Perceptions, actions and interactions of supervised aides providing services to children with cerebral palsy in pre-school settings: a qualitative study of knowledge application

References

• Borge AI, Hartmann E, Strøm S. The Norwegian perspective on issues of quality in day care. Eur J Psychol Educ. 1996;11:129–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannås BM, Hanssen NB. Special needs education in light of the inclusion principle: an exploratory study of special needs education practice in Belarusian and Norwegian preschools. Eur J Special Needs Educ. 2016;31:520–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell SK, Palisano RJ, Orlin MN. Physical therapy for children. 4th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier Saunders; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Law M, Darrah J, Pollock N, et al. Family-centred functional therapy for children with cerebral palsy: an emerging practice model. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1998;18:83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Bourke P. The experiences of teacher aides who support students with disabilities and learning difficulties: A phenomenological study [Doctoral]. Australia: Queensland University of Technology; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Mäensivu K-T, Uusiautti S, Määttä K. Special needs assistants – the special characteristic and strength of the school system of Finland. Eur J Ed Res. 2012;1:23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Colbran-Smith M. White paper: physiotherapist support personnel study: Canadian Physiotherapy Association; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Sørvoll M, Obstfelder A, Normann B, et al. Management and dissemination of professional knowledge: physiotherapists’ perceptions of supervision of dedicated aides working with children with Cerebral Palsy. 2016, In Review.
   Google Scholar
• Ahl L, Johansson. E, Granat T, et al. Functional therapy for children with cerebral palsy: an ecological approach. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47:613–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ylvén R, Granlund M. Collaborative problem solving in the context of early childhood intervention – the link between problems and goals. Scand J Disabil Res. 2015;17:221–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter C, Maciver D, Howden S, et al. Identification of a common language describing paediatric physiotherapy practice for children with additional support needs, to support communication with those outside the physiotherapy profession. Physiotherapy. 2013;99:84–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øberg GK, Blanchard Y, Obstfelder A. Therapeutic encounters with preterm infants: interaction, posture and movement. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30:1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jaegher H, Di Paolo E. Participatory sense-making. Phenom Cogn Sci. 2007;6:485–507.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher S. How the body shapes the mind. United States, New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Di Paolo E, Rohde M, De Jaegher H. Horizons for the enactive mind: values, social interaction, and play. In: Stewart J, Gapenne O, Di Paolo EA, editors. Enaction: towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2010. p. 33–87.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs T, De Jaegher H. Enactive intersubjectivity: participatory sense-making and mutual incorporation. Phenom Cogn Sci. 2009;8:465–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann M, De Jaeger H. Self-other contingencies: enacting social perception. Phenom Cogn Sci. 2009;8:417–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Paolo E, Buhrmann T, Barandiaran X. Sensorimotor life. An enactive proposal. 1st ed. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 9th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Wolters Kluwer Health; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lysklett OB, Berger HW. What are the characteristics of nature preschools in Norway, and how do they organize their daily activities? J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn. 2017;17:95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodal P. The central nervous system. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Girolami GL, Shiratori T, Aruin AS. Anticipatory postural adjustments in children with hemiplegia and diplegia. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2011;21:988–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink S. More visualising, more methodologies: on video, reflexivity and qualitative research. Sociol Rev. 2001;49:586–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkman S, Kvale S. Interviews: learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358:483–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindseth A, Norberg A. A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scand J Caring Sci. 2004;18:145–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K. Systematic text condensation: a strategy for qualitative analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40:795–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jaeger H. How we affect each other. Michel Henry's 'pathos-with' and the enactive approch to intersubjectivity. J Conscious Stud. 2015;22:112–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øberg GK, Normann B, Gallagher S. Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31:244–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xenakis I, Arnellos A. Aesthetics as an emotional activity that facilitates sense-making: towards en enactive approach to aesthetic experience. In: Scarinzi A, editor. Aesthetics and the embodied mind: beyond art theory and the Cartesian mind-body dichotomy. Dordrecht: Springer, Dordrecht; 2015. p. 245–259.
   Google Scholar
• Sheets-Johnstone M. Thinking in movement. Further analyses and validations. In: Stewart J, Gapenne O, Di Paolo E, editors. Enaction: toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2010. p. 165–181.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1753–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar