Development of a novel Ti-Nb-Au superelastic alloy with exceptionally low elastic modulus

References

• Gajiwala M, Paliwal J, Husain SY, et al. Influence of surface modification of titanium implants on improving osseointegration: An in vitro study. J Prosthetic Dentistry; 126(3):405.e1–405.e7. doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.06.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raphel J, Holodniy M, Goodman SB, et al. Multifunctional coatings to simultaneously promote osseointegration and prevent infection of orthopaedic implants.  Biomaterials. 2016;84:301–314. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.01.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabanella G, Nowzari H, Slots J. Clinical and microbiological determinants of ailing dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009;11(1):24–36. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00088.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochar SP, Reche A, Paul P. The etiology and management of dental implant failure: A review. Cureus. 2022;14(10):e30455. doi:10.7759/cureus.30455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anijs T, Kouwert I, Verdonschot N, et al. Towards a standard approach to assess tibial bone loss following total knee arthroplasty. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab. 2020;18:72–86. doi:10.1007/s12018-021-09276-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins JRS, Araújo RO, Nogueira RA, et al. Internal friction and microstructure of ti and ti-mo alloys containing oxygen. Arch Metall Mater. 2016;61(1):25–30. doi:10.1515/amm-2016-0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J. Metallic biomaterials. In: Fundamental biomaterials: metals. Elsevier; 2018, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Yang R, Hao YL, Li SJ. Development and application of Low-modulus biomedical titanium alloy Ti2448. Biomed Eng Trends Mater Sci. 2011: 225–248. Available from: www.intechopen.com.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto H, Watanabe S, Hanada S. Beta TiNbSn alloys with Low young’s modulus and high strength. Mater Trans. 2005;46; doi:10.2320/matertrans.46.1070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikehata H, Nagasako N, Furuta T, et al. First-principles calculations for development of low elastic modulus Ti alloys. Phys Rev B. 2004;70(17):174113. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.174113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao YL, Li SJ, Prima F, et al. Controlling reversible martensitic transformation in titanium alloys with high strength and low elastic modulus. Scr Mater. 2012;67(5):487–490. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HY, Miyazaki S. Ni-free Ti-based shape memory alloys. Elsevier; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki S, Kim HY, Hosoda H. Development and characterization of Ni-free Ti-base shape memory and superelastic alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;438–440:18–24. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2006.02.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Lee WT, Yeom JT, et al. Towards bone-like elastic modulus in Ti Nb Sn alloys with large recovery strain for biomedical applications. J Alloys Compd. 2022;925:166724. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein MA, Kumar AM, Azeem MA, et al. Ti–30Nb–3Ag alloy with improved corrosion resistance and antibacterial properties for orthopedic and dental applications produced by mechanical alloying. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023;1:142. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.105851.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein MA, Azeem MA, Kumar AM, et al. Design and processing of near-β Ti–Nb–Ag alloy with low elastic modulus and enhanced corrosion resistance for orthopedic implants. J Mater Res Technol. 2023;24:259–273. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.003
   Google Scholar
• Zhang E, Zhao X, Hu J, et al. Antibacterial metals and alloys for potential biomedical implants. Bioact Mater KeAi Commun. 2021;6:2569–2612. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Z, Xu W, Xin H, et al. Microstructure, corrosion and anti-bacterial investigation of novel Ti-xNb-yCu alloy for biomedical implant application. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;18:5212–5225. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.158
   Google Scholar
• Fu S, Zhao X, Yang L, et al. A novel Ti-Au alloy with strong antibacterial properties and excellent biocompatibility for biomedical application. Biomater Adv. 2022: 133. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2022.112653.
   Google Scholar
• Horiuchi Y, Nakayama K, Inamura T, et al. Effect of Cu addition on shape memory behavior of Ti-18 mol%Nb alloys. Mater Trans. 2007;48(3):414–421. doi:10.2320/matertrans.48.414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberta LA, Vishnu J, Hariharan A, et al. Novel low modulus beta-type Ti-Nb alloys by gallium and copper minor additions for antibacterial implant applications. J Mater Res Technol. 2022;20:3306–3322. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.08.111.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi M, Kikuchi M, Takada Y, et al. Corrosion behavior and microstructures of experimental Ti-Au alloys. Dent Mater J. 2004;23(2):109–116. doi:10.4012/dmj.23.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu WT, Fuchiwaki K, Umise A, et al. Enhancement of the superelastic behavior of the Ti–Au–Cr–based shape memory alloys via the manipulations of annealing–treatments and Ta additions. Mater Sci Eng A. 2022: 847. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2022.143312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church NL, Hildyard EM, Jones NG. The influence of grain size on the onset of the superelastic transformation in Ti–24Nb–4Sn–8Zr (wt%). Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;828:142072. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.142072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao JJ, Thibon I, Castany P, et al. Effect of grain size on the recovery strain in a new Ti–20Zr–12Nb–2Sn superelastic alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2020;793:139878. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.139878.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drakopoulos M, Connolley T, Reinhard C, et al. I12: The joint engineering, environment and processing (JEEP) beamline at diamond light source. J Synchrotron Radiat. 2015;22:828–838. doi:10.1107/S1600577515003513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart ML, Drakopoulos M, Reinhard C, et al. Complete elliptical ring geometry provides energy and instrument calibration for synchrotron-based two-dimensional X-ray diffraction. J Appl Crystallogr. 2013;46(5):1249–1260. doi:10.1107/S0021889813022437
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Šišak Jung D, Donath T, Magdysyuk O, et al. High-energy X-ray applications: current status and new opportunities. Powder Diffr. 2017;32(S2):S22–S27. doi:10.1017/S0885715617001191
   Google Scholar
• Filik J, Ashton AW, Chang PCY, et al. Processing two-dimensional X-ray diffraction and small-angle scattering data in DAWN 2. J Appl Crystallogr. 2017;50(3):959–966. doi:10.1107/S1600576717004708
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basham M, Filik J, Wharmby MT, et al. Data Analysis WorkbeNch (DAWN). J Synchrotron Radiat. 2015;22:853–858. doi:10.1107/S1600577515002283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildyard EM, Connor LD, Owen LR, et al. The influence of microstructural condition on the phase transformations in Ti-24Nb (at.%). Acta Mater. 2020;199:129–140. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Sun F, Hao Y, et al. Influence of equiatomic Zr/Nb substitution on superelastic behavior of Ti-Nb-Zr alloy. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;563:78–85. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2012.11.045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmay W, Prima F, Gloriant T, et al. Effects of thermomechanical process on the microstructure and mechanical properties of a fully martensitic titanium-based biomedical alloy. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;18:47–56. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ijaz MF, Kim HY, Hosoda H, et al. Effect of Sn addition on stress hysteresis and superelastic properties of a Ti-15Nb-3Mo alloy. Scr Mater. 2014;72–73:29–32. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bönisch M, Calin M, Van Humbeeck J, et al. Factors influencing the elastic moduli, reversible strains and hysteresis loops in martensitic Ti-Nb alloys. Mater Sci Eng C. 2015;48:511–520. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church NL, Jones NG. The influence of stress on subsequent superelastic behaviour in Ti2448 (Ti–24Nb–4Zr–8Sn, wt%). Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;833:142530. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.142530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HY, Ohmatsu Y, Kim JI, et al. Mechanical properties and shape memory behavior of Ti-Nb alloys. Mater Trans. 2004;45(4):1090–1095. doi:10.2320/matertrans.45.1090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héraud L, Castany P, Ijaz MF, et al. Large-strain functional fatigue properties of superelastic metastable β titanium and NiTi alloys: A comparative study. J Alloys Compd. 2023;953:170170. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.170170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church N, Talbot C, Connor L, et al. Functional fatigue during superelastic load cycling of Ti2448 (Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn, wt%). Materialia. 2023;28:101719. doi:10.1016/j.mtla.2023.101719.
   Google Scholar
• Vorontsov VA, Jones NG, Rahman KM, et al. Superelastic load cycling of Gum Metal. Acta Mater. 2015;88:323–333. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2015.01.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong Y, Shuitcev A, Zheng Y. Recent development of TiNi-based shape memory alloys with high cycle stability and high transformation temperature. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2020;22:1900496. doi:10.1002/adem.201900496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzik Ijaz M, Tasaki W, Young Kim H, et al. Achievement of ultra-low elastic modulus through optimization of phase stability and recrystallization texture in Ti–Nb–Fe–Sn alloys. Adv Eng Mater. 2023: 2300468. doi:10.1002/adem.202300468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You L, Song X. A study of low Young′s modulus Ti-Nb-Zr alloys using d electrons alloy theory. Scr Mater. 2012;67(1):57–60. doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meardon SA, Derrick TR, Willson JD, et al. Peak and per-step tibial bone stress during walking and running in female and male recreational runners. Amer J Sports Med. 2021;49(8):2227–2237. doi:10.1177/03635465211014854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morinaga M, Kato M, Kamimura T, et al. Theoretical design of β-type titanium alloys. Miner Met Mater Soc. 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Cai S, Wang L, Schaffer JE, et al. Influence of Sn on martensitic beta Ti alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2019;743:764–772. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2018.11.095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu J, Yamamoto A, Kim HY, et al. Novel Ti-base superelastic alloys with large recovery strain and excellent biocompatibility. Acta Biomater. 2015;17:56–67. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao YL, Li SJ, Sun SY, et al. Elastic deformation behaviour of Ti-24Nb-4Zr-7.9Sn for biomedical applications. Acta Biomater. 2007;3(2):277–286. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2006.11.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke CA, Taggart R, Polonis DH. Electronic Factors and the metastable constitution of quenched alloys based on titanium and zirconium. J Nucl Mater. 1965;16:7–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church NL, Talbot CEP, Jones NG. On the influence of thermal history on the martensitic transformation in Ti-24Nb-4Zr-8Sn (wt%). Shape Memory Superelasticity. 2021;7(1):166–178. doi:10.1007/s40830-021-00309-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedotov SV, Baikov AA. Peculiarities of changes in elastic properties of titanium alloys. In: RI Jaffee, HM Burte, editors. Titanium Science and Technology. 1973. p. 871–881.
   Google Scholar
• Hao YL, Li SJ, Sun SY, et al. Effect of Zr and Sn on young’s modulus and superelasticity of Ti-Nb-based alloys. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;441(1–2):112–118. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2006.09.051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo Azevedo T, Nunes Lima T, Garcia de Blas J, et al. The mechanical behavior of TiNbSn alloys according to alloying contents, cold rolling and aging. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;75:33–40. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zain Y, Kim HY, Hosoda H, et al. Shape memory properties of Ti-Nb-Mo biomedical alloys. Acta Mater. 2010;58(12):4212–4223. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar