Safeguarding Editorial Independence in an Automated Media System: The Relationship Between Law and Journalistic Perspectives

References

• Ananny, M. 2018. Networked Press Freedom: Creating Infrastructures for a Public Right to Hear. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Appelgren, E., and G. Nygren. 2014. “Data Journalism in Sweden.” Digital Journalism 2 (3): 394–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena, A., K. Bania, E. Brogi, M. D. Cole, G. Fontaine, S. Hans, P. Kamina, et al. 2016. Media Ownership: Market Realities and Regulatory Responses (IRIS Special). Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/media-ownership-market-realities-and-regulatory-responses/168078996c
   Google Scholar
• Ausserhofer, J., R. Gutounig, M. Oppermann, S. Matiasek, and E. Goldgruber. 2020. “The Datafication of Data Journalism Scholarship: Focal Points, Methods, and Research Propositions for the Investigation of Data-Intensive Newswork.” Journalism 21 (7): 950–973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baack, S. 2018. “Practically Engaged: The Entanglements between Data Journalism and Civic Tech.” Digital Journalism 6 (6): 673–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, C. E. 2006. Media Concentration and Democracy: Why Ownership Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckett, C. 2019. New Powers, New Responsibilities. A Global Survey of Journalism and Artificial Intelligence. LSE. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/polis/2019/11/18/new-powers-new-responsibilities/
   Google Scholar
• Bell, E. 2018. “The Dependent Press. How Silicon Valley Threatens Independent Journalism.” In Digital Dominance. The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple, edited by M. Moore and D. Tambini, 241–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., & Strange, N., eds. 2015. Media Independence: Working with Freedom or Working for Free? London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bodó, B. 2019. “Selling News to Audiences – A Qualitative Inquiry into the Emerging Logics of Algorithmic News Personalization in European Quality News Media.” Digital Journalism 7 (8): 1054–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges-Rey, E. 2016. “Unravelling Data Journalism.” Journalism Practice 10 (7): 833–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogi, E., R. Carlini, I. Nenadic, P. L. Parcu, and M. V. de Azevedo Cunha. 2020. Monitoring Media Pluralism in the Digital Era: Report 2020. European University Institute. 10.2870/21728.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, M. 2015. “The Robotic Reporter: Automated Journalism and the Redefinition of Labor, Compositional Forms, and Journalistic Authority.” Digital Journalism 3 (3): 416–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheruiyot, D., S. Baack, and R. Ferrer-Conill. 2019. “Data Journalism beyond Legacy Media: The Case of African and European Civic Technology Organizations.” Digital Journalism 7 (9): 1215–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christians, C. G., T. L. Glasser, D. McQuail, K. Nordenstreng, and R. A. White. 2009. Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press. https://experts.illinois.edu/en/publications/normative-theories-of-the-media-journalism-in-democratic-societie.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, M. 2015a. “Clarifying Journalism’s Quantitative Turn: A Typology for Evaluating Data Journalism, Computational Journalism, and Computer-Assisted Reporting.” Digital Journalism 3 (3): 331–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coddington, M. 2015b. “The Wall Becomes a Curtain: Revisiting Journalism’s News–Business Boundary.” In Boundaries of Journalism, edited by M. Carlson and S. C. Lewis, 67–82. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• CoE. 2011. Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on a New Notion of Media (CM/Rec(2011)7). Council of Europe. https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805cc2c0
   Google Scholar
• CoE. 2012. Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Public Service Media Governance (CM/Rec(2012)1). Council of Europe. https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectID=09000016805cb4b4
   Google Scholar
• CoE. 2019. Declaration by the Committee of Ministers on the Financial Sustainability of Quality Journalism in the Digital Age (Decl(13/02/2019)2). Council of Europe. https://search.coe.int/cm/pages/result_details.aspx?objectid=090000168092dd4d
   Google Scholar
• Commissariaat voor de Media. 2021. Het redactiestatuut bij aanbieders van audiovisuele mediadiensten. https://www.cvdm.nl/actueel/beleid-nodig-voor-inhoud-redactiestatuten
   Google Scholar
• Cushion, S., J. Lewis, and R. Callaghan. 2017. “Data Journalism, Impartiality and Statistical Claims: Towards More Independent Scrutiny in News Reporting.” Journalism Practice 11 (10): 1198–1215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deuze, M. 2005. “What is Journalism? Professional Identity and Ideology of Journalists Reconsidered.” Journalism 6 (4): 442–464.
   Google Scholar
• Diakopoulos, N. 2019. Automating the News: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Media. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dierickx, L. 2021. “News Automation, Materialities, and the Remix of an Editorial Process.” Journalism. 146488492110238. Advance online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dourish, P., and E. Gómez Cruz. 2018. “Datafication and Data Fiction: Narrating Data and Narrating with Data.” Big Data & Society 5 (2): 205395171878408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberwein, T., ed. 2011. Mapping Media Accountability: In Europe and beyond. Cologne: Herbert von Halem Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020a. Europe’s Media in the Digital Decade: An Action Plan to Support Recovery and Transformation (COM(2020) 784 Final). European Commission. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52020DC0784
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020b. On the European Democracy Action Plan (COM(2020) 790 Final). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2020%3A790%3AFIN&qid=1607079662423
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2018. Resolution on Media Pluralism and Media Freedom in the European Union (2017/2209(INI)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2018-0204_EN.html
   Google Scholar
• Fanta, A., and I. Dachwitz. 2020. Google, The Media Patron. How the Digital Giant Ensnares Journalism. Frankfurt am Main: Otto Brenner Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes Bobo v. Spain. 2000. No. 39293/98 (ECtHR 2000). https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-63608
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, T. 1998. Regulating the Media. 2nd ed. UK: Sweet & Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, T., and I. Katsirea. 2012. “Commercial Influences on Programme Content: The German and UK Approaches to Transposing EU Rules on Product Placement.” Journal of Media Law 4 (2): 159–188.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, T. 2014. “The Relevance of Algorithms.” In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, and K. A. Foot. 167–194. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., L. Chambers, and L. Bounegru. 2012. The Data Journalism Handbook: How Journalists Can Use Data to Improve the News. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hallin, D. C, and P. Mancini. 2004. Comparing Media Systems. Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/comparing-media-systems/B7A12371782B7A1D62BA1A72C1395E43.
   Google Scholar
• Hamada, B., S. Hughes, T. Hanitzsch, J. Hollings, C. Lauerer, J. Arroyave, V. Rupar, and S. Splendore. 2019. “6. Editorial Autonomy: Journalists’ Perceptions of Their Freedom.” In Worlds of Journalism, 133–160. New York: Columbia University Press. 10.7312/hani18642-007/html.
   Google Scholar
• Hamada, B. I. 2021. “Determinants of Journalists’ Autonomy and Safety: Evidence from the Worlds of Journalism Study.” Journalism Practice 1–21. Advance online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildén, J. 2021. “The Public Service Approach to Recommender Systems: Filtering to Cultivate.” Television & New Media. 152747642110201. Advance online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karppinen, K., and H. Moe. 2016. “What We Talk about When Talk about “Media Independence.” Javnost – The Public 23 (2): 105–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R. 2017. “Thinking Critically about and Researching Algorithms.” Information, Communication & Society 20 (1): 14–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimkiewicz, B. 2021. Community and minority media: The third sector in European policies and Media Pluralism Monitor. In Research Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy, edited by P. L. Parcu and E. Brogi. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781786439321/9781786439321.00028.xml
   Google Scholar
• Klinger, U., and J. Svensson. 2018. “The End of Media Logics? On Algorithms and Agency.” New Media & Society 20 (12): 4653–4681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunert, J., and N. Thurman. 2019. “The Form of Content Personalisation at Mainstream, Transatlantic News Outlets: 2010–2016.” Journalism Practice 13 (7): 759–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. C., and O. Westlund. 2015. “Actors, Actants, Audiences, and Activities in Cross-Media News Work.” Digital Journalism 3 (1): 19–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malcorps, S. 2019. “News Website Personalisation: The Co-Creation of Content, Audiences and Services by Online Journalists and Marketers.” Journal of Media Business Studies 16 (3): 230–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2010. “Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse.” In Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in Der Psychologie, edited by G. Mey and K. Mruck, 601–613. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, B. 2009. “Journalism and Democracy.” In The Handbook of Journalism Studies, edited by K. Wahl-Jorgensen and T. Hanitzsch, 237–249. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mediawet. 2008. Stb. 2008, 583. https://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0025028
   Google Scholar
• Oster, J. 2015. Media Freedom as a Fundamental Right. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781316162736.
   Google Scholar
• Parasie, S. 2015. “Data-Driven Revelation?” Digital Journalism 3 (3): 364–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parasie, S., and E. Dagiral. 2013. “Data-Driven Journalism and the Public Good: “Computer-Assisted-Reporters” and “Programmer-Journalists” in Chicago.” New Media & Society 15 (6): 853–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcu, P. L., and E. Brogi. 2021. Research Handbook on EU Media Law and Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pickard, V. 2020. “Restructuring Democratic Infrastructures: A Policy Approach to the Journalism Crisis.” Digital Journalism 8 (6): 704–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, Z., and T. Hanitzsch. 2013. “Determinants of Journalists’ Professional Autonomy: Individual and National Level Factors Matter More than Organizational Ones.” Mass Communication and Society 16 (1): 133–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 2005. “Autonomy from What.” Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field 214: 214–223.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, W. 2014. “Approaches to Independence.” In The Independence of the Media and Its Regulatory Agencies, edited by W. Schulz, P. Valcke, and K. Irion, 28–38. Singapore: Intellect. https://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/I/bo15571080.html.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, D. 2016. “The News Media and the FOIA.” Communication Law and Policy 21 (4): 493–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, J. B. 2007. “Contested Autonomy: Professional and Popular Claims on Journalistic Norms.” Journalism Studies 8 (1): 79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. C., and D. Tambini. 2012. “Measuring Media Plurality in the United Kingdom: Policy Choices and Regulatory Challenges.” Journal of Media Law 4 (1): 35–63.
   Google Scholar
• Splendore, S. 2016. “Quantitatively Oriented Forms of Journalism and Their Epistemology.” Sociology Compass 10 (5): 343–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalph, F. 2018. “Classifying Data Journalism.” Journalism Practice 12 (10): 1332–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabary, C., A.-M. Provost, and A. Trottier. 2016. “Data Journalism’s Actors, Practices and Skills: A Case Study from Quebec.” Journalism 17 (1): 66–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurman, N., S. C. Lewis, and J. Kunert. 2019. “Algorithms, Automation, and News.” Digital Journalism 7 (8): 980–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurman, N., and S. Schifferes. 2012. “The Future of Personalization at News Websites: Lessons from a Longitudinal Study.” Journalism Studies 13 (5–6): 775–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong, J. 2018. “Journalistic Legitimacy Revisited.” Digital Journalism 6 (2): 256–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turow, J. 2012. The Daily You. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Drunen, M. Z. 2021. Editorial Independence in an Automated Media System. Internet Policy Review 10(3). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1569.
   Google Scholar
• Vendil Pallin, C. 2017. “Internet Control through Ownership: The Case of Russia.” Post-Soviet Affairs 33 (1): 16–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrijenhoek, S., M. Kaya, N. Metoui, J. Möller, D. Odijk, and N. Helberger. 2021. “Recommenders with a Mission: Assessing Diversity in News Recommendations.” In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. CHIIR’21. http://arxiv.org/abs/2012.10185.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. J. A. 2005. “Journalism Ethics from the Public’s Point of View.” Journalism Studies 6 (3): 315–330.
   Google Scholar
• Washington Post. 2020. The to debut AI-powered audio updates for 2020 election results. Washington Post, October 13. https://www.washingtonpost.com/pr/2020/10/13/washington-post-debut-ai-powered-audio-updates-2020-election-results/
   Google Scholar
• Wijermars, M. 2021. “Russia’s Law ‘on News Aggregators’: Control the News Feed, Control the News?” Journalism 22 (12): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, S. K. 2021. “The Grey Area: How Regulations Impact Autonomy in Computational Journalism.” Digital Journalism. 1–18. Advance online publication.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, S., E. C. Tandoc, and C. T. Salmon. 2019. “When Journalism and Automation Intersect: Assessing the Influence of the Technological Field on Contemporary Newsrooms.” Journalism Practice 13 (10): 1238–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamith, R. 2019. “Algorithms and Journalism.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, edited by H. Örnebring, Y. Y. Chan, M. Carlson, S. Craft, M. Karlsson, H. Sjøvaag and H. Wasserman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.779.
   Google Scholar