Challenging Selective Exposure

REFERENCES

• Bakker, Tom P., and Chris Paterson. 2011. “The New Frontiers of Journalism: Citizen Participation in the UK and the Netherlands.” In Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy, edited by Kees Brants and Katrin Voltmer, 183–199. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, Bruce. 2001. “Information and Political Engagement in America: The Search for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 53–67. doi:10.1177/106591290105400103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantner, Cornelia, Klaus Lojka, and Julia Wippersberg. 2009. Themenangebot und journalistische Thematisierungsleistungen in Online-Medien––Ein Vergleich von orf.at mit ausgewählten Online-Angeboten [Issues Offered and Journalistic Broaching of Issues in Online Media–A Comparison Between orf.at and Selected Online Outlets]. Vienna: Universität Wien.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, Steven H., and Miriam J. Metzger. 2001. “The End of Mass Communication?” Mass Communication and Society 4 (4): 365–379. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_3.10.1207/S15327825MCS0404_3
   Google Scholar
• Chyi, Hsiang Iris, and Angela M. Lee. 2013. “Online News Consumption. A Strucural Model Linking Preference, Use, and Paying Intent.” Digital Journalism 1 (2): 194–211. doi:10.1080/21670811.2012.753299.10.1080/21670811.2012.753299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimmick, John, and Eric Rothenbuhler. 1984. “The Theory of the Niche: Quantifying Competition among Media Industries.” Journal of Communication 34 (1): 103–119.10.1111/jcom.1984.34.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, Dieter. 1986. “Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information.” In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 19, edited by Leonard Berkowitz, 41–80. Orlando: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. Kelly. 2009. “Echo Chambers Online? Politically Motivated Selective Exposure among Internet News Users.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (2): 265–285. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x.10.1111/jcmc.2009.14.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. Kelly. 2009. “Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate.” Journal of Communication 59 (4): 676–699. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x.10.1111/jcom.2009.59.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. Kelly, Dustin Carnahan, and Emily K. Lynch. 2011. “A Turn toward Avoidance? Selective Exposure to Online Political Information, 2004–2008.” Political Behavior 35 (1): 113–134. doi:10.1007/s11109-011-9185-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentzkow, Matthew. 2007. “Valuing New Goods in a Model with Complementarities: Online Newspapers.” The American Economic Review 97 (3): 713–744.10.1257/aer.97.3.713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, Seth K., and Diana C. Mutz. 2011. “The Friendly Media Phenomenon: A Cross-National Analysis of Cross-Cutting Exposure.” Political Communication 28 (1): 42–66. doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.544280.10.1080/10584609.2010.544280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallin, Daniel C., and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511790867
   Google Scholar
• Holbert, R. Lance, R. Kelly Garrett, and Laurel S. Gleason. 2010. “A New Era of Minimal Effects? A Response to Bennett and Iyengar.” Journal of Communication 60 (1): 15–34. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01470.x.10.1111/jcom.2010.60.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, and Kyu S. Hahn. 2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication 59 (1): 19–39. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x.10.1111/jcom.2009.59.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Thomas J., Weiwu Zhang, and Shannon L. Bichard. 2010. “Voices of Convergence or Conflict? A Path Analysis Investigation of Selective Exposure to Political Websites.” Social Science Computer Review 29 (4): 449–469. doi:10.1177/0894439310379962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmasin, Matthias, Daniela Kraus, Andy Kaltenbrunner, and Klaus Bichler. 2011. “Austria: A Border-Crosser.” In Mapping Media-Accountability—in Europe and beyond, edited by Tobias Eberwein, Susanne Fengler, Epp Lauk, and Tanja Leppik-Bork, 22–35. Cologne: Halem.
   Google Scholar
• King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg. 2000. “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 347–361. doi:10.2307/2669316.10.2307/2669316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, Tetsuro, and Ken’ichi Ikeda. 2009. “Selective Exposure in Political Web Browsing.” Information, Communication & Society 12 (6): 929–953. doi:10.1080/13691180802158490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1944. The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Jae Kook. 2007. “The Effect of the Internet on Homogeneity of the Media Agenda: A Test of the Fragmentation Thesis.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 84 (4): 745–760. doi:10.1177/107769900708400406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, Justin, Andrew Williams, and Bob Franklin. 2008. “A Compromised Fourth Estate? UK News Journalism, Public Relations and News Sources.” Journalism Studies 9 (1): 1–20.10.1080/14616700701767974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunney, Gerald H. 1970. “Using Analysis of Variance with a Dichotmomous Dependent Variable: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Educational Measurement 7 (4): 263–269. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1970.tb00727.x.10.1111/jedm.1970.7.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negroponte, Nicholas. 1995. Being Digital. New York, NY: Knopf.
   Google Scholar
• Pariser, Eli. 2011. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, Chris. 2005. “News Agency Dominance in International News on the Internet.” In Converging Media, Diverging Politics: A Political Economy of News in the United States and Canada, edited by David Skinner, James R. Compton, and Michael Gasher, 145–164. Rowman and Littlefield: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Perlmutter, David D. 2008. Blogwars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, Markus. 2005. “News Vs. Entertainment: How Increasing Media Choice Widens Gaps in Political Knowledge and Turnout.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 577–592. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00143.x.10.1111/ajps.2005.49.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenbach, Klaus. 2007. “‘The Own in the Foreign’: Reliable Surprise—an Important Function of the Media?” Media, Culture & Society 29 (2): 344–353. doi:10.1177/0163443707074269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenbach, Klaus, Ester de Waal, and Edmund Lauf. 2005. “Research Note: Online and Print Newspapers: Their Impact on the Extent of the Perceived Public Agenda.” European Journal of Communication 20 (2): 245–258. doi:10.1177/0267323105052300.10.1177/0267323105052300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, David O., and Jonathan K. Freedman. 1967. “Selective Exposure to Information: A Critical Review.” Public Opinion Quarterly 31 (2): 194–213. doi:10.1086/267513.10.1086/267513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seethaler, Josef, and Gabriele Melischek. 2006. “Die Pressekonzentration in Österreich im europäischen Vergleich.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 35 (4): 337–360.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, Michael. 2007. “Reinforcing Spirals: The Mutual Influence of Media Selectivity and Media Effects and Their Impact on Individual Behavior and Social Identity.” Communication Theory 17: 281–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x.10.1111/comt.2007.17.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyrnaios, Nikos, Emmanuel Marty, and Franck Rebillard. 2010. “Does the Long Tail Apply to Online News? A Quantitative Study of French-Speaking News Websites.” New Media & Society 12 (8): 1244–1261. doi:10.1177/1461444809360699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, Nathalie J. 2008. “Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure.” Political Behavior 30 (3): 341–366. doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9.10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroud, Nathalie J. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755509.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R 2001. Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tenscher, Jens. 2008. “Massenmedien und politische Kommunikation in den Ländern der Europäischen Union.” In Die EU-Staaten im Vergleich. Strukturen, Prozesse, Politikinhalte, edited by Oscar W. Gabriel and Sabine Kropp, 412–447. Wiesbaden: VS.10.1007/978-3-531-91075-8
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, David. 2003. “What Do Americans Really Want to Know? Tracking the Behavior of News Readers on the Internet.” Journal of Communication 53 (4): 694–710. doi:10.1093/joc/53.4.694.10.1111/jcom.2003.53.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, David. 2005. “The Seeds of Audience Fragmentation: Specialization in the Use of Online News Sites.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 49 (3): 332–348. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4903_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trilling, Damian, and Klaus Schoenbach. 2013. “Patterns of News Consumption in Austria: How Fragmented Are They?” International Journal of Communication 7: 929–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meer, Tom, Rozemarijn Lubbe, Erika van Elsas, Martin Elff, and Wouter van der Brug. 2012. “Bounded Volatility in the Dutch Electoral Battlefield: A Panel Study on the Structure of Changing Vote Intentions in the Netherlands during 2006–2010.” Acta Politica 47 (4): 333–355. doi:10.1057/ap.2012.5.10.1057/ap.2012.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, James G. 2011. “The Duality of Media: A Structurational Theory of Public Attention.” Communication Theory 21 (1): 43–66. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2010.01375.x.10.1111/comt.2011.21.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, James G., and Thomas B. Ksiazek. 2012. “The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation: Public Attention in an Age of Digital Media.” Journal of Communication 62 (1): 39–56. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01616.x.10.1111/jcom.2012.62.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511818691
   Google Scholar
• Zillmann, Dolf, and Jennings Bryant (eds.). 1985. Selective Exposure to Communication. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar