850
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Interaction and Influence on Twitter

Comparing the discourse relationships between user types on five topics

, , &
Pages 251-272 | Received 19 Feb 2018, Accepted 03 Sep 2018, Published online: 19 Oct 2018

References

  • Ausserhofer, Julian, and Axel Maireder. 2013. “National Politics on Twitter: Structures and Topics of a Networked Public Sphere.” Information, Communication & Society 16 (3): 291–314. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.756050.
  • Bentele, Günter, and Howard Nothhaft. 2008. “The Intereffication Model: Theoretical Discussions and Empirical Research.” In Public Relations Research: European and International Perspectives and Innovations, edited by Ansgar Zerfass, Betteke van Ruler, and Krishnamurthy Sriramesh, 33–47. Wiesbaden: VS.
  • boyd, danah. 2011. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications.” In A Networked Self: Identity, Community and Culture on Social Network Sites, edited by Zizi Papacharissi, 39–58. New York: Routledge.
  • Boyraz, Maggie, Aparna Krishnan, and Danielle Catona. 2015. “Who Is Retweeted in Times of Political Protest? An Analysis of Characteristics of Top Tweeters and Top Retweeted Users During the 2011 Egyptian Revolution.” Atlantic Journal of Communication 23 (2): 99–119. doi:10.1080/15456870.2015.1013103.
  • Brosius, Hans-Bernd, and Hans Mathias Kepplinger. 1995. “Killer and Victim Issues: Issue Competition in the Agenda-Setting Process of German Television.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 7 (3): 211–231.
  • Bruns, Axel, and Jean E. Burgess. 2011. “#ausvotes: How Twitter Covered the 2010 Australian Federal Election.” Communication, Politics & Culture 44 (2): 37–56.
  • Bruns, Axel, and Jean E. Burgess. 2012. “Researching News Discussion on Twitter: New Methodologies.” Journalism Studies 13 (5-6): 801–814. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2012.664428.
  • Bruns, Axel, Jean E. Burgess, Kate Crawford, and Frances Shaw. 2012. #qldfloods and @QPSMedia: Crisis Communication on Twitter in the 2011 South East Queensland Floods.
  • Bruns, Axel, and Tim Highfield. 2012. “Blogs, Twitter, and Breaking News: The Produsage of Citizen Journalism.” In Produsing Theory in a Digital World: The Intersection of Audiences and Production in Contemporary Theory, edited by Rebecca A. Lind, 15–32. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Bruns, Axel. 2003. “Gatewatching, Not Gatekeeping: Collaborative Online News.” Media International Australia 107 (1): 31–44. doi:10.1177/1329878X0310700106.
  • Bruns, Axel. 2018. Gatewatching and News Curation: Journalism, Social Media, and the Public Sphere. New York: Peter Lang.
  • Cataldi, Mario, Luigi di Caro, and Claudio Schifanella. 2010. “Emerging Topic Detection on Twitter Based on Temporal and Social Terms Evaluation.” In Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Multimedia Data Mining. New York, NY: ACM
  • Djerf-Pierre, Monika. 2012. “When Attention Drives Attention: Issue Dynamics in Environmental News Reporting Over Five Decades. “European Journal of Communication 27 (3): 291–304. doi:10.1177/0267323112450820.
  • Engesser, Sven, and Edda Humprecht. 2015. “Frequency or Skillfulness: How Professional News Media Use Twitter in Five Western Countries.” Journalism Studies 16 (4): 513–529. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2014.939849.
  • Geiß, Stefan. 2011. “Patterns of Relationships between Issues: An Analysis of German Prestige Newspapers.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 23 (3), 265–286.
  • Getchell, Morgan C., and Timothy L. Sellnow. 2016. “A Network Analysis of Official Twitter Accounts During the West Virginia Water Crisis.” Computers in Human Behavior 54: 597–606. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.044.
  • Golbeck, Jennifer, Justin M. Grimes, and Anthony Rogers. 2010. “Twitter Use by the U.S. Congress.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (8): 1612–1621. doi:10.1002/asi.21344.
  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research.” Communication Theory 16 (4): 41–426. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00280.x
  • Hallin, Daniel C. and Paolo Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hermida, Alfred. 2010. “Twittering the News: The Emergence of Ambient Journalism.” Journalism Practice 4 (3): 297–308. doi:10.1080/17512781003640703.
  • Heverin, Thomas, and Lisl Zach. 2012. “Use of Microblogging for Collective Sense-making During Violent Crises: A Study of Three Campus Shootings.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (1): 34–47. doi:10.1002/asi.21685.
  • Himelboim, Itai, Eric Gleave, and Marc Smith. 2009. “Discussion Catalysts in Online Political Discussions: Content Importers and Conversation Starters.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (4): 771–789. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01470.x.
  • Himelboim, Itai, Stephen McCreery, and Marc Smith. 2013. “Birds of a Feather Tweet Together: Integrating Network and Content Analyses to Examine Cross-Ideology Exposure on Twitter.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 18 (2): 154–174. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12001.
  • Hughes, Amanda L., and Leysia Palen. 2009. “Twitter Adoption and Use in Mass Convergence and Emergency Events.” International Journal of Emergency Management 6 (3–4): 248–260. doi:10.1504/IJEM.2009.031564.
  • Jungherr, Andreas. 2016. “Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13 (1): 72–91. doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401.
  • Kim, Yonghwan, Youngju Kim, Joong Suk Lee, Jeyoung Oh, and Na Yeon Lee. 2015. “Tweeting the Public: Journalists' Twitter Use, Attitudes Toward the Public's Tweets, and the Relationship with the Public.” Information, Communication & Society 18 (4): 443–458. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2014.967267.
  • Kolb, Steffen. 2005. Mediale Thematisierung in Zyklen: Theoretischer Entwurf und empirische Anwendung [Media-related thematization in cycles: Theoretical concept and empirical implementation]. Köln: von Halem.
  • Larsson, Anders O., and Hallvard Moe. 2012. “Studying Political Microblogging: Twitter Users in the 2010 Swedish Election Campaign.” New Media & Society 14 (5): 729–747. doi:10.1177/1461444811422894.
  • Lasorsa, Dominic L., Seth C. Lewis, and Avery E. Holton. 2012. “Normalizing Twitter: Journalism Practice in an Emerging Communication Space.” Journalism Studies 13 (1): 19–36. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825.
  • Lewis, Seth C., and Logan Molyneux. In press. “A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward.” Media and Communication.
  • Lindgren, Simon, and Ragnar Lundström. 2011. “Pirate Culture and Hacktivist Mobilization: The Cultural and Social Protocols of #WikiLeaks on Twitter.” New Media & Society 13 (6): 999–1018. doi:10.1177/1461444811414833.
  • Loosen, Wiebke, and Jan-Hinrik Schmidt. 2012. “(Re-)Discovering the Audience: The Relationship between Journalism and Audience in Networked Digital Media.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (6): 867–887. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.665467
  • Lotan, Gilad, Erhardt Graeff, Mike Ananny, Devin Gaffney, Ian Pearce, and danah boyd. 2011. “The Revolutions Were Tweeted: Information Flows During the 2011 Tunisian and Egyptian Revolutions.” International Journal of Communication 5: 1375–1405.
  • Lovejoy, Kristen, and Gregory D. Saxton. 2012. “Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (3): 337–353. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x.
  • Mascaro, Christopher, and Sean P. Goggins. 2012. “Twitter as Virtual Town Square: Citizen Engagement During a Nationally Televised Republican Primary Debate.” Paper presented at the annual meeting for the APSA, New Orleans, August 30–September 2.
  • Metag, Julia, and Adrian Rauchfleisch. 2016. “Journalists’ Use of Political Tweets Functions for Journalistic Work and the Role of Perceived Influences.” Digital Journalism 5 (9): 1155–1172. doi:10.1080/21670811.2016.1248989.
  • Murthy, Dhiraj. 2011. “Twitter: Microphone for the Masses?” Media, Culture & Society 33 (5): 779–789. doi:10.1177/0163443711404744.
  • Naaman, Mor, Hila Becker, and Luis Gravano. 2011. “Hip and Trendy: Characterizing Emerging Trends on Twitter.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62 (5): 902–918. doi:10.1002/asi.21489.
  • Nuernbergk, Christian, and Julia Conrad. 2016. “Conversations and Campaign Dynamics in a Hybrid Media Environment: Use of Twitter by Members of the German Bundestag.” Social Media + Society Issue January-March 2016: 1–14. doi:10.1177/2056305116628888.
  • Nuernbergk, Christian. 2016. “Political Journalists’ Interaction Networks: The German Federal Press Conference on Twitter.” Journalism Practice 10 (7): 868–879. doi:10.1080/17512786.2016.1162669.
  • Otterbacher, Jahna, Matthew A. Shapiro, and Libby Hemphill. 2012. “Tweeting Vertically? Elected Officials’ Interactions with Citizens on Twitter.” In CeDEM Asia 2012: Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government, edited by Marko M. Skoric, Michael Sachs, and Peter Parycek, 71–83. Krems: Edition Donau-Universität Krems.
  • Papacharissi, Zizi, and Maria de Fatima Oliveira. 2012. “Affective News and Networked Publics: The Rhythms of News Storytelling on #Egypt.” Journal of Communication 62 (2): 266–282. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x.
  • Quandt, Thorsten. In press. “Dark Participation.” Media and Communication.
  • Romero, Daniel M., Brendan Meeder, and Jon Kleinberg. 2011. “Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion Across Topics: Idioms, Political Hashtags, and Complex Contagion on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on WWW, 695–704. New York: ACM.
  • Schimank, Uwe. 2010. Action and structure: Introduction of actor-theoretical sociology [Handeln und Strukturen: Einführung in die akteurtheoretische Soziologie]. 4th ed. Weinheim: Juventa.
  • Shoemaker, Pamela J., Tim P. Vos, and Stephen D. Reese. 2008. “Journalists as Gatekeepers.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, edited by Karin Wahl-Jorgensen, and Thomas Hanitzsch, 73–87. New York: Routledge.
  • Singer, Jane B. 2014. “User-generated Visibility: Secondary Gatekeeping in a Shared Media Space.” New Media & Society 16 (1): 55–73. doi:10.1177/1461444813477833.
  • Spence, Patric R., Kenneth A. Lachlan, Xialing Lin, and Maria del Greco. 2015. “Variability in Twitter Content Across the Stages of a Natural Disaster: Implications for Crisis Communication.” Communication Quarterly 63 (2): 171–186. doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1012219.
  • Subašić, Ilija, and Bettina Berendt. 2011. “Peddling or Creating? Investigating the Role of Twitter in News Reporting.” In Advances in Information Retrieval, edited by Paul Clough, Colum Foley, Cathal Gurrin, Gareth J. F. Jones, Wessel Kraaij, Hyowon Lee, and Vanessa Murdock, 207–213. Berlin: Springer.
  • Thimm, Caja, Jessica Einspänner, and Mark Dang-Anh. 2012. “Twitter als Wahlkampfmedium: Modellierung und Analyse politischer Social-Media-Nutzung [Twitter as campaign resource: Modeling and analysis of political social media use].” Publizistik 57 (3): 293–313. doi:10.1007/s11616-012-0156-7.
  • Tumasjan, Andranik, Timm O. Sprenger, Philipp G. Sandner, and Isabell M. Welpe. 2010. “Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal About Political Sentiment.” In Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM10/paper/view/1441/1852.
  • Waldherr Annie. 2014. “Emergence of News Waves: A Social Simulation Approach.” Journal of Communication 64 (5): 852–873. doi:10.1111/jcom.12117.
  • Westman, Stina, and Luanne Freund. 2010. “Information Interaction in 140 Characters or Less: Genres on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Information Interaction in Context, edited by Nicholas J. Belkin, and Diane Kelly, 323–327. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Wilkinson, David, and Mike Thelwall. 2012. “Trending Twitter Topics in English: An International Comparison.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (8): 1631–1646. doi:10.1002/asi.22713.
  • Wu, Shaomei, Jake M. Hofman, Winter A. Mason, and Duncan J. Watts. 2011. “Who Says What to Whom on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on WWW, 705–714. New York, NY: ACM.
  • Zhao, Wayne X., Jing Jiang, Jianshu Weng, Jing He, Ee-Peng Lim, Hongfei Yan, and Xiaoming Li. 2011. “Comparing Twitter and Traditional Media Using Topic Models.” In Advances in Information Retrieval, edited by Paul Clough, Colum Foley, Cathal Gurrin, Gareth J. F. Jones, Wessel Kraaij, Hyowon Lee, and Vanessa Murdock, 338–349. Berlin: Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.