Reality and Danger in Psychoanalytic Treatment

REFERENCES

• Alexander, F. (1954). Some quantitative aspects of psychoanalytic technique. J. Amer. Psychoanal. Assn., 2:685–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron, L. & Frankel, J. (1994). Who is overlooking whose reality? Commentary on Tabin’s “Freud’s shift from the seduction theory: some overlooked reality factors.” Psychoanal. Psychol., 11:291–302.
   Google Scholar
• ——— & Harris, A., Editors (1993). The Legacy of Sandor Ferenczi. Hillsdale, NJ/London: Analytic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boesky, D. (1990). The psychoanalytic process and its components. Psychoanal. Q., 59:550–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollas, C. (1989). The psychoanalyst’s celebration of the analysand. In Forces of Destiny: Psychoanalysis and Human Idiom. London: Free Association Books, pp. 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. M. (1994a). Love in the afternoon: a relational reconsideration of desire and dread in the countertransference. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 4:153–170.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1994b). Desire and dread in the analyst: reply to Glen Gabbard’s commentary on “love in the afternoon.” Psychoanal. Dialogues, 4:503–508.
   Google Scholar
• ——— & Frawley, M. G. (1991). Dissociative processes and transference-countertransference paradigms in the psychoanalytically oriented treatment of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 2:5–36.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1994). Treating the Adult Survivor of Childhood Sexual Abuse: A Psychoanalytic Perspective. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, D. B. (1984). Psychoanalytic engagement, II: affective considerations. Contemp. Psychoanal., 20:560–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of tongues between adults and the child. In Final Contributions to the Problems and Methods of Psycho-Analysi., ed. M. Balint. New York: Brunner/Mazel, pp. 156–167.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1914). Remembering, repeating and working-through. (Further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis II.) S.E., 12.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1915). Observations on transference-love. (Further recommendations on the technique of psycho-analysis III.). S.E., 12.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1925). An autobiographical study. S.E., 20.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard, G. O. (1994a). Commentary on papers by Tansey, Hirsch, and Davies. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 4:203–213.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1994b). A response to Davies (but not the last word). Psychoanal. Dialogues, 4:5og–5io.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. (1986). Theoretical models and the analyst’s neutrality. Contemp. Psychoanal., 22:87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, I. Z. (1983). The patient as interpreter of the analyst’s experience. Contemp. Psychoanal., 19:389–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. (1991). Discussion: toward a social-constructivist view of the psychoanalytic situation. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 1:74–105.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1992). Expressive participation and psychoanalytic discipline. Contemp. Psychoanal., 28:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1994). Dialectical thinking and therapeutic action in the psychoanalytic process. Psychoanal. Q., 63:187–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewald, H. (1973). On internalization. In Papers on Psychoanalysis. New Haven/ London: Yale Univ. Press, 1980, pp. 69–86.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, J. T. (1995). Touching limits in the analytic dyad. Psychoanal. Q., 64:433–465.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational Concepts in Psychoanalysis: An Integration. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polen, N. (1988). Passover: looking into the heart of choice. The Jewish Advocate, 179(13):1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Renik, O. (1993). Analytic interaction: conceptualizing technique in light of the analyst’s irreducible subjectivity. Psychoanal. Q., 62:553–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ———. (1995). The ideal of the anonymous analyst and the problem of selfdisclosure. Psychoanal. Q., 64:466–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searles, H. F. (1959). Oedipal love in the countertransference. In Collected Papers on Schizophrenia and Related Subjects. New York: Int. Univ. Press, 1965, pp. 284–303.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, J. H. (1992). Interpretation and interaction in psychoanalysis: a relational view of the development of insight. Presidential address to the Division of Psychoanalysis, presented at the centennial meetings of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• ———. (1994). On making rules: towards a reformulation of the dynamics of transference in psychoanalytic treatment. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 4:253–274.
   Google Scholar
• ———. (1997). Can reform be sustained in psychoanalytic training? Models of learning and psychoanalytic traditions. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 7:803–817.
   Google Scholar
• ——— & Pollock, L. (1997). The poisoning of desire: the destruction of agency and the recovery of psychic integrity in sexual abuse. Contemp. Psychoanal., 33:573–593.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, M. O. & Kriegman, D. (1992). The Adaptive Design of the Human Psyche: Psychoanalysis, Evolutionary Biology, and the Therapeutic Process. New York/ London: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Strachey, J. (1934). The nature of the therapeutic action of psycho-analysis. Int. J. Psychoanal., 15:127–159.
   Google Scholar
• Szasz, T. S. (1963). The concept of transference. Int. J. Psychoanal., 44:432–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar