Advances in S gene targeted genome-editing and its applicability to disease resistance breeding in selected Solanaceae crop plants

References

• Knapp S, Bohs L, Nee M, et al. Solanaceae—A model for linking genomics with biodiversity.Comp Funct Genomics. 2004;5(3):285–291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gebhardt C. The historical role of species from the Solanaceae plant family in genetic research.Theor Appl Genet. 2016;129(12):2281–2294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels J. Biodiversity of food species of the Solanaceae family: a preliminary taxonomic inventory of subfamily solanoideae.Resources. 2015;4(2):277–322.
   Google Scholar
• Olaya M, Lara M, Martín-María M-A, et al. Fruit and vegetable consumption and potential moderators associated with all-cause mortality in a representative sample of Spanish older adults.Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreinemachers P, Simmons EB, Wopereis MCS. Tapping the economic and nutritional power of vegetables. Glob Food Sec. 2018;16:36–45.
   Google Scholar
• SM Y. Review of post-harvest losses of fruits and vegetables. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2019;13.
   Google Scholar
• Tournas VH. Spoilage of vegetable crops by bacteria and fungi and related health hazards.Crit Rev Microbiol. 2005;31(1):33–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelhardt S, Stam R, Good Riddance? HR. Breaking disease susceptibility in the era of new breeding technologies.Agronomy. 2018;8(7):114.
   Google Scholar
• Romero FM, Gatica-Arias A. CRISPR/Cas9: development and application in rice breeding. Rice Sci 2019; 26:265–281;(5).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorang JM, Sweat TA, Wolpert TJ. Plant disease susceptibility conferred by a “resistance” gene.Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2007;104(37):14861–14866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi SS-A, Mukhtar MS, Mansoor S. Genome Editing: targeting Susceptibility Genes for Plant Disease Resistance.Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36(9):898–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieu NP, Lenman M, Wang ES, et al. Mutations introduced in susceptibility genes through CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing confer increased late blight resistance in potatoes.Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun K, Schipper D, Jacobsen E, et al. Silencing susceptibility genes in potato hinders primary infection with Phytophthora infestans at different stages. Hortic Res. 2022;9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HO, Welcox KW. A restriction enzyme from hemophilus influenzae.J Mol Biol. 1970;51(2):379–391.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rouet P, Smih F, Jasin M. Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14: 8096–8106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamburova VS, Nikitina EV, Shermatov SE, et al. Genome editing in plants: an overview of tools and applications. Int J Agron. 2017;2017:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu RM, Liang LL, Freed E, et al. Synthetic chimeric nucleases function for efficient genome editing.Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):5524.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang L, Li F, Dang L, et al. In vivo delivery systems for therapeutic genome editing. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(5):626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong OX, Ronald PC. Targeted DNA insertion in plants.Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118(22):e2004834117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YG, Cha J, Chandrasegaran S. Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain.Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1996;93(3):1156–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin SJ, Zhang F, Sander JD, et al. Targeted mutagenesis of duplicated genes in soybean with zinc-finger nucleases. Plant Physiol. 2011;156(2):466–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beerli RR, Barbas CF. Engineering polydactyl zinc-finger transcription factors.Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(2):135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaj T, Gersbach CA, Barbas CFZFN. TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering.Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31(7):397–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mushtaq M, Sakina A, Wani SH, et al. Harnessing genome editing techniques to engineer disease resistance in plants. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HB, Sundberg BN, Sigafoos AN, et al. Genome engineering with TALE and CRISPR systems in neuroscience. Front Genet. 2016;7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim E, Kim S, Kim DH, et al. Precision genome engineering with programmable DNA-nicking enzymes.Genome Res. 2012;22(7):1327–1333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Yang Y, Hong W, et al. Applications of genome editing technology in the targeted therapy of human diseases: mechanisms, advances and prospects. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5: 1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaganathan D, Ramasamy K, Sellamuthu G, et al. CRISPR for crop improvement: an update review. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sera T. Inhibition of virus DNA replication by artificial zinc finger proteins.J Virol. 2005;79(4):2614–2619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Qian Y, Wu X, et al. Inhibiting replication of begomoviruses using artificial zinc finger nucleases that target viral-conserved nucleotide motif.Virus Genes. 2014;48(3):494–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takenaka K, Koshino-Kimura Y, Aoyama Y, et al. Inhibition of tomato yellow leaf curl virus replication by artificial zinc-finger proteins.Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 2007;51(1):429–430.
   Google Scholar
• Boch J, Bonas U. Xanthomonas AvrBs3 family-type III effectors: discovery and function.Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2010;48(1):419–436.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jankele R, Svoboda P. TAL effectors: tools for DNA Targeting.Brief Funct Genomics. 2014;13(5):409–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joung JK, Sander JD. TALENs: a widely applicable technology for targeted genome editing.Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(1):49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boch J, Scholze H, Schornack S, et al. Breaking the Code of DNA Binding Specificity of TAL-Type III Effectors.Science. 2009;326(5959):1509–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb BM, Mercer AC, Barbas CF. Directed evolution of the TALE N-terminal domain for recognition of all 5′.Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(21):9779–9785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YG, Chandrasegaran S. Chimeric restriction endonuclease.Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1994;91(3):883–887.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu T, Doan D, Kim J, et al. CRISPR/Cas‐based precision genome editing via microhomology‐mediated end joining.Plant Biotechnol J. 2021;19(2):230–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Liu B, Spalding MH, et al. High-efficiency TALEN-based gene editing produces disease-resistant rice.Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(5):390–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Peng Z, Long J, et al. Gene targeting by the TAL effector PthXo2 reveals cryptic resistance gene for bacterial blight of rice. Plant J. 2015;82(4):632–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanvillain-Baufumé S, Reschke M, Solé M, et al. Targeted promoter editing for rice resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae reveals differential activities for SWEET14 -inducing TAL effectors. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15(3):306–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan Q, Wang Y, Li J, et al. Targeted genome modification of crop plants using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(8):686–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetham PR, Kipp PB, Sawycky XL, et al. A tool for functional plant genomics: chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides cause in vivo gene-specific mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96 8774–8778. 15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songstad DD, Petolino JF, Voytas DF, et al. Genome editing of plants.CRC Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2017;36(1):1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer NJ, Mozoruk J, Miller RB, et al. Oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis for precision gene editing.Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14(2):496–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdurakhmonov IY. Genomics era for plants and crop species – advances made and needed tasks ahead [Internet]. In: Plant Genomics. InTech; 2016. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/plant-genomics/genomics-era-for-plants-and-crop-species-advances-made-and-needed-tasks-ahead
   Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Puchta H, Thomson JG. editors. Advances in new technology for targeted modification of plant genomes. Internet]. New York NY: Springer New York; 2015. Available from. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4939-2556-8
   Google Scholar
• Zhu T, Peterson DJ, Tagliani L, et al. Targeted manipulation of maize genes in vivo using chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides.Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999;96(15):8768–8773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetham PR, Kipp PB, Sawycky XL, et al. A tool for functional plant genomics: chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides cause in vivo gene-specific mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1999;96 8774–8778. 15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishino Y, Shinagawa H, Makino K, et al. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product.J Bacteriol. 1987;169(12):5429–5433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Alkhnbashi OS, et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(11):722–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Iranzo J, et al. Evolutionary classification of CRISPR–Cas systems: a burst of class 2 and derived variants. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(2):67–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu TY, Doudna JA. Chemistry of class 1 CRISPR-Cas effectors: binding, editing, and regulation.J Biol Chem. 2020;295(42):14473–14487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarova KS, Zhang F, Koonin EV. SnapShot: class 2 CRISPR-Cas Systems.Cell. 2017;168(1–2):328–328.e1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox DBT, Gootenberg JS, Abudayyeh OO, et al. RNA editing with CRISPR-Cas13. Science (80) [Internet]. 2017;358(6366):1019–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedenheft B, Sternberg SH, Doudna JA. RNA-guided genetic silencing systems in bacteria and archaea.Nat. 2012;482(7385):331–338.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaya D, Davison M, Barrangou R. CRISPR-cas systems in bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation.Annu Rev Genet. 2011;45(1):273–297.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science (80) [Internet]. 2012;337(6096):816–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Zhang W, Xin C, et al. Global detection of DNA repair outcomes induced by CRISPR–Cas9.Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(15):8732–8742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan M-Y, Yan H-Q, Ren G-X, et al. CRISPR-Cas12a-assisted recombineering in bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright AV, Nuñez JK, Doudna JA. Biology and applications of CRISPR systems: harnessing nature’s toolbox for genome engineering.Cell. 2016;164(1–2):29–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abudayyeh OO, Gootenberg JS, Konermann S, et al. C2c2 is a single-component programmable RNA-guided RNA-targeting CRISPR effector. Science Internet] 2016; 353:aaf5573;(6299).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Cheng X, Shan Q, et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew.Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(9):947–951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji X, Zhang H, Zhang Y, et al. Establishing a CRISPR–Cas-like immune system conferring DNA virus resistance in plants.Nat Plants. 2015;1(10):15144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyott DE, Sheehan E, Molnar A. Engineering of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated potyvirus resistance in transgene-free Arabidopsis plants.Mol Plant Pathol. 2016;17(8):1276–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Wang C, Liu P, et al. Enhanced rice blast resistance by CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis of the ERF transcription factor gene OsERF922.PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0154027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekaran J, Brumin M, Wolf D, et al. Development of broad virus resistance in non-transgenic cucumber using CRISPR/Cas9 technology.Mol Plant Pathol. 2016;17(7):1140–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi J, Gao H, Wang H, et al. ARGOS8 variants generated by CRISPR-Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions.Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15(2):207–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao X, Zheng Y, Xiao K, et al. OsPRX2 contributes to stomatal closure and improves potassium deficiency tolerance in rice.Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;495(1):461–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaganathan D, Ramasamy K, Sellamuthu G, et al. CRISPR for crop improvement: an update review. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauer NJ, Narváez-Vásquez J, Mozoruk J, et al. Oligonucleotide-mediated genome editing provides precision and function to engineered nucleases and antibiotics in plants. Plant Physiol. 2016;170(4):1917–1928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oerke E-C, Dehne H-W. Safeguarding production—losses in major crops and the role of crop protection.Crop Prot. 2004;23(4):275–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp J. Jacobsen B. Bacterial and fungal diseases of potato and their management. 2017;:1–12. Available from: http://www.montanaspud.org/documents/extension-information/potatoes12-27-3.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Knorr LC. Suscept range of the potato ring rot bacterium.Am Potato J. 1948;25(10):361–371.
   Google Scholar
• Bonas U, Conrads-Strauch J, Balbo I. Resistance in tomato to Xanthomonas campestris pv vesicatoria is determined by alleles of the pepper-specific avirulence gene avrBs3.Mol Gen Genet MGG. 1993;238–238(1–2):261–269.
   Google Scholar
• Barka GDGD, Lee J. Molecular marker development and gene cloning for diverse disease resistance in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.): current status and prospects. Plant Breed Biotechnol 2020; 8:89–113;(2).
   Google Scholar
• OEPP/EPPO. Outdoor solanaceous crops. Blackwell Publ Ltd Eur Mediterr Plant Prot Organ; 2004. p. 79–90.
   Google Scholar
• Gutarra L, Herrera J, Fernandez E, et al. Diversity, pathogenicity, and current occurrence of bacterial wilt bacterium ralstonia solanacearum in Peru. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abad JA, Moyer JW, Kennedy GG, et al. Tomato spotted wilt virus on potato in eastern North Carolina.Am J Potato Res. 2005;82(3):255–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward CW, Shukla DD. Taxonomy of potyviruses: current problems and some solutions.Intervirology. 1991;32(5):269–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazzini AA, Asurmendi S, Hopp HE. Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and potato virus X (PVX) coat proteins confer heterologous interference to PVX and TMV infection, respectively.J Gen Virol. 2006;87(4):1005–1012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rashid F, Khalid S, Ahmad I, et al. Potato virus X (PVX) resistance in tomato cultivars. Trop Pest Manag 1989; 35:357–358.(4)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortes IM, Navas-Castillo J. Potato, an experimental and natural host of the crinivirus Tomato chlorosis virus.EurJ Plant Pathol. 2012;134(1):81–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hückelhoven R, Eichmann R, Weis C, et al. Genetic loss of susceptibility: a costly route to disease resistance? Plant Pathol. 2013;62: 56–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong OX, Ronald PC. Genetic engineering for disease resistance in plants: recent progress and future perspectives.Plant Physiol. 2019;180(1):26–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Schie Ccn, Takken FLW, van Schie FLW. Susceptibility genes 101: how to be a good host.Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2014;52(1):551–581.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pessina S, Lenzi L, Perazzolli M, et al. Knockdown of MLO genes reduces susceptibility to powdery mildew in grapevine.Hortic Res. 2016;3(1):16016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis C, Karafyllidis I, Wasternack C, et al. The Arabidopsis mutant cev1 links cell wall signaling to jasmonate and ethylene responses.Plant Cell. 2002;14(7):1557–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva R, Ji C, Atienza-Grande G, et al. Broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight in rice using genome editing. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(11):1344–1350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastet A, Zafirov D, Giovinazzo N, et al. Mimicking natural polymorphism in eIF4E by CRISPR-Cas9 base editing is associated with resistance to potyviruses.Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(9):1736–1750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantu D, Vicente AR, Greve LC, et al. The intersection between cell wall disassembly, ripening, and fruit susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea.Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105(3):859–864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curvers K, Seifi H, Mouille G, et al. Abscisic acid deficiency causes changes in cuticle permeability and pectin composition that influence tomato resistance to botrytis cinerea. Plant Physiol. 2010;154(2):847–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison E, Burbidge A, Okyere JP, et al. Identification of the tomato ABA-deficient mutant sitiens as a member of the ABA-aldehyde oxidase gene family using genetic and genomic analysis.Plant Growth Regul. 2011;64(3):301–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Nonomura T, Appiano M, et al. Loss of function in Mlo orthologs reduces susceptibility of pepper and tomato to powdery mildew disease caused by leveillula taurica.PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e70723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flors V, de la O LM, Vicedo B, et al. Absence of the endo-β-1,4-glucanases Cel1 and Cel2 reduces susceptibility to botrytis cinerea in tomato.Plant J. 2007;52(6):1027–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S-K O, Baek K-H, Park JM, et al. Capsicum annuum WRKY protein CaWRKY1 is a negative regulator of pathogen defense.New Phytol. 2008;177(4):977–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Dang F, Liu Z, et al. CaWRKY58, encoding a group I WRKY transcription factor of Capsicum annuum, negatively regulates resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum infection. Mol Plant Pathol. 2013;14(2):131–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huibers RP, AEHM L, Gao D, et al. Powdery mildew resistance in tomato by impairment of SlPMR4 and SlDMR1.PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e67467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krasikov V, Dekker HL, Rep M, et al. The tomato xylem sap protein XSP10 is required for full susceptibility to fusarium wilt disease.J Exp Bot. 2011;62(3):963–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay S, Hahn S, Marois E, et al. A bacterial effector acts as a plant transcription factor and induces a cell size regulator. Science (80) [Internet]. 2007;318(5850):648–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazier M, Flamain F, Nicolaï M, et al. Knock-down of both eIF4E1 and eIF4E2 genes confers broad-spectrum resistance against potyviruses in Tomato.PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e29595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truniger V, Aranda MA. Recessive resistance to plant viruses [Internet]. 2009. 119–231.Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065352709075046
   Google Scholar
• Charron C, Nicolaï M, Gallois J-L, et al. Natural variation and functional analyses provide evidence for co-evolution between plant eIF4E and potyviral VPg.Plant J. 2008;54(1):56–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun K, Wolters A-MA, AEHM L, et al. Down-regulation of Arabidopsis DND1 orthologs in potato and tomato leads to broad-spectrum resistance to late blight and powdery mildew.Transgenic Res. 2016;25(2):123–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler NM, Baltes NJ, Voytas DF, et al. Geminivirus-Mediated Genome Editing in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Using Sequence-Specific Nucleases. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson M, Turesson H, Nicolia A, et al. Efficient targeted multiallelic mutagenesis in tetraploid potato (Solanum tuberosum) by transient CRISPR-Cas9 expression in protoplasts.Plant Cell Rep. 2017;36(1):117–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasumoto S, Umemoto N, Lee HJ, et al. Efficient genome engineering using Platinum TALEN in potato.Plant Biotechnol. 2019;36(3):167–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun K, Wolters A-MA, Vossen JH, et al. Silencing of six susceptibility genes results in potato late blight resistance.Transgenic Res. 2016;25(5):731–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andolfo G, Iovieno P, Frusciante L, et al. Genome-editing technologies for enhancing plant disease resistance. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan X, Zhang F, Zhong Z, et al. Generation of virus-resistant potato plants by RNA genome targeting.Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(9):1814–1822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen IH. Discovery, characterization and exploitation of Mlo powdery mildew resistance in barley.Euphytica. 1992;63(1–2):141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nekrasov V, Wang C, Win J, et al. Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion.Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):482.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de TDP, Brail T, Dahlbeck D Q, et al. CRISPR-Cas9 mediated mutagenesis of a DMR6 ortholog in tomato confers broad-spectrum disease resistance. bioRxiv Prepr. 2016: 1–23
   Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Pavan S, Zheng Z, et al. Naturally occurring broad-spectrum powdery mildew resistance in a central American tomato accession is caused by loss of Mlo function. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact. 2008;21(1):30–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortigosa A, Gimenez-Ibanez S, Leonhardt N, et al. Design of a bacterial speck resistant tomato by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of SlJAZ2.Plant Biotechnol J. 2019;17(3):665–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali Z, Abulfaraj A, Idris A, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated viral interference in plants.Genome Biol. 2015;16(1):238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang Y, Kim K, Shim S, et al. Genome-wide mapping of NBS-LRR genes and their association with disease resistance in soybean.BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12(1):139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hwang J, Li J, Liu W-Y, et al. Double mutations in eIF4E and eIFiso4E confer recessive resistance to Chilli veinal mottle virus in pepper.Mol Cells. 2009;27(3):329–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi KR. Genome editing in chili pepper using a CRISPR/Cas9 cytidine base editing system [Internet]. In: Plant Genomics. Berlin: EuroSciCon; 2019. 1–16. Available from: https://www.imedpub.com/conference-abstracts-files/genome-editing-in-chili-pepper-using-a-crisprcas9
   Google Scholar
• Yoon Y-J, Venkatesh J, Lee J-H, et al. Genome editing of eIF4E1 in tomato confers resistance to pepper mottle virus. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy A, Zhai Y, Ortiz J, et al. Multiplexed editing of a begomovirus genome restricts escape mutant formation and disease development.PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansjakob A, Riederer M, Hildebrandt U. Wax matters: absence of very-long-chain aldehydes from the leaf cuticular wax of the glossy11 mutant of maize compromises the prepenetration processes of blumeria graminis.Plant Pathol. 2011;60(6):1151–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piffanelli P, Ramsay L, Waugh R, et al. A barley cultivation-associated polymorphism conveys resistance to powdery mildew.Nat. 2004;430(7002):887–891.
   Google Scholar