103
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

How can we Study the Efficacy of Psychoanalysis?

, M.D.
Pages 283-322 | Published online: 07 Nov 2017

REFERENCES

  • Appelbaum, S. A. (1977). The Anatomy of Change: A Menninger Foundation Report on Testing the Effects of Psychotherapy. New York/London: Plenum Press.
  • Bachrach, H. M., Galatzer-Levy, R., Skolnikoff, A., & Waldron, S., Jr. (1991). On the efficacy of psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 39:871–916.
  • Barlow, D. (1981). On the relation of clinical research to clinical practice: current issues, new directions. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 49:147–155.
  • Battle, C., et al. (1966). Target complaints as criteria of improvement. Amer. J. Psychother., 20:184–192.
  • Becker, H. (1958). Problems of inference in proof in participant observation. Amer. Sociological Rev., 23:652–660.
  • ———. (1967). Whose side are we on? Social Problems, 14:239–247.
  • Blatt, S. J. (1990). The Rorschach: a test of perception or an evaluation of representation. J. Personality Assess., 55:394–416.
  • ———. (1992). The differential effect of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis with anaclitic and introjective patients: the Menninger Psychotherapy Research Project revisited. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:691–724.
  • ——— & Berman, W. (1984). A methodology for the use of the Rorschach in clinical research. J. Personality Assess., 48:226–239.
  • Boesky, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanal. Q., 59:550–584.
  • Borkovec, T. D. & Miranda, J. (1996). Between-group psychotherapy outcome research and basic science. Psychother. and Rehab. Research Bull., #5. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, pp. 14–20.
  • Brooks, R. G. (1991). EuroQol—health-related quality of life measurement— results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise. Health Policy, 18:1.
  • Calder, K. T. (1980). An analyst’s self-analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 28:5–20.
  • Cheape, C. (1985). Family Firm to Modem Multinational: Norton Company, a New England Enterprise. Harvard Studies in Business History, No. 36. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
  • Conant, J. (1957). Harvard Case Studies in the History of Science, ed. J. Dunner. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
  • Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
  • Dahl, H., Kächele, H., & Thomä, H., editors. (1988). Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategies. Heidelburg/New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Dalzell, R. (1987). Enterprising Elite: The Boston Associates and the World They Made. Harvard Studies in Business History, No. 40. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
  • Davison, W. T., Pray, M., & Bristol, C. (1990). Mutative interpretation and close process monitoring in a study of psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Q., 59:599–628.
  • DeWitt, K. N., et al. (1991). Scales of psychological capacities: development of an assessment approach. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 14:343–361.
  • Dohrenwend, B. P., et al. (1980). Nonspecific psychological distress and other dimensions of psychopathology, measures for use in the general population. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 37:1229–1236.
  • Edelson, M. (1984). Hypothesis and Evidence in Psychoanalysis. Chicago/London: Univ. of Chicago Press.
  • Elliott, R. (1991). Five dimensions of therapy process. Psychother. Research, 1:92–103.
  • ——— & Anderson, C. (1994). Simplicity and complexity in psychotherapy research. In Reassessing Psychotherapy Researc., ed. R. L. Russell. New York: Guilford, pp. 65–113.
  • Ellwood, P. (1988). Outcome management: a technology of patient experience. New England J. Med., 318:1549–1556.
  • Erle, J. B. (1979). An approach to the study of analyzability and analyses: the course of forty consecutive cases selected for supervised analysis. Psychoanal. Q., 48:198–228.
  • ——— & Goldberg, D. A. (1984). Observations on assessment of analyzability by experienced analysts. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 32:715–737.
  • Fine, S. & Fine, E. (1990). Four psychoanalytic perspectives: a study of differences in interpretive interventions. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38:1017–1047.
  • Firestein, S. K. (1978). Termination in Psychoanalysis. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
  • Fisher, J., et al. (1989). Psychological effects of participation in a large group awareness training. J. Consult. Clin. Psych., 57:747–755.
  • Galatzer-Levy, R., Bachrach, H., Skolnikoff, A., & Waldron, S. (1997). Does Psychoanalysis Work? New Haven: Yale Univ. Press. In press.
  • Gardner, R. M. (1983). Self Inquiry. Boston/Toronto: Little Brown.
  • Garduk, E. L. & Haggard, E. A. (1972). Immediate Effects on Patients of Psychoanalytic Interpretations. Psychol. Issues, Monogr. 28. New York: Int. Univ. Press.
  • Gassner, S., Sampson, H., Weiss, J., & Brumer, S. (1982). The emergence of warded-off contents. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 5:55–76.
  • Gedo, P. M. & Schaffer, N. (1989). An empirical approach to studying psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Psychol., 6:277–291.
  • Geertz, C. (1983). Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
  • Gehan, E. & Freireich, E. (1974). Non-randomized controls in cancer clinical trials. New England J. Med., 290:198–203.
  • Gill, M. M. & Hoffman, I. Z. (1982). A method for studying the analysis of aspects of the patient’s experience of the relationship in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 30:137–167.
  • Gill, T. M. & Feinstein, A. R. (1994). A critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements. J. Amer. Med. Assn., 272:619–626.
  • Gottman, J. (1981). Time Series Analysis: A Comprehensive Introduction for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • ——— & Parker, J., editors. (1986). Conversations of Friends. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • ——— & Roy, A. (1990). Sequential Analysis: A Guide for Behavioral Researchers. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  • Gray, P. (1990). The nature of therapeutic action in psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38:1083–1097.
  • Greenacre, P. (1966). Problems of overidealization of the analyst and of analysis. Their manifestations in the transference and countertransference relationship. Psychoanal. Study Child, 21:193–212.
  • Greenfield, S. (1989). The state of outcome research: are we on target? New England J. Med., 320:1142–1143.
  • Hartmann, H. (1939). Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaption. Translated by D. Rapaport. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1958.
  • Horowitz, L., et al. (1975). On the identification of warded-off mental contents: an empirical and methodological contribution. J. Abnormal Psychol., 84:545–558.
  • ——— (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: psychometric properties and clinical applications. J. Consult. Clin. Psych., 56:885–892.
  • ——— (1988). Psychodynamic formulation, consensual response method, and interpersonal problems. J. Consult. Clin. Psych., 57:599–606.
  • Horowitz, M. J., et al. (1984). Personality Styles and Brief Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.
  • Horwitz, L., et al. (1989). Menninger Study of Psychotherapy of Borderline Patients: Expressive vs. Supportive Interventions and the Therapeutic Alliance. Unpublished.
  • Jacobs, T. J. (1973). Posture, gesture, and movement in the analyst: cues to interpretation and countertransference. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 21:77–92.
  • Jones, E. E., editor. (1993). Special section: single-case research in psychotherapy. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 61:371–430.
  • ——— Cumming, J. D. & Horowitz, M. J. (1988). Another look at the nonspecific hypothesis of therapeutic effectiveness. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 56:48–55.
  • ——— & Windholz, M. (1990). The psychoanalytic case study: toward a method for systematic inquiry. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38:985–1015.
  • Kächele, H. (1988). Clinical and scientific aspects of the Ulm process model of psychoanalysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 69:65–73.
  • ——— & Thomä, H. (1993). Psychoanalytic process research: methods and achievements. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., Suppl., 41:109–129.
  • Kantrowitz, J. L., et al. (1987a). Changes in the level and quality of object relations in psychoanalysis: followup of a longitudinal prospective study. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:23–46.
  • ——— (1987b). The role of reality testing in psychoanalysis: followup of 22 cases. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 35:367–385.
  • ——— (1990a). Followup of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: I. Stability of change. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38:471–496.
  • ——— (1990b). Followup of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: II. Development of the self-analytic function. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38:637–654.
  • ——— (1990c). Followup of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: III. The relationship between the resolution of the transference and the patient-analyst match. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38:655–678.
  • Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-Case Research Designs: Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
  • ——— (1986). The evaluation of psychotherapy: research design and methodology. In Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Chang., ed. S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, pp. 23–68.
  • Klein, H. R. (1960). A study of changes occurring in patients during and after psychoanalytic treatment. In Current Approaches to Psychoanalysi., ed. P. H. Hoch & J. Zubin. New York: Grune & Stratton, pp. 151–175.
  • Knapp, P. H., et al. (1960). Suitability for psychoanalysis: a review of one hundred supervised analytic cases. Psychoanal. Q., 29:459–477.
  • Kris, A. O. (1982). Free Association: Method and Process. New Haven/London: Yale Univ. Press.
  • Leighton, D., et al. (1963). The Character of Danger. New York: Basic Books.
  • Levy, S. T. & Inderbitzin, L. B. (1990). The analytic surface and the theory of technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 38:371–391.
  • Luborsky, L. (1962). Clinicians’ judgments of mental health: a proposed scale. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 7:407–417.
  • ——;— & Bachrach, H. (1974). Factors influencing clinicians’ judgments of mental health, eighteen experiences with the health-sickness rating scale. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 31:292–299.
  • ——— Crits-Christoph, P., Mintz, J., & Auerbach, A. (1988). Who Will Benefit from Psychotherapy? Predicting Therapeutic Outcomes. New York: Basic Books.
  • ——— & Spence, D. (1978). Quantitative research on psychoanalytic therapy. In Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Chang., ed. S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin. Revised Edition. New York: Wiley, pp. 331–368.
  • ——— (1979). Preconditions and consequences of transference interpretations. J. Nervous Mental Disease, 167:391–401.
  • Malan, D. H., Heath, E. S., Bacal, H. M., & Balfour, F. H. G. (1975). Psychodynamic changes in untreated neurotic patients: II. Apparently genuine improvements. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 32:110–126.
  • Markowitz, J. S., et al. (1989). Quality of life in panic disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 46:984–992.
  • Meyer, A.-E. (1988). What makes psychoanalysts tick? A model and the method of audio-recorded retroreports. In Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategie., ed. H. Dahl, H. Kächele & H. Thomä. Heidelburg/New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 273–289.
  • Miller, N., Luborsky, L., Barber, J., & Docherty, J. (1993). Psychodynamic Treatment Research: A Handbook for Clinical Practice. New York: Basic Books.
  • Mishler, E. G. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: the role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Rev., 60:415–442.
  • Nachmias, D. & Nachmias, C. (1976). Research Methods in the Social Sciences. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Nord, E. (1991). EuroQol—health-related quality of life measurement— valuations of health states by the general public in Norway. Health Policy, 18:25–36.
  • Norman, H. F., Blacker, K. H., Oremland, J. D., & Barrett, W. G. (1976). The fate of the transference neurosis after termination of a satisfactory analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 24:471–498.
  • Nye, C. (1991). Discourse analysis of narrative process in a psychoanalytic case. Presented to the meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research, June.
  • Ogles, B. M., Lambert, M. J., & Sawyer, J. D. (1995). Clinical significance of the National Institute of Mental Health treatment of depression collaborative research program data. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 63:321–326.
  • Oremland, J. D., Blacker, K. H., & Norman, H. F. (1975). Incompleteness in “successful” psychoanalyses: a follow-up study. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 23:819–844.
  • Panel (1989). Evaluation of outcome of psychoanalytic treatment: should followup by the analyst be part of the post-termination phase of analytic treatment? M. Johan, Reporter. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 37:813–822.
  • Paniagua, C. (1985). A methodological approach to surface material. Int. Rev. Psychoanal., 12:311–325.
  • Parfrey, P., et al. (1989). Development of a health questionnaire specific for end-stage renal disease. Nephron., 52:20–28.
  • Perry, J., Augusto, F., & Cooper, S. (1989). The assessment of psychodynamic conflicts: I. Reliability of the idiographic conflict formulation method. Psychiatry, 52:289–301.
