Eng. 2018;394(2):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ruka DR, Simon GP, Dean KM. Altering the growth conditions of Gluconacetobacter xylinus to maximize the yield of bacterial cellulose. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;89(2):613–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krystynowicz A, Czaja W, Polomorski L, et al. Factors affecting the yield and properties of bacterial cellulose. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;29(4):189–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khattak WA, Khan T, Ul-Islam M, et al. Production, characterization and biological features of bacterial cellulose from scum obtained during preparation of sugarcane jaggery (gur). J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52(12):8343–8349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın YA, Aksoy ND. Isolation and characterization of an efficient bacterial cellulose producer strain in agitated culture: gluconacetobacter hansenii P2A. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(3):1065–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son HJ, Kim HG, Kim KK, et al. Increased production of bacterial cellulose by Acetobacter sp. V6 in synthetic media under shaking culture conditions. Bioresour Technol. 2003;86(3):215–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa AFS, Almeida FCG, Vinhas GM, et al. Production of bacterial cellulose by gluconacetobacter hansenii using corn steep liquor as nutrient sources. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2027–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung HI, Jeong JH, Lee OM, et al. Influence of glycerol on production and structural–physical properties of cellulose from Acetobacter sp. V6 cultured in shake flasks. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(10):3602–3608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çoban EP, Biyik H. Evaluation of different pH and temperatures for bacterial cellulose production in HS (Hestrin-Scharmm) medium and beet molasses medium. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2011;5:1037–1045.
   Google Scholar
• Castro C, Zuluaga R, Putaux J-L, et al. Structural characterization of bacterial cellulose produced by Gluconacetobacter swingsii sp. from Colombian agroindustrial wastes. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;84(1):96–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohite BV, Patil SV. Physical, structural, mechanical and thermal characterization of bacterial cellulose by G. hansenii NCIM 2529. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;106:132–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorat MN, Dastager SG. High yield production of cellulose by a Komagataeibacter rhaeticus PG2 strain isolated from pomegranate as a new host. Royal Soc Chem Adv. 2018;8:29797–29805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andritsou, de Melo ME, Tsouko E, et al. Synthesis and characterisation of bacterial cellulose from citrus-based sustainable resources. ACS Omega. 2018;3(8):10365–10373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayal MS, Goswami N, Sahai A, et al. Effect of media components on cell growth and bacterial cellulose production from acetobacter aceti MTCC 2623. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;94(1):12–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado RTA, Gutierrez J, Tercjak A, et al. Komagataeibacter rhaeticus as an alternative bacteria for cellulose production Carbohydr Polym. 2016;152:841–849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ul-Islam M, Khan T, Park JK. Water holding and release properties of bacterial cellulose obtained by in situ and ex situ modification. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88(2):596–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong C, Zhang GC, Liu M, et al. Metabolic flux analyses of gluconacetobacter xylinus for bacterial cellulose production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97(14):6189–6199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha JH, Shah N, Ul-Islam M, et al. Bacterial cellulose production from a single sugar α-linked glucuronic acid-based oligosaccharide. Process Biochem. 2011;46(9):1717–1723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shezad O, Khan S, Khan T, et al. Physicochemical and mechanical characterization of bacterial cellulose produced with an excellent productivity in static conditions using a simple fed-batch cultivation strategy. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;82(1):173–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida IF, Pereira T, Silva NH, et al. Bacterial cellulose membranes as drug delivery systems: an in vivo skin compatibility study. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2014;86(3):332–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar