Advanced search
Publication Cover
Digital Journalism Volume 4, 2016 - Issue 6
Submit an article Journal homepage
702
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Pursuing the Ideal

How news website commenting policies structure public discourse

J. David WolfgangJournalism School, University of Missouri, USACorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 764-783 | Published online: 13 Oct 2015

REFERENCES

  • Baek, Young Min, Magdalena Wojcieszak, Michael X. Delli Carpini. 2011. “Online versus Face-to-face Deliberation: Why? Why? What? With What Effects?” New Media & Society 14: 363–383.
  • Baumgarten, Britta, Dieter Gosewinkel, and Dieter Rucht. 2011. “Civility: Introductory Notes on the History and Systematic Analysis of a Concept.” European Review of History: Revue Europeenne D'histoire 18 (3): 289–312.https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2011.574684
  • Boyd, Richard. 2004. “Michael Oakeshott on Civility, Civil Society and Civil Association.” Political Studies 52: 603–622.https://doi.org/10.1111/post.2004.52.issue-3
  • Brundidge, Jennifer. 2010. “Encountering ‘Difference’ in the Contemporary Public Sphere: The Contribution of the Internet to the Heterogeneity of Political Discussion Networks.” Jouranl of Communication 60: 680–700.
  • Carey, James. 1995. “The Press, Public Opinion, and Public Discourse.” In Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent, edited by Theodore Glasser and Charles Salmon, 373–402. New York: Guilford.
  • Charmaz, Kathy. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Christians, Clifford, Theodore Glasser, Denis McQuail, Kaarle Nordenstreng, and Robert A. White. 2009. Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Clark, Cynthia, and Joan Carnosso. 2008. “Civility: A Concept Analysis.” The Journal of Theory Construction & Testing 12 (1): 11–15.
  • Coe, Kevin, Kate Kenski, and Stephen A. Rains. 2014. “Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments.” Journal of Communication 64 (4): 658–679.https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.2014.64.issue-4
  • Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2001. “The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring the Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere.” Information, Communication & Society 4 (4): 615–633.
  • Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2014. “The Habermasian Public Sphere and Exclusion: An Engagement with Poststructuralist-influenced Critics.” Communication Theory 24 (1): 21–41.https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.2014.24.issue-1
  • Dahlgren, Peter. 2005. “The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation.” Political Communication 22 (2): 147–162.https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600590933160
  • Darr, Christopher R. 2005. “Civility as Rhetorical Enactment: The John Ashcroft “Debates” and Burke’s Theory of Form.” Southern Communication Journal 70 (4): 316–328.https://doi.org/10.1080/10417940509373337
  • Eley, Geoff. 1987. “Nations, Publics, and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, 289–339. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Freelon, Deen, Mitsuharu Watanabe, Laura Busch, and Akira Kawabata. 2008. “Town Halls of the Digital Age: Controversy and Ideology in Online Deliberation (and beyond).” Paper presented at the Association of the Internet Researchers 9th Annual Conference, Copenhagen.
  • Glaser, Barney, and Anselm Strauss. 1968. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
  • Glotz, Peter. 1968. Buchkritik in Deutschen Zeitungen [Book Criticism in German Newspapers]. Hamburg: Verlag für Buchmarkt-Forschung.
  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Heinonen, Ari. 2011. “The Journalist’s Relationship with Users: New Dimensions to Conventional Roles.” In Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, edited by Jane Singer, Alfred Hermida, David Domingo, Ari Heinonen, Steve Paulussen, Thorsten Quandt, Zvi Reich, and Marina Vujnovic, 34–56. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Herbst, Susan. 2010. Rude Democracy: Civility and Incivility in American Politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Hermida, Alfred. 2011. “Mechanisms of Participation: How Audience Options Shape the Conversation.” In Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, edited by Jane Singer, Alfred Hermida, David Domingo, Ari Heinonen, Steve Paulussen, Thorsten Quandt, Zvi Reich, and Marina Vujnovic, 13–33. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Hohendahl, Peter Uwe. 1979. “Critical Theory, Public Sphere and Culture. Jurgen Habermas and His Critics.” New German Critique 16: 89–118.https://doi.org/10.2307/487878
  • Hurrell, Christie. 2005. “Civility in Online Discussion: The Case of the Foreign Policy Dialogue.” Canadian Journal of Communication 30 (4): 633–648.
  • Hutchins Commission on Freedom of the Press. 1947. A Free and Responsible Press: A General Report on Mass Communication: Newspapers, Radio, Motion Pictures, and Books. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Jäger, Wolfgang. 1973. Öffentlichkeit Und Parlamentarismus [Public and parliamentary system. A criticism of Jurgen Habermas]. Eine Kritik an Jürgen Habermas. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
  • Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Bruce Hardy. 2012. “What is Civil Engaged Argument and Why Does Aspiring to It Matter?” Political Science & Politics 45 (3): 412–415.
  • Landes, Joan. 1988. Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1970. “Öffentliche Meinung.” [Public Opinion] Politische Vierteljahresschrift 11: 2–28.
  • Mansbridge, Jane. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books Inc.
  • McGregor, Joan. 2004. “Civility, Civic Virtue, and Citizenship.” In Civility and Its Discontents: Essays on Civic Virtue, Toleration, and Cultural Fragmentation, edited by Christine T. Sistare, 25–42. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
  • Mouffe, Chantal. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
  • Mouffe, Chantal. 2005. On the Political. New York: Routledge.
  • Orwin, Clifford. 1991. “Civility.” American Scholar 60 (4): 553–564.
  • Papacharissi, Zizi. 2002. “The Virtual Sphere: The Internet as a Public Sphere.” New Media & Society 4 (9): 9–27.
  • Papacharissi, Zizi. 2004. “Democracy Online: Civility, Politeness, and the Democratic Potential of Online Political Discussion Groups.” New Media & Society 6: 259–283.
  • Parkinson, John. 2006. Deliberating in the Real World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.https://doi.org/10.1093/019929111X.001.0001
  • Poor, Nathaniel. 2005. “Mechanisms of an Online Public Sphere: The Website Slashdot.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00241.x
  • Reader, Bill. 2012. “Free Press Vs. Free Speech? The Rhetoric of ‘Civility’ in Regard to Anonymous Online Comments.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89 (3): 495–513.
  • Reich, Zvi. 2011. “User Comments: The Transformation of Participatory Space.” In Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers, edited by Jane Singer, Alfred Hermida, David Domingo, Ari Heinonen, Steve Paulussen, Thorsten Quandt, Zvi Reich, and Marina Vujnovic, 96–118. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Robinson, Sue. 2006. “The Mission of the J-Blog: Recapturing Journalistic Authority Online.” Journalism 7 (1): 65–83.https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884906059428
  • Robinson, Sue. 2010. “Traditionalists Vs. Convergers: Textual Privilege, Boundary Work, and the Journalist—Audience Relationship in the Commenting Polices of Online News Sites.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 16 (1): 125–143.
  • Rucht, Dieter. 2011. “Civil Society and Civility in Twentieth-Century Theorising.” European Review of History: Revue Europeenne D’histoire 18 (3): 387–407.https://doi.org/10.1080/13507486.2011.574680
  • Ryan, Mary P. 1987. “Gender and Public Access: Women’s Politics in Nineteenth Century America.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, 259–288. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Ryan, Mary P. 1990. Women in Public: Between Banners and Ballots, 1825–1880. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
  • Santana, Arthur. 2011. “Online Readers’ Comments Represent New Opinion Pipeline.” Newspaper Research Journal 32 (3): 66–81.
  • Santana, Arthur. 2014. “Virtuous or Vitriolic.” Journalism Practice 8 (1): 18–33.https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2013.813194
  • Siebert, Frederick, Theodore Peterson, and Wilbur Schramm. 1956. Four Theories of the Press. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • Singer, Jane. 2005. “The Political J-Blogger: ‘Normalizing’ a New Media Form to Fit Old Norms and Practices.” Journalism 6 (2): 173–198.https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884905051009
  • Singer, Jane. 2011. “Taking Responsibility: Legal and Ethical Issues in Participatory Journalism.” In Participatory Journalism, edited by Jane Singer, Alfred Hermida, David Domingo, Ari Heinonen, Steve Paulussen, Thorsten Quandt, Zvi Reich, and Marina Vujnovic, 121–138. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444340747
  • Sinopoli, Richard. 1995. “Thick-Skinned Liberalism: Redefining Civility.” The American Political Science Review 89 (3): 612–620.https://doi.org/10.2307/2082977
  • Thurman, Neil. 2008. “Forums for Citizen Journalists? Adoption of User Generated Content Initiatives by Online News Media.” New Media and Society 10 (1): 138–157.
  • Witschge, Tamara. 2008. “Examining Online Public Discourse in Context: A Mixed Method Approach.” Javnost - the Public 15 (2): 75–92.
  • Wright, Randall, and Thom Gehring. 2008. “From Spheres of Civility to Critical Public Spheres: Democracy and Citizenship in the Big House (Part I).” The Journal of Correctional Education 59 (3): 244–260.

Policies

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.