  • ——— & Cooper, S. (1986). What do cross-sectional measures of defense mechanisms predict?. In Empirical Studies of Ego Mechanisms of Defens., ed. G. E. Vaillant. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  • Pfeffer, A. Z. (1959). A procedure for evaluating the results of psychoanalysis. A preliminary report. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 7:418–444.
  • ———. (1961). Follow-up study of a satisfactory analysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 9:698–718.
  • ———. (1963). The meaning of the analyst after analysis. A contribution to the theory of therapeutic results. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 11:229–244.
  • Popple, C. (1974). Development of Two Bank Groups in the Central Northwest: A Study in Bank Policy and Organization. Harvard Studies in Business History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
  • Reizenstein, P. (1986). Quality of life in cancer patients. Med. Oncol. Tumor Pharmacother., 3:51–54.
  • Richards, A. D. (1991). The role of research in Institutes of the American Psychoanalytic association.
  • Robins, L. N. (1966). Deviant Children Grown Up. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
  • Russell, R. L., editor. (1994). Reassessing Psychotherapy Research. New York: Guilford.
  • Sampson, H., Weiss, J., Mlodnosky, K., & Hause, E. (1972). Defense analysis and the emergence of warded-off mental contents: an empirical study. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 26:524–532.
  • Schachter, J. (1990). Post-termination patient-analyst contact: I. Analysts’ attitudes and experience; II. Impact on patients. Int. J. Psychoanal., 71:475–486.
  • Schlesinger, H. J. (1974). Problems of doing research on the therapeutic process in psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 22:3–13.
  • Schlessinger, N. (1987). Evaluation of the outcomes of psychoanalysis. Presented at the mid-winter meetings of the American Psychoanalytic Association, New York.
  • ——— & Robbins, F. (1974). Assessment and follow-up in psychoanalysis. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 22:542–567.
  • ——— (1983). A Developmental View of the Psychoanalytic Process: Follow-Up Studies and Their Consequences. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
  • Schuller, R., Crits-Cristoph, P., & Connolly, M. B. (1991). The resistance scale: background and psychometric properties. Psychoanal. Psychol., 8:195–211.
  • Seitz, P. F. D. (1966). The consensus problem in psychoanalytic research. In Methods of Research in Psychotherap., ed. L. Gottschalk & A. H. Auerbach. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 209–225.
  • Sexton, H. (1993). Exploring a psychotherapeutic change sequence: relating process to intersessional and postreatment outcome. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 61:128–136.
  • Shapiro, T. & Emde, R. N. (1995). Research in Psychoanalysis: Process, Development, Outcome. Madison, CT: Int. Univ. Press.
  • Silberschatz, G., Curtis, J. T., Fretter, P., & Kelly, T. (1988). Testing hypotheses of psychotherapeutic change processes. In Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategie., ed. H. Dahl, H. Kächele & H. Thomä. Heidelberg/New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 129–146.
  • ——— Fretter, P. & Curtis, J. (1986). How do interpretations influence the process of psychotherapy? J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 54:646–652.
  • Skolnikoff, A. (1985). Consensual analysis: a case study. In New Ideas in Psychoanalysis: The Process of Change in a Humanistic Scienc., ed. C. F. Settlage & R. Brockbank. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, pp. 235–243.
  • Smith, B. (1966). The Rand Corporation: Case Study of a Non-Profit Advisory Corporation. Harvard Political Studies Series. Cambridge, MA: Books On Demand.
  • Spence, D. P., Dahl, H. &Jones, E. (1993). Impact of interpretation on associative freedom. J. Clin. Consult. Psychol., 61:395–402.
  • ——— Mayes, L. C. & Dahl, H. (1994). Monitoring the analytic surface. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 42:43–64.
  • Stewart, A. L., et al. (1989). Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. J. Amer. Med. Assn., 262:907–913.
  • Stigler, S. (1986). The History of Statistics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
  • Stiles, W. G., Shapiro, D. A., & Harper, H. (1994). Finding the way from process to outcome: blind alleys and unmarked trails. In Reassessing Psychotherapy Researc., ed. R. L. Russell. New York: Guildford, pp. 36–64.
  • Strupp, H. H. & Hadley, S. W. (1979). Specific vs. nonspecific factors in psychotherapy: a controlled study of outcome. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 36:1125–1136.
  • ——— Schacht, T. E. & Henry, W. P. (1988). Problem-treatment-outcome congruence: a principle whose time has come. In Psychoanalytic Process Research Strategie., ed. H. Dahl, H. Kächele & H. Thomä. Heidelburg/New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 1–15.
  • Sundin, E., Armelius, B., & Nilsson, T. (1994). Reliability studies of scales of psychological capacities: a new method to assess psychological change. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 17:591–615.
  • Tolliday, S. (1987). Business, Banking, and Politics: The Case of British Steel, 1918–1939. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
  • Vaillant, G. E. (1974). Natural history of male psychological health, II: some antecedents of healthy adult adjustment. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 31:15–22.
  • ———. (1975). Natural history of male psychological health, III: empirical dimensions of mental health. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 32:420–426.
  • ——— (1976). Natural history of male psychological health, V: the relation of choice of ego mechanisms of defense to adult adjustment. Arch. Gen. Psychiat., 33:535–547.
  • ———. (1978). Natural history of male psychological health, VI: correlates of successful marriage and fatherhood. Amer. J. Psychiat., 135:653–659.
  • ——— (1986). Empirical Studies of Ego Mechanisms of Defense. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  • ——— & McArthur, C. (1972). Natural history of male psychological health, I: the adult life cycle from 18–50. Seminars in Psychiat., 4:415–427.
  • ——— & Vaillant, C. O. (1981). Natural history of male psychological health, X: work as a predictor of positive mental health. Amer. J. Psychiat., 138:1433–1440.
  • ———. (1990). Natural history of male psychological health, XII: a 45-year study of predictors of successful aging at age 65. Amer. J. Psychiat., 147:31–37.
  • Von Benedek, L. (1992). The mental activity of the psychoanalyst. Psychother. Research, 2:63–72.
  • Waldron, S., Jr. (1976). The significance of childhood neurosis for adult mental health: a follow-up study. Amer. J. Psychiat., 133:532–538.
  • ——— (1997). Psychoanalytic work and benefit to the patient: preliminary results from the analytic process scales (APS). Presented to the meeting of the Western New England Psychoanalytic Society, March 1.
  • ——— Firestein, S., Goldberger, M., & Scharf, R. (1991). Development of rating scales of psychoanalytic process for use in time series analysis of interaction between patient and analyst. Presented at Research in Progress Series, midwinter meetings, American Psychoanalytic Association, December 21.
  • Wallerstein, R. S. (1986). Forty-Two Lives in Treatment: A Study of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press.
  • ——— (1988). Assessment of structural change in psychoanalytic therapy and research. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 36: Suppl., 241–261.
  • ———. (1992). Followup in psychoanalysis: what happens to treatment gains? J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 40:665–690.
  • Waskow, I. & Parloff, M., Editors (1975). Psychotherapy Change Measures, Section on Psychotherapy and Behavioral Intervention. Clinical Research Branch Nimh Dhew Publication No. (ADM) 74–120, Chapter 19, pp. 233–242.
  • Weinshel, E. M. (1984). Some observations on the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Q., 53:63–92.
  • Wells, K. B., et al. (1989). The functioning and well-being of depressed patients: results from the Medical Outcome Studies. J. Amer. Med. Assn., 262:914–919.
  • Yin, Y. (1989). Case Study Research Design and Method. Revised edition. Applied Social Research Method Series, Vol. 5. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Zilberg, N. J., et al. (1991). A conceptual analysis and strategy for assessing structural change. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 14:317–342.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.