Exploring patient and public involvement in motor neuron disease research

References

• McKenna H. Perspectives: patient and public involvement and research impact: a reciprocal relationship. J Res Nurs. 2015;20:723–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter P, Beech R, Coxon D, Thomas MJ, Jinks C. Mobilising the experiential knowledge of clinicians, patients and carers for applied health-care research. Contemp Social Sci. 2013;8:307–20.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson J, Barber R, Ward PR. Health researchers’ attitudes towards public involvement in health research. Health Expect. 2009;12:209–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward PR, Thompson J, Barber R, Armitage CJ, Boote JD, Cooper CL, et al. Critical perspectives on ‘consumer involvement’ in health research: epistemological dissonance and the know-do gap. J Sociol. 2010;46:63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble C, Dudley L, Allam A, Bell P, Goodare H, Hanley B, et al. Patient and public involvement in the early stages of clinical trial development: a systematic cohort investigation. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e005234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffield Motor Neuron Disorders Research Advisory Group. Members [Internet]. Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield; 2017. Available at: http://smndrag.group.shef.ac.uk/members/
   Google Scholar
• Northeast Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Consortium. Clinical Research Learning Institute [Internet]. Los Angeles, CA: Northeast Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Consortium; 2019. Available at: https://www.neals.org/for-people-with-als-caregivers/clinical-research-learning-institute-crli/
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson’s at King’s. CRISP [Internet]. London, UK: Parkinson’s London; 2019. Available at: http://parkinsons-london.co.uk/europar/crisp/
   Google Scholar
• South Yorkshire Dementia Research Advisory Group. About us [Internet] Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield; 2019. Available at: http://sydemrag.group.shef.ac.uk/about-us/
   Google Scholar
• Fusch PI, Ness LR. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qual. Rep 2015;20:1408–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. NVivo qualitative data analysis software Version 11. Melbourne, Australia: QSR International; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual in Health Care. 2007;19:349–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed H, Langley J, Stanton A, Heron N, Clarke Z, Judge S, et al. Head-Up; an Interdisciplinary, participatory and co-design process informing the development of a novel head and neck support for people living with progressive neck muscle weakness. J Med Eng Technol. 2015;39:404–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baxter S, Reed H, Clarke Z, Judge S, Heron N, Mccarthy A, et al. Evaluating a novel cervical orthosis, the sheffield support snood, in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease with neck weakness. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2016;17:436–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glennon L, Pryde E, Spronson L, et al. The 100 collars project: a multi- centre evaluation of the Head Up cervical orthosis. Amytroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2017;18:1–73.
   Google Scholar
• Head-Up Collar [Internet]. Derbyshire, UK: Talar Made. Available at: http://www.talarmade.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/V2-Online-Head-Up-Brochure.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson EV, Baird WO, Partridge R, et al. The TiM system: developing a novel telehealth service to improve access to specialist care in motor neurone disease using user-centered design. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener 2018:19;351–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullo ES, Robinson L, Newton J. Comparing the perceptions of academics and members of the public about patient and public involvement in ageing research. Age Ageing. 2015;44:533–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iliffe S, McGrath T, Mitchell D. The impact of patient and public involvement in the work of the dementias & neurodegenerative diseases research network (DeNDRoN): case studies. Health Expect. 2011;16:351–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns T, Miller P, Kopp K, Carter Z, Cooper G, Johnston J, et al. Equal lives? Disabled people evaluate an independent living strategy for Essex Social Services. Res Policy Plan. 2004;22:51–7.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin H. Involving young service users as co-researchers: possibilities, benefits and costs. Br J Soc Work. 2005;36:1395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale CL, Thompson LC, Murphy C, Forcat S, Hanley B. Involvement of consumers in studies run by the Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit: results of a survey. Trials. 2012;13:9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashcroft J, Wykes T, Taylor J, Crowther A, Szmukler G. Impact on the individual: what do patients and carers gain, lose and expect from being involved in research. J Ment Health. 2016;25:28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson J, Bissell P, Cooper CL, Armitage CJ, Barber R. Exploring the impact of patient and public involvement in a cancer research setting. Qual Health Res. 2014;24:46–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snape D, Kirkham J, Britten N, Froggatt K, Gradinger F, Lobban F, et al. Exploring perceived barriers, drivers, impacts and the need for evaluation of public involvement in health and social care research: a modified Delphi study. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e004943.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buck D, Gamble C, Dudley L, Preston J, Hanley B, Williamson PR, et al. From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: qualitative study of documented plans and the accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials. BMJ Open. 2014;4:e006400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price A, Schroter S, Snow R, Hicks M, Harmston R, Staniszewska S, et al. Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e020452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ives J, Damery S, Redwod S. PPI, paradoxes and Plato: who’s sailing the ship? J Med Ethics. 2013;39:181–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health Research [Internet]. National Standards for Public Involvement in Research V1 March 2018. London, UK: NIHR. Available at: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/news-and-events/documents/Public_Involvement_Standards_March%202018_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner A. 2006. Beyond our expectations: a report of the experiences of involving service users in forensic mental health research. National Programme on Forensic Mental Health R&D, London, UK: Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Minogue V, Boness J, Brown A, Girdlestone J. The impact of service user involvement in research. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2005;18:103–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yates SJ. Collecting qualitative data. In Doing Social Science research. London, UK: Sage Publications in association with the Open University; 2004;155–87.
   Google Scholar
• Zubin A, Sutton J. Qualitative research: getting started. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2014;67:436–40.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar