Interdisciplinary facilitation of the minimal participation of patients with severe brain injury in early rehabilitation

References

• Baum C. Fulfilling the promise: supporting participation in daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laureys S, Owen AM, Schiff ND. Brain function in coma, vegetative state, and related disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:537–546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laureys S. The neural correlate of (un)awareness: lessons from the vegetative state. Trends Cogn Sci (Regul. Ed.). 2005;9:556–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol. 2009;9:35. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-9-35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avesani R, Gambini MG, Albertini G. The vegetative state: a report of two cases with a long-term follow-up. Brain Inj. 2006;20:333–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L, Pick A, Nair A, et al. Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;12:CD004170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Stott D, Knight A, et al. Very early rehabilitation or intensive telemetry after stroke: a pilot randomised trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010;29:352–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen HS, Kammersgaard LP, Houth J, et al. Who benefits from treatment and rehabilitation in a stroke Unit? A community-based study. Stroke. 2000;31:434–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Aadal L, Kirkevold M. A model for neurorehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury: facilitating patient participation and learning. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2011;34:E1–E17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson PM, Boudreau ML, Davis J, et al. 'Participate to learn': a promising practice for community ABI rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 2006;20:1111–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aadal L, Kirkevold M, Borg T. Neurorehabilitation analysed through ’situated learning’ theory. Scand J Disabil Res. 2014;16:348–363.
   Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Piškur B, Daniëls R, Jongmans MJ, et al. Participation and social participation: are they distinct concepts? Clin Rehabil. 2013;28:211–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception. New York: Humanities Press; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher S, Zahavi A. The phenomenological mind. London: Routledge; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Lave J, Wenger E. Practice, person, social world. In: Daniels H, editor. An introduction to Vygotsky. 1st ed. London: Routledge; 1996. p. 143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Calder L. Coma Stimulation in TBI: Rationale, goals, principles, and Techniques of Coma Stimulation. NIH Consensus Statement [Internet]. 1998 [cited 2013 Nov 27] Available from: http://calder.med.miami.edu/pointis/tbifam/coma2.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen C, Malkmus D, Durham P. Levels of cognitive function. 1972.
   Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1976;34:45–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi A. The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology. Pittsburg: Duquesne University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi A. An application of phenomenological method in psychology. In: Giorgi A, Fischer C, Murray E, editor. Duquesne studies in phenomenological psychology. vol. 2. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press; 1975. p. 82–103.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. 2nd ed.: Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2008. p. 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Pallesen H, Buhl I, Roenn-Smidt H. Early rehabilitation and participation in focus: a Danish perspective on patients with severe acquired brain injury. Eur J Physiother. 2016. doi:10.1080/21679169.2016.1189594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhl I, Pallesen H. Early rehabilitation of patients with severe acquired brain injury: strategies to promote participation. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22:181–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberg GK, Normann B, Gallagher S. Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31:244–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming M. The therapist with the three-track mind. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:1007–1014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattingly C. The narrative nature of clinical reasoning. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:998–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen M, Poder P. The sociology of Zygmund Bauman: challenges and critique. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, Mills J. Client-centred practice: what does it mean and does it make a difference? Can J Occup Ther. 1995;62:250–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Townsend E, Polatajko H, Craik J, et al. Canadian model of client-cenetred enablement. In: Townsend E, Polatajko, editors. Enabling occupation II: advancing occupational therapy vision for health, well-being and justice through occupation Ottawa: CAOT Publications; 2007. p. 87–151.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour W. Remaking the body. Rehabilitation and change. London: Routledge; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher S. Lived body and environment. Res Phenomenol. 1986;16:139–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar